In the United States, consumer demand drives the economy. For most supply chain managers, therefore, consumer behavior matters.
And how is the American consumer faring these days? Even in the face of uncertainty—about anticipated economic growth, expected improvements in job prospects, and growth in housing wealth and equity markets—consumers have continued to manage their household finances and spending. But when they do shop, they are less likely to spend their money at traditional brick-and-mortar stores than in the past.
More spending, less saving
Real personal consumption expenditures grew 2.6 percent (annual rate) in the final quarter of 2013—the strongest annual increase since the first quarter of 2012. That growth was not uniform across all sectors, however. Although the fourth quarter saw stronger-than-usual spending on nondurable goods and services, durable goods spending was weaker than expected. Some of the added strength in nondurables was weather-related—spending on clothing, heating oil, natural gas services, and electricity increased—because November and December were unseasonably cold.
For the full year 2013, real consumer spending growth came in at 2.0 percent, the weakest showing since 2010. Real disposable income, meanwhile, grew a measly 0.7 percent, the weakest growth since 2009. Both are shown in Figure 1. The payroll-tax cut that expired in January 2013 took 2 percentage points out of households' paychecks and approximately 1 percent out of disposable income. With less after-tax income, many Americans put less money aside, sending the savings rate down to 4.5 percent in 2013, the lowest since 2007. (See Figure 2.)
Despite the weak growth in disposable income and spending during 2013, the average monthly reading of the Reuters/University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index for the year was the highest since 2007. Indeed, consumers had some encouraging news in 2013, as the housing market gained traction, job prospects improved, and inflation remained relatively subdued.
Housing strength and consumer spending
Housing prices and sales gained significant traction in 2013, although they are still below their 2006 peaks. The relatively strong housing numbers helped boost consumer spending in two ways. First, new and existing home sales are associated with increased purchases of "white goods" (home appliances, such as refrigerators, dryers, and washers). And second, the so-called "wealth effect" also had an impact. Many economists believe that people are likely to increase their spending when they "feel" wealthier or when their actual assets (typically real estate and stock holdings) increase in value, and that appeared to be the case in 2013.
In the third quarter of 2012 household net worth surpassed its previous peak, registered in the third quarter of 2007, by US $511.5 billion. By the fourth quarter of 2010, household financial asset holdings surpassed its previous peak, also set in the third quarter of 2007. In addition, household nonfinancial asset holdings (mostly real estate) are likely to surpass their previous peak, registered in the first quarter of 2007, during the second quarter of 2014.
Then again, not all wealth is created equal. Econometric research by Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller clearly indicates that an increase in real housing wealth has a stronger impact on consumer spending than does an increase in financial wealth. Rates of home ownership are still elevated in the United States, so gains in housing wealth are distributed more widely through the economy. Since the fourth quarter of 2012 and through the third quarter of 2013, household nonfinancial asset growth outpaced the growth of household financial assets. In fact, year-over-year quarterly growth in household nonfinancial assets was in the 9.3-percent to 10.2-percent range in every quarter of 2013. Thus, due to higher household wealth, consumer spending kept pace with 2012 despite anemic increases in disposable income.
A few other indicators suggest that consumers' prospects may be improving somewhat. For instance, wage gains have started to outpace price increases on a year-over-year basis, mostly because price increases were very modest. (See Figure 3.) This helps consumers' budgets, as they are able to maintain a certain level of purchasing power. Both job opportunities and the unemployment rate improved in 2013; however, declines in the unemployment rate were mostly attributable to many people leaving the labor force.
Lackluster holiday retail sales
Holiday retail sales—defined as not seasonally adjusted November plus December retail sales less autos, gasoline, and food services—increased 3.3 percent in 2013 compared to 2012. Any increase is a boost to the economy, but last year's growth was the weakest since 2009.
"Black Friday" week (the busy holiday shopping period immediately following Thanksgiving) was not particularly stellar on the brick-and-mortar front. In fact, many retailers experienced an inventory build-up in November due to lackluster sales. Moreover, many retailers introduced heavy price discounting in order to lure shoppers into their stores, hoping to increase revenue by bringing in more foot traffic and generating more sales even as their per-unit margins were hurt. In addition, slower growth in many emerging markets and eurozone economies has kept global commodity and import prices relatively muted. Consumer goods prices, excluding food and energy, fell on a year-over-year basis every month in the last two quarters of 2013.
Looking ahead
Retailers whose profitability took a strong hit last year are unlikely to discount as heavily in the last quarter of 2014 as they did during the holiday season of 2013. In addition, they are likely to keep inventory holdings on the low side next holiday season to minimize the risk of engaging in excessive price discounting in order to move product if sales are weak.
The outlook for online retailing is more upbeat, however. E-commerce retail sales represented 6 percent of retail trade (total retail sales less food services) in the fourth quarter of 2013 and are likely to grow to 7.0 percent of retail trade by 2016.
