At Whirlpool, being green is more than just talk. Not only has the appliance maker taken the lead in developing energy-efficient products, but it has also redesigned its supply chain with an eye toward conserving energy and cutting air pollution.
For appliance maker Whirlpool Corp., energy-conservation and sustainability programs have never been just a marketing ploy. The company's history of environmental activism dates back to the 1970s, when it was one of the first businesses to set up an office of sustainability (the office focused on product development). Whirlpool was also an early champion of Energy Star, a U.S government- backed program launched in 1992 to encourage the design and manufacture of energy-efficient products; today, 590 of Whirlpool's products qualify for the Energy Star label. And in 2003, the company made a public pledge to reduce its emissions of greenhouse gases worldwide.
It's hardly surprising, then, that when it went to redesign its supply chain in the summer of 2005, Whirlpool took the opportunity to raise its eco-profile. Given the company's support for energy conservation in product development, says Brian Hancock, vice president of Whirlpool's North American regional supply chain, it was natural for Whirlpool to take the same approach to redesigning its supply chain. "Environmentalism has been built into our company fabric," he says, "and the supply chain is an extension of one of the best corporate cultures [where sustainability is concerned]."
Still, this would be a formidable undertaking for a company of Whirlpool's size and scale. With annual sales of around $19 billion, Whirlpool is the worldwide leader in the global home appliance market, selling refrigerators, washing machines, dryers, and other appliances around the world under such brand names as Whirlpool, Maytag, KitchenAid, Jenn-Air, Amana, Brastemp, and Bauknecht. Its supply chain network today includes 20 plants in North America, 11 in Europe, three in Latin America, and six in Asia. Whirlpool's distribution network consists of plant warehouses or factory distribution centers (DCs), regional distribution centers, and local distribution centers. (The latter are sites that Whirlpool uses to deliver its products directly to consumers, since many retailers have shifted that responsibility to the appliance maker.)
Time for an overhaul
The redesign itself—Whirlpool's first major supply chain overhaul in 20 years —was prompted by growth in both its product portfolio and its "contract" business —sales to builders or companies that sell to builders. The project took on even greater importance and urgency when the Benton Harbor, Michigan-based manufacturer acquired rival appliance maker Maytag in 2006.
"The growth in our contract business and the acquisition [of Maytag] triggered a fullscale network redesign," says Hancock. "We had changed our products. We wanted to [rethink] how we deal with high-volume and low-volume SKUs (stock-keeping units)."
As for the redesign's objectives, Whirlpool's overarching goal was to create a network that would ensure swift deliveries to customers —a process complicated by the expansion of its product offerings in recent years. But that was just the beginning. The company also wanted a distribution model that would allow it to consolidate shipments of slower-moving stock-keeping units while providing a free flow of high-volume SKUs. In addition, Whirlpool wanted to take advantage of time-saving techniques like cross docking at its regional distribution facilities. On top of that, the appliance maker was looking to make its network as cost effective and as energy efficient as possible.
In the end, the redesign team came up with a strategy that would not only meet the company's cost and service objectives, but would also be environmentally sustainable, with energy-efficient warehouses and cleaner equipment. Although the plan required an investment in new buildings and equipment, it is expected to produce considerable savings over time. "In the long term, it's the low-cost solution," says Hancock. "And that's what makes it good for business and the environment. That's what sustainability is all about."
Greener, cleaner buildings
Although Whirlpool has completed its supply chain redesign plan, the actual work won't be finished until sometime next year. Part of the holdup has been the construction of new facilities. The acquisition of Maytag forced Whirlpool to look at ways to rationalize its plant and distribution network. One result of the review was the decision to consolidate buildings and replace older distribution centers with new, energy-efficient facilities.
The new distribution centers will conserve electricity by using energy-efficient lights, skylights (in some locations), and motion sensors to turn lights on and off automatically. By adopting more energy-efficient practices, Whirlpool will also reduce emissions of the greenhouse gases that many scientists believe contribute to global warming. "That all adds up to a lower carbon footprint," says Hancock.
By the end of this year, Whirlpool will have added 10 new energy-efficient regional distribution centers in North America to replace older facilities. It will also have cut the total number of buildings in half. In fact, when the Maytag network integration is completed, Whirlpool will end up with 17 percent fewer factory distribution centers, 33 percent fewer regional DCs, and 32 percent fewer local DCs.
A breath of fresh air
Whirlpool is looking at more than just its buildings in its drive to go green. It's also swapping its internal-combustion-powered industrial clamp trucks for cleaner electric models. As of this writing, the company had replaced 105 of its internal-combustion trucks with electric units.
Today, electric models are in use in all 25 of Whirlpool's worldwide factory distribution centers. The company is currently in the process of replacing the trucks at its regional distribution centers with electric models as well, an effort that won't be completed until the end of this year. (The local distribution centers, which generally do not use lift trucks, are unaffected by the conversion.)
By Whirlpool's calculation, the switch to electric forklifts has already resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. The company estimates that replacing the internal-combustion models has kept 12,643 tons of carbon dioxide and 208 tons of nitrogen oxides from entering the atmosphere.
