Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

No, AI has not killed supply chain management

Some have argued that supply chain management is on its way to becoming obsolete. Recent events would seem suggest otherwise.

Almost three years ago, Harvard Business Review published a provocative article entitled The Death of Supply Chain Management. It became as viral as an article on Supply Chain Management can be, circulating widely on Twitter and LinkedIn.  The authors posited that the advent of Industry 4.0 technologies, the digitalization of data, and the growth of advanced analytics, machine learning and AI would mean that “within 5-10 years, the supply chain function may be obsolete, replaced by a smoothly running, self-regulating utility that … requires very little human intervention.”

That’s not how things have turned out so far.  It seems that more than ever, the supply chain manager is a critical contributor to the performance of their company.


The Pandemic That Changed Everything

The obvious place to start considering why is the pandemic that has upended supply chains around the world for the past year.  With lockdowns changing consumer behavior, some of the weaknesses of hyper-optimized supply chains have been exposed. From toilet paper manufacturing that could not easily switch between industrial and residential formats to eggs and flour prepared and packaged in separate streams for consumers and commercial needs, many supply chains struggled to adapt.

The ones that did, however, were because managers collaborated across business silos to remove complexity and focus on key SKUs at the intersection of manufacturing speed and high sales volume. Rather than being obsolete, one senior marketing executive at a major FMCG company told us I knew my supply chain was a key strategic advantage, but I had not realized how much it could be a key tactical advantage as well.”

Another impact of the pandemic was an explosion in e-commerce, leaving companies scrambling to adapt their order treatment and fulfilment activities to meet the demand. With stores closed in many markets, this became a matter of survival, with supply chain front and center. Many companies are now trying to push their omni-channel strategies as a way to build in free supply chain resilience for the future.

Of course, the pandemic was very much unchartered waters for all of us.  But the next time might be an earthquake in Japan, an economic downturn due to a financial crisis, a volcano in Iceland, new trade tariff wars, or even a major global waterway closure.  The recent days-long blockage of the Suez Canal may spur some companies to rethink their global supply chain footprints, both internal and external. This will require careful consideration of the quantifiable cost of freight and customs duties, but also the more nuanced impacts of reactivity, agility and working capital that require a supply chain manager’s participation.

The Supply Chain Spotlight

Even without pandemics and headline-grabbing logistics snafus, supply chains are front-of-mind more than ever. The waves of exciting capabilities brought by Industry 4.0 technologies have impacts beyond the world of supply chain management. Companies leading the way in digital transformation have understood that these technologies are opportunities to rethink their value proposition, for example through personalization, and not merely a way to automate away their supply chains.

The potential impacts of industrial automation and AI have led to discussions about structural change to the economy, jobs and even to society at large. The entrance of supply chain management into the mainstream has gotten the attention of those looking for a  promising career choice. Gartner, the supply chain advisory and research company, has seen the U.S. university masters programs in supply chain in its ranking grow 170% from 2016 to 2020

A Seat at the Table

As much as we would like supply chains to be simple and predictable enough to run themselves, a more achievable goal would be for supply chain mangers to leverage all of the exciting capabilities available to automate the routine, and to build visibility and agility for the next unforeseeable problem.

A recent survey by IMD revealed that the highest priority for supply chain managers was to implement Sales and Operations Planning – a process that requires deep cross-functional collaboration – and integrate the supply chain strategy and the business strategy.  Rather than looking to slot supply chain as an autonomous function, companies are looking more than ever to place it squarely in the boardroom.

Supply Chain Opportunities

Contributing to this spike is the growing interest of consumers, professionals and investors in sustainability and the circular economy.  Many companies look to their supply chains to lead the way in finding solutions to these critical issues. To quote the Head of Strategy from a large multi-national “"We have spoken about end to end supply chain optimization for some years already but the scope, from which end to which end, has changed dramatically for today’s supply chains.

Supply chain executives today, have to navigate ever more complex regulatory (environmental) requirements, give input to IT on how to digitally enable their supply chains and leverage their supply chain a key driver in ongoing business transformations. This way, far from facing death, supply chain managers need to focus on being at the table as an active contributor in shaping the company’s strategic vision. Or, to invoke common wisdom, it’s nice to have a strategy–its far better if you can execute on it and enact it operationally.

Recent

More Stories

digital chain links

How to evaluate blockchain for your supply chain

In 2015, blockchain (the technology that makes digital currencies such as bitcoin work) was starting to be explored as a solution for supply chains. It promised cost savings, increased efficiency, and heightened transparency, among other benefits. For that reason, many companies were happy to run pilots testing blockchain for themselves. Today, these small-scale projects have been replaced by large-scale enterprise adoption of blockchain-based supply chain solutions. There are plenty of choices now for blockchain supply chain products, platforms, and providers. This makes the option to use blockchain available now to nearly everyone in the sector. This wealth of choice does, however, make it more difficult to decide which blockchain integration is best (or, indeed, if your organization needs to use it at all). To find the right blockchain, companies need to consider three factors: cost, sustainability, and the ultimate goal of trying new technology.

