Leslie Levesque focuses on forecasting and analysis of the Canadian economy at IHS Global Insight. She previously worked for Putnam Invest ments and Bain Capital. Levesque has a master?s degree in International Economics from Suffolk University.
What's the world's largest bilateral trade relationship? You might be surprised to learn that it does not involve China. The biggest bilateral economic trade occurs in the Western Hemisphere, between the United States and Canada. These two neighbors exchanged goods and services valued at more than US $700 billion in 2009.
The strength of U.S.-Canada trade is not simply a matter of proximity, although that certainly plays a role. The relationship also revolves around cultural, geographic, economic, sociological, and political similarities and disparities (asymmetry).
In terms of per-capita economic growth, the United States and Canada are similar, with the Americans slightly ahead of their northern neighbor in most economic categories. Canada's percapita income, at purchasing power parity (PPP), is approximately 80 percent of the U.S. level, due primarily to the United States' greater competitiveness and productivity. PPP is the rate of currency conversion that eliminates the price differences between countries.
The asymmetry between the two countries can mainly be found in their comparative economic size, which has important implications for the economy of the smaller economic partner. Thus, the combined trends in the health of the U.S. economy and in developments affecting supply chains have a disproportionate impact on Canada.
Cross-border integration Canada's proximity to the United States offers insights into the level of integration between the two countries' economies and supply chain activities. Approximately 90 percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the U.S. border, while 85 percent of Canada's 20 largest cities are located within 110 miles of the border. Many Canadian production and distribution centers are situated closer to major U.S. markets than their American counterparts are.
Cross-border integration
Canada's proximity to the United States offers insights into the level of integration between the two countries' economies and supply chain activities. Approximately 90 percent of Canadians live within 100 miles of the U.S. border, while 85 percent of Canada's 20 largest cities are located within 110 miles of the border. Many Canadian production and distribution centers are situated closer to major U.S. markets than their American counterparts are.
There are more than 15,000 Canadian-owned companies in the United States, and many of them depend on integrated, cross-border supply chains that handle high-value-added goods and services. Trade liberalization has been an important factor in this development. The first substantial trade liberalization agreement between the two nations was the Automotive Agreement of 1965, which eliminated tariffs on automobiles and parts. The Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement of 1989, which eventually morphed into the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), eliminated most nonagricultural tariffs.
The level of economic similarity, geographic proximity, and bilateral trade liberalization between the two countries has also increased economic trade flows in similar manufactured goods. Approximately 50 percent of all merchandise trade consists of intermediate production inputs, and more than 33 percent of cross-border shipments are intracompany transfers. This is one reason why supply chain connectivity in certain sectors more closely resembles a web than a chain. Automotive parts, for example, frequently cross the border six or more times before entering the final assembly stage.
The flow of some commodities and finished goods, however, is unidirectional—mostly southbound trade destined for the U.S. market. One example is energy, which is a huge component of U.S.-Canada trade. Approximately 25 percent of U.S. petroleum imports are from Canada, and over 90 percent of Canada's energy exports are destined for U.S. consumers and businesses. The southbound energy flows from Canada to the United States are highly integrated, and the energy infrastructure serving the two countries is wellconnected and efficient. In addition, the neighbors' strong economic and political relationship and peaceful border allow significant crossdependence relative to energy inventories, thus helping to reduce the United States' dependence on volatile energy markets. In this sense, unidirectional trade has benefited both countries.
Retailers look northward
One of the significant asymmetries between the United States and Canada is the role trade (exports plus imports) plays in each economy. In 2009, trade as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) was approximately 18 percent for the United States; for Canada it was 48 percent. Exports to the United States alone represent 18 percent of Canada's GDP. This exposure to the U.S. economy, and therefore to the U.S. consumer—remember that consumer spending represents 70 percent of U.S. GDP—places Canada in a very vulnerable position and exposes the country's economy to U.S. economic cycles. This was easily observed during the recent recession. As the housing and financial crisis was working its way through the U.S. economy, retail sales plummeted, thereby constricting both Canadian and U.S. manufacturing. However, Canadian consumption expenditures did not experience the same downturn that was seen in the United States. (See Figures 1 and 2.)
A major reason for the smaller slump in Canada's consumer spending was the country's regulatory control over the way Canadian financial institutions manage mortgages. That policy shielded Canada from some of the massive dips in the economy seen in the United States. Because consumers were less affected by the downturn than their U.S. counterparts, they were able to take advantage of falling interest rates and increased their spending. This ultimately helped drive Canada's economy out of recession, but it has led to record levels of debt among Canadian households.
The Canadian consumer's resilience has many U.S. retailers eyeing a possible expansion across the border. U.S.-based companies that have already entered the Canadian retail space include American Apparel, Bath and Body Works, and Aldo. Recently, Target, Express, and Zumiez have confirmed plans to expand into this market.
Over the last few years, U.S. retailers entering the Canadian market have tweaked their domestic supply chain networks to handle northbound goods. Because most Canadian businesses and major cities are clustered near the border, U.S. retailers that expand into Canada are well-positioned to efficiently serve their new customers. Another advantage to expanding within North America: U.S.-based distribution operations can keep costs lower because they will have shorter distances to cover than they would if they expanded overseas. As the automotive industry's experience shows, there are also opportunities to keep costs low through the exchange of manufactured goods across the border.
In light of the demand shock U.S. retailers suffered during the past two years, moving into Canadian markets seems like a natural and logical diversification of risk. Moreover, the reduction of the Canadian corporate tax rate from 18 percent to 16.5 percent on January 1, 2011, and the further reduction to 15 percent scheduled for January 1, 2012, make Canada even more attractive to U.S. companies. Still, with Canadians becoming more cautious about spending, American companies expanding northward will have to make keeping costs low one of their top priorities.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.
The new funding brings Amazon's total investment in Anthropic to $8 billion, while maintaining the e-commerce giant’s position as a minority investor, according to Anthropic. The partnership was launched in 2023, when Amazon invested its first $4 billion round in the firm.
Anthropic’s “Claude” family of AI assistant models is available on AWS’s Amazon Bedrock, which is a cloud-based managed service that lets companies build specialized generative AI applications by choosing from an array of foundation models (FMs) developed by AI providers like AI21 Labs, Anthropic, Cohere, Meta, Mistral AI, Stability AI, and Amazon itself.
According to Amazon, tens of thousands of customers, from startups to enterprises and government institutions, are currently running their generative AI workloads using Anthropic’s models in the AWS cloud. Those GenAI tools are powering tasks such as customer service chatbots, coding assistants, translation applications, drug discovery, engineering design, and complex business processes.
"The response from AWS customers who are developing generative AI applications powered by Anthropic in Amazon Bedrock has been remarkable," Matt Garman, AWS CEO, said in a release. "By continuing to deploy Anthropic models in Amazon Bedrock and collaborating with Anthropic on the development of our custom Trainium chips, we’ll keep pushing the boundaries of what customers can achieve with generative AI technologies. We’ve been impressed by Anthropic’s pace of innovation and commitment to responsible development of generative AI, and look forward to deepening our collaboration."