How to create a supply chain center of excellence that works
A center of excellence (CoE) staffed by analytics experts can drive supply chain improvements across your organization. Here are six recommendations for ensuring a successful CoE initiative.
Significant business change and fluctuating levels of complexity make it extremely difficult for companies with multiple, independent supply chains to achieve internal supply chain alignment across divisions. Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), consumer packaged goods (CPG), retail, and electronics companies can be especially vulnerable to misaligned or fractured supply chains in the face of volatile consumer demand, short product life cycles, erratic supply, and high transportation costs.
To address those and other challenges, some companies have established supply chain centers of excellence (CoEs). A CoE is a designated specialty group within the firm that works together to drive supply chain innovation, collaboration, and excellence across the organization. While many companies use "center of excellence" to refer to anything that is centralized or perhaps outsourced, in this article the term refers to centers of competency focused on supply chain design and flow-path analysis, route planning, inventory deployment, and related advanced analytics. These organizations often serve to unite companies across their supply chain silos. (See the sidebar, "Who could benefit from a CoE?")
CoE experts excel at using models to conduct sensitivity analyses and hypothesis testing. They use their analytical skills to interpret wider data trends for long-term supply chain planning. Since the supply chain best practices that CoEs engender rely on multiple types of data from innumerable information technology (IT) sources, these experts must be capable not only of collecting and cleansing the data (a critical step for accurate supply chain network modeling), but also of building models, conducting sophisticated analyses, and sharing repeatable supply chain insights and knowledge across the organization.
As part of their purview, the CoE team often develops and manages an enterprisewide focus on balanced metrics (also known as holistic or aligned metrics) that can overcome business units' biases while reflecting the different aspects of the supply chain. These metrics can be used to measure supply chain performance and costs spanning inventory, transportation, warehousing, manufacturing, procurement, and customer service functions. Accordingly, well-run CoEs ensure the best use of talent and resources; reduce transportation, inventory, and warehousing costs; and improve customer service levels while ensuring more effective management of inventory-deployment costs across multiple supply chains. Typically, however, they have limited (if any) operational responsibility.
CoEs thrive if they are viewed as bringing long-term strategic benefit to the organization. Their success rides on strong executive support and a thoughtfully developed long-term plan. Well-administered and carefully nurtured CoEs can inspire superior, long-term supply chain results that drive the changes needed for a company to be market-responsive.
In fact, research conducted by the analyst firm Supply Chain Insights1 found that companies with well-resourced, well-oiled CoE teams are more likely to describe themselves as "strategic," "proactive," and internally aligned and functioning from "the outside in" or "from the customer back." These companies rely on their CoE teams (whether centrally or virtually located) to develop models; identify, propose, and manage internal supply chain design projects; and oversee supply chain-design consulting engagements.
Who could benefit from a CoE?
Centers of excellence strengthen supply chains by optimizing operations and inculcating enterprisewide best practices. CoE experts guide and facilitate changes to internal processes, practices, technologies, and strategies to optimize overall organizational performance, providing the most value for large companies that need to:
Sell across multiple channels
Serve volatile or shifting markets
Conduct frequent contingency planning
Develop supply chain strategies to address e-commerce demands
Build a unified, optimized post-merger-and-acquisition supply chain
Six tips for developing an effective CoE
On the surface, centers of excellence may sound like a panacea for supply chain management challenges. However, although they have provided significant value for some companies and their supply chains, they have proved less useful for others. The decision to adopt a CoE strategy therefore comes with a few notable caveats, and ensuring a CoE's long-term viability and sustainability requires some candid self-analysis as well as proactive change management. When done right, a CoE can be a valuable asset that produces long-lasting benefits. With that in mind, here are six guidelines for establishing a successful supply chain center of excellence:
1. Start with a CoE readiness assessment. Before you can begin to develop a CoE, you must know whether you have or can acquire the skills and talent that will be needed to support it. That requires undertaking an honest assessment of whether your company has what it takes to operate a dedicated CoE. Among the questions to ask yourself: Do you have both the critical mass of work and the financial resources required to justify establishing and maintaining a CoE organization? Are you capable of developing high-performance teams? Can your culture attract and retain people with analytical skills in mathematical, inventory, network-design, or transportation modeling? Does your company do a good job of mentoring, developing, and retaining highly skilled professionals?
