A wealth of experience on four continents has given South Africa's Abré Pienaar a global outlook that's balanced by an appreciation of local sensitivities.
Abré Pienaar exemplifies the expression "a citizen of the world." As chief executive of South Africa-based iPlan Industrial Engineers, he has supervised projects in Africa, Europe, Asia, and the United States. But Pienaar's global outlook is not simply a matter of being widely traveled. His experiences as an industrial engineer and as an academic have helped him become an open-minded observer of the interaction of technology and people in supply chain systems.
Pienaar currently is the Planning Chair of CSCMP's Board of Directors and served on the Education Strategies Committee from 2004 through 2006. As co-chair of CSCMP's 2006 regional conference in Dubai, he played an active role in bringing supply chain professionals from the Middle East, Africa, and Asia together to share best practices. He has numerous professional and academic achievements to his credit, including a bachelor's degree in mathematical statistics and a doctorate in industrial engineering. He continues to be involved in engineering curriculum development and has published a book on manufacturing systems.
In a recent interview, Pienaar discussed what is unique about doing business in Africa—and what is universal about managing supply chains and people everywhere.
Name: Dr. Abré Pienaar Title: CEO Organization: iPlan Industrial Engineers, Midrand, South Africa
CSCMP Board of Directors Planning Chair, 2007-2008
CSCMP Education Strategies Committee, 2004-2006
Co-chair, CSCMP regional conference on global supply chain and logistics, Dubai 2006
Bachelor's degree in mathematical statistics, University of South Africa
Doctorate in industrial engineering, University of Pretoria
Professional recognitions: Registered professional engineer in South Africa; Certified Member of the American Society for Quality Control (ASQC); fellow-level CPIM certification from APICS—The Association for Operations Management
Founding member, South African Institute of Industrial Engineers
Member, Advisory Council on Industrial Engineering Curriculum, University of Pretoria
Author, Vervaardigingstelsels in die Praktyk, a handbook on manufacturing systems
South Africa is something of an outpost in a far-off corner of the world. How has CSCMP helped you learn about supply chain best practices that you have been able to adapt to your business?
With the globalization of business and what The World Is Flat author Thomas L. Friedman calls "the flat world," there no longer really are any places that can be considered "outposts." The business world has become globally integrated regardless of geography. And that is precisely how CSCMP is playing a major role in disseminating best-practice knowledge globally—including via the Southern African Roundtable—with meetings, seminars, short courses, and networking opportunities.
What percentage of your business is within South Africa, and what percentage is global?
We work on project assignments, so the percentages vary with each one. Over the last five years, I would estimate that about half our work has been in South Africa, and the other half was evenly split over the rest of Africa and throughout Europe, Asia, and the United States.
We talk a lot about global business practices. Are things done differently in South Africa?
Best practices are best practices, so for the most part, the best way to run a warehouse in Cincinnati, Ohio, is also the best way to run one in Moscow and one in Cape Town. There are some differences—for example, in the way road freight transport is managed and in the local cost of high-tech solutions—but it is really easy to exchange people from South Africa and other parts of the world because everybody essentially follows the same best business practices.
What kind of cultural and language difficulties do you encounter that are unique to Africa? How do you deal with these?
The cultural and language difficulties that one encounters in business are not unique to South Africa, the rest of Africa, or even the rest of the world. It is a fact that virtually everywhere, people work in teams composed of others from diverse backgrounds and different cultures. Language tends not to be an impassable obstacle since the global business language is English, but cultural, religious, racial, gender, and nationality issues are extremely sensitive. How do you deal with these issues? Implementations simply have to be structured very carefully around local sensitivities or they will surely fail.
What are some of the challenges you face as you conduct business in the four corners of the world?
Best practices are similar all over the world, as I mentioned earlier. However, implementing best practices— and making them work consistently—presents dramatically different challenges in different parts of the world.
For example, my company, iPlan Industrial Engineers, found that an implementation we did in Joplin, Missouri, required tremendous attention to roles and responsibilities, organizational politics, and individualized people issues but the technology aspect was easy. For an implementation in Uganda, Africa, the technology and logistics were hugely problematical but the people were extremely capable and cooperative, so business processes were designed, accepted, and implemented with very little fuss and pushback. In Hong Kong, we faced cultural and language obstacles to the usual implementation methodologies and had to follow some convoluted workarounds before we got people's buy-in and could proceed.
