Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

REFLECTIONS

Supply chain management in today’s post-pandemic world

In our world’s new normal, disruption to supply chains seems to be a permanent fixture.

COVID hit trade supply chain networks hard. Well-understood demand patterns evaporated. Ports jammed up with legacy flows while simultaneously coping with new and unexpected spikes. International trade ground to a crawl. According to the think tank Initiative for a Competitive Inner City (ICIC), COVID hit some industries harder than others. The most disrupted segments include retail, manufacturing, accommodations, and food services—including hotels, restaurants, and similar businesses. The ripples from these segments washed across all areas of the economy.

Three years have passed since the darkest days of the pandemic. Many have returned to the office, perhaps still working from home a few days each week. Restaurants have reopened. Some believe we are back to normal. 


We may have arrived at the new normal, but in this new normal, disruption to supply chains seems to be a permanent fixture. 

Five volatile years

Even before COVID hit, global supply chains and international trade had been roiled by volatility and upheaval. In 2018, former President Donald Trump started trade wars around the world, not only with China but also with U.S. allies, like Canada and Mexico. Each battle has used a different U.S. legal rationale, such as calling some imports a national security threat. Trump followed up by imposing tariffs or quotas on imports. Subsequent retaliation by trading partners and the prospect of further escalation hampered trade and investment. This put various global trade segments under pressure.

Then, in 2020, toward the end of Trump’s tenure, COVID erupted. According to the University of Southern California’s Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, “From 2020 to 2023, the cumulative net economic output of the United States will amount to about $103 trillion. Without the pandemic, the total of gross domestic product over those four years would have been $117 trillion—nearly 14% higher in inflation-adjusted 2020 dollars, according to our analysis.”

The hits—albeit unrelated hits—kept coming. During the latter days of the COVID epidemic, long-standing tensions in Ukraine went from simmer to boil. In the spring of 2021, Russia began what President Vladimir Putin described as a “training exercise,” building up troops on the border with Ukraine. By the end of that year, analysts using satellite imagery estimated over 100,000 Russian troops were poised at the border. In December, using the massed forces as an implicit threat, Putin demanded NATO’s withdrawal from Eastern Europe, along with a promise to never allow Ukraine to join NATO. 

Just as the final big COVID wave tailed off in early 2022, Ukraine went into full crisis. By the end of February, the U.S. had sent additional combat troops to Eastern Europe, NATO put forces on standby, and Western formations moved forward in Poland and Romania. At the end of February, Putin authorized his “special military operations” against Ukraine, and the attack began, with bullets and missiles still flying almost two years later. 

Far from easing, conflict around the globe only seems to be heating up. In October, war erupted between Israel and Hamas, causing an unexpected and seismic dislocation in the Middle East. What effect these most recent events will have on the global supply chain remains to be seen.

At the same time that these geopolitical conflicts have been flaring up, tensions with United States’ largest trade relationship have also risen. The Trump administration’s tariffs on Chinese imports remained active and were subsequently buttressed by the Biden administration. The U.S. Department of Commerce expanded sanctions on Chinese companies, like the widely publicized restrictions on telecommunications company Huawei as well as drone maker DJI and genomics company BGI Genomics. Export controls hit chip makers Nvidia, Yangtze Memory Technologies, and ChangXin Memory Technologies. There are now over one hundred individuals and organizations under restrictions or sanctions.

Congress is an active partner in efforts to “decouple” from China. The CHIPS and Science Act aims to restrict technology transfer to China and stimulate firms to invest in the United States. The Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which supersedes a series of individual import bans, is also discouraging U.S. businesses from sourcing products from China.

Unfortunately, the blight extends beyond China. In response to the war in Ukraine, the U.S. Department of Commerce has enacted stringent trade restrictions and sanctions on Russia. And Turkey’s international straddle across NATO and Russia has landed it on some restrictions list as well. It’s complicated, to say the least.

Volatility is the result

As the flow of goods from Russia and China into America declines, imports are growing from nearly every United States ally. Mexico and Canada have each individually surpassed China as the U.S.’ leading sources of imported goods. The European Union’s trade with Russia dropped dramatically after the Ukrainian invasion, and the EU is now also trying to reduce risk by shrinking reliance on China. 

Assessing the state of global supply chains in 2023, the consulting company KPMG’s Global Operations Centre of Excellence published a report identifying The Supply Chain Trends Shaking Up 2023. Geopolitical disruption and volatility lie at the root of many of the trends detailed in the report, including nations being skeptical of cross-border trade cooperation, turmoil around access to key materials, and manufacturing footprints changing shape. The report asserts that, “Disruptions to supply chain operations are set to stay in 2023, whether they be existing or new geopolitical conflicts, inflationary pressures and the recessionary environment, climate change weather events, or other issues yet to emerge.” 

In the face of all this volatility, conventional wisdom is evolving rapidly. Thirty years ago, Ross Perot talked about “the giant sucking sound” of manufacturing moving out of the United States. Now, the trend is moving the other way, with contemporary nearshoring and reshoring efforts reversing the flow. Supply chain networks are simplifying, and organizations are again learning the difference between “low cost” and “best cost.” For years, most companies focused on building low-cost supply chains with the primary goal being to present a low price to customers. Now, more companies are realizing they need to adopt a best-cost strategy that adds factors beyond cost to the equation, like risk, lead time, and responsiveness.

Global tensions and the resultant uncertainties are the risks to be managed in this new normal where disruptions are a permanent fixture. To survive we must all adopt the mantra, “Adapt. Improvise. Overcome.” We live in interesting times.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less