Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Afterword

A trade pact that could reshape global supply chains

The Trans-Pacific Partnership, if it takes effect, will bring big changes in trade not only for the 12 nations in pact, but for the rest of the world as well.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) took a major step toward final approval in early October when 12 Pacific Rim nations reached agreement on the accord's provisions.

Because it is so enormous—it covers 40 percent of the world's gross domestic product—the TPP remains both controversial and a long way from implementation. It was a major issue in Canada's national elections in October, and it has become an important topic of discussion in the presidential race in the United States, where it must win approval from the U.S. Congress in the heat of the 2016 election campaign. Significant opposition to the pact exists in other nations as well. Yet there is also enormous pressure to enact the TPP. Already several nonmember states are asking to be included in the agreement.


Many of the TPP's details are not yet public; the secrecy of the negotiations is one reason that the agreement has become controversial. But should it take effect, a trade pact that includes a vast swath of the world economy, including two of the three largest economies in the world, the U.S. and Japan, is certain to have profound effects on global supply chains.

Until we know more, it is hard to predict just what those effects will be, but a few things seem if not certain, then very likely. Moody's Investors Service, for one, predicts that by reducing the cost of trade, the TPP will spur growth in all 12 member nations. (In addition to the U.S. and Japan, they include Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam.)

Japan and the U.S., which already have a solid trade relationship, are likely to become even stronger partners, a development that could lead to a huge, beneficial impact on the electronics and automotive industries. Some of the smaller member economies expect the agreement will spur enormous growth in trade. A report in the Nikkei Asian Review says that manufacturers in Vietnam and Malaysia are already ramping up production capacity in preparation for the additional business they anticipate will result from the TPP. The pact also has significant implications for the elephant that is not in the room—China. Containing China, which is not a TPP member, is widely perceived as one of the major driving forces behind the TPP. Another Nikkei Asian Review report says that China will look toward Europe and Africa to build a "new Silk Road economic zone" in response to setbacks it may experience when business shifts to TPP members. Longer term, it is quite possible that China itself will either join the TPP or work toward a similar agreement for the Asia-Pacific region. Add in the Philippines, Thailand, South Korea, and Taiwan—all of which have indicated interest in such a deal—and the implications for global supply chains become as broad as the Pacific itself.

Recent

More Stories

pie chart of business challenges in 2025

DHL: small businesses wary of uncertain times in 2025

As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.

However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

image of earth from space

Maersk offers 5 steps to make your supply chain “antifragile”

Companies worldwide faced waves of business disruptions throughout the past year, but as 2025 is predicted to be just as complex as 2024, global cargo carrier Maersk has listed five steps for making supply chains “antifragile.”

Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
attendees at the EDGE resource center

Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.

Lean into your supply chain community

As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.

CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.

Keep ReadingShow less
illustration of two people working together with the help of a neutral party

The standing neutral: An innovative approach for managing supplier conflict

Editor’s Note:This article serves as a follow-up to “Avoiding supplier conflict and disputes before they begin,” which appeared in the July/August 2024 issue of Supply Chain Xchange.

The concept of using a neutral third party to resolve conflicts between suppliers and customers is not new. Mediation and arbitration have long been considered as more efficient and less costly ways to resolve contractual disputes than litigation. In fact, 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for contract disputes to be resolved through a private resolution process instead of going to court.

Keep ReadingShow less

Idea in action: EY case study

The global consulting firm EY was looking to outsource the food services, cleaning services, and maintenance at its facilities to the provider Integrated Service Solutions (ISS). But the company wanted to do so in a way that was completely different from how it had approached outsourcing workplace services in the past. EY and ISS wanted to create an outsourcing agreement that was highly collaborative and beneficial for both parties.

To do so, they incorporated a standing neutral in the contracting process from the outset. Together the parties selected one standing neutral—Erik Linnarsson, a lawyer from Cirio Law Firm—as a deal facilitator. Linnarsson was trained as a certified deal architect (CDA) to craft complex outsourcing agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less