Many chief executives still view the supply chain as a cost center. To change their minds, you need to link supply chain initiatives to financial performance, says OfficeMax executive Reuben Slone.
Most supply chain professionals recognize that their work is crucial to their companies' ability to not just survive but also to prosper in the current sluggish economy. Their CEOs, however, may take a little more convincing. That's just one of the many reasons why it's important to link supply chain operations to corporate financial performance, says Reuben Slone. Slone has spent a good part of his career working toward this goal at leading companies such as General Motors, Whirlpool, and now as executive vice president of supply chain for OfficeMax.
To share his ideas with supply chain professionals at other companies, Slone teamed up with University of Tennessee professors J. Paul Dittmann and the late John T. Mentzer to write the book, The New Supply Chain Agenda: The 5 Steps That Drive Real Value. Published by Harvard Business Press, the book outlines the tenets of a successful supply chain strategy and describes how the supply chain can drive shareholder value.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, Slone discussed some of the book's key ideas.
Given your experience as a supply chain executive for a number of leading companies, what do you believe is the biggest misconception that top management has about the role of supply chains?
Senior executives don't always see the relationship between supply chain effectiveness and the overarching goal of driving shareholder value. They instead simply see their supply chain as a transactional operation and a cost center. It is our responsibility as supply chain managers to show the connection between our work and the overall financial health of the firm.
Why do some CEOs understand supply chains while others do not?
Some CEOs rise through operations and have a more intuitive understanding of the supply chain. Some have been forced to learn about it by outside stock analysts who bombard them with questions about their supply chain. And some have been trained by internal supply chain executives who are clever enough to translate their work into the language of the executive suite.
Bachelor of science in engineering, University of Michigan
Graduate fellowship in mechanical engineering, University of Michigan
Senior manager, Ernst & Young
Principal, A.T. Kearney's automotive practice
Vice president of process development and change management, Federal-Mogul
General director, global supply chain, General Motors
Vice president, global supply chain, Whirlpool Corp.
In your book, you talk about the need to show the relationship between supply chain practices and shareholder return. Can you briefly describe how OfficeMax links economic profit to supply chain initiatives?
Our focus is availability, inventory reduction, and cost reduction, in that order. When we do that, we help the company not only drive revenue but also shore up the balance sheet and the income statement. That supports the overall economic health of the firm and drives economic profit—and ultimately shareholder value—over time.
Your book also discusses the importance of hiring the right talent. You mention that companies need supply chain leaders who are "system thinkers." Can you elaborate on what you mean by that and why it's important?
When we use the term "systems," we are not referring to information technology. Instead, we mean the need to understand all of the interconnections among the links in the supply chain. Comprehending the supply chain as a system means that we can have a way of determining the impact on one link in the chain when we make changes in another area. For example, when we drive shorter response times from our suppliers, we will see both lower inventory and higher availability for our customers.
The book has a chapter on selecting appropriate technology for the supply chain. Is there any particular technology that supply chain managers should be considering for adoption?
We break technology into four buckets: software, e-business tools, visibility and productivity tools, and process advances. Of those, we believe that process advances should be prominent in any technology strategy, and they should be applied first. In particular, the application of process tools such as Lean and Six Sigma to the extended supply chain can lead to breakthrough results.
What has been your most important career accomplishment to date as a supply chain executive?
We have made major supply chain improvements at OfficeMax that have been critical to completing the company's turnaround. For example, over the past five years, we improved store out-of-stocks from more than 200 "outs" per store to less than 85, and we maintained a next-day delivery [rate] to our contract customers of over 99 percent on all items while taking out over $250 million in inventory and $118 million in operating expense. This work in improving availability while optimizing inventory levels and cost has resulted in a major contribution to economic profit and helped OfficeMax survive the Great Recession.
I must also add the three-year achievement of writing The New Supply Chain Agenda with my co-authors Paul Dittmann and Tom Mentzer. Sadly, Tom lost his three-year battle with melanoma in March just as the book was being printed.
In a tough economy, what's the one thing supply chain leaders must do to help their companies survive and prosper?
To do their job, they need to develop and implement a disciplined strategy to aggressively drive economic profit for their firms. Further, to be relevant, they need to be able to communicate that strategy in the language of the boardroom and investor.
Beyond that, they have a window of opportunity to foster better collaboration with customers and suppliers and to make tough decisions that would be much more difficult in easier times, like closing a favorite distribution center or reducing stock-keeping units.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.