Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Forward Thinking

Mexican approach to NAFTA renegotiation offers a lesson for the U.S., observers say

Mexico's public-private collaboration ensures that—unlike in this country—government and industry are on the same page when it comes to negotiating positions and priorities, say Mexican trade experts at Coalition of New England Companies for Trade conference.

Mexican business and trade interests are astonished that an array of U.S. industries, as well as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, are at odds with their own government over what provisions should be included in the renegotiated North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), a Mexican attorney with extensive international trade experience said at the Coalition of New England Companies for Trade (CONECT) 16th Annual Northeast Cargo Conference in Providence, R.I., earlier this month.

Such conflicts don't arise between Mexican businesses and the country's trade negotiators, according to Edmundo Elías-Fernández, who practices with Cacheaux, Cavazos & Newton in Guadalajara. Mexico has a private sector advisory group commonly referred to as the "Cuarto de Junto" ("in the next room"). These advisors represent the interests of Mexico's major industrial and service sectors. Though they don't participate in the negotiations, they are present at every round to provide immediate feedback to negotiators, Elías-Fernández said. As a result, Mexican private industry will not be "blindsided" by negotiators' proposals, as has been the case in the U.S., he said.


There has been no shortage of squabbling between the U.S. government and industry over NAFTA. In early October, a U.S. Chamber of Commerce executive called some Trump administration proposals "highly dangerous" to the U.S. economy. Later that month, several automotive-industry groups formed the "Driving American Jobs" coalition to fight the White House's stance on renegotiating the treaty, including a proposal that cars made in North America contain 85 percent NAFTA-origin content, with 50 percent of inputs manufactured in the United States, to qualify for duty-free treatment. Numerous business groups and companies have slammed President Trump's assertion that he will pull the U.S. out of NAFTA if he does not get what he wants. The groups have warned that the three North American economies would suffer irreparable harm if the agreement were to fall apart.

For now, negotiations are moving quickly, said Nicolas Guzmán, a senior associate with Drinker Biddle & Reath, a U.S.-based law firm with a large international trade practice. Guzmán noted that previous rounds have covered approximately 60 percent of the issues to be renegotiated, and a fifth round that begins later this week in Mexico could reach accords on perhaps 75 percent of the topics on the table, he estimated. (Mexico's chief negotiator is Kenneth Smith Ramos; read our Q&A with him here.)

Guzman, who also spoke at CONECT, said Mexico seeks four things from an updated accord: Strengthened competitiveness across North America; regional trade policies that are "inclusive and responsible"; rules changes that will allow Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. to take full advantage of "21st century" economic opportunities; and economic certainty that encourages trade and investment in all three countries.

Elías-Fernández and Guzmán highlighted several areas of disagreement between the U.S. and Mexican positions. Number one on their list is the U.S. demand that cars made in North America must include 50 percent U.S-made content in order to qualify for preferential treatment under NAFTA. This has "set off a lot of fireworks" because U.S. automakers have invested heavily in Mexican assembly plants, Guzmán said. "The capacity doesn't exist in the U.S." to meet the 50 percent requirement, he contended.

Elías-Fernández said that although the 50-percent proposal is unacceptable, he thinks the automotive rules of origin "are going to change in some way." He also believes the United States will try to push similar U.S.-content requirements on other industry sectors. Both Canada and Mexico strongly oppose such positions.

Other concerns include the Trump administration's proposal to renegotiate NAFTA every five years, a plan that would create enormous uncertainty and instability for businesses, Elías-Fernández said. "Nobody makes plans or invests in five-year time spans," he said. Mexico is also worried about the U.S. demand that the three countries follow Washington's lead and raise the de minimis threshold for formal customs entries to US$800, meaning that imports valued below those levels would be exempt from certain import documentation requirements. Mexico City calls the U.S. demand a non-starter due to concerns about smuggling and security.

A sixth round is scheduled for January in Canada, and a seventh round is possible, Guzmán said. Mexico's negotiators will "remain at the table" and will respond firmly even to proposals that are unacceptable, he asserted. Mexico "is not taking the bait, but it's not backing off, either," he said.

Recent

More Stories

cover of report on electrical efficiency

ABI: Push to drop fossil fuels also needs better electric efficiency

Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.

In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Logistics economy continues on solid footing
Logistics Managers' Index

Logistics economy continues on solid footing

Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.

The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.

Keep ReadingShow less
iceberg drawing to represent threats

GEP: six factors could change calm to storm in 2025

The current year is ending on a calm note for the logistics sector, but 2025 is on pace to be an era of rapid transformation, due to six driving forces that will shape procurement and supply chains in coming months, according to a forecast from New Jersey-based supply chain software provider GEP.

"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of top business concerns from descartes

Descartes: businesses say top concern is tariff hikes

Business leaders at companies of every size say that rising tariffs and trade barriers are the most significant global trade challenge facing logistics and supply chain leaders today, according to a survey from supply chain software provider Descartes.

Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.

Keep ReadingShow less
photo of worker at port tracking containers

Trump tariff threat strains logistics businesses

Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.

Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.

Keep ReadingShow less