All over the world, heading offshore to outsource production has become so commonplace that it is now accepted as the norm. Offshoring does indeed make sense for many companies, especially those that want to establish a global footprint. Too many, however, outsource production for the wrong reasons.
Lured by the promise of cheaper labor, they are blind to the tactical costs of manufacturing overseas. While they may save money on unskilled labor and by achieving economies of scale, they ultimately will pay more because of longer lead times, increased inventories, the need for more management resources for planning and logistics, and constraints on their ability to respond quickly to changing demand.
Despite these and other hidden costs, offshore manufacturing has become a fact of life. Now the challenge for many companies is to manage the resulting global supply chain effectively. They can accomplish this by conducting thorough research, developing a logical strategy, and managing proactively to prevent problems. Effective management also requires establishing open communication with suppliers about expectations, especially when all requirements are contractual.
If you are considering offshoring some or all of your manufacturing, the following will provide a basic guide to the potential problems, business considerations, and success strategies associated with this increasingly common practice.
Know the pain points
No matter what business you're in, you will find that offshoring brings many pain points to the fore. When outsourcing some or all of your operations, you will have to deal with longer lead times. Their length will be determined by the complexity, variation, and shipping times for the parts or products involved. Longer lead times will also require you to forecast inventory needs more accurately.
In addition, you'll confront cultural and time-zone differences that can make communication difficult and can engender misunderstandings. You'll need to address issues of product integrity, quality, and variation. Sometimes you may encounter impractical shipping options. And you may have limited or no visibility into the overseas operation, making it difficult to identify a problem before it's too late to fix it.
The most pressing of these problems are lead times and quality issues. There's no getting around the fact that transit times, not to mention often-forgotten factors like holidays, vacations, and the like in the manufacturing country, will greatly increase a product's lead time. Because every company wants to have sufficient products on hand when its customers want them, you will likely have to stockpile inventory—and that will incur enormous costs in capital and warehousing. Accurate, effective forecasting will help, but even the best forecasts won't remain accurate when they must be firmed up two to six months in advance of production.
Additional pressure to stockpile inventory can result when sourcing a single item from an overseas manufacturer that insists on shipping full ocean containers. This requirement forces you to buy more of a product than is needed at a particular time, which adds inventory, transportation, and storage costs. Moreover, many Asian manufacturers require cash up front for their services. All of these factors can force your company to make larger capital investments than intended.
Another critical issue is maintaining product quality and integrity. A number of incidents involving manufacturers in Asia that produced substandard or unsafe products have made the news recently. Involvement in such a scandal can cost you—not only in lost profits but also in brand loyalty. It's hard to gain back trust once it's been lost.
Quality issues often are closely tied to a lack of visibility into offshore manufacturing operations. If you choose to manufacture overseas, you must be willing and able to closely oversee those operations (or hire someone trustworthy to do so) to ensure that quality standards are being met.
Given all the potential problems associated with offshore manufacturing, you might wonder why anyone would want to do it. The reason is that, at least for some, the benefits outweigh the pitfalls. To make sure that is indeed the case—in other words, that it is not just a matter of perception and that the benefits actually do outweigh the negatives—you'll need to do extensive, thorough, and accurate research before going ahead.
Research first
It goes without saying that nobody should jump right into something as complex and fraught with pitfalls as offshore manufacturing without first doing extensive, careful research.
One mistake companies often make is focusing on the lowest purchase price per item instead of considering the total landed cost of sourcing from offshore suppliers. Total landed cost includes such cost factors as transportation, port charges, duties and taxes, insurance, and material. It also includes internal, "soft" costs, such as those for capital tied up in excess inventory and storage and for often-overlooked considerations like the cost of handling inefficiently loaded containers.
Not all products are suited to offshoring. The ones that are most suitable may be those that have long lifecycles, are simple and cheap, do not undergo frequent design changes, will be sold or used in the region where they are produced, and/or require significant manual labor inputs.
There are several reasons why these types of products make good candidates for offshore manufacturing. For one thing, when products have longer lifecycles, there is less risk associated with carrying enough inventory to compensate for long lead times. For another, it may be more cost effective to outsource items that are cheap enough that quality isn't a concern; that is, if it's less costly to scrap bad parts overseas than it would be to manufacture in the home country to the quality standards required to avoid scrapping bad parts.
Other strong candidates are parts or products that will be sold near the site of manufacture or will be shipped to another offshore location for assembly. Manufacturing products in the region where they will be sold results in shorter lead times, lower inventories, improved customer service, and higher profits. Moreover, buying a component offshore for use in an assembly that is produced in the same region improves lead times and flexibility while reducing working-capital requirements.
Finally, when it comes to labor, the value-added content can be as important as the cost of wages and benefits. When a product with low value-added content is manufactured in a process that eliminates waste, it may actually be cheaper to produce it locally rather than offshore.
