Top 10 Supply Chain Threats: Paul Bingham of IHS Markit on the threat of inflation and economic uncertainty
After operating in a low-inflation environment for many years, will companies be able to adapt to rising inflation levels? What effect will rising inflation and an uncertain economy have on the supply chain, and what can supply chain executives do to prepare? We tackle these questions and more.
For links and show notes, mouse over the player and click the .
Transcript
About this week's guest
Paul Bingham is the director of transportation consulting at IHS Markit. He leads business advisory services product teams, advises on client engagements and report delivery, analyzes and forecasts freight transportation demand and infrastructure requirements, and drives business innovation. Bingham primarily focuses on North American freight transportation markets, including the international trade of North America.
David Maloney, Editorial Director, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly 00:02
The Covid-19 pandemic showed us just how vulnerable supply chains are. Today we face many threats: shipping delays, a lack of workers, failing infrastructure, transportation rates that are out of control, cybersecurity threats, and of course, a worldwide pandemic that is still very much with us. But with each of these threats comes opportunities. Welcome to this limited podcast series from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats. Today we focus on the threat of inflation and economic uncertainty. Here is your moderator for this segment, Supply Chain Quarterly’s executive editor, Susan Lacefield.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly00:51
Hello, and welcome. With us today is Paul Bingham, who is the director of transportation consulting at the analyst firm IHS Markit. Paul, thank you for taking some time out of your day to talk to us.
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 01:03
Great to be here, Susan.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly01:04
Great. So, many of the risks that supply chain professionals have been grappling with this year are not necessarily new, they're just been intensified by the pandemic. But inflation is something that most supply chain professionals haven't had to deal with for some time. So to help our listeners out, maybe heading into the new year, can you give us an idea of what we might be seeing in terms of inflation?
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 01:30
Well, yeah, this is an incredibly important topic. Inflation has reared its head in this this year, 2021, more so than in most of all of our careers, almost, unless you've been working since the 1970s. As far as supply chains go, it certainly reflects the supply and demand conditions that we've seen. There was a discussion earlier this year of inflation being transitory, meaning it was going to go away by now. Well, in fact, we haven't seen that, and we have been advising this year that there were elements of this inflation which were a reflection of permanent shifts, and that are unlikely to reverse themselves entirely. However, there are elements of the inflation in 2021 that our company does view as, you could characterize it as transitory. An example of that is in energy prices, where we've seen quite a runup—actually, a dramatic runup, even more than we had forecast by this fourth quarter for global crude oil prices, and we've certainly seen it in terms of the pump price of motor gasoline and diesel in the United States. So, the forecast for the year is inflation running for our estimate for the entire[ty] of the calendar year is 4.6%, which is record high growth of inflation looking back over decades for the United States. And that same Consumer Price Index, though we're forecasting, because of some elements of it that we do view is transitory, falling back in 2022 to 3.7%. Now, that is still far above the Federal Reserve Board's 2% target, so we're still talking a high inflation environment from that perspective, but the trend is one that's downward. And the reasons for that include some of those elements that we do view as transitory, such as used vehicle prices that have exploded in 2021 because of the shortage in the chips, which has restricted production such that new motor vehicles have not been able to be manufactured anywhere near where the demand has been running. That's an example where, as the supply catches up, as those fab plants are operating and the chips are made available to the manufacturers and new vehicles are able to be produced, which then meets the demand, we'll see those new those used car and use the truck prices falling. And that's just one example. There's some other supply chain bottlenecks situations in the economy that we view as resolving themselves—maybe not quickly, but happening in 2022, such that overall the trend will be positive in terms of a reduction in inflation. But we're not going back to 2%, and not for a while.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:04
Okay, so some semi-good news out there, then, that what we're seeing right now will soften a bit.
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 04:11
Yeah.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly04:12
So, what may be some of the repercussions of this inflation that's still high for supply chain managers?
