The ratio of U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of GDP hasn't changed in two years. Costs should continue to hold steady as the economy struggles to gain momentum.
If you had to sum up the state of U.S. business logistics costs in just a few words, you might do well to borrow a phrase that was well-known to drivers of an earlier era: stuck in neutral. That's because logistics costs as a percentage of the overall U.S. economy in 2012 came in at 8.5 percent, exactly the same as in the previous year.
U.S. business logistics costs did rise in 2012, to $1.33 trillion, an increase of US $43 billion from 2011. But that increase—less than half of the increase seen in 2011—paralleled the overall growth in the sluggish economy. In other words, the freight logistics sector was growing at the same rate as the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP).
Article Figures
[Figure 1] U.S. logistics costs as a percentage of GDPEnlarge this image
[Figure 2] Calculation of 2012 logistics costs (in U.S. $ billions)Enlarge this image
That and other findings indicative of slow growth for at least the next few years prompted transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson to choose Is This the New Normal? as the title for the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals' 24th Annual "State of Logistics Report," sponsored by Penske Logistics. The longest-running study in the field, the report provides an accepted measure for quantifying the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. (For more about the report, see the sidebar.)
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For more than two decades, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Currently the report is authored by transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This year's report was sponsored by Penske Logistics.
CSCMP members can download the complete 24th Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase the report from CSCMP's online bookstore.
The report measures logistics costs against the U.S. GDP, a ratio often cited as a measurement of the supply chain's efficiency in moving the United States' output of goods. A ratio below 10 percent traditionally was viewed as a sign that the nation's logistics managers were keeping costs under control and boosting operational efficiency. Since the Great Recession of 2007-2009, however, a low ratio has signified a decline in shipping expenditures and transportation costs that correlates to sluggish economic activity. In fact, the lowest point ever recorded in the 30-year history of the report was a ratio of 7.8 percent in 2009. (The "State of Logistics Report" was first issued in 1989, but the first edition included data dating back to 1981.) Figure 1 shows logistics costs as a percentage of GDP for the most recent 10-year period.
Carrying costs, inventory up slightly
The report breaks down overall logistics expenditures into three major components: inventory carrying costs, transportation costs, and administrative costs.
Inventory carrying costs rose in 2012 to $434 billion—a 4-percent hike from 2011. Carrying costs reflect the amount of interest paid on inventory, the expenses for holding inventory in storage (taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance), and warehousing costs. (See Figure 2.)
The value of the nation's business inventories (which includes agriculture, mining, construction, services, manufacturing, and wholesale and retail trade) rose to almost $2.3 trillion last year. In her report, Wilson pointed out that U.S. business inventories rose in three out of the four quarters last year. (See Figure 3.) All three subcategories of inventory (retail, wholesale, and manufacturing) climbed in 2012. Retail inventories increased 8.3 percent, far higher than those for wholesale (3.8 percent) and manufacturing (1.3 percent).
Although inventory levels rose, interest rates did not. In fact, the interest component of carrying costs declined by 6.9 percent, according to Wilson. That's because the cost of capital, as measured by the commercial paper rate, declined. The commercial paper rate, which reflects the interest businesses pay to borrow short-term capital, reached near-historic lows, falling from .13 percent in 2011 to .11 percent in 2012. Had it not been for the low cost of capital, Wilson noted, the growth in inventory levels would have caused carrying costs to rise.
Interestingly, the retail inventory-to-sales ratio, which indicates how well retailers are balancing stock with sales, rose in the latter half of 2012. During the Great Recession in 2009, that ratio skyrocketed to 1.49. During the first four months of 2012, it stabilized at 1.26, indicating that sales and inventory were fairly well balanced, Wilson wrote. By year's end, however, flagging sales had caused it to inch up to 1.28. (See Figure 4.)
Taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance rose 2.6 percent in 2012 to reach $302 billion. Wilson said that hike was directly related to the growth in inventories.