After determining which products are suitable for outsourcing, it's time to consider where to produce them. Not all offshore locations are created equal, and—as noted earlier—cheap labor shouldn't be the only deciding factor. While investigating various locales, consider not only labor costs but also managerial costs (which may not be as inexpensive as many people assume); protections provided for intellectual property; the availability of utilities and other infrastructure, including associated trade-offs (for example, good roads versus poor roads); and local culture— especially as it pertains to business and legal practices.
All of these considerations will come into play in another important step: creating a "value-chain map" that captures all of the costs and operational data (such as cycle times, inventory, and so forth) associated with your product's journey from the offshore facility to its final destination. Visualizing each point in the value stream, from order to delivery, makes it possible to predict where problems might occur—and to take steps to prevent them from happening.
Prevent problems
Once you've completed that "homework" and (with the aid of a value-chain map) have developed plans to address every identifiable contingency, you can take steps to help ensure the success of your offshoring venture.
Perhaps the best advice is to do everything possible to avoid problems in the first place! And that's essentially what the following suggestions are all about. They may seem quite basic, but these preventive measures are often overlooked when companies focus simply on cheap labor.
Perform comprehensive assessments of offshore suppliers to ensure that they are capable of meeting your expectations. Look at areas such as manufacturing capabilities (such as productivity and quality) and capacities, quality systems, technology and technical expertise, ability to comply with specifications, cost structure, and financial stability.
Lay out terms for agreements and partnerships in contractual form. Specify exactly what you need with respect to quality, cost, delivery, and service.
Communicate regularly and clearly with offshore suppliers. Don't assume that an offshore manufacturer understands what you require. Put expectations in clear, unambiguous writing, especially with respect to quality, and be prepared to follow up.
Use key metrics and a scorecard system to understand if product is flowing as planned. Establishing a system for tracking and measuring performance— much like those you use on the home-based manufacturing floor—will allow you to assess offshore performance at a glance and will provide early warning when product flow is getting off-track.
Visit offshore manufacturing sites regularly to find and solve problems before they become big enough to affect your company's ability to profitably meet its customers' requirements.
Weigh the facts
Offshoring can be a logical and cost-effective way to improve your company's competitiveness, but as we've seen, there's more to it than simply choosing a manufacturing site or finding a contract manufacturer overseas.
Ensuring success requires learning and weighing all of the facts before contracting with an offshore supplier. Map the value chain, understand your total landed costs, visit the potential supplier, and thoroughly assess its capabilities to be certain that the right partner has been selected. Once you've chosen that partner, document all of your requirements regarding order volumes, product specifications, and operational details in the contract. And finally, monitor offshore suppliers no differently than you would your own manufacturing operations.
Going offshore can improve your competitiveness and open up new markets; just remember to make that decision based on facts that take all costs into account. And once you've decided to manufacture overseas, stay vigilant and continue to carefully monitor and manage your supplier.
The new funding brings Amazon's total investment in Anthropic to $8 billion, while maintaining the e-commerce giant’s position as a minority investor, according to Anthropic. The partnership was launched in 2023, when Amazon invested its first $4 billion round in the firm.
Anthropic’s “Claude” family of AI assistant models is available on AWS’s Amazon Bedrock, which is a cloud-based managed service that lets companies build specialized generative AI applications by choosing from an array of foundation models (FMs) developed by AI providers like AI21 Labs, Anthropic, Cohere, Meta, Mistral AI, Stability AI, and Amazon itself.
According to Amazon, tens of thousands of customers, from startups to enterprises and government institutions, are currently running their generative AI workloads using Anthropic’s models in the AWS cloud. Those GenAI tools are powering tasks such as customer service chatbots, coding assistants, translation applications, drug discovery, engineering design, and complex business processes.
"The response from AWS customers who are developing generative AI applications powered by Anthropic in Amazon Bedrock has been remarkable," Matt Garman, AWS CEO, said in a release. "By continuing to deploy Anthropic models in Amazon Bedrock and collaborating with Anthropic on the development of our custom Trainium chips, we’ll keep pushing the boundaries of what customers can achieve with generative AI technologies. We’ve been impressed by Anthropic’s pace of innovation and commitment to responsible development of generative AI, and look forward to deepening our collaboration."
Specifically, the new global average robot density has reached a record 162 units per 10,000 employees in 2023, which is more than double the mark of 74 units measured seven years ago.
Broken into geographical regions, the European Union has a robot density of 219 units per 10,000 employees, an increase of 5.2%, with Germany, Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia in the global top ten. Next, North America’s robot density is 197 units per 10,000 employees – up 4.2%. And Asia has a robot density of 182 units per 10,000 persons employed in manufacturing - an increase of 7.6%. The economies of Korea, Singapore, mainland China and Japan are among the top ten most automated countries.
Broken into individual countries, the U.S. ranked in 10th place in 2023, with a robot density of 295 units. Higher up on the list, the top five are:
The Republic of Korea, with 1,012 robot units, showing a 5% increase on average each year since 2018 thanks to its strong electronics and automotive industries.
Singapore had 770 robot units, in part because it is a small country with a very low number of employees in the manufacturing industry, so it can reach a high robot density with a relatively small operational stock.
