Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Adopting emerging technology? Culture matters

An illustration of a lit up circuit board with a cyber-looking brain resting on top.

Does your company take a cautious or conservative approach to risk? If so, you might want to take a pass on generative AI for the time being.

Read the news today and there is likely to be an article on how generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is going to change the world. One story will praise the transformative potential of GenAI, the next will shout doom and gloom. Neither is 100% right and neither is 100% wrong.

The mixed perceived potential of GenAI can be seen in responses to the “2023 Gartner Supply Chain Technology User Wants and Needs Survey.” We asked respondents to rate how important they currently saw certain emerging technologies like GenAI and how transformative they felt these technologies were going to be over the next decade. GenAI was an interesting case study. Respondents saw it as one of the most potentially transformative emerging technologies over the long term. But, at this time, it was rated as one of the least currently important technologies.


At this point, many organizations are struggling to prove and realize value from their GenAI investments and pilot projects. Accordingly, Gartner research predicts that at least 30% of GenAI projects will be abandoned after proof of concept by the end of 2025.

The survey findings highlight that before they invest heavily in a technology, companies must honestly assess who they are and what their risk tolerance is. Different supply chain organizations view the value and importance of technology differently, and they should align their investment strategies with their unique identity. Every supply chain and logistics organization has its own culture, and this culture has a significant influence on how leaders must approach and manage their technology investment decisions.

What’s your tech adoption profile?

Distribution of supply chain technology adoption profiles, Gartner 2023 survey results

Distribution of supply chain technology adoption profiles

"2023 Gartner Supply Chain Technology User Wants and Needs Survey"

As part of gaining an understanding of what types of technology they should invest in, supply chain leaders must honestly and candidly assess their organization's risk tolerance. This is because risk tolerance has a notable impact on which technology investments are right for an organization, at what time, and for what reasons.

Gartner research has identified five adoption profiles:

  • Cautious: These organizations wait until technologies are fully mature and several iterations of the technology have been released.
  • Conservative: These organizations adopt mainstream technologies once they are proven and lower risk solutions are available.
  • Adventurer: These organizations prefer to adopt adolescent but maturing technologies with manageable risk.
  • Pioneer: These organizations may adopt emerging technologies in the early stages of commercialization when there are successful deployments by industry leaders.
  • Maverick: These organizations favor adopting embryonic, emerging, and often unproven technologies that are relatively new and riskier.

The figure above shows the distribution of adoption profiles among respondents to the “Wants and Needs” survey. As can be seen in the chart, there is a notable disparity among companies in how they approach purchasing and adopting technology.

If buying decisions are not aligned with the organization’s adoption behavior, then investments may be made at the wrong time or for the wrong reasons—or both—and organizations will fail to meet their intended goals and objectives. For example, risk-intolerant companies, like cautious or conservative adopters, should be very cautious of investing in technologies like GenAI today, while risk-exploiting companies (those that are willing to put capital at risk for big payoffs) should take the plunge.

Taking a closer look

An illustration of a blue face with a lit up circuit board superimposed on top of it.

In addition to their application profile, there are three other dimensions that supply chain leaders should take into account when deciding what technology they should invest in and when and how these technologies should be implemented: planning, control, and pace of change.

Planning identifies the organization’s approach to creating and adhering to a strategic technology plan. There are three general profile attributes:

  • Strict—The majority of technology decisions will be driven by and to fit to the plan.
  • Accommodating—The strategic plan is typically adjusted only under certain situations, such as changes in the business climate or the urgency of responding to new, unanticipated events.
  • Flexible—The plan is less of a definitive driver for technology decisions, and users have more autonomy to pursue other opportunities where they make business sense.

Control identifies the locus of power for driving the technology agenda, with the following profile attributes:

  • IT-led—The IT organization and a strong chief information officer drive the technology agenda.
  • Collaborative—Business and IT work together to determine the technology path.
  • Business-led—Leaders from the business largely guide the agenda.
Pace of change explores the organization’s receptivity to new ideas and technology approaches, building upon the technology adoption approaches outlined previously with the following profile attributes:
  • Measured—The enterprise prefers to observe the impact of events and new technology before acting.
  • Responsive—The enterprise looks for technology to help it react and respond to external events.
  • Dynamic—The enterprise aggressively pursues new technologies and reacts quickly to external events in pursuit of competitive advantage.

