Navigating uncertainty: the impact of Trump's proposed tariffs on global supply chains
As companies reevaluate their supply chains to accommodate Trump’s promise to impose tariffs immediately upon taking office, they should keep in mind five potential repercussions.
Bindiya Vakil is the chief executive officer of supply chain risk management company Resilinc. She is also a founding member of the Global Supply Chain Resiliency Council and a member of the Advisory Board of MIT Center for Transportation and Logistics. Vakil holds a master’s degree in supply chain management from MIT and an MBA in Finance.
As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to return to the White House, his promises of sweeping tariffs—including an additional 10% tariff on imports from China, a 25% tariff on imports from Canada and Mexico, and a 10% to 20% universal tariff on all other imports—have businesses rethinking their supply chains. The potential impact of these tariffs is expected to be substantial and wide-ranging, affecting numerous industries like automotive, manufacturing, industrial, defense, pharmaceuticals, and high-tech electronics. The impact will be particularly acute for consumer goods.
Many companies are already taking proactive measures to mitigate risks and prepare for various scenarios. Some are accelerating efforts to diversify their production away from China, while others are stockpiling inventory in the U.S. before the new administration takes office. No matter what tactic they are taking, one effect is certain: Companies need to reevaluate their supply chain strategies.
My company Resilinc has identified five key ways that Trump’s proposed tariffs will affect supply chains. Companies should carefully consider how each of these consequences will impact their supply chains and what responses they should take to mitigate the changes.
#1 Increase in prices
Tariffs could have far-reaching effects on consumer goods, including those produced domestically. Many products that Americans use daily rely on imported components. A substantial portion of items manufactured in the U.S.—from appliances and industrial goods to pharmaceuticals, cars, and electronics—include imported parts. For instance, key smartphone components such as processors, displays, and batteries are often sourced from countries like China, South Korea, and Taiwan. Tariffs will make the cost to produce and sell all of these goods significantly higher. If these cost increases are passed on to consumers, tariffs could ultimately influence consumer purchasing behavior. This might include reduced demand or shifts in preferences toward products not subject to tariffs.
#2 Change in freight flows and rates
The potential impact extends beyond just the cost of goods. The shipping industry is likely to see significant changes as well. In the short term, freight rates could spike as retailers rush to buy safety stock ahead of potential tariff implementations. However, in the longer term, broad tariffs could discourage imports, potentially slowing freight volumes at ports and driving down rates. This could have a ripple effect throughout the entire supply chain ecosystem.
#3 Retaliatory tariffs from other countries
When Trump was previously in office, the administration applied tariffs on steel, aluminum Chinese imports, and automotive imports. Within a year, other countries enacted numerous retaliatory tariffs on U.S. imports in response. Some of the key products targeted included U.S. soybeans, pork, whiskey, and automobiles. Exports to China, the largest buyer of U.S. soybeans, dropped by nearly 75% in 2018 due to retaliatory tariffs and export volumes of some machinery products and vehicles dropped by 10%–20%. China placed tariffs on tens of billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. exports, and The European Union and Canada responded to steel and aluminum tariffs by imposing tariffs of their own. While it will be hard to predict how different countries will react this time, similar reactions are likely.
#4 Increased interest in nearshoring/reshoring
The proposed tariffs are likely to accelerate the trend of nearshoring and reshoring, with countries like Mexico potentially benefiting. Mexico is becoming more attractive due to its low labor costs, proximity, and potentially lower tariffs compared to China. In fact, Mexico was the United States’ top trading partner in 2024, surpassing China for the first time in over 20 years. In recent years, as companies have started increasing nearshoring initiatives, Mexico has become a critical part of these strategies. With costs potentially rising for Chinese goods, Central America could benefit as a nearshore option—even with a 10% tariff. Other countries like Vietnam, Thailand, and India are also emerging as alternatives to China.
However, both nearshoring and reshoring come with their own challenges. Setting up a new factory can be extremely costly and time intensive. Plus, labor in the U.S. is expensive. The average manufacturing wage as of January 2022 in the U.S. was $24.55 per hour, compared to an average of $2.80 per hour in Mexico.