China took third place in 2023, surpassing Germany and Japan with a mark of 470 robot units as the nation has managed to double its robot density within four years.
Germany ranks fourth with 429 robot units for a 5% CAGR since 2018.
Japan is in fifth place with 419 robot units, showing growth of 7% on average each year from 2018 to 2023.
Progress in generative AI (GenAI) is poised to impact business procurement processes through advancements in three areas—agentic reasoning, multimodality, and AI agents—according to Gartner Inc.
Those functions will redefine how procurement operates and significantly impact the agendas of chief procurement officers (CPOs). And 72% of procurement leaders are already prioritizing the integration of GenAI into their strategies, thus highlighting the recognition of its potential to drive significant improvements in efficiency and effectiveness, Gartner found in a survey conducted in July, 2024, with 258 global respondents.
Gartner defined the new functions as follows:
Agentic reasoning in GenAI allows for advanced decision-making processes that mimic human-like cognition. This capability will enable procurement functions to leverage GenAI to analyze complex scenarios and make informed decisions with greater accuracy and speed.
Multimodality refers to the ability of GenAI to process and integrate multiple forms of data, such as text, images, and audio. This will make GenAI more intuitively consumable to users and enhance procurement's ability to gather and analyze diverse information sources, leading to more comprehensive insights and better-informed strategies.
AI agents are autonomous systems that can perform tasks and make decisions on behalf of human operators. In procurement, these agents will automate procurement tasks and activities, freeing up human resources to focus on strategic initiatives, complex problem-solving and edge cases.
As CPOs look to maximize the value of GenAI in procurement, the study recommended three starting points: double down on data governance, develop and incorporate privacy standards into contracts, and increase procurement thresholds.
“These advancements will usher procurement into an era where the distance between ideas, insights, and actions will shorten rapidly,” Ryan Polk, senior director analyst in Gartner’s Supply Chain practice, said in a release. "Procurement leaders who build their foundation now through a focus on data quality, privacy and risk management have the potential to reap new levels of productivity and strategic value from the technology."
Businesses are cautiously optimistic as peak holiday shipping season draws near, with many anticipating year-over-year sales increases as they continue to battle challenging supply chain conditions.
That’s according to the DHL 2024 Peak Season Shipping Survey, released today by express shipping service provider DHL Express U.S. The company surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to gauge their holiday business outlook compared to last year and found that a mix of optimism and “strategic caution” prevail ahead of this year’s peak.
Nearly half (48%) of the SMEs surveyed said they expect higher holiday sales compared to 2023, while 44% said they expect sales to remain on par with last year, and just 8% said they foresee a decline. Respondents said the main challenges to hitting those goals are supply chain problems (35%), inflation and fluctuating consumer demand (34%), staffing (16%), and inventory challenges (14%).
But respondents said they have strategies in place to tackle those issues. Many said they began preparing for holiday season earlier this year—with 45% saying they started planning in Q2 or earlier, up from 39% last year. Other strategies include expanding into international markets (35%) and leveraging holiday discounts (32%).
Sixty percent of respondents said they will prioritize personalized customer service as a way to enhance customer interactions and loyalty this year. Still others said they will invest in enhanced web and mobile experiences (23%) and eco-friendly practices (13%) to draw customers this holiday season.
The practice consists of 5,000 professionals from Accenture and from Avanade—the consulting firm’s joint venture with Microsoft. They will be supported by Microsoft product specialists who will work closely with the Accenture Center for Advanced AI. Together, that group will collaborate on AI and Copilot agent templates, extensions, plugins, and connectors to help organizations leverage their data and gen AI to reduce costs, improve efficiencies and drive growth, they said on Thursday.
Accenture and Avanade say they have already developed some AI tools for these applications. For example, a supplier discovery and risk agent can deliver real-time market insights, agile supply chain responses, and better vendor selection, which could result in up to 15% cost savings. And a procure-to-pay agent could improve efficiency by up to 40% and enhance vendor relations and satisfaction by addressing urgent payment requirements and avoiding disruptions of key services
Likewise, they have also built solutions for clients using Microsoft 365 Copilot technology. For example, they have created Copilots for a variety of industries and functions including finance, manufacturing, supply chain, retail, and consumer goods and healthcare.
Another part of the new practice will be educating clients how to use the technology, using an “Azure Generative AI Engineer Nanodegree program” to teach users how to design, build, and operationalize AI-driven applications on Azure, Microsoft’s cloud computing platform. The online classes will teach learners how to use AI models to solve real-world problems through automation, data insights, and generative AI solutions, the firms said.
“We are pleased to deepen our collaboration with Accenture to help our mutual customers develop AI-first business processes responsibly and securely, while helping them drive market differentiation,” Judson Althoff, executive vice president and chief commercial officer at Microsoft, said in a release. “By bringing together Copilots and human ambition, paired with the autonomous capabilities of an agent, we can accelerate AI transformation for organizations across industries and help them realize successful business outcomes through pragmatic innovation.”