These categories are more indicative of an organization’s buying propensity in terms of when, who, and how they make technology decisions than traditional factors such as company size, geography, or even industry.

These considerations also go a step beyond traditional technology maturity models. Maturity models are a good first step for gaining an understanding of “who are you,” “what you do,” and “how you perform” compared to other companies. However, the three dimensions above help you unlock another level of insight—the “why you do what you do” and the way you do it. This provides leaders with a deeper level of understanding of organizational behavioral traits, much like psychographic targeting in consumer marketing.

These insights can help leaders gain perspective on how cultural differences influence an organization’s supply chain technology adoption behaviors. Thus, they can use the information to determine which technology strategies and investment plans will be most effective with their organization’s unique temperament.

More Stories

Illustration with four interlocking circles that show icons for a mobile phone, a truck, a store, and a credit card swiper.

How is omnichannel retailing impacting supply chain operations?

Do you have five minutes to help shape the future of retail by sharing your insights and experience? The MIT Omnichannel Supply Chain Lab has officially opened its 2024 Omnichannel Survey, and researchers want to hear from you.

This year’s survey is investigating the impact of e-commerce on the different tiers of the supply chains, the most common challenges faced when defining and implementing an omnichannel strategy, and the role of artificial intelligence and tech-related innovations supporting it.

Keep ReadingShow less
An audience views a presentation given by man in a sport coat against a backdrop that says "Becoming a Real-Time Busines."

Peter Weill of MIT tells the audience at the IFS Unleashed user conference about the benefits of being a "real-time business."

Ben Ames

Real-time data flows can provide competitive advantage

Companies that integrate real-time data flows into their operations consistently outperform their competitors, said Peter Weill, the chairman of MIT’s Center for Information Systems Research (CISR), in a session Wednesday at a conference held by IFS, the Swedish enterprise resource planning (ERP) and artificial intelligence (AI) firm.

These "real-time businesses," according to Weill, use trusted, real-time data to enable people and systems to make real-time decisions. By adopting that strategy, these companies gain three major capabilities:

Keep ReadingShow less
exxonmobile oil field with pumps in texas

Kinaxis and ExxonMobil will design supply chain planning tools

Supply chain orchestration software provider Kinaxis today announced a co-development deal with ExxonMobil to create supply chain technology solutions designed specifically for the energy sector.

ExxonMobil is uniquely placed to understand the biggest opportunities in improving energy supply chains, from more accurate sales and operations planning, increased agility in field operations, effective management of enormous transportation networks and adapting quickly to complex regulatory environments,” John Sicard, Kinaxis CEO, said in a release.

Keep ReadingShow less
AMRs and a drone operate in a warehouse environment. Overlaid are blue lines and data indicating that they are all connected digitally.

Future warehouse success depends on robot interoperability.

Image created by Yingyaipumi via Adobe Stock.

The Urgent Call for Warehouse Robotics Interoperability

Interest in warehouse robotics remains high, driven by labor pressures and a general desire to further automate distribution processes. Likewise, the number of robot makers also continues to grow. By one count, more than 50 providers exhibited at the big MODEX show in Atlanta in March 2024.

In distribution environments, there is especially strong interest in autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) for collaborative order picking. In this application, the AMR meets pickers at the right inventory location, and the workers then place picks in totes on the robot, which then moves on to another location/picker or off to packing, greatly reducing human travel time.

Keep ReadingShow less
warehouse worker using mobile computer

Federal regulators delay pharma track and trace rule

Pharmaceutical groups are breathing a sigh of relief today after federal regulators granted many of them more time to come into compliance with strict track and trace rules required by the Drug Supply Chain Security Act (DSCSA).

The initiative is intended to create an electronic track and trace network that allows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to pinpoint the location of any drug throughout the supply chain and drill down to the individual package level, thus improving safety compliance and reducing counterfeiting. To enable that practice, third-party companies like TraceLink have built networks to manage the massive amounts of data required.

Keep ReadingShow less