Although the new trucks have done much to curb pollution, Hancock says, Whirlpool's decision to use electric models was actually motivated by a desire to reduce noise and product damage. The forklifts Whirlpool uses are equipped with big clamps to pick up items like refrigerators and stack them as many as five high. When an operator of an internal-combustion-powered lift truck would deploy the clamp while pressing down on the gas pedal, the clamp would sometimes damage the side of a refrigerator. "There was an increase in clamp pressure as the gas pedal [was] pushed," Hancock explains. "That's not the case with electric trucks. We get a more level and even clamp, which we feel helps [reduce] damage."
The push for full loads
Just as Whirlpool has been analyzing its distribution network for ways to save energy, it has also been examining its transportation operations for opportunities to reduce its carbon footprint. As oil prices have skyrocketed over the past three years, the company has come up with several innovative strategies for cutting transportation costs and at the same time, reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
For example, Whirlpool has made a concerted effort to ship products in full truckloads rather than in multiple less-than-truckload shipments. Using full truckloads wherever feasible creates efficiencies that reduce fossil-fuel consumption, noise, and traffic congestion.
Moving products in full truckloads may be cost effective and eco-friendly, but it's not always easy to do. That's especially true now that more retailers are turning over the responsibility for customer deliveries to Whirlpool. And because of the bulky nature of large appliances, Whirlpool often finds that shipments "cube out" (fill up the trailer) before they "weigh out" (reach the maximum weight capacity allowed for road travel). Even so, the company is currently moving more than 63 percent of its consumer products via full truckloads.
At the same time, the company has begun stepping up its use of rail transportation, which is both cheaper and more fuel-efficient (and therefore greener) than highway transport. For example, the appliance maker is now using rail to transport refrigerators from Mexican plants to U.S. regional distribution centers. As it does with trucking, Whirlpool seeks to fill up the intermodal containers and railcars it uses for shipping.
Fuel-saving incentives
Many times, rail is not an option, however, leaving Whirlpool with no choice but to use trucks. In its dealings with U.S. carriers, Whirlpool has initiated several programs to encourage greater fuel economy.
To begin with, it has developed a fuel surcharge policy that provides incentives to carriers to boost fuel efficiency —and conversely, penalizes them for poor fuel utilization. Whirlpool determines the mileage for each trip and then pays its carriers a fuel surcharge based on a set rate of six miles per gallon, regardless of the truck's actual mileage per gallon. On a 330-mile trip, for example, Whirlpool will pay surcharges on 55 gallons of fuel —the amount a truck that gets six miles per gallon needs for the journey. If the truck gets just 5.5 miles per gallon and the carrier ends up using 60 gallons of fuel for the trip, the carrier can only collect fuel surcharges on 55 gallons.
"Current engine technology says a truck should get six miles a gallon," says Hancock. "This makes the carrier responsible for having trucks with the right engines. This fuel surcharge method [provides an incentive for] carriers to maximize fuel efficiency and minimize empty miles."
Whirlpool has had this fuel surcharge arrangement in effect for the past three years with its 50 primary motor carriers as well as its 250 secondary carriers. "In the beginning, there was some pushback from the carriers," says Hancock, "but we haven't had any pushback in the last couple of years." Although the sixmile standard applies to fuel surcharges only in the United States, Whirlpool does have a similar program in Europe.
To further encourage fuel economy among its carriers, Whirlpool has also been promoting the practice known as "drop and hook." In a drop-and-hook operation, the carrier drops off a fully loaded trailer in the warehouse yard and then hauls away an empty one. The primary advantage of drop and hook is that it eliminates the need for the truck to sit in the yard with its engine idling while it waits for the trailer to be unloaded. In some cases, Whirlpool even provides trailers to carriers to facilitate the practice. The company uses drop and hook in its U.S., Canadian, and Mexican operations —and to a limited extent, its European operations.
Whirlpool also helps its carriers "triangulate" shipments in order to make the best use of their assets. In triangulation, carriers deliver an outbound load to a Whirlpool customer, and then arrange loads that will bring them back to the starting point with no empty moves. For example, a trucking company might move a shipment from a Whirlpool facility in Ohio to Memphis, Tennessee; pick up a load from another shipper and haul it to Atlanta; and then take a load in Atlanta from a third company and bring it to Ohio in time to pick up another of Whirlpool's outbound loads.
Along with its other transportation programs, Whirlpool has enlisted in the SmartWay Transport Partnership, an initiative by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the freight industry to increase energy efficiency while reducing greenhouse gases and air pollution. In signing up for the program in 2007, the company committed to using more energy- efficient practices in its warehouses and to shipping at least 50 percent of its product volume with carriers that participate in the program. "The carrier actually signs up with the EPA, and we agree to use those approved carriers," says Hancock. "The program is trying to get the carriers and the industry to work on sustainability."
A long but worthwhile journey
When Whirlpool completes its network redesign next year, its supply chain will be considerably greener than it was just three years ago. As a result, Whirlpool stands to realize big savings in energy and transportation costs (not to mention, increased consumer goodwill).
Yet Whirlpool has found that it isn't always easy being green. In fact, Hancock advises others considering a similar program to steel themselves for a long journey. Just putting the infrastructure in place isn't enough, he says. You also have to keep an eye on things and make sure your suppliers are meeting your demands for eco-friendly goods and services. "Once you start changing the infrastructure of your supply chain, you need to be persistent in [monitoring] what types of trucks you use, what types of carriers you use, and the type of lighting [you use] in the warehouse," he says. "It's a long-term commitment."
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.