To get the right people on the CoE team, look for supply chain professionals who have both the aptitude and the passion for analytical modeling, and provide them with rich, diverse experiences. Consider tapping into the supply chain talent as well as the research on best practices at a nearby university with a strong supply chain or operations research program. To help CoE experts stay on top of cutting-edge techniques and practices, you'll also need to provide them with mentoring and skills-development programs that enable them to not only maintain deep expertise, but to also effectively mentor more-junior members. In essence, your CoE needs leaders with both technical and soft skills.
2. Ensure strong executive sponsorship and guidance. Your high-performing CoE team needs to report to a senior-level executive sponsor who has the power to enable them to carve out time to focus on supply chain improvement projects. With sponsorship at the highest corporate level, your CoE team won't become an isolated "island" whose analyses are filed away and never put to use, but rather will lead the way on key supply chain standardization and improvement efforts.
Your CoE team will benefit if you also develop a proactive, cross-functional or cross-divisional steering committee that includes your company's major constituencies. This committee can stay abreast of—and be involved with and internally promote—the CoE's best practices and successes. This will be key to opening doors and overcoming resistance to CoE activities like data gathering and assessing supply chain performance, as well as resistance to making significant operational changes.
CoEs have a tendency to go "off mission." Ironically, this is often the result of doing great work or having great people. As a CoE attains success it can become a catchall for special projects, solving emergencies, and powerful sponsors' pet projects. To prevent this, the senior sponsor and steering committee need to protect the mission of the CoE with an actively managed work-inflow process.
3. Provide good analytical tools. The CoE team often is tasked with reviewing different supply chain technologies and analyzing critical technology gaps and priorities for the organization's short- and long-term supply chain needs and business requirements. CoE experts will analyze a supply chain solution's time-to-value, its return on investment (ROI), and the time needed to close capability gaps. They'll also be able to address business-critical issues, like linking supply chain technologies and strategies to large customers' needs and demands.
Like other good craftsmen, CoE experts like to work with good tools. You'll be best served if you enable your CoE team to choose the feature-rich and robust technology they need to drive supply chain analyses.
4. Bring core CoE team members together in one place. Although it is entirely possible to create a virtual center of excellence by having experts across the company collaborate electronically, they often can be more effective if they work together in the same location. One reason is that doing so can improve communication and collaboration. For example, supply chain design is extremely complex, and the analyses lend themselves to sitting side-by-side and graphically depicting and explaining ideas. A centralized group can also help to resolve another common concern: it's hard for an expert to have credibility across the company when he or she is remote and attached to a particular business unit. And finally, a centrally located department promotes the most efficient use of a limited talent pool, allowing experts to focus on the CoE's mission rather than having to juggle responsibilities on both a business-unit and a corporate level.
5. Develop a clear and meaningful career path for CoE team members. While many companies guide would-be supply chain executives through rotations in functions such as inbound logistics, distribution, and procurement, few develop a meaningful career path for the technical-minded individuals populating their CoE teams. These experts, with their advanced degrees in computer science, operations research, data analytics, or supply chain management, enjoy problem solving and the challenge of improving enterprise systems and processes. They may be excited by the process of analyzing and determining which warehouses should be opened and which should be closed, but they would feel challenged and overwhelmed if they had to manage the actual closing of a distribution center and the relocation of inventory to other operations. It can be difficult to keep their work varied and intellectually stimulating; they rarely want to take on repetitive tasks or duties, and they also tend to like working on varied types of models and analyses.