Next, China has dominated as the “world’s factory” for a long time; its ecosystem of easy-to-find vendors for components of manufactured products will be hard to replicate. Scaling suppliers and finding availability of certain products and parts could prove difficult in the U.S., at least for the next few years. If a company reshores product assembly to the U.S., for example, but is still reliant on nuts and bolts from Chinese or Taiwanese suppliers, it has not solved its supply chain problem. Establishing new supplier networks can be time-intensive and costly.
While reshoring may help companies avoid tariffs, it introduces new challenges. For instance, Intel’s effort to establish a semiconductor plant in Arizona faces the hurdle of water scarcity, a critical issue for facilities that require an uninterrupted water supply. Meanwhile, Intel’s planned site in Ohio avoids this issue but faces a shortage of workers.
To be clear, the U.S. is not a risk-free region. Nowhere is risk-free. By reshoring or nearshoring, companies may mitigate certain risks but encounter a new set of uncertainties, potentially impacting supply chain stability.
#5 Tariffs may be applied unevenly
Companies are not just passively waiting for these changes to occur. Following the tariffs previously enacted under the Trump Administration, many U.S. companies responded by lobbying for product exemptions to safeguard their finances and operations. Apple, for instance, received 10 out of 15 requested exemptions for items like computer chargers and mice that were solely available from China. This time, certain products may face even greater tariff impacts. Automotive parts, which frequently across the Mexico-U.S. border, could incur rising costs with each crossing, prompting automakers to lobby for exemptions.
On the opposite side of the equation, the Trump administration may consider imposing tariffs on specific companies instead of country-specific tariffs. For instance, Chinese companies have increasingly shifted production to countries like Vietnam, making China Vietnam's largest trading partner in 2023, with trade totaling $172 billion. To prevent Chinese products from being rerouted through other countries to reach the U.S., the administration may impose targeted measures aimed at companies. In recent years, for instance, the U.S. has imposed significant sanctions on Chinese telecommunications companies like Huawei and ZTE, citing national security concerns.
How companies can prepare
To prepare for these potential changes, companies are advised to take several key steps. The most critical (and foundational) step companies can take is to map their entire subtier supplier network—identifying where their products and components originate and which could be affected.
Additional key steps for readiness include:
1. Modeling “what-if” scenarios to quantify potential business impacts.
2. Preparing detailed data for exclusion requests and to support rapid adjustments.
3. Evaluating supply chain diversification options, balancing risks and benefits by region.
4. Anticipating potential shifts in consumer behavior and financial impacts.
5. Closely monitoring announcements on tariffs and exemption procedures.
The next year is expected to be a dynamic one for global supply chains. Trump's proposed tariffs are already having a significant impact, even before any official policies have been implemented. To prepare, companies must expect uncertainty and create an action plan now—not later. Companies that have already mapped their supply chains and collected comprehensive data will be better positioned to respond quickly and effectively as tariffs are rolled out.
The “2024 Year in Review” report lists the various transportation delays, freight volume restrictions, and infrastructure repair costs of a long string of events. Those disruptions include labor strikes at Canadian ports and postal sites, the U.S. East and Gulf coast port strike; hurricanes Helene, Francine, and Milton; the Francis Scott key Bridge collapse in Baltimore Harbor; the CrowdStrike cyber attack; and Red Sea missile attacks on passing cargo ships.
“While 2024 was characterized by frequent and overlapping disruptions that exposed many supply chain vulnerabilities, it was also a year of resilience,” the Project44 report said. “From labor strikes and natural disasters to geopolitical tensions, each event served as a critical learning opportunity, underscoring the necessity for robust contingency planning, effective labor relations, and durable infrastructure. As supply chains continue to evolve, the lessons learned this past year highlight the increased importance of proactive measures and collaborative efforts. These strategies are essential to fostering stability and adaptability in a world where unpredictability is becoming the norm.”
