The year 2017 is looking very good for retailers. As the end of the year approaches, consumer spending continues to be supported by elevated levels of confidence and solid gains in employment, real disposable income, and household net worth. Strong gains in the equity markets are also helping to boost discretionary spending this holiday season.
While the outlook is positive for retailers in general, one channel—online sales—is consistently outperforming its counterpart, the brick-and-mortar stores. Online holiday retail sales growth this year is likely to outpace last year's growth, roaring ahead at a 13.0 percent year-on-year rate, according to the IHS Markit forecast. (See Figure 1.) As a share of holiday spending, online retail sales reach new highs every year, and this year will be no exception: in 2016, online sales represented 16.8 percent of holiday retail sales, while this year that share is likely to be 18.2 percent.
[Figure 2] Core goods prices decline while services prices riseEnlarge this image
Online retail sales follow a cyclical pattern and typically are particularly robust during the holiday shopping season. During the past five years, electronic shopping and mail-order sales (not seasonally adjusted) were an average of 30.1 percent higher in December than in the prior month of November. But there is also a structural change happening: online stores are tremendously outpacing brick-and-mortar retailers across the board, not just during the holidays. As a share of total retail trade, e-commerce increases every year, and its pace is quickening; in the third quarter of 2017, the online portion of retail trade was 16.4 percent, compared with 14.8 percent a mere one year earlier.
Several factors are responsible for this shift. Convenience cannot be denied, and as online shopping gains share, shipping and delivery times by online retailers and parcel delivery services have dropped. But the biggest factor is prices. The absence of a sales tax for many online retailers without a physical presence in a given state gives these retailers a built-in price advantage. The cost of holding inventory is also lower for online retailers, which can store vast quantities in centralized warehouses until they are needed. From the consumer's perspective, the online nature of cyber-stores makes comparison shopping possible across virtually the entire world. And new smartphone-based "shopping apps" that can send live updates on bargains and promotions, as well as scour the Internet for deals, have allowed some shoppers to find the lowest prices in real time.
Consumer goods prices slide downward
The supremacy of e-commerce is pushing down prices at brick-and-mortar stores, which are increasingly fighting for market share, and so are offering amped-up price promotions. But online sales are not the only reason consumers are finding that their dollars go farther than usual. Prices for goods across the U.S.—and to some extent, across the globe—are growing slowly or even declining. On a quarterly year-over-year basis, consumer prices for commodities other than food and energy have been in negative territory since the first half of 2013. There are several factors at play:
The stronger dollar over the past couple of years has helped to lower the cost of imported consumer goods. Moreover, the strong dollar has reduced the competitiveness of U.S. exports in international markets, resulting in a larger supply surplus at home.
Many multinational corporations are shifting production or sourcing away from the eastern provinces of China, where labor costs have been rising, to lower-cost areas such as Vietnam or China's interior and western provinces.
Lower energy prices imply lower transportation costs for U.S. importers. In addition, domestically sourced goods and materials have become less expensive to transport.
The cost of many consumer goods that are especially popular during the holidays, such as televisions and electronics, continues to decline as their production becomes more efficient. Indeed, television and computer prices have fallen by more than 10 percent a year over most of the last decade.
The U.S. economic recovery is currently over eight years old—a relatively mature age for expansions. Often, inflationary pressure begins to build up during the latter stages of an expansion. This time, however, price and wage inflation have remained subdued. (See Figure 2.) In the third quarter of 2017, the Federal Reserve's favorite measure of core inflation, the core personal consumption expenditures (PCE) deflator excluding food and energy, was the slowest since 2015. There are many plausible explanations for this persistently low inflation, but little consensus as to the root causes. Some possible reasons include:
Lackluster growth and, for some countries, large output gaps. Sometimes referred to as "secular stagnation," the languid recovery from the 2008-09 recession has had a restraining effect on the buildup of inflationary pressures.
Excess industrial capacity. Global goods prices have also been pushed down by substantial amounts of excess capacity (much of it in China) in industries such as steel, iron ore, chemicals, and automotive.
Technology. Product and process innovations are cutting production costs and are being passed on to consumers as lower prices (or at least smaller price increases).
International commodity prices have gained some traction in the latter half of 2017, which may complicate this picture. As measured by the IHS Markit Materials Price Index (MPI), they rose at the end of 2016, suffered a correction between February and June, and started rising strongly again in the third quarter. Reasons for the third-quarter rebound include favorable data from China and Europe, the U.S. dollar depreciation, higher oil prices, and investor buying.
China is the biggest factor for the buoyant mood in markets. Growth has proven to be remarkably stable in 2017, with industrial activity actually accelerating into the second quarter before easing in July. The performance of the eurozone economy has also proved to be a pleasant surprise. At the same time, increased instability in the U.S. has been weighing on the dollar since the start of the year. Our research shows that for certain exchange-traded commodities, as much as half of the movement in the U.S. dollar is translated into an opposite move in prices. Higher oil prices, another feature of the current rally, act in a number of ways to influence the broader commodity complex, and investors have also added some momentum. Investors moved to the sidelines in commodity markets between 2013 and 2015 as prices first peaked and then began their long fall in the summer of 2014, but this began to reverse in 2016.
Looking forward, we do not expect commodities to come to the rescue for goods prices. Fundamentals do not point to a prolonged rally. For example, we expect to see a slowdown in real gross domestic product (GDP) growth in China and financial markets to tighten. Interest rates are moving higher, and the U.S. dollar is expected to begin depreciating in the second half of 2018. This should place some upward pressure on price inflation for imported consumer goods. Until then, though, look for lower consumer good prices to continue—a positive development for the American consumer this holiday season. Happy shopping!
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.