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 04:21
In 2022, the transportation and logistics side of supply chain management responsibility is still going to be facing significant inflation. The rate of increase will decline compared to 2021, but the cost of freight transport, the cost of warehousing, and so forth are still going to be elevated. Some of that is tied to the labor input costs, where wages tend to go up and they don't tend to go down again once they've ratcheted up, and that's going to be true for dockworkers, for truck drivers, and some other key elements of supply chain transportation and logistics costs. Some of the procurement costs, in terms of raw materials and supplies, some of those are going to see reductions in some areas in 2022, but not, perhaps, down back to the levels that we saw, say, before we got into the recovery from the pandemic in the summer of 2020. That implies some necessary planning for elevated costs that may squeeze budgets and perhaps have managers tried to pay attention to where they should try to lock in rates or where they should try to, perhaps, more focus on short-term contracting and allow some rates and some costs to decline later on into 2022 as inflation eases.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly05:35
Fantastic, thank you. So, you had mentioned that earlier this year, there was some feeling among many economists that the inflation would be transitory. You know, maybe maybe IHS Markit was not seeing that, but what were we missing when we thought that it was going to be transitory?
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 05:54
Well, I think it was an overreaction to some of the observations of where price increases had happened. So, for example, we had seen record runups, early on, of lumber prices, because of an inadequate supply when demand came back in 2020. Those got to, you know, historic high record rates, and then some of those came down relatively quickly once some of the production came back on stream and some of the transportation was actually start—able to start serving end markets. That has continued through the pattern for a number of materials, but not all of them, and certainly not in in petroleum-based energy costs or natural gas energy costs during 2021. And so, that transitory nature of overall inflation, I think, got extrapolated way beyond where its impact really ends up in terms of what contributes to overall inflation. But I don't want to overstate it on the other side of it, that we shouldn't then react too much on the other side and say, Well, none of this is transitory and that we're going to have to be living with this 6% CPI on into the future. By no means is that the situation. We believe that inflation does have some of those transitory elements, so that the rate of inflation is going to be reduced, but it will still be running ahead of what, really, any supply chain managers are comfortable with, or even what they've been used to planning around, as we head through 2022. We're talking moving more towards the 2023-to-2025 time period till we get back to a very long-term, say 2%, inflation. And for many of us in the supply chain industry, we're used to inflation running below 2%. The Federal Reserve Board was frustrated for years with almost threats of deflation, so in a 2% inflation outlook, it's even above trend for what we had for a long period of time since the Great Recession running up to the pandemic.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly07:47
Right. So, how has this kind of major change for how we're dealing with, like our worldview, in terms of inflation? How does that affect your planning? What advice would you have for supply chain professionals going forward with their plans?
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 08:04
Well, they have to pay special attention now to that procurement costing and labor costs—the elements of budget planning, where quantities may not equal the unit price or the unit value as this inflation takes a toll, you know, across the board. And that requires a different perspective than perhaps what they've been accustomed to in terms of budget planning for out years and making decisions about contract periods and contract terms, and making some of those decisions even on inventory management when they get back to somewhat approaching desired levels of inventory-sales ratios, in terms of the carrying cost of those goods as inflation is running higher.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly08:43
Great, thank you. Well, Paul, you have certainly given us a lot of great insight heading into 2022, and we appreciate you spending some time with us today, and we hope to be hearing more from you in the future.
Paul Bingham, Director of Transportation Consulting, IHS Markit 08:56
Thank you, Susan. I really appreciate the opportunity and we hope to talk to you again in the future. Thank you. Bye now.
Susan Lacefield, Executive Editor, Supply Chain Quarterly09:02
Thanks again, we've been talking with Paul Bingham who is the director of transportation consulting at IHS Markit, and he's been providing us with some great insights on inflation and the economy ahead. Thank you for joining us for this podcast from CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly, the Top 10 Supply Chain Threats. We encourage you to subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.