Traditional approaches to transportation management won't stand up in today's truck transportation market. Shippers and carriers need a new recipe for doing business together.
Start with a raw boom-and-bust business cycle, add demands for low-cost flexibility, ladle on liberal amounts of regulation while going light on drivers and credit, and then simmer over a fire of rising fuel and equipment costs. That's a recipe for the "stew" that makes up the U.S. trucking market today.
Unfortunately, that stew may not have enough servings for everyone. "Capacity will continue to get tighter in the marketplace as regulatory, insurance, and financial pressures in a slow-growing economy force service providers to exit the marketplace or scale back their operations to a limited offering," predicts Phil Clouden, director of corporate logistics at NBTY, a producer, distributor, and marketer of nutritional supplements that makes truckload, less-than-truckload (LTL), and intermodal shipments across the United States and Canada.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Cass Information Systems freight index for January 2009-July 2012Enlarge this image
Despite that gloomy outlook, there are ways for shippers and carriers to succeed in the current market. The successful ones will be those that rethink the "ingredients" they put into the business they share.
Carriers change course
Trucking rates have been steadily rising since 2009 and are forecast to continue on that track for the next two to three years, even if economic growth remains anemic. The main drivers of rising rates are surging costs for motor carriers and narrowing supply options for shippers as both continue to rely heavily on the "ingredients" mentioned earlier: traditional approaches to network planning and sourcing, relationship management, and daily operations. The Cass Freight Index (see Figure 1) shows how shippers' expenditures are rising even though shipment volumes are holding steady.
For carriers, the traditional recipe calls for buying and maintaining the assets, training and retaining the drivers, and finding profitable routes where shippers will pay a premium for reliable service. Selling consists of maintaining and growing the shipper base, ideally by making every shipment a head-haul, as customers are developed in destinations that could provide reliable round trips. If carriers can't create the perfect fit of shipper with lane, then brokers find the loads and the trucks' owners pay the broker's margin, either from their own pockets or by passing that charge on to the head-haul shippers. The worst outcome of this traditional pattern, of course, is the "empty mile," which shippers pay for either as a minimum charge in short-haul lanes or as a premium fare when their carriers cannot find a load for part of or the entire return trip. The rest of the empty mile is eaten by the carrier.
Forward-thinking carriers are increasing their profitability by investing in more fuel-efficient equipment, better technology, and improved driver screening and training. More of them are getting into the brokerage business as a way to supplement their incomes by utilizing existing resources. Larger brokers, meanwhile, have not stood still and are growing in size and sophistication. They have heavily invested in people and technology that allow them to go beyond traditional load-matching services to earn their margins. Some, for example, offer shippers a managed transportation management system (TMS) that includes contract management, safety-rating monitoring, and freight auditing and payment. Others provide attractive features (such as factoring, fuel programs, and pooled insurance buying) that bind carriers to them and, most importantly, differentiate themselves from the new entrants in the market. In these times of constrained capacity, the best carriers and brokers are also becoming more selective when it comes to the shippers they serve, and they're using freight rates to help them make those choices.
Shippers' strategies
Turning to shippers, their basic recipe has been to build a base of reliable carriers, give the new ones that call on them a shot at some lanes, and keep them all on their toes by asking for occasional bids for some part of the distribution network. Less-regular lanes or seasonal volumes are bought on the spot market. Larger shippers might leverage benchmarking databases to find out where they're paying above-average rates, and then focus and time their bid efforts accordingly.
The prognosis for these shippers is that their freight rates will rise and fall with the boom-and-bust market trends. While shippers may be able to get cheaper rates when volumes are low, high rates will eventually catch up with them when capacity shrinks.
Although the basic recipe for transportation management is already resource-intensive for both shippers and carriers, some successful shippers have taken the extra time and effort to investigate how to work with their carriers to reduce network costs and raise efficiencies. "Carrier relationships will be vital to shippers as they narrow their carrier base and leverage the available volume in a slow-growing economy," says NBTY's Clouden. "Frequent communication, metrics-driven performance analysis, and quarterly business reviews will become standard in carrier and shipper relations."
As Clouden suggests, the days of simply meeting around the negotiation table to talk about rate increases and benchmarks should give way to reviews of which components of the network work well, which don't, and what improvements can be made.
A new recipe for success
With a backdrop of increased volatility that drives uncertain returns, together with the tighter credit and increased regulation that are capping capacity, truckload rates may continue on a path of 3-percent to 6-percent increases for the market at large. But that won't be true for everyone. The most effective shippers and carriers have found that they must regularly re-examine their entire network and the inefficiencies and opportunities that arise within them. Only then can they reallocate capacity to where it will best be used, work to remove inefficiencies (such as clogged yards, long unloading times, and long payment terms), and minimize the empty miles in their respective networks.
Clouden summarizes this new recipe for success: "The [truck transportation] sourcing process will continue to be more strategic and confined to more financially strong service providers with a broader footprint and multimodal offerings. The willingness of carriers to form stronger partnerships with shippers and share in the savings by offering a greater value proposition will be more critical over the next 18 months when [shippers are] sourcing transportation providers."
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.