At Intermountain Healthcare, Brent Johnson oversees a remarkably wide range of activities--everything from warehousing and transportation to sustainability and laundry services. Bringing all that and more under the supply chain umbrella, he says, leads to better service at lower cost.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
As his title suggests, Brent T. Johnson, Intermountain Healthcare's vice president supply chain & support services and chief purchasing officer, oversees some areas that don't normally fall under a supply chain professional's purview. In addition to managing the company's US $1.5 billion nonlabor spend, he's responsible for a number of other functions that are pivotal to the Utah-based health-care provider's success, such as laundry and linen services, sustainability, environmental services, clinical engineering, food and nutrition, information technology asset management, and printing.
Intermountain Healthcare's senior leadership views supply chain management as strategically important for the company, and it has supported major investments in labor and facility resources that bring added value, Johnson says. In 2012, the company demonstrated its commitment to supply chain excellence by opening the US $40 million Intermountain Kem C. Gardner Supply Chain Center, a 327,000-square-foot distribution, warehouse, and office complex near Salt Lake City, Utah, that employs more than 350 people. The facility, which has qualified for Gold LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, stocks and distributes more than 2.5 million medical items annually. The center also brings together under a single roof some of the programs and services that previously had been scattered across Intermountain's system. By so doing, the company has centralized the control of purchasing, warehousing, transportation, distribution, and other traditional supply chain functions.
To Johnson's mind there's good reason to bring all that and more under the supply chain umbrella. The nonprofit's supply chain organization, he believes, has the expertise and problem-solving skills to improve many of the processes and activities that support Intermountain Healthcare's network of hospitals, clinics, pharmacies, a health plans division, and other health services. The more efficiently and cost-effectively they are managed, the better the outcome for patient and provider alike, he says.
In this interview, Johnson—who came to the health care field from the electric utility industry—tells Managing Editor Toby Gooley how this inclusive approach and best practices he's adopting from other industries will help the company reduce the cost of providing health services while maintaining its high standard of care.
Name: Brent T. Johnson Title: Vice President Supply Chain & Support Services Organization: Intermountain Healthcare Education: Bachelor of Arts in Finance, Weber State University; Master of Business Administration, University of Utah Business Experience: Director Supply Chain at PacifiCorp; Senior Supply Chain Consultant, Denali Consulting; Director Supply Chain at ARUP Laboratories
Whom does the new supply chain center serve?
It was built to serve one company: Intermountain Healthcare. We're the largest company in Utah, with 33,000 employees, 22 hospitals, 185 clinics, and 26 retail pharmacies, plus a health plan. The distribution center will support all operations for all of the hospitals, the clinics, and our home-care service.
What functional areas does the supply chain center handle, and what makes that unusual?
The whole campus totals about 327,000 square feet of building space, but only 160,000 of that is the distribution center. The administrative building is 60,000 square feet, and there's a 40,000-square-foot materials management and logistics wing. We also have a 60,000-square-foot ancillary services building.
There are other, similarly large DCs in the health-care industry, but few are built adjacent to or combined with supply chain management functions the way ours is. Everything that's involved in managing our supply chain is in this one center: purchasing, accounts payable, sourcing, analytics, information systems, logistics—including our courier department, which has 140 people and 80 vehicles—distribution, and warehousing. We have a call center for supply chain functions and a medical-surgical recall management center. Sustainability also reports to supply chain.
We also put waste stream management, publishing services, and linen services under the supply chain function. For example, we have a central laundry that reports to me, and linen services is co-located in the same facility so that we are now cross-docking linens to hospitals. That's unique in health care, where they typically don't manage these types of activities as rigorously as other aspects of the business. Generally if health-care providers have extra money, they spend it on clinical care. They don't realize that having poor technology and processes does impact clinical care.
We evaluated 12 to 15 other programs [for possible location at the supply chain campus]. We selected whichever ones had the best business case. Some we own, and some are outsourced but we control them.