In addition to tallying the supply chain impact of those events, the report also made four broad predictions for trends in 2025 that may affect logistics operations. In Project44’s analysis, they include:
More technology and automation will be introduced into supply chains, particularly ports. This will help make operations more efficient but also increase the risk of cybersecurity attacks and service interruptions due to glitches and bugs. This could also add tensions among the labor pool and unions, who do not want jobs to be replaced with automation.
The new administration in the United States introduces a lot of uncertainty, with talks of major tariffs for numerous countries as well as talks of US freight getting preferential treatment through the Panama Canal. If these things do come to fruition, expect to see shifts in global trade patterns and sourcing.
Natural disasters will continue to become more frequent and more severe, as exhibited by the wildfires in Los Angeles and the winter storms throughout the southern states in the U.S. As a result, expect companies to invest more heavily in sustainability to mitigate climate change.
The peace treaty announced on Wednesday between Isael and Hamas in the Middle East could support increased freight volumes returning to the Suez Canal as political crisis in the area are resolved.
Logistics industry growth slowed in December due to a seasonal wind-down of inventory and following one of the busiest holiday shopping seasons on record, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index (LMI) report, released this week.
The monthly LMI was 57.3 in December, down more than a percentage point from November’s reading of 58.4. Despite the slowdown, economic activity across the industry continued to expand, as an LMI reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
The LMI researchers said the monthly conditions were largely due to seasonal drawdowns in inventory levels—and the associated costs of holding them—at the retail level. The LMI’s Inventory Levels index registered 50, falling from 56.1 in November. That reduction also affected warehousing capacity, which slowed but remained in expansion mode: The LMI’s warehousing capacity index fell 7 points to a reading of 61.6.
December’s results reflect a continued trend toward more typical industry growth patterns following recent years of volatility—and they point to a successful peak holiday season as well.
“Retailers were clearly correct in their bet to stock [up] on goods ahead of the holiday season,” the LMI researchers wrote in their monthly report. “Holiday sales from November until Christmas Eve were up 3.8% year-over-year according to Mastercard. This was largely driven by a 6.7% increase in e-commerce sales, although in-person spending was up 2.9% as well.”
And those results came during a compressed peak shopping cycle.
“The increase in spending came despite the shorter holiday season due to the late Thanksgiving,” the researchers also wrote, citing National Retail Federation (NRF) estimates that U.S. shoppers spent just short of a trillion dollars in November and December, making it the busiest holiday season of all time.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
As U.S. small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face an uncertain business landscape in 2025, a substantial majority (67%) expect positive growth in the new year compared to 2024, according to a survey from DHL.
However, the survey also showed that businesses could face a rocky road to reach that goal, as they navigate a complex environment of regulatory/policy shifts and global market volatility. Both those issues were cited as top challenges by 36% of respondents, followed by staffing/talent retention (11%) and digital threats and cyber attacks (2%).
Against that backdrop, SMEs said that the biggest opportunity for growth in 2025 lies in expanding into new markets (40%), followed by economic improvements (31%) and implementing new technologies (14%).
As the U.S. prepares for a broad shift in political leadership in Washington after a contentious election, the SMEs in DHL’s survey were likely split evenly on their opinion about the impact of regulatory and policy changes. A plurality of 40% were on the fence (uncertain, still evaluating), followed by 24% who believe regulatory changes could negatively impact growth, 20% who see these changes as having a positive impact, and 16% predicting no impact on growth at all.
That uncertainty also triggered a split when respondents were asked how they planned to adjust their strategy in 2025 in response to changes in the policy or regulatory landscape. The largest portion (38%) of SMEs said they remained uncertain or still evaluating, followed by 30% who will make minor adjustments, 19% will maintain their current approach, and 13% who were willing to significantly adjust their approach.
That percentage is even greater than the 13.21% of total retail sales that were returned. Measured in dollars, returns (including both legitimate and fraudulent) last year reached $685 billion out of the $5.19 trillion in total retail sales.
“It’s clear why retailers want to limit bad actors that exhibit fraudulent and abusive returns behavior, but the reality is that they are finding stricter returns policies are not reducing the returns fraud they face,” Michael Osborne, CEO of Appriss Retail, said in a release.
