Tim Lefkowicz is a managing director in the transportation and logistics practice of AArete, a global consultancy specializing in data-informed performance improvement.
Sean Maharaj is a vice president in the Global Transportation Practice of the management consultancy Kearney. Additionally, Maharaj is a chief commercial officer of Kearney’s Hoptek.
The state of the trucking market in 2016 and the early part of 2017 offers a potent reminder that, while the United States still ships 80 percent of its cargo on trucks, the industry has some ground to make up following the last recession. In some respects, the market may appear to be healthy, especially over the long term. But when compared to prior years, the growth rate seems to be slowing. This was especially true in 2016, when available loads and opportunities dried up, capacity was "loose," and freight rates softened aggressively.
Data from the American Trucking Associations' (ATA) most recent American Trucking Trends indicates a year-over-year decline in revenues to $676.2 billion in 2016, from an all-time record of $719.3 billion in 2015. On the positive side, 2016 witnessed gains in truck sales as well as in the number of truck drivers employed.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] ATA trucking tonnage index (seasonally adjusted; 2000 = 100)Enlarge this image
Truckload: Rates continue soft That excess capacity forced many trucking companies to engage more fully with the truckload spot market. Some carriers that generally refrain from participation in that segment found themselves scrambling for freight and revenue, and therefore were forced to enter that market. Although rates typically are discounted by up to 30 percent on the spot market, in 2016 discounts were as deep as 65 percent in some cases.
Current analysis by the online freight marketplace and information provider DAT Solutions shows that spot rates remain stagnant even though more shipments are moving across the country. In addition, the Cass Truckload Linehaul Index, which many transportation industry executives and analysts consider to be the most accurate gauge of freight volumes and market conditions, shows that 2016 rates tracked somewhere between those of 2014 and 2015 for most of the year. For the last four months of 2016, however, motor carrier rates were nearly aligned with 2014 levels. For 2017, the index shows that rates began the year in line with 2015, only to dip below those levels during the second quarter.
This type of softness indicates that carriers are still having a hard time charging sustainable rates, and that shippers continue to dictate the terms in the marketplace. Indeed, although the Cass Index initially forecast annual growth of 3.1 percent for long-distance freight in 2017, that number was revised downward at mid-year to no more than 2 percent.
All of this suggests that the truckload market is grappling with muted freight demand. Essentially, there's still too much capacity chasing too little cargo. This is one of the main reasons the truckload market will likely continue to experience turbulence, with rates remaining at historically low levels and more consolidations taking place. While this situation is a negative for motor carriers, it does translate into better opportunities for shippers to lock in favorable contract rates.
LTL: A bright spot While the truckload market faces uncertainty and turbulence, the forecast is more positive for less-than-truckload (LTL) providers. LTL data hasn't yet been completely compiled, but initial evidence indicates the first half of 2017 turned out better than expected. That's primarily due to a robust second quarter that saw an increase in tonnage built on the back of several quarters of positive industrial economic data.
This growth in tonnage can be seen in ATA's seasonally adjusted Trucking Tonnage Index, which tracks the amount of freight moved by the for-hire trucking industry, including both truckload and LTL. (See Figure 1.) May saw a 6.5-percent bump over April and was up 4.8 percent compared to May 2016. This puts tonnage nearly back in line with volumes seen at the start of 2016. However, on a year-to-date basis, tonnage is only up nine-tenths of one percent.
While the single-month changes in May are not a concrete indication of a trend, they do seem to corroborate a general feeling across the industry that we will see low to moderate growth for the overall industry over the remainder of the year. Analysts anticipate that the truckload segment will remain sluggish and the LTL segment—an early indicator of economic activity such as construction—will see most of the growth. Only time will tell.
Disruptive technology and ongoing trends Some of the unpredictability and rate softness we are witnessing in the trucking industry can be attributed to technological innovations and other disruptions, such as online trucking marketplaces, the growth of Amazon's business across a variety of sectors, and a growing propensity among consumers to shop online. For instance, Uber-like applications have promised to marry shippers with available freight capacity. One example is the startup Next Trucking, which is billed as a truck-centric online marketplace that will connect shippers and motor carriers in real time. Waiting in the wings are potential providers like Amazon that, given their sheer size and buying power, have the ability to create a similar marketplace for shippers to buy transportation services from them.
Driverless trucks are another disruptor to consider. Some believe this level of automation won't be realized on a wide scale until perhaps 10 years from now. But driverless solutions like Uber's Otto and others could come online faster than expected. Once they are widely available, they could dramatically change how trucking companies respond to some of the ongoing struggles of the last few years, such as driver shortages.
Depending on what type of shipper demand they serve, trucking companies will have dramatically different experiences and related economic considerations in the coming years. As we've seen, the LTL market is showing positive signs of life. The truckload market, meanwhile, will continue to deal with its own set of concerns for the foreseeable future. The resulting rate softness means that truckload is currently a buyer's market for shippers and is likely to remain so for a while.
Shippers who have been down this road before know that this rate window may not remain open forever, and that they have an opportunity to make good on some of their own cost-savings goals in the near term. From a business management perspective, meanwhile, truckload carrier executives will need to have a disciplined plan for realizing cost savings while paying attention to operational efficiencies and technological innovation. This implies making investments across a range of areas—something that has typically eluded players in this long-standing and indispensable service industry.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.