In sum, although retail supply chain managers should see relatively robust purchasing activity by American consumers this year, retail chains will be very cautious with their inventory stocking levels. With online sales growth expected to outpace the growth of traditional in-store sales, 2014 could turn out to be a challenging year for retail store supply chains, especially in the last two quarters of the year.
Business software vendor Cleo has acquired DataTrans Solutions, a cloud-based procurement automation and EDI solutions provider, saying the move enhances Cleo’s supply chain orchestration with new procurement automation capabilities.
According to Chicago-based Cleo, the acquisition comes as companies increasingly look to digitalize their procurement processes, instead of relying on inefficient and expensive manual approaches.
By buying Texas-based DataTrans, Cleo said it will gain an expanded ability to help businesses streamline procurement, optimize working capital, and strengthen supplier relationships. Specifically, by integrating DTS’s procurement automation capabilities, Cleo will be able to provide businesses with solutions including: a supplier EDI & testing portal; web EDI & PDF digitization; and supplier scorecarding & performance tracking.
“Cleo’s vision is to deliver true supply chain orchestration by bridging the gap between planning and execution,” Cleo President and CEO Mahesh Rajasekharan said in a release. “With DTS’s technology embedded into CIC, we’re empowering procurement teams to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and minimize supply chain risks—all through automation.”
And many of them will have a budget to do it, since 51% of supply chain professionals with existing innovation budgets saw an increase earmarked for 2025, suggesting an even greater emphasis on investing in new technologies to meet rising demand, Kenco said in its “2025 Supply Chain Innovation” survey.
One of the biggest targets for innovation spending will artificial intelligence, as supply chain leaders look to use AI to automate time-consuming tasks. The survey showed that 41% are making AI a key part of their innovation strategy, with a third already leveraging it for data visibility, 29% for quality control, and 26% for labor optimization.
Still, lingering concerns around how to effectively and securely implement AI are leading some companies to sidestep the technology altogether. More than a third – 35% – said they’re largely prevented from using AI because of company policy, leaving an opportunity to streamline operations on the table.
“Avoiding AI entirely is no longer an option. Implementing it strategically can give supply chain-focused companies a serious competitive advantage,” Kristi Montgomery, Vice President, Innovation, Research & Development at Kenco, said in a release. “Now’s the time for organizations to explore and experiment with the tech, especially for automating data-heavy operations such as demand planning, shipping, and receiving to optimize your operations and unlock true efficiency.”
Among the survey’s other top findings:
there was essentially three-way tie for which physical automation tools professionals are looking to adopt in the coming year: robotics (43%), sensors and automatic identification (40%), and 3D printing (40%).
professionals tend to select a proven developer for providing supply chain innovation, but many also pick start-ups. Forty-five percent said they work with a mix of new and established developers, compared to 39% who work with established technologies only.
there’s room to grow in partnering with 3PLs for innovation: only 13% said their 3PL identified a need for innovation, and just 8% partnered with a 3PL to bring a technology to life.
Even as a last-minute deal today appeared to delay the tariff on Mexico, that deal is set to last only one month, and tariffs on the other two countries are still set to go into effect at midnight tonight.
Once new U.S. tariffs go into effect, those other countries are widely expected to respond with retaliatory tariffs of their own on U.S. exports, that would reduce demand for U.S. and manufacturing goods. In the context of that unpredictable business landscape, many U.S. business groups have been pressuring the White House to pull back from the new policy.
Here is a sampling of the reaction to the tariff plan by the U.S. business community:
American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA)
“Tariffs are taxes,” AAPA President and CEO Cary Davis said in a release. “Though the port industry supports President Trump’s efforts to combat the flow of illicit drugs, tariffs will slow down our supply chains, tax American businesses, and increase costs for hard-working citizens. Instead, we call on the Administration and Congress to thoughtfully pursue alternatives to achieving these policy goals and exempt items critical to national security from tariffs, including port equipment.”
Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA)
“We understand the president is working toward an agreement. The leaders of all four nations should come together and work to reach a deal before Feb. 4 because enacting broad-based tariffs will be disruptive to the U.S. economy,” Michael Hanson, RILA’s Senior Executive Vice President of Public Affairs, said in a release. “The American people are counting on President Trump to grow the U.S. economy and lower inflation, and broad-based tariffs will put that at risk.”
National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
“Manufacturers understand the need to deal with any sort of crisis that involves illicit drugs crossing our border, and we hope the three countries can come together quickly to confront this challenge,” NAM President and CEO Jay Timmons said in a release. “However, with essential tax reforms left on the cutting room floor by the last Congress and the Biden administration, manufacturers are already facing mounting cost pressures. A 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico threatens to upend the very supply chains that have made U.S. manufacturing more competitive globally. The ripple effects will be severe, particularly for small and medium-sized manufacturers that lack the flexibility and capital to rapidly find alternative suppliers or absorb skyrocketing energy costs. These businesses—employing millions of American workers—will face significant disruptions. Ultimately, manufacturers will bear the brunt of these tariffs, undermining our ability to sell our products at a competitive price and putting American jobs at risk.”