The final component of inventory carrying costs—warehousing expenses—totaled $130 billion in 2012, up 7.6 percent from 2011. In her report, Wilson noted that lease rates for warehouses have risen, indicating a recovery in this sector. Although new construction has increased available inventory, occupancy rates for warehousing have continued to rise.
Transportation costs in check
Transportation, the second major component of U.S. logistics costs, rose only 3 percent in 2012. Transportation costs totaled $836 billion last year, up from $821 billion in 2011. Wilson said that transportation costs increased modestly because of weak and inconsistent shipment volumes and strong pressure to restrain rates. As a result, transportation accounted for 5.4 percent of overall GDP in 2012—well below the historic norm of approximately 6 percent.
Trucking costs, the largest component in the transportation sector, totaled $647 billion in 2012. Intercity motor carriage, at $445 billion, accounted for about two-thirds of that amount, while local motor freight (which includes delivery services) reached $202 billion.
Truck tonnage rose 2.3 percent, and utilization rates "are at all-time highs," Wilson noted in the report. Those are two of several factors suggesting that the trucking industry is on the brink of serious capacity problems. Another is the new Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FCSA) hours-of-service (HOS) rules, which reduce maximum weekly driving time. According to various estimates, that could potentially reduce driver capacity by 2 to 5 percent, and could cause productivity to decline by between 2 and 10 percent, Wilson said. Additional new rules on medical certifications and drug testing could further shrink the pool of eligible drivers. Put that together with difficulties in recruiting and retaining drivers, and it's estimated the industry currently needs 30,000 more drivers, she said.
Spending on rail services, the second largest component of transportation costs, amounted to $72 billion last year. That's up 4.9 percent, a modest increase compared to the 16-percent spike in 2011. Intermodal volume was the second highest on record, providing competition that helped to keep down motor carrier rates. Although intermodal fared well, bulk rail shipping did not: total carloads for the year fell 3.1 percent from 2011.
Costs for shipping by water totaled about $35 billion, with international shipping accounting for about $27.5 billion and domestic waterways $7.5 billion. Because of increased vessel capacity, ocean carriers struggled to maintain rate levels, and many engaged in a bidding war over declining cargo volumes. As a result, overall costs for water transportation declined by 0.9 percent in 2012, despite higher rates for some domestic barge shipments brought about by drought-related restrictions on traffic.
As for other transportation components, oil pipelines generated $13 billion. The airfreight industry accounted for $33 billion, an increase of 3.1 percent over 2011, but the industry continues to struggle with profitability due to "chronic overcapacity and deteriorating yields," Wilson observed. Freight forwarders, a category that also includes third-party logistics service providers, brought in $37 billion, an increase of 5.4 percent.
In addition to inventory carrying and transportation costs, two other factors figure in Wilson's computation of business logistics costs. Shipper-related costs, which include the loading and unloading of transportation equipment as well as traffic department operations, totaled $10 billion in 2012, up just 1.8 percent from 2011. Administrative expenses—which are computed by a generally accepted formula that takes the sum of inventory and transportation costs and multiplies it by 4 percent—amounted to $51 billion in 2012, up $2 billion from the prior year.
Slow growth is the "new normal"
As for the future, Wilson said the recovery from the Great Recession has been longer than most economists anticipated. In the past, consumers spurred economic recoveries, but this time consumers, who lost ground financially during the downturn, have little confidence in the economy. Most Americans are "still holding tight to their paychecks, spending most of that on necessities," she said.
Although manufacturing had been a bright spot following the Great Recession, sustaining some growth, that sector too has cooled. Manufacturing grew at 7.4 percent in 2010, then 5 percent in 2011, and last year dropped to 3 percent. Since manufacturing growth has abated, Wilson noted, there is less demand for logistics services.
Where's the U.S. economy going? In Wilson's view the economy is entering a period that could be termed the "new normal," one that's characterized by slow expansion with GDP growth hovering between 2.5 to 4 percent, high unemployment levels, and slower job creation. Given those economic conditions, she expects that both the economy as a whole and the logistics sector will be slow to regain any sustainable momentum, and that growth rates will be uneven for some time to come.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.