Ideally, a career path for CoE experts will both challenge their technical competency and protect those rare and valuable members who have both strong technical skills and a high degree of management acumen. However, more-technical CoE employees rarely have a Master of Business Administration (MBA) degree; as a result, their recommendations—no matter how technically sound—may meet opposition. Moreover, although those serving in junior CoE roles may be technically competent managers, they may lack business credibility because they are perceived as not thoroughly understanding the business yet.
Finally, a strong career path is important because CoEs can become overreliant on a single resource: the "resident expert." You'll extend your CoE team's longevity and viability by putting a transition or succession plan in place that ensures the center will continue to run smoothly if your resident expert leaves the group. Keep in mind, though, that the new resident expert will need some time to master his or her new role.
6. Know when to call in reinforcements. Many managers assume that a center of excellence must be entirely internal. Yet the reality for many firms is that they lack the critical mass of work and access to talent in very specialized areas that will enable them to support a fully functional, exclusively internal organization. Additionally, the demanding nature of CoE projects, sometimes accompanied by short timelines, means that it's possible for almost any team to become overwhelmed or to confront a technical challenge that's beyond their expertise. When a project's demands outstrip available capacity, or when projects are quite different than those the CoE has previously managed, CoE leaders may want to consider supplementing the center's capabilities with external resources.
In our experience, the hybrid model (that is, a blend of internal and external resources) is the structure that consistently delivers the highest value for most organizations. It is also the only sustainable model given the significant challenges associated with creating and successfully maintaining a CoE, as well as the many failures of CoEs built on internal-only models, which are often caused by the lack of a critical mass of skills.
Careful consideration
Setting up a center of excellence is not an easy or obvious decision, and there is certainly risk involved. Some have delivered great results, and others have performed unsatisfactorily. In fact, the previously cited research by Supply Chain Insights found that CoEs only work satisfactorily about 50 percent of the time.
Before embarking on the effort and expense of developing a supply chain CoE, then, you should give careful consideration to whether you have the right culture, work environment, business problems, sponsorship, and developmental paths to build and maintain it. If the answer to one or more of these questions is "no," then the next question is whether the deficiency is easily correctable. If you find that the answer to this question is also "no," then a reasonable alternative to consider would be either supplementing your capabilities with external support or focusing on driving value through improved performance in the functional supply chain areas. Either of these alternatives is a better solution than attempting to run a CoE that doesn't have the backing or resources it needs to succeed.
But if you do have the right business needs, culture, and resources, then the potential benefits of establishing a supply chain center of excellence may well justify the cost and effort. The opportunity to analyze metrics, supply chain performance, total cost to serve, and other important success factors across the entire company and then use that analysis to help set policies and develop the best outlook for the business as a whole is a worthy goal.
Business software vendor Cleo has acquired DataTrans Solutions, a cloud-based procurement automation and EDI solutions provider, saying the move enhances Cleo’s supply chain orchestration with new procurement automation capabilities.
According to Chicago-based Cleo, the acquisition comes as companies increasingly look to digitalize their procurement processes, instead of relying on inefficient and expensive manual approaches.
By buying Texas-based DataTrans, Cleo said it will gain an expanded ability to help businesses streamline procurement, optimize working capital, and strengthen supplier relationships. Specifically, by integrating DTS’s procurement automation capabilities, Cleo will be able to provide businesses with solutions including: a supplier EDI & testing portal; web EDI & PDF digitization; and supplier scorecarding & performance tracking.
“Cleo’s vision is to deliver true supply chain orchestration by bridging the gap between planning and execution,” Cleo President and CEO Mahesh Rajasekharan said in a release. “With DTS’s technology embedded into CIC, we’re empowering procurement teams to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and minimize supply chain risks—all through automation.”
And many of them will have a budget to do it, since 51% of supply chain professionals with existing innovation budgets saw an increase earmarked for 2025, suggesting an even greater emphasis on investing in new technologies to meet rising demand, Kenco said in its “2025 Supply Chain Innovation” survey.
