All over the world, heading offshore to outsource production has become so commonplace that it is now accepted as the norm. Offshoring does indeed make sense for many companies, especially those that want to establish a global footprint. Too many, however, outsource production for the wrong reasons.
Lured by the promise of cheaper labor, they are blind to the tactical costs of manufacturing overseas. While they may save money on unskilled labor and by achieving economies of scale, they ultimately will pay more because of longer lead times, increased inventories, the need for more management resources for planning and logistics, and constraints on their ability to respond quickly to changing demand.
Despite these and other hidden costs, offshore manufacturing has become a fact of life. Now the challenge for many companies is to manage the resulting global supply chain effectively. They can accomplish this by conducting thorough research, developing a logical strategy, and managing proactively to prevent problems. Effective management also requires establishing open communication with suppliers about expectations, especially when all requirements are contractual.
If you are considering offshoring some or all of your manufacturing, the following will provide a basic guide to the potential problems, business considerations, and success strategies associated with this increasingly common practice.
Know the pain points
No matter what business you're in, you will find that offshoring brings many pain points to the fore. When outsourcing some or all of your operations, you will have to deal with longer lead times. Their length will be determined by the complexity, variation, and shipping times for the parts or products involved. Longer lead times will also require you to forecast inventory needs more accurately.
In addition, you'll confront cultural and time-zone differences that can make communication difficult and can engender misunderstandings. You'll need to address issues of product integrity, quality, and variation. Sometimes you may encounter impractical shipping options. And you may have limited or no visibility into the overseas operation, making it difficult to identify a problem before it's too late to fix it.
The most pressing of these problems are lead times and quality issues. There's no getting around the fact that transit times, not to mention often-forgotten factors like holidays, vacations, and the like in the manufacturing country, will greatly increase a product's lead time. Because every company wants to have sufficient products on hand when its customers want them, you will likely have to stockpile inventory—and that will incur enormous costs in capital and warehousing. Accurate, effective forecasting will help, but even the best forecasts won't remain accurate when they must be firmed up two to six months in advance of production.
Additional pressure to stockpile inventory can result when sourcing a single item from an overseas manufacturer that insists on shipping full ocean containers. This requirement forces you to buy more of a product than is needed at a particular time, which adds inventory, transportation, and storage costs. Moreover, many Asian manufacturers require cash up front for their services. All of these factors can force your company to make larger capital investments than intended.
Another critical issue is maintaining product quality and integrity. A number of incidents involving manufacturers in Asia that produced substandard or unsafe products have made the news recently. Involvement in such a scandal can cost you—not only in lost profits but also in brand loyalty. It's hard to gain back trust once it's been lost.
Quality issues often are closely tied to a lack of visibility into offshore manufacturing operations. If you choose to manufacture overseas, you must be willing and able to closely oversee those operations (or hire someone trustworthy to do so) to ensure that quality standards are being met.
Given all the potential problems associated with offshore manufacturing, you might wonder why anyone would want to do it. The reason is that, at least for some, the benefits outweigh the pitfalls. To make sure that is indeed the case—in other words, that it is not just a matter of perception and that the benefits actually do outweigh the negatives—you'll need to do extensive, thorough, and accurate research before going ahead.
Research first
It goes without saying that nobody should jump right into something as complex and fraught with pitfalls as offshore manufacturing without first doing extensive, careful research.
One mistake companies often make is focusing on the lowest purchase price per item instead of considering the total landed cost of sourcing from offshore suppliers. Total landed cost includes such cost factors as transportation, port charges, duties and taxes, insurance, and material. It also includes internal, "soft" costs, such as those for capital tied up in excess inventory and storage and for often-overlooked considerations like the cost of handling inefficiently loaded containers.
Not all products are suited to offshoring. The ones that are most suitable may be those that have long lifecycles, are simple and cheap, do not undergo frequent design changes, will be sold or used in the region where they are produced, and/or require significant manual labor inputs.