Choosing the right blockchain for an enterprise supply chain begins with the most basic consideration: cost. Blockchains work by securely recording “transactions,” and in a supply chain, those transactions are essentially database updates. However, making such updates has varying costs on different chains. If a container moves locations, that entry is updated, and a transaction is recorded. Enterprises need to figure out how many products, containers, or pieces of information they will process daily. Each of these can be considered a transaction. Now, some blockchains cost not even $1 to record a million movements. Other chains can cost thousands of dollars for the same amount of recording. Understanding the amount of activity you will need to record against the cost of transactions is the first place for an enterprise to start when considering blockchain. Ask the provider which blockchain their product is built on, and its average transaction cost. This will help you find the most cost-effective product or integration.

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

A series of blocks. The first block is balanced on the edge so that it shows both "glob" and "loc" the rest of the blocks read "alization" to create the sense of both "globalizaiton" and "localization."

Balancing global sourcing and local availability can improve supply chain resiliency and sustainability.

Prazis Images via Adobe Stock

“Glocalization”: The path for navigating a volatile global supply chain

Over the last two decades, globalization became more intense, and with it, competition among companies and their supply networks. The constant fight for new sources of raw materials at a more competitive cost, the development of suppliers in low-cost countries, and the ability to manage logistic chains have become part of the routine of strategic sourcing.

In today's economic environment, companies are continuously pressured to reduce costs to combat slower growth; to offset increases in material prices, energy, and transportation; and to counterbalance various other pressures, such as inflation. Despite these issues and the economic instability worldwide, companies must continue to differentiate themselves and find growth opportunities to compete in the global marketplace. For example, in order to boost revenues and fuel growth, many companies are now under as much pressure to reduce product life cycles and speed-to-market as they are to find savings and reduce operational costs.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of five trucks connected by lines and hubs to give the appearance of a network.

An advanced transportation management system can help with route optimization, real-time tracking, multimodal management, and predicting potential supply chain challenges.

Georgii courtesy of Adobe Stock

How an advanced TMS optimizes supply chain performance

A transportation management system (TMS) is a critical tool for all supply chain and logistics practitioners. It provides shippers, third-party logistics companies (3PLs), and fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs) with the visibility they need to manage the supply chain and optimize the movement of products and goods. There are various types of transportation management systems, and while using a basic TMS is better than no TMS at all, advanced transportation management systems offer enhanced functionality and can scale with you as your business grows.

Getting the right TMS in place can have considerable benefits, as a TMS helps with planning and executing the movement of goods on a comprehensive level, which aids in reducing the risks of disruptions at every point in the supply chain. Companies that better manage risk will see significant savings. Data from the supply chain risk intelligence company Interos found that of the organizations they surveyed in 2021, the average organization lost $184 million in global supply chain disruptions. Similarly, a McKinsey study found that, within 10 years, the cost of supply chain disruptions adds up to nearly half of a company’s profits.


Keep ReadingShow less
A rusty blue chain crosses in front of blue, red, and yellow containers.

Labor strikes can stop supply chains in their tracks unless companies take steps to build up resiliency.

huntspy via Adobe Stock

Strikes and labor negotiations highlight need for resilient supply chains

Strikes and potential strikes have plagued the supply chain over the last few years. An analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics by the Economics Policy Institute concluded that the number of workers involved in major strike activity increased by 280% in 2023 from 2022. Currently, the U.S. East Coast and Gulf Coast ports are facing the threat of another dockworker strike after they return to the negotiating table in January to attempt to resolve the remaining wage and automation issues. Similarly, Boeing is continuing to contend with a machinists strike.

Strikes, or even the threat of a strike, can cause significant disruptions across the global supply chain and have a massive economic impact. For example, when U.S. railroads were facing the threat of a strike in 2022, many companies redirected their cargo to avoid work stoppages and unhappy customers. If the strike had occurred, it would have had a massive economic impact. The Association of American Railroads (AAR), estimated that the economic impact of a railroad strike could be $2 billion per day.

Keep ReadingShow less
An illustration of a campaign button that says, "Supply Chain Issues" lays on top of a U.S. flag.

Supply chain professionals should be aware of how the different policies proposed by the U.S. presidential candidates would affect supply chain operations.

Jon Anders Wiken via Adobe Stock

Assessing the U.S. election impact on supply chain policy

For both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, the revival of domestic manufacturing is a key campaign theme and centerpiece in their respective proposals for economic growth and national security. Amid the electioneering and campaign pledges, however, the centrality of supply chain policy is being lost in the shuffle. While both candidates want to make the supply chain less dependent on China and to rebuild the American industrial base, their approaches will impact manufacturing, allied sectors, and global supply chains much differently despite the common overlay of protectionist industrial policy.

Both Trump’s “America First” and Harris’ “Opportunity Economy” policies call for moving home parts of supply chains, like those that bring to market critical products like semiconductors, pharmaceutical products, and medical supplies, and strengthening long-term supply chain resilience by discouraging offshoring. Harris’ economic plan, dubbed the “New Way Forward,” aims to close tax loopholes, strengthen labor rights, and provide government support to high-priority sectors, such as semiconductors and green energy technologies. Trump’s economic plan, dubbed “New American Industrialism,” emphasizes tariffs, corporate tax cuts, and easing of regulations.

Keep ReadingShow less