One of the biggest targets for innovation spending will artificial intelligence, as supply chain leaders look to use AI to automate time-consuming tasks. The survey showed that 41% are making AI a key part of their innovation strategy, with a third already leveraging it for data visibility, 29% for quality control, and 26% for labor optimization.
Still, lingering concerns around how to effectively and securely implement AI are leading some companies to sidestep the technology altogether. More than a third – 35% – said they’re largely prevented from using AI because of company policy, leaving an opportunity to streamline operations on the table.
“Avoiding AI entirely is no longer an option. Implementing it strategically can give supply chain-focused companies a serious competitive advantage,” Kristi Montgomery, Vice President, Innovation, Research & Development at Kenco, said in a release. “Now’s the time for organizations to explore and experiment with the tech, especially for automating data-heavy operations such as demand planning, shipping, and receiving to optimize your operations and unlock true efficiency.”
Among the survey’s other top findings:
there was essentially three-way tie for which physical automation tools professionals are looking to adopt in the coming year: robotics (43%), sensors and automatic identification (40%), and 3D printing (40%).
professionals tend to select a proven developer for providing supply chain innovation, but many also pick start-ups. Forty-five percent said they work with a mix of new and established developers, compared to 39% who work with established technologies only.
there’s room to grow in partnering with 3PLs for innovation: only 13% said their 3PL identified a need for innovation, and just 8% partnered with a 3PL to bring a technology to life.
Even as a last-minute deal today appeared to delay the tariff on Mexico, that deal is set to last only one month, and tariffs on the other two countries are still set to go into effect at midnight tonight.
Once new U.S. tariffs go into effect, those other countries are widely expected to respond with retaliatory tariffs of their own on U.S. exports, that would reduce demand for U.S. and manufacturing goods. In the context of that unpredictable business landscape, many U.S. business groups have been pressuring the White House to pull back from the new policy.
Here is a sampling of the reaction to the tariff plan by the U.S. business community:
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
“Tariffs are taxes,” AAPA President and CEO Cary Davis said in a release. “Though the port industry supports President Trump’s efforts to combat the flow of illicit drugs, tariffs will slow down our supply chains, tax American businesses, and increase costs for hard-working citizens. Instead, we call on the Administration and Congress to thoughtfully pursue alternatives to achieving these policy goals and exempt items critical to national security from tariffs, including port equipment.”
Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
“We understand the president is working toward an agreement. The leaders of all four nations should come together and work to reach a deal before Feb. 4 because enacting broad-based tariffs will be disruptive to the U.S. economy,” Michael Hanson, RILA’s Senior Executive Vice President of Public Affairs, said in a release. “The American people are counting on President Trump to grow the U.S. economy and lower inflation, and broad-based tariffs will put that at risk.”
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
“Manufacturers understand the need to deal with any sort of crisis that involves illicit drugs crossing our border, and we hope the three countries can come together quickly to confront this challenge,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a release. “However, with essential tax reforms left on the cutting room floor by the last Congress and the Biden administration, manufacturers are already facing mounting cost pressures. A 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico threatens to upend the very supply chains that have made U.S. manufacturing more competitive globally. The ripple effects will be severe, particularly for small and medium-sized manufacturers that lack the flexibility and capital to rapidly find alternative suppliers or absorb skyrocketing energy costs. These businesses—employing millions of American workers—will face significant disruptions. Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.”
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA)
“Widespread tariff actions on Mexico, Canada, and China announced this evening will inject massive costs into our inflation-weary economy while exposing us to a damaging tit-for-tat tariff war that will harm key export markets that U.S. farmers and manufacturers need,” Steve Lamar, AAFA’s president and CEO, said in a release. “We should be forging deeper collaboration with our free trade agreement partners, not taking actions that call into question the very foundation of that partnership."