There are several reasons why these types of products make good candidates for offshore manufacturing. For one thing, when products have longer lifecycles, there is less risk associated with carrying enough inventory to compensate for long lead times. For another, it may be more cost effective to outsource items that are cheap enough that quality isn't a concern; that is, if it's less costly to scrap bad parts overseas than it would be to manufacture in the home country to the quality standards required to avoid scrapping bad parts.
Other strong candidates are parts or products that will be sold near the site of manufacture or will be shipped to another offshore location for assembly. Manufacturing products in the region where they will be sold results in shorter lead times, lower inventories, improved customer service, and higher profits. Moreover, buying a component offshore for use in an assembly that is produced in the same region improves lead times and flexibility while reducing working-capital requirements.
Finally, when it comes to labor, the value-added content can be as important as the cost of wages and benefits. When a product with low value-added content is manufactured in a process that eliminates waste, it may actually be cheaper to produce it locally rather than offshore.
After determining which products are suitable for outsourcing, it's time to consider where to produce them. Not all offshore locations are created equal, and—as noted earlier—cheap labor shouldn't be the only deciding factor. While investigating various locales, consider not only labor costs but also managerial costs (which may not be as inexpensive as many people assume); protections provided for intellectual property; the availability of utilities and other infrastructure, including associated trade-offs (for example, good roads versus poor roads); and local culture— especially as it pertains to business and legal practices.
All of these considerations will come into play in another important step: creating a "value-chain map" that captures all of the costs and operational data (such as cycle times, inventory, and so forth) associated with your product's journey from the offshore facility to its final destination. Visualizing each point in the value stream, from order to delivery, makes it possible to predict where problems might occur—and to take steps to prevent them from happening.
Prevent problems
Once you've completed that "homework" and (with the aid of a value-chain map) have developed plans to address every identifiable contingency, you can take steps to help ensure the success of your offshoring venture.
Perhaps the best advice is to do everything possible to avoid problems in the first place! And that's essentially what the following suggestions are all about. They may seem quite basic, but these preventive measures are often overlooked when companies focus simply on cheap labor.
Perform comprehensive assessments of offshore suppliers to ensure that they are capable of meeting your expectations. Look at areas such as manufacturing capabilities (such as productivity and quality) and capacities, quality systems, technology and technical expertise, ability to comply with specifications, cost structure, and financial stability.
Lay out terms for agreements and partnerships in contractual form. Specify exactly what you need with respect to quality, cost, delivery, and service.
Communicate regularly and clearly with offshore suppliers. Don't assume that an offshore manufacturer understands what you require. Put expectations in clear, unambiguous writing, especially with respect to quality, and be prepared to follow up.
Use key metrics and a scorecard system to understand if product is flowing as planned. Establishing a system for tracking and measuring performance— much like those you use on the home-based manufacturing floor—will allow you to assess offshore performance at a glance and will provide early warning when product flow is getting off-track.
Visit offshore manufacturing sites regularly to find and solve problems before they become big enough to affect your company's ability to profitably meet its customers' requirements.
Weigh the facts
Offshoring can be a logical and cost-effective way to improve your company's competitiveness, but as we've seen, there's more to it than simply choosing a manufacturing site or finding a contract manufacturer overseas.
Ensuring success requires learning and weighing all of the facts before contracting with an offshore supplier. Map the value chain, understand your total landed costs, visit the potential supplier, and thoroughly assess its capabilities to be certain that the right partner has been selected. Once you've chosen that partner, document all of your requirements regarding order volumes, product specifications, and operational details in the contract. And finally, monitor offshore suppliers no differently than you would your own manufacturing operations.
Going offshore can improve your competitiveness and open up new markets; just remember to make that decision based on facts that take all costs into account. And once you've decided to manufacture overseas, stay vigilant and continue to carefully monitor and manage your supplier.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.