Commentary: Five ways to ramp up supply chain sustainability
Taking the time to model and analyze both the supply chain costs and environmental impacts of key supply chain decisions can help you be both profitable and sustainable.
Starting in the mid-2000s, climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions began moving
to the top of many companies' lists of business concerns and priorities. The focus on those
issues grew as the global community became hyper-aware of the effects of climate change and
how the habits of individuals as well as organizations were playing a contributing role.
Companies that made greenhouse gas emissions and sustainability a priority were also gaining
positive public relations and increasing consumer loyalty.
Unfortunately, these initiatives took a back seat during the financial crisis as companies
were forced to prioritize corporate survival over reducing their environmental impact. At the
same time, many influencers in the business world felt that sustainability initiatives were
costly and had little to no positive impact on the bottom line.
Since recovering from those difficult times, many organizations have restarted their
sustainability efforts because they want to be good corporate citizens and have the money
and workforce available to make a real change and minimize their carbon footprint. As they
do so, many are also realizing that they were wrong to believe sustainability initiatives
would negatively impact their bottom line. The opposite is actually true; sustainability
is an area that can help boost the bottom line and provide a true competitive
advantage for companies that choose to implement sustainable practices and policies. For
example, recycling parts can help realize savings across manufacturing processes;
increased supply chain efficiency can help to minimize "empty miles" spent traveling;
and using renewable energy sources can reduce operating costs incurred from month to month.
Supply chain management plays a critical role in any company's sustainability efforts. To
implement sustainability programs that really have an impact—on both the environment and
your business—you must begin to "think green" during the supply chain planning and design
process, not afterward. Doing so will help you to operate efficiently and responsibly while also
increasing profitability. Here are five methods supply chain professionals can implement to help
reduce GHG emissions and positively impact the sustainability profile of their organization:
Revisit the "structure" of the global supply chain with sustainability as a primary objective.
Supply chain structure refers to the overall, end-to-end physical footprint, from suppliers through to the
final delivery leg. Typically, the structure is optimized to maximize service or to minimize cost, but when
considering sustainability metrics, some additional factors come into play. For example, if you consider
the source of energy powering a facility, you may find significant opportunities to reduce GHG emissions,
often within only a few miles and within similar cost constraints. A facility with a primary energy source
that is nuclear or geothermal, for instance, will yield major emission reductions compared to a facility
fueled by coal.
Analyze your transportation routes to reduce empty miles and wasted resources.
Creating smarter and more efficient transportation processes and routing will not only help to
reduce GHG emissions, it will also save money on such things as gas and hours on the road. To
accomplish this, it's important to model and optimize routes and resources to ensure that you
are keeping up with such fluctuations as changing market conditions, shifting demand, variable
fuel costs, and changing traffic patterns. When you run these models, you might find that you
aren't running the most optimal route and are instead traveling farther and for longer than is
necessary. This not only trickles down to your bottom line and increases costs such as fuel
expenses, employee wages, and depreciation of assets but also emits more pollutants into the
environment. Route-optimization software often identifies a 20 percent or more reduction in
miles and can help identify opportunities for backhauls and better asset utilization, which
leads to a more sustainable transportation network.
Evaluate the impact and benefits of an emission-regulated fleet. Deciding whether
to pursue a major investment in updated equipment, such as the purchase of an emission-regulated
fleet, or vehicles that meet regulatory limits for the maximum levels of engine exhaust emissions,
can be daunting. With proper modeling software, supply chain leaders can identify the cost
trade-offs between investing early in new equipment versus doing nothing or phasing out an
existing fleet over time. These models can also help companies determine the environmental
impact of each scenario and the overall return on investment. This approach will allow you
to make a decision using concrete figures and push toward a solution that will be the most
environmentally and cost-friendly in the long run.
Optimize inventory placement throughout the multiple echelons of the supply chain.
Inventory is an amazingly challenging issue for supply chain professionals. Hold too much and
you increase cost and working capital; hold too little and you risk major service delays or
lost sales. A proper inventory strategy can reduce cost and improve service while also having
a major impact on sustainability. For instance, a company can choose to increase safety stock
at distribution locations to allow for the use of ocean freight instead of air. In certain
situations, the reduction in shipping costs and emissions from switching to ocean freight
from air will be greater than the increase in inventory holding costs. As another example,
to reduce overall capacity requirements, which would result in lower facility energy usage,
a company can consolidate certain slow-moving items at one distribution location instead of
spreading them throughout its network. The key is to include sustainability metrics within
the digital models used to optimize inventory placement and properly evaluate the trade-offs.
Design packaging to optimize capacity utilization and handling efficiency. While
packaging design has made significant strides in the last few years, many products are still
packaged for overall aesthetics or production cost. This means that packaging may be bulkier
than necessary, and therefore the total number of products per pallet or container is much
higher than needed, or that companies are paying to transport "air" (the empty space within packages).
Packaging design software can help you optimize space utilization, improve stacking, and reduce the
amount of empty air. This leads to better overall capacity utilization, which has a significant
impact on sustainability throughout the supply chain. A bonus can come into play if you are able
to use recycled or reusable components in your packaging material.
What's listed above are only a few examples of how sustainable initiatives can help increase
profitability in the supply chain. There is no longer a trade-off between going green and
growing revenue, and companies looking to increase their business should be seriously
considering sustainability practices as part of their long-term growth strategies. Modeling
and visualizing their end-to-end supply chain costs can help businesses implement the right
changes to achieve these goals. Doing this will not only reduce a company's carbon footprint,
it will also help to maintain a competitive advantage and empower decision makers to make a
positive impact on their bottom line.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
Specifically, the two sides remain at odds over provisions related to the deployment of semi-automated technologies like rail-mounted gantry cranes, according to an analysis by the Kansas-based 3PL Noatum Logistics. The ILA has strongly opposed further automation, arguing it threatens dockworker protections, while the USMX contends that automation enhances productivity and can create long-term opportunities for labor.
In fact, U.S. importers are already taking action to prevent the impact of such a strike, “pulling forward” their container shipments by rushing imports to earlier dates on the calendar, according to analysis by supply chain visibility provider Project44. That strategy can help companies to build enough safety stock to dampen the damage of events like the strike and like the steep tariffs being threatened by the incoming Trump administration.
Likewise, some ocean carriers have already instituted January surcharges in pre-emption of possible labor action, which could support inbound ocean rates if a strike occurs, according to freight market analysts with TD Cowen. In the meantime, the outcome of the new negotiations are seen with “significant uncertainty,” due to the contentious history of the discussion and to the timing of the talks that overlap with a transition between two White House regimes, analysts said.