The blurring of lines between providers of equipment, software, and other technologies will profoundly change the material handling world—and yours, too.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
When I was an export traffic manager years ago, I generally had to contract separately for each type of service my company required—transportation, warehousing, freight forwarding, customs brokerage, packing, and so forth. That was further broken down depending on whether those activities were for the domestic or the international leg of an order's journey.
Today, those business activities can all be arranged and managed through a single, third-party logistics company (3PL). As 3PLs become increasingly involved in providing software and systems to support supply chain activities, the lines between these companies, technology providers, and consulting firms are also becoming harder to discern. (If you'd like to learn more about this trend, I can recommend two perceptive articles written by industry analyst Adrian Gonzalez, "Convergence is the word" and "Convergence accelerates—but will shippers buy in?")
The "convergence" business model Gonzalez cites has spread to another area of the supply chain: material handling. An early example was the 2013 acquisition of Peach State Integrated Technologies, a provider of distribution, logistics, and material handling solutions and consulting and engineering services, by Associated Integrated Supply Chain Solutions, a provider of lift truck and other material handling equipment and engineering, fleet management, and labor-optimization services. At the time, it was a surprising—and to some, puzzling—move by Associated's then president, Mike Romano.
Nobody's surprised or puzzled now. Convergence in the material handling world—bringing together equipment, services, and technology to provide comprehensive warehouse and distribution-centered solutions—is fast becoming a global phenomenon. In 2016, Kion Group AG, the world's second-largest manufacturer of industrial trucks, acquired Dematic, the giant systems integrator best known for designing fully automated warehouse systems. Kion previously had acquired Egemin Automation, a provider of automated lift trucks and automated guided vehicles, and Retrotech, a systems integrator. All are now part of an integrated supply chain services organization within Kion.
Just a few months later, Toyota Industries Corp., parent of Toyota Forklifts, announced that it had created a new division called Toyota Advanced Logistics Solutions (TALS) to sell integrated automation and productivity solutions to material handling and logistics markets in North America, and had acquired systems integrator Bastian Solutions LLC to provide the foundation for that business. Shortly thereafter, Toyota moved to establish a similar organization in Europe with its acquisition of the material handling systems provider Vanderlande.
Most recently, we've seen Honeywell embark on a similar path, acquiring Intelligrated, a systems integrator and provider of supply chain and warehouse automation systems and software. Honeywell had previously purchased Intermec, the provider of automated data-capture equipment and systems. The tech giant has incorporated both companies into the Sensing and Productivity Solutions division of its Automation and Control Solutions business.
At this year's ProMat show in Chicago, I met with executives from several of these companies to discuss the reasons behind their acquisitions. All of them have the same objective in mind: to be a "one-stop supplier for intelligent supply chain and automation solutions," as Kion Group CEO Gordon Riske put it. And all of them are moved by the same vision of the future: a world where e-commerce fulfillment and "Industry 4.0"—the application of the Internet of Things (IoT) to the industrial and logistics sectors—dominate business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) models.
During the show, I sat down with Jerry Weidmann, president of Wolter Group LLC, a provider of material handling equipment, automation solutions, and associated services, to get his take on this trend. It's inevitable, he said, that material handling equipment and systems will be the hub around which the industrial IoT and e-commerce fulfillment will revolve. This evolution will affect everyone involved—not just the customer that is taking orders and selling product, or the warehouse and DC operator, but also the suppliers, distributors, and other entities that provide the equipment and technologies that make this new vision possible, he commented. "The supplier base has to converge to reflect the customer's business needs," he said, adding that equipment manufacturers, distributors, and systems integrators will have to collaborate more closely than ever to ensure they can provide the right capabilities and systems that are seamlessly blended together at the level of complexity and sophistication the customer requires—and, let's not forget, at a price the customer is willing to pay.
I think Weidmann and the leaders of the companies mentioned above have it exactly right. There is no turning back the e-commerce tide or the consumer trends that fuel it. For a growing number of businesses around the world, their future success will depend in good measure on where the trend toward convergence in material handling leads.
ReposiTrak, a global food traceability network operator, will partner with Upshop, a provider of store operations technology for food retailers, to create an end-to-end grocery traceability solution that reaches from the supply chain to the retail store, the firms said today.
The partnership creates a data connection between suppliers and the retail store. It works by integrating Salt Lake City-based ReposiTrak’s network of thousands of suppliers and their traceability shipment data with Austin, Texas-based Upshop’s network of more than 450 retailers and their retail stores.
That accomplishment is important because it will allow food sector trading partners to meet the U.S. FDA’s Food Safety Modernization Act Section 204d (FSMA 204) requirements that they must create and store complete traceability records for certain foods.
And according to ReposiTrak and Upshop, the traceability solution may also unlock potential business benefits. It could do that by creating margin and growth opportunities in stores by connecting supply chain data with store data, thus allowing users to optimize inventory, labor, and customer experience management automation.
"Traceability requires data from the supply chain and – importantly – confirmation at the retail store that the proper and accurate lot code data from each shipment has been captured when the product is received. The missing piece for us has been the supply chain data. ReposiTrak is the leader in capturing and managing supply chain data, starting at the suppliers. Together, we can deliver a single, comprehensive traceability solution," Mark Hawthorne, chief innovation and strategy officer at Upshop, said in a release.
