The pandemic supercharged last-mile delivery as stuck-at-home consumers ordered everything from treadmills to computers and furniture for their homes. Now with COVID subsiding, pocketbooks thinner, and inflation rising, is last-mile growth hitting a wall?
Gary Frantz is a contributing editor for CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly and a veteran communications executive with more than 30 years of experience in the transportation and logistics industries. He's served as communications director and strategic media relations counselor for companies including XPO Logistics, Con-way, Menlo Logistics, GT Nexus, Circle International Group, and Consolidated Freightways. Gary is currently principal of GNF Communications LLC, a consultancy providing freelance writing, editorial and media strategy services. He's a proud graduate of the Journalism program at California State University–Chico.
During the pandemic, fitness equipment for the home, computers and monitors, and furniture for newly established home offices filled the trucks of last-mile delivery providers. That, along with consumers relegated to their homes and undertaking all types of home improvement projects, drove last-mile volume growth at a 40% annual pace as over-the-threshold, “big and bulky” deliveries surged.
Fast forward a year. Consumers are still ordering goods for home delivery and installation, but often after visiting a brick-and-mortar store versus going online and filling a digital shopping cart. And while by some accounts, orders of fitness equipment and electronics have “flattened,” consumers have tossed the market a change-up, ordering goods for delivery to hybrid offices, being more selective about what they’re buying for the home, and scaling back on discretionary purchases as inflation raises the costs of virtually everything.
“What [the last-mile market] did in 2020 and ’21 was not reality,” nor was it sustainable, notes Satish Jindel, chief executive officer of shipping analytics firm ShipMatrix. “With [government stimulus payments,] everyone believed there was a Santa. But Santa is real only for children,” he quipped.
Instead, consumers are shifting much, though not all, of their spending back to services, Jindel says, adding: “People want and need human interaction, which is why you find people [doing more] eating out, spending more on travel and entertainment, and going back to the gym” while dialing back on buying big and bulky goods for the home or office.
Residential on a roll
Estes Express Lines, as a less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier, has performed residential deliveries for years, notes Billy Hupp, the company’s executive vice president and chief operating officer. But it’s only been in the last five years that the company has formalized last-mile home delivery as a discrete service, investing in specialized equipment, driver training, and a complementary agent network in locations where Estes doesn’t have a significant presence.
“[During the pandemic,] we delivered more 65-inch TVs than the world could ever use,” joked Hupp. Estes does not itself do the “white glove” in-home delivery and installation service, instead deploying a network of agent-partners to provide those deliveries with two-person teams. The majority of Estes’ home deliveries are “to the threshold” service. “We do help get it in the house or put something in a garage or the backyard, as an accommodation if the customer requests it,” he clarifies. A dedicated customer service team for residential is there to help as well, while Estes’ technology platform texts consumers with real-time updates on the “estimated time of arrival” (ETA).
Like other providers, the company has seen a shift in the types of products going to homes in the past year. Where there once was a preponderance of electronics, fitness equipment, and office furniture, now it’s goods like pavers for a driveway. Patio furniture and backyard play structures. Outdoor grills. Tools and materials for home improvement projects, where the customer orders online and Estes delivers it to the home on behalf of the retailer.
Nationwide, Estes operates from 220 terminals, with a fleet of some 7,500 tractors and 30,000 trailers. As the residential business has grown, so has Estes’ investment in it. Today, Estes deploys some 2,000 lift-gate–equipped units, a combination of straight trucks and 28-foot pup trailers, and 1,000 electric pallet jacks. The carrier has also upped its game on mobile technologies and customer-facing apps that improve visibility and communication. An added benefit of these investments has been driver satisfaction, says Hupp. “Adding lift gates and providing pallet jacks is a real advantage that improves driver’s daily work experience and makes for a better customer experience as well,” he says.
He cites the company’s LTL network, which provides often-needed flexibility and capacity, as another advantage. “When a residential delivery agent gets swamped, we can swing some of that freight into LTL and vice versa,” he notes. And while the overall last-mile home delivery market has flattened somewhat, it remains an in-demand service that will continue to grow. “We’re here to stay,” he says. “We’ve equipped ourselves to be multifaceted in our approach so we can be more flexible, and that’s a competitive advantage.”
The toughest job in trucking
The last-mile, big-and-bulky over-the-threshold business is one of the hardest jobs in trucking from a driver’s standpoint, observes Jeff Abeson, vice president of business development for Ryder. “You’re driving a very large vehicle in residential areas. You’re carrying heavy stuff into people’s homes, goods they’ve spent a lot of money on,” he explains. “And then you’re assembling it and sometimes taking away the old goods that are being replaced.”
Ryder operates a national network of 82 locations that serve as hubs for last-mile home deliveries. And while the market has shown signs of softening, “we are still seeing an incredible amount of volume” of last-mile business, Abeson notes. Companies are still dealing with back orders of goods, balancing and repositioning inventories, and managing through the residual supply chain effects of earlier port delays and rail congestion.
