Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

UN plan would raise $5 billion from containership companies to stop emissions

New technology is needed to launch zero-carbon emission cargo ships within a decade, sponsor countries say.

UN plan would raise $5 billion from containership companies to stop emissions

A coalition of countries is pitching a plan to the United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO) to require global shipping companies to raise funds for a “moon-shot” effort to deploy widescale fleets of zero-carbon emission cargo ships within a decade.

Announced March 10, the effort would raise $5 billion through “mandatory contributions” by containership companies in a push to decarbonize the maritime transport sector. The plan’s backers say that clean emission technology does not yet exist for large ocean-going ships, so any decarbonization effort can only take place with a significant acceleration of research and development.


As with previous emissions reduction efforts, the investment would likely boost delivery rates for shippers in the short term, as carriers pass on the increased cost. But supporters argue that the investment is necessary to mitigate the longer-term impacts of climate change, such as rising sea levels and volatile storms poised to swamp the world’s cargo ports.

The new approach would enable global maritime cargo carriers to reduce greenhouse gases enough to meet the IMO’s 2050 50% reduction and zero-carbon emissions goals. 

It would also follow the current IMO 2020 policy, which limits sulfur emissions from oceangoing ships by requiring vessels to burn fuel with a sulfur content of 0.5% or less, down from the current 3.5%, or else to use exhaust-cleaning “scrubbers" or convert to liquefied natural gas.

The IMO 2020 plan is forecast to reduce acid rain and to avoid more than half a million annual premature deaths worldwide from conditions like strokes, asthma, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases. But industry giants like A.P. Møller-Maersk (Maersk) and Mediterranean Shipping Co. (MSC) have said they will need to pass on the costs of compliance to their customers. The impact could also reduce the growth rate of world container port volumes over a five-year period, according to a report from Drewry Shipping Consultants.

Despite those costs, the effort is necessary to slow the momentum of accelerating global climate change, according to the World Shipping Council, one of the backers of the new plan. “The sponsoring nations have done a very thorough job, mapping out in detail the framework required to get the R&D program up and running as quickly as possible. We are very pleased to see Denmark’s support, as one of the leading maritime nations. The IMRB is a crucial step on the path to decarbonize shipping, and we have no time to lose if we are to meet the UN climate goals,” WSC CEO John Butler said in a release.

The proposal was first submitted by a collection of shipping nations including Georgia, Greece, Japan, Liberia, Malta, Nigeria, Singapore, and Switzerland. It has since added Denmark and Palau. It is also co-sponsored by a collection of global shipowners’ associations: BIMCO, Cruise Lines International Association, IMCA, INTERCARGO, INTERFERRY, International Chamber of Shipping, INTERTANKO, IPTA, and the WSC.

Under terms of the plan, the money would go into an “IMO Maritime Research Fund” to support an International Maritime Research and Development Board (IMRB) to commission collaborative programs for research and development into zero-carbon technologies specifically tailored for maritime applications, including the development of working prototypes. It will also assist carbon dioxide-reduction projects in developing countries, including Pacific island nations which are at high risk of flooding damage from rising sea levels due to their low-lying terrain.

The next step for the plan will be to seek additional sponsors at the next meeting of the IMO Marine Environment Protection Committee in June, and then to lobby for full approval at an IMO meeting in London in November, which will coincide with the next UN Climate Conference (COP 26) in Glasgow.

Recent

More Stories

pie chart of business challenges in 2025

DHL: small businesses wary of uncertain times in 2025

As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.

However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

image of earth from space

Maersk offers 5 steps to make your supply chain “antifragile”

Companies worldwide faced waves of business disruptions throughout the past year, but as 2025 is predicted to be just as complex as 2024, global cargo carrier Maersk has listed five steps for making supply chains “antifragile.”

Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.

Keep ReadingShow less
attendees at the EDGE resource center

Attendees visit the CSCMP EDGE 2024 Resource Center.

Lean into your supply chain community

As I assume the role of Chair of the Board of Directors for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), I fondly reflect on the more than 10 years that I’ve had the privilege of being part of this extraordinary organization. I’ve seen firsthand the impact we have had on individuals, companies, and the entire supply chain profession.

CSCMP’s journey as an organization began back in 1963. It has since grown from a small, passionate community to the world’s premier association for supply chain professionals. Our mission—to connect, educate, and develop supply chain professionals throughout their careers—remains not only relevant, but vital in today’s world.

Keep ReadingShow less
illustration of two people working together with the help of a neutral party

The standing neutral: An innovative approach for managing supplier conflict

Editor’s Note:This article serves as a follow-up to “Avoiding supplier conflict and disputes before they begin,” which appeared in the July/August 2024 issue of Supply Chain Xchange.

The concept of using a neutral third party to resolve conflicts between suppliers and customers is not new. Mediation and arbitration have long been considered as more efficient and less costly ways to resolve contractual disputes than litigation. In fact, 2025 marks the 100th anniversary of the Federal Arbitration Act, which allows for contract disputes to be resolved through a private resolution process instead of going to court.

Keep ReadingShow less

Idea in action: EY case study

The global consulting firm EY was looking to outsource the food services, cleaning services, and maintenance at its facilities to the provider Integrated Service Solutions (ISS). But the company wanted to do so in a way that was completely different from how it had approached outsourcing workplace services in the past. EY and ISS wanted to create an outsourcing agreement that was highly collaborative and beneficial for both parties.

To do so, they incorporated a standing neutral in the contracting process from the outset. Together the parties selected one standing neutral—Erik Linnarsson, a lawyer from Cirio Law Firm—as a deal facilitator. Linnarsson was trained as a certified deal architect (CDA) to craft complex outsourcing agreements.

Keep ReadingShow less