Healthcare Distribution Alliance (HDA)
“We are concerned that placing tariffs on generic drug products produced outside the U.S. will put additional pressure on an industry that is already experiencing financial distress. Distributors and generic manufacturers and cannot absorb the rising costs of broad tariffs. It is worth noting that distributors operate on low profit margins — 0.3 percent. As a result, the U.S. will likely see new and worsened shortages of important medications and the costs will be passed down to payers and patients, including those in the Medicare and Medicaid programs,” the group said in a statement.
National Retail Federation (NRF)
“We support the Trump administration’s goal of strengthening trade relationships and creating fair and favorable terms for America,” NRF Executive Vice President of Government Relations David French said in a release. “But imposing steep tariffs on three of our closest trading partners is a serious step. We strongly encourage all parties to continue negotiating to find solutions that will strengthen trade relationships and avoid shifting the costs of shared policy failures onto the backs of American families, workers and small businesses.”
In a statement, DCA airport officials said they would open the facility again today for flights after planes were grounded for more than 12 hours. “Reagan National airport will resume flight operations at 11:00am. All airport roads and terminals are open. Some flights have been delayed or cancelled, so passengers are encouraged to check with their airline for specific flight information,” the facility said in a social media post.
An investigation into the cause of the crash is now underway, being led by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and assisted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Neither agency had released additional information yet today.
First responders say nearly 70 people may have died in the crash, including all 60 passengers and four crew on the American Airlines flight and three soldiers in the military helicopter after both aircraft appeared to explode upon impact and fall into the Potomac River.
Editor's note:This article was revised on February 3.
GE Vernova today said it plans to invest nearly $600 million in its U.S. factories and facilities over the next two years to support its energy businesses, which make equipment for generating electricity through gas power, grid, nuclear, and onshore wind.
The company was created just nine months ago as a spin-off from its parent corporation, General Electric, with a mission to meet surging global electricity demands. That move created a company with some 18,000 workers across 50 states in the U.S., with 18 U.S. manufacturing facilities and its global headquarters located in Massachusetts. GE Vernova’s technology helps produce approximately 25% of the world’s energy and is currently deployed in more than 140 countries.
The new investments – expected to create approximately 1,500 new U.S. jobs – will help drive U.S. energy affordability, national security, and competitiveness, and enable the American manufacturing footprint needed to support expanding global exports, the company said. They follow more than $167 million in funding in 2024 across a range of GE Vernova sites, helping create more than 1,120 jobs. And following a forecast that worldwide energy needs are on pace to double, GE Vernova is also planning a $9 billion cumulative global capex and R&D investment plan through 2028.
The new investments include:
almost $300 million in support of its Gas Power business and build-out of capacity to make heavy duty gas turbines, for facilities in Greenville, SC, Schenectady, NY, Parsippany, NJ, and Bangor, ME.
nearly $20 million to expand capacity at its Grid Solutions facilities in Charleroi, PA, which manufactures switchgear, and Clearwater, FL, which produces capacitors and instrument transformers.
more than $50 million to enhance safety, quality and productivity at its Wilmington, NC-based GE Hitachi nuclear business and to launch its next generation nuclear fuel design.
nearly $100 million in its manufacturing facilities at U.S. onshore wind factories in Pensacola, FL, Schenectady, NY and Grand Forks, ND, and its remanufacturing facilities in Amarillo, TX.
more than $10 million in its Pittsburgh, PA facility to expand capabilities across its Electrification segment, adding U.S. manufacturing capacity to support the U.S. grid, and demand for solar and energy storage
almost $100 million for its energy innovation research hub, the Advanced Research Center in Niskayuna, NY, to strengthen the center’s electrification and carbon efforts, enable continued recruitment of top-tier talent, and push forward innovative technologies, including $15 million for Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) work.
“These investments represent our serious commitment and responsibility as the leading energy manufacturer in the United States to help meet America’s and the world’s accelerating energy demand,” Scott Strazik, CEO of GE Vernova, said in a release. “These strategic investments and the jobs they create aim to both help our customers meet the doubling of demand and accelerate American innovation and technology development to boost the country’s energy security and global competitiveness.”