Where future demand is headed is tough to predict. Yet the fact of the matter is that the business of hard goods delivered into the home, in Abeson’s view, has not really slowed. “It’s hard to get your head wrapped around that [post pandemic] … since while many are back in an office, many more people are still working from home.” And because they’re spending so much time in the same space, that’s where they’re making their investments.
The majority of Ryder’s last-mile business is over-the-threshold, in-home deliveries, often with installation, Abeson notes. The infrastructure supporting that service is challenging. It requires systems, physical warehouse capacity, labor resources, and specialized equipment. Variability is constant in a business where “your forecast really is only as good as your customer’s forecast,” he says, adding that Ryder works diligently with its customers to flex capacity to match demand.
The biggest focus for Ryder, Abeson says, is continued material investments in technology evolving around the end consumer. “It could be as simple as scheduling a delivery and putting an appointment automatically on [the customer’s] calendar, then sending them text updates. It gives the customer confidence we’ve scheduled them and are following up,” he says. Such technologies “reduce inefficiency because we’re more predictable and we’re delivering the first time more often.” Speed to the customer also is high on the list. To enable quick deliveries, Ryder’s customers are forward-stocking fast-moving SKUs (stock-keeping units) at Ryder facilities. “We are all being conditioned in that way” to expect fast deliveries, he says.
One continuing wrench in the works, a holdover from the pandemic: supply chain delays creating partial orders. “You bought a table and six chairs, but only the table is in the warehouse,” Abeson explains. “You’re not interested in just getting the table. You want the whole order at one time. So, from an operator’s perspective, we have to account for how that affects warehouse space and labor, driver labor, and scheduling. Many of our customers’ supply chains continue to be challenged in this way, but we just have to manage it and support our customers.”
Flat volumes, changing mix
Fernando Rabel, interim president of last mile for RXO—a digital truck brokerage that was spun off from XPO as an independent company this fall—sees two immediate effects on last-mile logistics from the post-pandemic environment. “First, the increase in operating costs has been significant and impactful. Second, high inflation has impacted the overall market for furniture and appliances.”
And while RXO’s delivery volumes remain relatively flat compared with a two-year average, Rabel believes the company is well-positioned to capture even more share of the $16 billion last-mile logistics market.
“We’re seeing the typical cyclicality one would expect, with appliances more resilient than bedding, furniture, and fitness equipment,” he says. “By 2025, heavy and bulky penetration is expected to increase to nearly 30% of all e-commerce. We expect in the long term that this tailwind will drive continued demand for last-mile services.”
Rabel notes that RXO’s last-mile service covers 159 markets, with its network putting it within 125 miles of 90% of the U.S. population. The company handled more than 11 million deliveries last year.
No more white boards and spreadsheets
Roadie, a company that utilizes a crowdsourced network of drivers to make same-day deliveries and which is now part of UPS, is also seeing shifts in its business. According to its chief operating officer, Dennis Moon, shipper supply chains continue to evolve in an effort to get product closer to the customer. “That’s everyone’s holy grail,” he says.
Roadie has an advantage in that type of business environment, according to Moon, because of “the scalability of our platform and its flexibility to move up and down with a customer’s volumes.”
Lately, Moon has also seen a shift in the types of products Roadie drivers are delivering. “We are seeing a lot of lift in the medical area—everything from crutches to wheelchairs. Prescription and medical deliveries are one of our largest growth areas,” he says.
The company is also doing more shipment consolidation to gain density. Before, one of Roadie’s “on the way” drivers might make one pickup and deliver it. Now through sophisticated technology, they are doing more batching and consolidating, which is good for drivers, who can make more money, and good for shippers, who benefit from a better rate.
Technology advances and innovation also are driving more responsive operations and customer service for last-mile carriers. End-user consumers want an Uber-like experience that gives them flexible delivery options, up-to-the-minute visibility into shipment status, and an immediate feedback loop post-delivery. New cloud-based, low-cost systems are rising to the challenge, bringing sophisticated tools that once were the domain of the large players to smaller operators.
Krishna Vattipalli is chief executive of software developer Fleet Enable, which provides a platform and workstreams that help last-mile fleets wean themselves off manual workflows and drive better processes. He says that many small to mid-sized operators are using at least four different systems—including spreadsheets and even white boards—to plan and run their business. Fleet Enable provides a single-source solution for last-mile delivery fleets, optimizing 16 workflows in the lifecycle of an order, including appointment scheduling, route and capacity optimization, visibility tracking and alerts, asset forecasting, payroll, and billing and invoicing.
Even with companies bringing workers back to the office, there are still many working from home or on a hybrid schedule. That’s extending demand for big-and-bulky last-mile service into business-to-business (B2B) markets, complementing business-to-consumer (B2C) deliveries. That, along with a continued demand for speed and convenience, is one reason last-mile delivery will continue to grow, Vattipalli believes. “Technology these days is no longer a differentiator; it is a basic requirement,” he says. “Carriers need to be smart about their investments in technology. That will help them achieve better margins and give them an edge to negotiate better with shippers.”
Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared in the December 2022 issue of DC Velocity.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.