There was a time when South Africa was banned from a lot of corporate commerce. Then the government dismantled apartheid and freed Nelson Mandela. How did those actions change things for leaders who were managing supply chains in your country?
Those actions opened up the world to South African expertise and know-how. The South African Breweries Limited is now the third-largest brewery in the world, Richmond is one of the top luxury goods companies in the world, and even a small consulting business like mine can easily contract with and work at many places around the globe.
How is doing business in South Africa today different than it was before the dismantling of apartheid?
South Africa is now part of the integrated global business network of the 21st century, whereas before, virtually all economic activity was bottled up at the southern tip of Africa. In addition, South Africa is now considered the gateway into Africa for the rest of the world in terms of logistics, skilled people, and the ability to get things done.
What can South Africa do to help bring the rest of Africa into the global marketplace?
It's already happening. South African expatriates are living all throughout Africa—running businesses and implementing 21st century technology, education, and teaching. For example, MTN is a South African cell-phone operator that is bringing communications, including data networks, to millions of Africans all over the continent.
What example can South Africa offer other countries that are seeking to participate in the global economy?
You're either in or you're out of the global economy; there is little chance for half measures. If you want to be in, you have to embrace global economic principles and you have to empower people. As a country, you have to look forward to where you want to go, not dwell in the past.
As the manufacturing centers in India and China bring new prosperity to those coun- tries, it seems logical that the next frontier of low-cost labor could be Africa. How is South Africa poised to capitalize on this potential opportunity?
The assumption of low-cost labor is not necessarily correct. What Africa does have is vast reserves of natural resources. South Africa essentially built a first-world economy in the developing world by reinvesting proceeds from resource sales—in this case, gold in the early and mid-20th century. Individual South Africa-based companies and even individual South Africans are in the forefront of efforts to do the same in other African countries, from mining operations in Ghana to oil in Angola and Nigeria.
As CSCMP's planning chair for 2007 through 2008, what is your vision for this role?
Over the last few years, CSCMP moved from a mostly U.S.-based, mostly logistics-focused association to the global champion of supply chain management. In my role as Planning Chair, I see us accelerating that process to more firmly establish a global footprint in supply chain management while simultaneously maintaining and even expanding our leadership base in logistics.
What supply chain advice can you offer to companies looking to augment their growth strategies?
A corollary to the "supply chain" is the so-called "demand chain." The principle is that the final demand from the end consumer determines the value of any product or service. The sum total of all the value-adds by everybody in the supply chain cannot exceed this number, regardless of how the accounting is done. Companies looking to augment their growth strategy would do well to understand what this value is and to use that to construct their entire supply chain.
You have a background in industrial engi- neering. How is that helpful in the supply chain management arena?
Industrial engineers are taught to examine the interaction of technology, people, and finance to search for optimum solutions rather than maximize any individual machine or operation. Supply chain management expects that there will be more benefits for everybody if the individual functions within a business entity and the individual business entities within a supply chain all collaborate to pursue a common goal instead of looking after their own interests. The guiding philosophies are exactly the same, and my experience has been that industrial engineers easily transition to supply chain management.
Is your Ph.D. helpful in your business?
I earned my Ph.D. some time ago in engineering, so the specific details are probably now out-of-date. However, the lessons learned, such as keeping an open mind and not blindly accepting the status quo, researching what others have done to avoid reinventing things, crediting others where credit is due, and so forth still greatly influence my day-to-day business activities. At the same time, I do enjoy my part-time association with academia, and the Ph.D. was the entrance ticket to that part of my life.
What advice would you offer to students entering the supply chain field?
Get as much breadth of experience (as opposed to depth) in your early years as possible. There will be time enough to become a specialist if you understand that supply chain management is about the strategic integration of many disciplines rather than a focus on any particular area, such as logistics or procurement.
i understand that you and your family are avid horseracing fans. what kind of planning goes into this sport, and why do you love it?
My wife and two daughters ride endurance horse races. I personally don't get on the horses, but there is a lot of logistics that happens before, during, and after the race.
Like the business world, where it takes a lot of planning and a team of people in the back office to enable a solitary salesman to clinch the deal, my whole family is intimately engaged in helping one of my daughters win a 100-mile event. Strangely enough—and maybe specific to the endurance events—I think of horseracing as a team sport where each is doing his or her part in pursuit of a common goal. Just like supply chain management.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.