Specifically, the report lists the leading types of returns fraud and abuse reported by retailers in 2024, including findings that:
60% of retailers surveyed reported incidents of “wardrobing,” or the act of consumers buying an item, using the merchandise, and then returning it.
55% cited cases of returning an item obtained through fraudulent or stolen tender, such as stolen credit cards, counterfeit bills, gift cards obtained through fraudulent means or fraudulent checks.
48% of retailers faced occurrences of returning stolen merchandise.
Together, those statistics show that the problem remains prevalent despite growing efforts by retailers to curb retail returns fraud through stricter returns policies, while still offering a sufficiently open returns policy to keep customers loyal, they said.
“Returns are a significant cost for retailers, and the rise of online shopping could increase this trend,” Kevin Mahoney, managing director, retail, Deloitte Consulting LLP, said. “As retailers implement policies to address this issue, they should avoid negatively affecting customer loyalty and retention. Effective policies should reduce losses for the retailer while minimally impacting the customer experience. This approach can be crucial for long-term success.”
Maersk’s overall view of the coming year is that the global economy is expected to grow modestly, with the possibility of higher inflation caused by lingering supply chain issues, continued geopolitical tensions, and fiscal policies such as new tariffs. Geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions could threaten global stability, climate change action will continue to shape international cooperation, and the ongoing security issue in the Red Sea is expected to continue into 2025.
Those are difficult challenges, but according to Maersk, a vital part of logistics planning is understanding where risk and weak spots might be and finding ways to dampen the impact of inevitable hurdles.
They include:
1. Build a resilient supply chain As opposed to simply maintaining traditional network designs, Maersk says it is teaming with Hapag-Lloyd to implement a new East-West network called Gemini, beginning in February, 2025. The network will use leaner mainliners and shuttles together, allowing for isolation of port disruptions, minimizing the impact of disruptions to supply chains and routes. More broadly, companies should work with an integrated logistics partner that has multiple solutions—be they by air, truck, barge or rail—allowing supply chains to adapt around issues, while still meeting consumer demands.
2. Implementing technological advances
A key component in ensuring more resilience against disruptions is working with a supply chain supplier that offers advanced real-time tracking systems and AI-powered analytics to provide comprehensive visibility across supply chains. An AI-powered dashboard of analytics can provide end-to-end visibility of shipments, tasks, and updates, enabling efficient logistics management without the need to chase down data. Also, forecasting tools can give predictive analytics to optimize inventory, reduce waste, and enhance efficiency. And incorporating Internet of Things (IoT) into digital solutions can enable live tracking of containers to monitor shipments.
3. Preparing for anything, instead of everything Contingency planning was a big theme for 2024, and remains so for 2025. That need is highlighted by geopolitical instability, climate change and volatility, and changes to tariffs and legislation. So in 2025, businesses should seek to partner with a logistics partner that offers risk and disruption navigation through pre-planned procedures, risk assessments, and alternative solutions.
4. Diversifying all aspects of the supply chain Supply chains have felt the impact of disruption throughout 2024, with the situation in the Red Sea resulting in all shipping having to avoid the Suez Canal, and instead going around the Cape of Good Hope. This has increased demand throughout the year, resulting in businesses trying to move cargo earlier to ensure they can meet customer needs, and even considering nearshoring. As regionalization has become more prevalent, businesses can use nearshoring to diversify suppliers and reduce their dependency on single sources. By ensuring that these suppliers and manufacturers are closer to the consumer market, businesses can keep production costs lower as well as have more ease of reaching markets and avoid delay-related risks from global disruptions. Utilizing options closer to market can also allow companies to better adapt to changes in consumer needs and behavior. Finally, some companies may also find it useful to stock critical materials for future, to act as a buffer against unexpected delays and/or issues relating to trade embargoes.
5. Understanding tariffs, legislation and regulations 2024 was year of customs regulations in EU. And tariffs are expected in the U.S. as well, once the new Trump Administration takes office. However, consistent with President-elect Trump’s first term, threats of increases are often used as a negotiating tool. So companies should take a wait and see approach to U.S. customs, even as they cope with the certainty that further EU customs are set to come into play.