Third-party logistics providers (3PLs) are playing an increasingly important role in guiding shippers through today’s volatile supply chain environment.
As supply chains grow more complex and prone to disruptions, more and more companies are turning to third-party logistics providers (3PLs) for help. 3PLs can provide a whole host of distribution and fulfillment services for their clients from warehousing and inventory management to shipping and receiving, transportation management and freight brokerage, and returns management.
The resources, expertise, relationships, and assets that a 3PL offers can help companies better navigate dramatic shifts in demand, capacity constraints, transportation network congestion, and labor issues. Indeed, many 3PLs have moved far beyond simple storage and transportation services and are assuming more of a consultative role with their clients, helping them design and shape their supply chain.
As 3PLs take on more of a partnership role, it becomes even more crucial for shippers to understand the value and benefits that a 3PL can provide as well as what characteristics to look for when selecting one. Toward this end, CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly assembled a panel of experts to share some of their insights about the 3PL market: Bobby Clements, Allan J. Miner, and Johann Strauss. Bobby Clements is the vice president of UPS Global Logistics Products and Services for UPS Supply Chain Solutions. Allan J. Miner is the president of the third-party logistics provider CT Logistics. Johann Strauss is the key account manager of KION Group, which supplies forklifts and warehouse equipment for many 3PL companies.
Bobby Clements, Vice President of UPS Global Logistics Products and Services, UPS Supply Chain Solutions
Allan Miner, President, CT Logistics
Johann Strauss, Key Account Manager, KION Group
Q: What is the business case for when a company should work with a 3PL partner?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: There are many different reasons—or “compelling events” as we call them—why companies outsource their logistics and supply chain activities. There are around 20 of them! They usually stem from a combination of challenges pertaining to network constraints, operational inefficiencies, or customer dissatisfaction.
For example, some companies have a priority to accelerate growth but have challenges (such as “we are out of space” or “we want to enter a new market we can’t effectively serve today”). For others, they don’t have the capital, or even culture in some cases, to improve operational efficiency, which is critical to running a profitable business (“we need help managing labor costs” or “we don’t have the expertise to support investments in technology and automation”). In a recent study we commissioned, managing labor costs was the No. 1 reason cited for seeking help from a 3PL. And others understand that driving brand loyalty requires them to consistently deliver exceptional quality—fulfilling orders accurately, quickly, and on time.
Most companies that outsource recognize the need to focus on core strengths, like sourcing, marketing, selling, and taking care of their customers, and leaving logistics to the experts.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: On the transportation side, when a company loses key “traffic” or “transportation” managers or supervisors who oversee daily inbound and outbound shipment activity for all plants, DCs/warehouses, and customer deliveries, it makes sense to outsource the role to a third party.
Johann Strauss–KION Group: It is difficult to have one 3PL business case that fits it all. Some companies simply want to focus on their core activity and not be bothered about the daily moving of their products. Others want to benefit from the 3PL’s relationships and bargaining power to reduce overall logistic costs and generate savings. In-house logistics is linked to a significant investment in labor, equipment, and real estate. 3PL companies have the expertise, technology, and competencies to develop the best solution for the customer.
Q: What should be the main criteria in selecting the right 3PL?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: Customers want to know that the 3PL has the right network, capabilities, and expertise to meet their needs. But in my experience, it eventually comes down to trust. In a true partnership, companies need to be able to share their vision for the company, and both parties must be transparent with one another, have frequent and open communication, and have common goals. They need to work together to solve problems and work toward continuous improvement. Without trust, the relationship will undoubtably fail sooner or later.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: The main criteria should be whether there is synergy between the 3PL’s operational, day-to-day staff who are managing your business and your own key daily operational traffic/transportation personnel—the ones who are in constant contact with these key 3PL line staff members. In addition to that synergy, the 3PL should have 24/7 staffing for any and all “hot” loads that need to be expedited.
Q: What advantages do 3PLs bring to companies entering new markets?
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: 3PLs can provide competent, previous experience in those new markets so that all the local groundwork for effective communication and management relationships are in-place.
Q: With rising inflation, can a 3PL lower overall distribution costs?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: We experience the same inflationary challenges that other companies do. But modern 3PLs are better equipped at managing controllable costs than most companies.
