Since the end of the Cold War, trade liberalization and globalization have increased at a very rapid pace. As a result, the United States and Europe have become increasingly dependent on Asian imports to satisfy domestic consumer demand, aided by Asia's continuing appetite for U.S. and European financial assets, especially in the form of sovereign debt.
Two countries in particular, the United States and China, have developed a very close trade and financial relationship, but their economic strategies differ. The United States continues to borrow, import, and run up public debt, with important negative implications for the long-term sustainability of the U.S dollar as an international reserve currency. Meanwhile, China, by contrast, has been saving, exporting, investing, and purchasing U.S. debt.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Global composition of GDP and consumer spendingEnlarge this image
China has the "comparative advantage" of production and assembly of low-value-added consumer goods, which it exports to North American and European markets. China's exports are also aided by a foreign-exchange policy that keeps its currency devalued against the U.S. dollar to encourage and sustain exports in key sectors. The United States, on the other hand, has so far opted for a consumer-driven growth model. (For more about the principle of comparative advantage, see "Monetary Matters" in the Q3/2012 issue of CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly.)
Until recently, infrastructure investments and exports were the primary engines of China's economic growth; since 2001, investment has been the largest contributor to the growth of the country's gross domestic product (GDP). However, in October 2012, China's National Bureau of Statistics reported that private and public consumption accounted for over 50 percent of GDP growth in 2011 and during the first three quarters of 2012. It appears that the Chinese economy is finally making the transition to a more consumption-driven economic model, with investment playing a secondary role.
A tale of two consumers
While historically the U.S. consumer has been a key driver of trade patterns, China's move toward a more consumption-based economy foreshadows its future importance as a consumer market fueled by accumulating wealth and a growing middle class. That change is happening faster than many would have anticipated. In 2011 private per-capita consumption in China stood at US $1,863. That is expected to steadily increase, as consumer spending adjusted for inflation is forecast to grow, on average, 7.75 percent per year for the next 10 years. Looked at from another perspective, the potential influence of China as a consuming market becomes even clearer. In 2001 Chinese consumers represented only 3.0 percent of global consumer spending, but by 2011 they had come to represent 6.1 percent of the total. IHS Global Insight is forecasting that by 2021 Chinese consumer spending should grow to almost 13 percent of global spending. That means the Chinese consumer gains a two-fold increase in the percentage share of global private consumption every 10 years. Further, consumer spending as a share of China's GDP is projected to increase from 33.2 percent in 2010 to 37.3 percent by 2020.
Contrast this with the United States, where consumer spending per capita in 2011 stood at US $34,347. Meanwhile, consumer spending adjusted for inflation is expected to grow, on average, slightly above 2.0 percent per year for the next 10 years. In 2001 American consumers represented 36.4 percent of global consumer spending; by 2011, however, they represented 26.9 percent. IHS Global Insight forecasts that by 2021 the United States will represent only slightly more than one-fifth of global consumer spending. Moreover, U.S. consumer spending as a share of GDP is expected to drop slightly from its current standing of 70.5 percent to 69.5 percent by 2020.
Global consumption patterns shifting
Although it is likely that U.S. consumers will still claim the highest percentage share of global consumption in 2021, the global distribution of consumption shares is diversifying beyond the mature economies that have long dominated consumer spending. India, Latin America, China, and emerging Eastern European nations will gain in terms of global GDP and consumer spending shares—indeed, China's GDP is expected to equal that of the United States in the near future—while the shares held by the United States, Japan, and Western Europe are forecast to decline. (See Figure 1.)
Worldwide changes in consumption are likely to result in some production rebalancing during the next 10 years, but those changes may not be as significant as some might expect. It is anticipated that some multinational corporations will relocate production facilities to the United States or elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere, or move operations to Vietnam from China, but this shift will be relatively minor. In addition, the expected growth in the number of consumers and their spending power in markets like China and Vietnam may help to keep production facilities nearby.
The coming changes in global consumption and production should have a major, largely positive impact on supply chain risks. During the worldwide financial and economic downturn, low-value-added production continued to be concentrated in emerging markets, while consumers were concentrated in the more economically advanced parts of the world. But as the 2011 earthquake in Japan and floods in Thailand showed, there are substantial risks associated with global supply chains that link highly concentrated production in emerging economies with consumption in developed regions.
Such risks of supply-chain disruption have not been mitigated, let alone adequately addressed. However, as the consumer base broadens and diversifies across many countries, demand-side disruptions will not be as dramatic and should help mitigate any shocks emanating from a single nation. In other words, the U.S. consumer's declining global consumption share could be interpreted as a "blessing in disguise," as it will allow for a more balanced distribution of the effects of a sudden consumption or production shock.
A final note: A key feature in the future pattern of production and consumption across nations will be the global monetary arrangements adopted by markets and policy makers. In an environment where capital and financial markets continue to become more closely integrated, currency and exchange-rate manipulations are bound to further lose market legitimacy. Therefore, market participants need to pay close attention to developments related to sovereign debt and the worldwide competition for international currency-reserve status.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.