American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA)
“Widespread tariff actions on Mexico, Canada, and China announced this evening will inject massive costs into our inflation-weary economy while exposing us to a damaging tit-for-tat tariff war that will harm key export markets that U.S. farmers and manufacturers need,” Steve Lamar, AAFA’s president and CEO, said in a release. “We should be forging deeper collaboration with our free trade agreement partners, not taking actions that call into question the very foundation of that partnership."
Healthcare Distribution Alliance (HDA)
“We are concerned that placing tariffs on generic drug products produced outside the U.S. will put additional pressure on an industry that is already experiencing financial distress. Distributors and generic manufacturers and cannot absorb the rising costs of broad tariffs. It is worth noting that distributors operate on low profit margins — 0.3 percent. As a result, the U.S. will likely see new and worsened shortages of important medications and the costs will be passed down to payers and patients, including those in the Medicare and Medicaid programs,” the group said in a statement.
National Retail Federation (NRF)
“We support the Trump administration’s goal of strengthening trade relationships and creating fair and favorable terms for America,” NRF Executive Vice President of Government Relations David French said in a release. “But imposing steep tariffs on three of our closest trading partners is a serious step. We strongly encourage all parties to continue negotiating to find solutions that will strengthen trade relationships and avoid shifting the costs of shared policy failures onto the backs of American families, workers and small businesses.”
In a statement, DCA airport officials said they would open the facility again today for flights after planes were grounded for more than 12 hours. “Reagan National airport will resume flight operations at 11:00am. All airport roads and terminals are open. Some flights have been delayed or cancelled, so passengers are encouraged to check with their airline for specific flight information,” the facility said in a social media post.
An investigation into the cause of the crash is now underway, being led by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and assisted by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Neither agency had released additional information yet today.
First responders say nearly 70 people may have died in the crash, including all 60 passengers and four crew on the American Airlines flight and three soldiers in the military helicopter after both aircraft appeared to explode upon impact and fall into the Potomac River.
Editor's note:This article was revised on February 3.
GE Vernova today said it plans to invest nearly $600 million in its U.S. factories and facilities over the next two years to support its energy businesses, which make equipment for generating electricity through gas power, grid, nuclear, and onshore wind.
The company was created just nine months ago as a spin-off from its parent corporation, General Electric, with a mission to meet surging global electricity demands. That move created a company with some 18,000 workers across 50 states in the U.S., with 18 U.S. manufacturing facilities and its global headquarters located in Massachusetts. GE Vernova’s technology helps produce approximately 25% of the world’s energy and is currently deployed in more than 140 countries.
The new investments – expected to create approximately 1,500 new U.S. jobs – will help drive U.S. energy affordability, national security, and competitiveness, and enable the American manufacturing footprint needed to support expanding global exports, the company said. They follow more than $167 million in funding in 2024 across a range of GE Vernova sites, helping create more than 1,120 jobs. And following a forecast that worldwide energy needs are on pace to double, GE Vernova is also planning a $9 billion cumulative global capex and R&D investment plan through 2028.
The new investments include:
almost $300 million in support of its Gas Power business and build-out of capacity to make heavy duty gas turbines, for facilities in Greenville, SC, Schenectady, NY, Parsippany, NJ, and Bangor, ME.
nearly $20 million to expand capacity at its Grid Solutions facilities in Charleroi, PA, which manufactures switchgear, and Clearwater, FL, which produces capacitors and instrument transformers.
more than $50 million to enhance safety, quality and productivity at its Wilmington, NC-based GE Hitachi nuclear business and to launch its next generation nuclear fuel design.
nearly $100 million in its manufacturing facilities at U.S. onshore wind factories in Pensacola, FL, Schenectady, NY and Grand Forks, ND, and its remanufacturing facilities in Amarillo, TX.
more than $10 million in its Pittsburgh, PA facility to expand capabilities across its Electrification segment, adding U.S. manufacturing capacity to support the U.S. grid, and demand for solar and energy storage
almost $100 million for its energy innovation research hub, the Advanced Research Center in Niskayuna, NY, to strengthen the center’s electrification and carbon efforts, enable continued recruitment of top-tier talent, and push forward innovative technologies, including $15 million for Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) work.
“These investments represent our serious commitment and responsibility as the leading energy manufacturer in the United States to help meet America’s and the world’s accelerating energy demand,” Scott Strazik, CEO of GE Vernova, said in a release. “These strategic investments and the jobs they create aim to both help our customers meet the doubling of demand and accelerate American innovation and technology development to boost the country’s energy security and global competitiveness.”