While you should certainly use your persuasion skills to make sure you receive the pay you deserve, negotiations should also reinforce the employer's decision to hire you.
There are a few times in your career when you can negotiate your salary and compensation packages: on your way in to a job, on your way out, and when you're asking for a raise or a promotion. Obviously, you have the most leverage on the way in and the least on the way out. So it's important to take an especially thoughtful approach to the negotiation process after you have received a new job offer.
Negotiating a salary and compensation package is not like negotiating the price of a car or house. While you should certainly use your persuasion skills to make sure you receive the pay you deserve, negotiations should also reinforce the employer's decision to hire you. Negotiations should be conducted in a constructive and positive atmosphere, with an emphasis on both parties finding a way to make it work. Here are a few tips on how to take that positive approach.
Getting started
Don't be too quick to discuss specifics when it comes to salary negotiations. The only time you should discuss your salary needs is when the company indicates that it would like to make you an offer.
If you are asked about your salary expectations during the interview process, you should just say that you are looking for a reasonable increase from your current salary with potential for growth. Refrain from giving a fixed number that you would accept unless you truly would be willing to start at that salary. And recognize that if you say you would be interested in a salary between US $110,000 and $120,000, you probably will end up with $110,000.
By the time you reach the negotiations stage, both the candidate and the company need to be serious about making a commitment. If you are not interested in a position or company, you should never let things get to this point.
For professionals in supply chain management, negotiations occur directly between the company and you, the candidate. If you have been working with a recruiter on a position, the recruiter's main role at this point is to assist with negotiations and help both parties come to an agreement that is reasonable.
The numbers game
When it comes to negotiating your compensation package, the size of the company can have a big influence. For large corporations, salary ranges and benefits are determined as part of the approval process for specific positions, so there is limited flexibility. Companies try to ensure that compensation is consistent with similar positions in the department, the corporation, and to some degree, competitors. They employ consultants and use salary surveys to correlate compensation levels.
To change a salary range during the hiring
and interviewing process requires approval at many levels, and it lengthens the search process considerably. Rather than go through the procedures required to upgrade a position's salary range, companies tend to reduce the screening requirements for the position. Smaller and/or private companies, on the other hand, have more flexibility to interview candidates without a specific hiring number and can adjust the salary offer within reason when they interview a candidate they like.
It's typical today for new hires to get an offer for 7 percent to 12 percent above their previous salaries. If you will be relocating, be sure to take into consideration any differences in the cost of living when you state your desired salary. Your new company, however, is not obligated to make up for your past low salary, but it will want to be sure your offer is on parity with similar positions in your department. In other words, even if your present salary is significantly below the starting range of the position, the company can't offer you less than the lowest point of the pay range.
Your current employment status will have a big effect on the strength of your negotiating position. Individuals who are happy where they are and see a future with their present company can often count on receiving larger increases. This is because the hiring company understands that the offer needs to be high enough to warrant a candidate's making a career change.
If you are not currently working, you have less leverage for negotiating. Similarly, candidates who show concerns about their present job or company, a takeover or merger, or a corporate move, tend to have fewer bargaining chips. For that reason, do not mention such concerns as the reason why you are looking for a new job, even if the interviewer might already know this information. At the same time, the hiring company should not take unfair advantage of a candidate who is unemployed. Companies that follow this path risk quickly losing new hires to a company that offers them a better package.
While salary may receive the most attention, it's important to also consider the whole compensation package. If you have negotiated the salary to the maximum and it is not quite at the level you deem sufficient, there are other ways to increase your total compensation: a signing bonus, adding stock, an early review, replacing a portion of your lost bonuses (if it is almost time to receive one in your current job), and vacation time.
Additionally, make sure you understand company policies regarding such areas as eligibility for bonuses, company profit sharing, stock options, retirement plans, saving plans, life and health insurance, vacation, and compensation for relocation costs. Speak to those people in Human Resources who have up-to-date knowledge of these benefits. There is nothing wrong with asking for a written explanation of benefits after an offer has been made. You don't want to find out after you've been hired that the benefits changed and the hiring manager was not aware of it.
There are some things that you should not expect the hiring company to offer. Compensation for your spouse's loss of income, for instance, cannot be a factor in negotiations, and you should consider this before you interview.
An employment contract normally will be offered only at the vice president level or above. In essence, employment contracts are really unemployment contracts, as they guarantee you a payout if you are let go without cause during the term of your contract.
Be sure to employ a lawyer who specializes in this area—not a friend or relative who is doing you a favor—to review the contract. At this point, you should worry more about ensuring that the contract provides you with adequate protection rather than about saving money on legal fees.
Finally, if a company makes you a great offer, don't try to squeeze it for more. Some companies do make their best offer up front.
Nothing personal
One of the problems we have when it comes to employment negotiations is that we tend to personalize them. Remember that your objective isn't to "win" or prove a point—it's to receive an offer that fits your financial and career needs. If this cannot be accomplished, then you want to walk away from the deal leaving the company feeling that you were a great find but the position was the wrong one for you. Be sure to leave the door open for renegotiation and perhaps other opportunities in the future.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.