When was the last time you sat down and talked with a customer? For many supply chain professionals, the answer is likely to be "not lately," or worse yet, "rarely, if ever."
That's not surprising, really; supply chain professionals are often considered specialists who aggressively pursue cost and efficiency primarily by working with suppliers and within their companies' four walls. Few companies, moreover, have truly embraced supply chain management's role in driving profitable growth and increasing sales.
But if you want to significantly improve your chances of becoming a senior leader—and perhaps lead an entire supply chain organization or even run a business—getting to know the customer is essential. After all, without customers, you don't have a business.
Let's say you are one of several executives being considered for a big promotion. Imagine that a closed-door conversation is under way about potential candidates for the job. After discussing the top three candidates, one of the key decision makers has this to say: "We are fortunate to have three strong choices; every one of these candidates has a demonstrated track record of success. However, Joe is the only one who has significant customer and market experience. A couple of years ago, he developed a performance goal that required him to visit at least one customer per month. In the beginning, Joe asked a friend of his in the sales organization if he could 'tag along' on a customer visit simply to learn and observe. I know for a fact that these days, Joe is being invited to attend customer meetings. This guy understands the customer and really adds value."
Are you Joe? Let's hope that you are, because this vignette is based on a true story. The real-life Joe is now a senior vice president of supply chain for a large company. Joe distinguished himself by getting to know the customer. Before that, he was seen as an "inside guy" who did a great job "behind the scenes." He knew, however, that to achieve his aspirations, he would need to broaden his experience. Although getting out into the field to meet customers was uncomfortable at first, Joe ultimately learned a lot about his company's customers and how a supply chain professional with passion can add value to the customer relationship.
Don't succumb to stereotypes
Now, with Joe's experience in mind, take a look at your own career objectives and goals for 2010. Are any of them related to enhancing revenue, customer acquisition, market share, or customer satisfaction? If you do have customer-related goals, that's great! Your company appears to embrace supply chain management's role in driving profitable growth. If you do not, don't worry; that doesn't mean you never will. The traditional role of the supply chain executive is evolving, albeit slowly, in many companies and industries.
To help push this change forward, it may be beneficial to ask ourselves, why do supply chain professionals sometimes believe that customers are "off limits"? After all, supply chain management embodies the entire business system. The last time I looked, the customer was a major part of this system. Are we hindered by the stereotype of a supply chain professional being primarily an internal player who is analytically oriented and maybe even introverted? Do we, perhaps, have a negative stereotype of the sales profession, which typically handles face-to-face customer meetings? Do we see them as nonanalytical extroverts who will promise anything to make the sale?
These are important questions. If you are candid with yourself, you can ask them with courage, face the answers objectively, and do something to dismantle the stereotypes that are holding you back from direct customer contact.
An important step is to recognize that stereotypes about sales and supply chain management being incompatible are not logical. The best supply chain leaders have terrific people skills that enable them to get things done, often without formal authority. Successful supply chain executives have great influencing skills, and they persuade others by connecting with their hearts and minds. Think about it: Doesn't this sound a bit like the description of an effective sales executive? Don't you "sell" your ideas and plans to other people every day?
Build your "brand"
Even after recognizing the similarities between sales and supply chain management, some of us may still feel apprehensive about engaging directly with customers. We may feel uncomfortable moving into an unfamiliar area. Maybe we are concerned that we might make a mistake and look bad. But taking this risk is worth it in the long run; it will help each of us build a personal "leadership brand" that includes a strong personal relationship with customers.
Your leadership brand comprises all the associations that people make when they think about you. Like any good commercial brand, it can be a source of great equity—or, if not developed and managed properly, a drag on your career. Think of a great brand that you admire. What goes through your head when you hear that company's name? What associations do you make with its products?
Personal brands operate the same way. Imagine that right now, 200 people who have interacted with you hear your name. What associations do they make? Are they associations you desire for yourself?
Certainly, you want those associations to be positive: "Jane is a strong leader and a risk taker; I'm confident in her ability to get results." Now, what if we add this association: "Jane understands customers." Imagine what will happen when all of the people who interact with Jane have that same customer-focused association whenever they think of her. My bet is that Jane's career will be a long and successful one.
If you want your personal brand to include a strong customer-focused association, then you will need to get out of your office and spend time in the market. Ask your supporters to look for opportunities to meet customers. Ask to attend sales and marketing meetings to observe and get to know the people who provide customer access. Open your mind to a new opportunity to grow. Most importantly, don't be afraid to venture into new territory.
It has often been said that what you conceive and believe you can achieve. If you believe you belong in the customer's office, you will get there. It is up to you to make it happen.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.