"Once the data is flowing the benefits are compounding. Traceability data can be used to improve food safety, reduce invoice discrepancies, and identify ways to reduce waste and improve efficiencies throughout the store,” Hawthorne said.
Under FSMA 204, retailers are required by law to track Key Data Elements (KDEs) to the store-level for every shipment containing high-risk food items from the Food Traceability List (FTL). ReposiTrak and Upshop say that major industry retailers have made public commitments to traceability, announcing programs that require more traceability data for all food product on a faster timeline. The efforts of those retailers have activated the industry, motivating others to institute traceability programs now, ahead of the FDA’s enforcement deadline of January 20, 2026.
Inclusive procurement practices can fuel economic growth and create jobs worldwide through increased partnerships with small and diverse suppliers, according to a study from the Illinois firm Supplier.io.
The firm’s “2024 Supplier Diversity Economic Impact Report” found that $168 billion spent directly with those suppliers generated a total economic impact of $303 billion. That analysis can help supplier diversity managers and chief procurement officers implement programs that grow diversity spend, improve supply chain competitiveness, and increase brand value, the firm said.
The companies featured in Supplier.io’s report collectively supported more than 710,000 direct jobs and contributed $60 billion in direct wages through their investments in small and diverse suppliers. According to the analysis, those purchases created a ripple effect, supporting over 1.4 million jobs and driving $105 billion in total income when factoring in direct, indirect, and induced economic impacts.
“At Supplier.io, we believe that empowering businesses with advanced supplier intelligence not only enhances their operational resilience but also significantly mitigates risks,” Aylin Basom, CEO of Supplier.io, said in a release. “Our platform provides critical insights that drive efficiency and innovation, enabling companies to find and invest in small and diverse suppliers. This approach helps build stronger, more reliable supply chains.”
Shippers today are praising an 11th-hour contract agreement that has averted the threat of a strike by dockworkers at East and Gulf coast ports that could have frozen container imports and exports as soon as January 16.
The agreement came late last night between the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) representing some 45,000 workers and the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) that includes the operators of 14 port facilities up and down the coast.
Details of the new agreement on those issues have not yet been made public, but in the meantime, retailers and manufacturers are heaving sighs of relief that trade flows will continue.
“Providing certainty with a new contract and avoiding further disruptions is paramount to ensure retail goods arrive in a timely manner for consumers. The agreement will also pave the way for much-needed modernization efforts, which are essential for future growth at these ports and the overall resiliency of our nation’s supply chain,” Gold said.
The next step in the process is for both sides to ratify the tentative agreement, so negotiators have agreed to keep those details private in the meantime, according to identical statements released by the ILA and the USMX. In their joint statement, the groups called the six-year deal a “win-win,” saying: “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coasts ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong. This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace.”
The breakthrough hints at broader supply chain trends, which will focus on the tension between operational efficiency and workforce job protection, not just at ports but across other sectors as well, according to a statement from Judah Levine, head of research at Freightos, a freight booking and payment platform. Port automation was the major sticking point leading up to this agreement, as the USMX pushed for technologies to make ports more efficient, while the ILA opposed automation or semi-automation that could threaten jobs.
"This is a six-year détente in the tech-versus-labor tug-of-war at U.S. ports," Levine said. “Automation remains a lightning rod—and likely one we’ll see in other industries—but this deal suggests a cautious path forward."
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
The three companies say the deal will allow clients to both define ideal set-ups for new warehouses and to continuously enhance existing facilities with Mega, an Nvidia Omniverse blueprint for large-scale industrial digital twins. The strategy includes a digital twin powered by physical AI – AI models that embody principles and qualities of the physical world – to improve the performance of intelligent warehouses that operate with automated forklifts, smart cameras and automation and robotics solutions.
The partners’ approach will take advantage of digital twins to plan warehouses and train robots, they said. “Future warehouses will function like massive autonomous robots, orchestrating fleets of robots within them,” Jensen Huang, founder and CEO of Nvidia, said in a release. “By integrating Omniverse and Mega into their solutions, Kion and Accenture can dramatically accelerate the development of industrial AI and autonomy for the world’s distribution and logistics ecosystem.”
Kion said it will use Nvidia’s technology to provide digital twins of warehouses that allows facility operators to design the most efficient and safe warehouse configuration without interrupting operations for testing. That includes optimizing the number of robots, workers, and automation equipment. The digital twin provides a testing ground for all aspects of warehouse operations, including facility layouts, the behavior of robot fleets, and the optimal number of workers and intelligent vehicles, the company said.
In that approach, the digital twin doesn’t stop at simulating and testing configurations, but it also trains the warehouse robots to handle changing conditions such as demand, inventory fluctuation, and layout changes. Integrated with Kion’s warehouse management software (WMS), the digital twin assigns tasks like moving goods from buffer zones to storage locations to virtual robots. And powered by advanced AI, the virtual robots plan, execute, and refine these tasks in a continuous loop, simulating and ultimately optimizing real-world operations with infinite scenarios, Kion said.