Optimism is not enough: Realization of pro-growth policies will shape U.S. economic outlook
Congress and the White House are likely to implement a modest pro-growth agenda, encouraging continued consumer confidence and economic growth for the next few years.
The surge in business confidence has a lot to do with the expectation that President Trump and the Republican-led Congress will cut corporate taxes, reduce personal income taxes, remove regulations, and introduce more pro-growth policies. These measures, it is assumed, would lead to stronger economic growth, increased profits, and expanded capital spending, which, in turn, could help boost productivity growth—turning the "soft" data into more objectively quantifiable economic reality.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Consumer and business optimism rise togetherEnlarge this image
[Figure 2] Income and consumption to surge with fiscal stimulus in 2018Enlarge this image
The "wealth effect" and "animal spirits"
Consumers have been doing most of the heavy lifting in the U.S. economy over the past several years. Now, rising stock prices coupled with a stronger housing market are pushing up household wealth, further stimulating consumer spending through the phenomenon known as the "wealth effect." The idea is that when households' stock market portfolios and home values rise, consumers feel more financially secure, which causes them to increase their spending even if their income is unchanged. The wealth effect is one example of a real impact of "soft" consumer attitudes; economists estimate that it may boost consumer spending by about 3 cents on the dollar. However, "hard" economic factors like improved job prospects, lower income tax rates, and rising real wages have a significantly stronger impact on consumer spending.
For the most part, the surge in "soft" indicators has been unaccompanied by equivalently strong "hard"
economic data. Although it was mostly a function of one-off factors and seasonal effects, the first quarter's
real gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate, measured at 1.2 percent (annualized) as of this writing, was the weakest since Q1 of 2016. Additionally, the average monthly payroll increase in March, April, and May was 121,000, compared with 201,000 in the prior three months.
Yet the U.S. economy is strengthening. The unemployment rate currently stands at 4.3 percent, the lowest since 2001, and there is ample evidence that the economy is chugging along at a 2.0–2.5 percent growth rate. The growth in final sales to domestic purchasers, which excludes inventories and exports (and therefore is a better gauge of the economy's underlying growth rate), was 2.0 percent in the first quarter. In light of this strength, the U. S. Federal Reserve is likely to continue its gradual pace of rate increases, such as its recent decision to raise the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points, to 1.00–1.25 percent.
But the size of the disconnect between the "soft" and "hard" data (for example, income, profits, and interest rates) suggests that the surge in business and consumer confidence is a manifestation of "animal spirits." This term, first used by John Maynard Keynes to explain investment behavior, is now used to describe consumer and business dynamics, which can be better understood by considering the interactions and contrasts between "soft" and "hard" indicators.
Expecting a wave of pro-growth policies, markets reacted to the November election with exuberance. However, consumer sentiment could change if there is a sufficient shock. In particular, concern is growing that amid the political turmoil in Washington the Trump administration's and Republican majority's reform agenda could come up short. Already, progress on health-care and tax reform has slowed considerably. The American Health Care Act, passed by a razor-thin margin by the House, is unpopular with the public. The corresponding Senate version of the bill has yet to be finalized or its contents released to public scrutiny. On the tax front, House Republicans' plan for a border adjustment tax (BAT) has been opposed by some members of both the House and the Senate, and the president's position is unclear at this writing.
Meanwhile, the White House's public tax plan still only consists of a one-page outline. Given these obstacles, it is unlikely that legislation will be passed on either of these priorities by the end of the year. Still, some progress has been made in other areas; in June the Trump administration rolled out its infrastructure initiative, and through its executive powers the White House has slowed or reversed the expansion of regulatory controls on business.
Robust growth depends on economic agenda
In spite of these concerns, we continue to believe that, on balance, a modest pro-growth agenda is likely to
be implemented next year. Our assumptions for these changes include:
A reduction in the statutory corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent, partially offset by fewer
tax breaks, starting in January 2018;
Repatriation of US $800 billion of foreign profits at a reduced tax rate of 10 percent in 2018;
Personal income tax reforms that lower the average effective federal tax rate from 20.3 percent to
19.6 percent in January 2018; and,
Additional public infrastructure investments totaling US $250 billion over 10 years, starting in Q1 of 2018.
At the same time, several of Trump's priorities are unlikely to gain traction, such as the border adjustment tax
mentioned earlier, significant capital expenditures, major changes in health care, or major changes to international
trade policies.
IHS Markit predicts robust economic growth in the next two years, but this outlook
is predicated on the passage of a pro-growth agenda of roughly the shape described. We expect that real GDP growth will
be 2.3 percent this year, and that it will accelerate to 2.7 percent in 2018—but only if fiscal stimulus is enacted.
Consumer spending will remain an engine of U.S. economic growth, supported by rising employment, disposable incomes,
and household wealth. Income tax cuts in 2018 will likely accelerate a hike in spending growth and the personal saving rate.
Real consumption is projected to grow 2.6 percent this year and 3.2 percent in 2018, then ease to 2.9 percent in 2019 as
the stimulus wears off. (See Figure 2.)
In this outlook, business fixed investment will benefit from strengthening global markets, firmer commodity prices,
an easing of regulations, and tax cuts in 2018. With oil and natural gas prices likely to climb higher, growth in
mining structures should remain solid during 2017 and 2018. Consistent with this story line, we expect Federal Reserve
policy rate increases of 75 basis points in each year through 2019 and a cautious reduction in the Fed's asset holdings.
Brisk sales, low inventories of homes for sale, and rising prices will encourage more homebuilding, even as interest rates
rise.
Measures of consumer confidence remain very close to their post-election highs, and as of early June, stock
indices were hitting all-time records. But an economy cannot run on animal spirits alone, and the growth rate during
the next few years will depend on the policies that the Trump administration and the Republican majority are
able to enact.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.