Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

REFLECTIONS

We’re not in Kansas anymore

Markets—both on the demand side and the supply side—are shifting. We need to figure out how to react, in real time.

SCQ21_Q3_reflections600x314.jpg

In August, my ten-year-old car gave up the ghost. But I wasn’t too worried; I knew—or should I say I thought I knew—how to get a deal on a car. 

Then I tried to buy a new car. 


At first everything seemed normal. At the first dealer, I sat down with the sales agent. The conversation began as I had remembered. Cup of coffee, a basic sales qualification interview, out for a test drive, then back to the agent’s desk, where we continued the conversation. I laid out the vehicle options I wanted that were in my budget. 

The agent smiled, “You don’t understand, Steve. That vehicle you drove is the only vehicle we have in the model you want. We’re expecting our next allocation in a couple of weeks, but right now that car is what we have. If you want to buy that model, that’s what I have.”

Sigh. Guessing that specific brand had a global supply chain problem, I sat down outside to regroup. I used my phone to find an alternative automaker with an SUV that might work for me. After a few minutes of research, I found a dealer that had over a dozen of a model in the class I needed.

I went there. After test driving that car, I understood why that dealer had so much inventory. Scratch that brand from my candidate list.

I moved on to the third brand. Drove a car that I liked but found the same problem as I had at the first dealership. No inventory. The only car they had was the one I test drove. It had every option possible, but even at list price, it was thousands of dollars above my budget.

I felt like Dorothy in “The Wizard of Oz” realizing she wasn’t in Kansas anymore. Those might have looked like traditional car dealerships, but they were operating in a market that was far from traditional. We were in a whole new reality.

As The New York Times reported in April, “Around the world, auto assembly lines are going quiet, workers are idle, and dealership parking lots are looking bare. A shortage of semiconductors, the tiny but critical chips used to calibrate cars’ fuel injection, run infotainment systems, or provide the brains for cruise control, has upended automaking.”

Do you remember the old advertising campaign with the tagline, “This is not your father’s Oldsmobile?” Well, today’s automotive supply chain isn’t your father’s distribution network either. There is a new dynamic in play.

The great mismatch

It was at this point that I finally realized that my challenge wasn’t a negotiation problem. It was a supply-and-demand mismatch problem. 

The auto industry isn’t the only one dealing with this issue. We are all facing a version of the supply-and-demand mismatch problem.

Consider what is happening with the transportation market. Currently hundreds of container ships are lining up for access to overloaded ports. Meanwhile on dry land, truck driver shortages have made it hard to transport the products from those ships to their destinations. Even finding available shipping containers where you need them can be daunting.

Each of these problems is a supply-and-demand mismatch.

In the October 1 issue of The Guardian, Matt Stoller describes this dynamic as “a quiet panic happening in the U.S. economy.” “Medical labs are running out of supplies like pipettes and petri dishes,” he writes, “summer camps and restaurants are having trouble getting food, and automobile, paint, and electronics firms are curtailing production because they can’t get semiconductors. One man told me he couldn’t get a Whopper meal at a Burger King in Florida, as there was a sign saying ‘Sorry, no french fries with any order. We have no potatoes.’”

Those are all supply-and-demand mismatches.

Change the problem

My faculty advisor in graduate school was a wise man of few words. He once told me, “If you can’t solve the problem, change the problem.”

I needed a car. I couldn’t change that. Dealers were short of new cars in inventory, I couldn’t change that either. Furthermore, the price of used cars has spiked, as consumers turn to the secondhand market in response to the shortage. 

Then I remembered visiting Baltimore Harbor not long ago and seeing a massive roll-on/roll-off ship delivering cars. New cars destined for dealers, rolled off into a parking lot. That memory held the answer to my new car buying dilemma. Rather than buying a car out of inventory, I should shop the inbound vehicles.

And that’s what happened. The dealer reviewed the inbound inventory with me, I found the car I wanted, and signed the deal. Five days later the car showed up at my home, with plates, registration, and insurance.

In the wake of recent global events—the pandemic, Brexit, the Suez Canal, container shortages, driver shortages—supply chain professionals can feel like they are playing a continuous game of whack-a-mole. Market dynamics are going to continue to ripple for the near future, if not longer. When this happens, it helps to step back, think about the flow, and find the point of leverage.

Even in chaos, there is opportunity. Be the supply chain leader who can adapt, improvise, and overcome. 

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less