Traditionally, labor could range from 50% to more than 60% of fulfillment costs. UPS has invested millions of dollars in robotics, material handling equipment, and warehouse execution and control systems to improve productivity and reduce reliance on manual labor, while improving order accuracy at the same time. And because most of our customers are in multi-client facilities on one of our campuses, we are able to flex labor across multiple clients and buildings.
UPS is also able to offer competitive pay and benefits to our employees, which helps drive down attrition and training costs.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: The current inflation picture presents a challenge for all 3PLs. However, their customers will find that using the distribution centers/warehouses in a 3PL’s current network will help them reduce their capital and/or operational costs. Consolidating and optimizing assets is the key to cutting costs, and using a 3PL can help with that. Additionally, a 3PL can help its clients cut costs by actively reviewing and rebidding all transportation and distribution contracts and agreements as they expire.
Q: In times of ongoing stress on supply chains, how can a 3PL help clients meet their customer service commitments?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: One way that 3PLs can help improve customer service is by providing good visibility tools that allow clients to see where their goods are at any point and alert them of problems so that the 3PL and/or customer can take proactive measures to correct them. UPS, for example, has a visibility tool called UPS Supply Chain Symphony that provides end-to-end visibility of the supply chain that give customers access to their inbound, in stock, and outbound orders on a single system.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: One way that a 3PL can help with customer service is by locating their product(s) in closer proximity to their client, so that smaller quantities can be shipped more frequently to the client’s customers at a reduced cost. Shorter transit times will increase service levels.
Johann Strauss–KION Group: A 3PL needs preparation and anticipation in order to help its clients meet their customer service requirements. With inventory and goods moving and evolving fast, having clear and transparent communication between the 3PL and its customer is important. If a need comes up quickly, it is important to have the right operators and mobile equipment on hand or quickly available.
Q: How can 3PLs help companies meet their needs during a tight labor market?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: In our warehouse network, UPS employs thousands of people. We operate dedicated and multi-client facilities on each of our main campus sites. Not only does this give us access to a large labor force, it allows us to flex that labor across our facilities and individual clients. In addition, as previously mentioned, our investments in automation and robotics help us maximize our existing workforce.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics: In terms of carrier contract negotiations and management, the 3PL can put staff onsite at your facility, if absolutely mandatory, or they can create a dedicated 3PL staffer to manage the company’s shipment needs from a remote location. In other cases, these 3PL staffers can be in charge of more than one client at a time.
Johann Strauss–KION Group: The core costs for a 3PL company are labor, facilities, and mobile equipment. Working with quality machines can help 3PL providers attract and retain quality personnel and reduce sick leave for back problems, for example. (One of the most common issues.) When selecting mobile equipment, 3PL companies can focus on more ergonomic machines to help retain employees. Linde Material Handling, for example, has designed all its lift trucks around the operators. The latest models lead to 50% less operator movements, leading to low operator fatigue and high productivity.
Q: In what ways do 3PLs allow customers to receive the benefits of new systems and technologies without large capital investments?
Bobby Clements–UPS Supply Chain Solutions: For some companies, this is precisely why they outsource. The benefits from advanced technology—including software and automated picking and sorting equipment—are well documented. In addition, new technologies are being introduced at an accelerated pace. At UPS we have developed a technology ecosystem, partnering with companies on the leading edge to ensure our customers have the benefit of the latest technologies without all the investment of R&D and risk of obsolescence. Most companies would rather invest in their products than in warehouses and fulfillment automation. The right 3PL partner can help them do just that.
Allan J. Miner–CT Logistics The 3PL’s capital investments allow them to add and manage a new client’s freight activity under their corporate IT systems and global/company deployment. As a result, the client does not have to spend money on a new system itself.
Johann Strauss–KION Group: Most 3PLs are working with state-of-the art software that help businesses manage their inventory, track transportation routes, and analyze logistic streams. For mobile equipment, many 3PLs are working with advanced telematic solutions to get real-time information about their machines and optimize consumption and usage. The information gathered can be used to reduce operating cost for the end customer. Networking and advanced sensors even enable some machines to act autonomously. A GPRS (ground penetrating radar system) transmission from the machine’s hardware to a cloud solution makes it a very efficient solution that does not require large capital investment. Those savings can be transmitted to the customer.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.