You expect savings of about $200 million over the first five years the supply chain center is in operation. Where will those savings come from?
The savings will come from a number of areas, starting with managing the contracts for and distribution of our basic medical and surgical products. This includes over 200 contracts with 7,000 products. Some of the savings will come from lower pricing. More will come from efficiencies—fewer touches—and even more will come from increased service levels that will impact patient care and remove the supply burden from the nurses. Also, from one distribution center, we intend to reduce by one-third the 15,000 road miles we put on to deliver products and equipment to our facilities. We will cross-dock many other products from other supply chains that make sense—clinical, pharmaceutical, lab, IT, linen, food, MRO [maintenance, repair, and operations], etc.
But we expect four other areas, from our ancillary services that are co-located at the supply chain center, to generate more value and savings. The first is pharmacy services. We installed a 20,000-square-foot pharmaceutical fulfillment center and invested in $8 to $10 million of robotic equipment. We buy pharmaceuticals in bulk and use the robots to break them down and prepackage orders. That way every hospital doesn't have to buy in bulk, which means that they don't have to buy more than they need. This system helps us manage expiration dates, too. We expect to reduce pharmaceuticals inventory for hospitals and our 26 retail pharmacies, many of them in our clinics, by 40 percent. We have a pharmacy call center on site, and we can take advantage of the warehouse and courier services being located together on the same campus.
Number two is printing. Before, printing was being done all over the place. Now we print 800 million pieces a year coordinated from this one location for the whole company. The supply chain function manages it, and we see lots of opportunities to reduce costs.
Third is IT asset management. We have centralized the storage and shipping of equipment, and we use our own couriers to deliver things like laptops, printers, and copiers. We ship out about 1,200 devices a month. All of the used assets come back here for asset recovery.
And fourth is our ancillary imaging equipment service program. We have 2,000 or so imaging devices in our system. Rather than outsource that, we started hiring our own technicians and are managing it ourselves. They have their own call center and space for sourcing, repair, and storage here on the supply chain campus.
We are also saving a lot of money in procurement. We have the most robust purchasing card system in health care. By implementing about 5,000 "p-cards" we removed 250,000 transactions worth $70 million a year from our system, including travel, fleet management, and asset recovery, among others.
In what other ways is Intermountain's supply chain strategy different than most in the health care industry?
We have implemented Low Unit of Measure (LUM) technology in our medical-surgical distribution operations, where we bypass our own warehouses at the hospitals and deliver standardized products in LUM totes every night to every nursing floor and clinic. To do this we have installed high-end technology conveyor systems and voice-directed picking to maximize efficiency and improve quality.
Another key to success was standardizing products across the system's 22 hospitals. This took extensive efforts working with nursing product committees. When you have to pay for the touch and inventory of every item, it becomes very important to you. Often these costs are hidden behind distributors and other supply chain partners.
Any other changes in the works?
If you look at all the operations that make up Intermountain, you will see that there are a lot of supply chains. Medical and surgical supplies are only one aspect. We also have food and nutrition, IT, clinical engineering, and others. They all have their own supply chains, and they have their own way of getting supplies and materials in and out. We've gotten very good at managing medical supplies, which represents the largest volume. Now we're looking at those other supply chains to see what value we can add by handling them.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.
Grocers and retailers are struggling to get their systems back online just before the winter holiday peak, following a software hack that hit the supply chain software provider Blue Yonder this week.
The ransomware attack is snarling inventory distribution patterns because of its impact on systems such as the employee scheduling system for coffee stalwart Starbucks, according to a published report. Scottsdale, Arizona-based Blue Yonder provides a wide range of supply chain software, including warehouse management system (WMS), transportation management system (TMS), order management and commerce, network and control tower, returns management, and others.
Blue Yonder today acknowledged the disruptions, saying they were the result of a ransomware incident affecting its managed services hosted environment. The company has established a dedicated cybersecurity incident update webpage to communicate its recovery progress, but it had not been updated for nearly two days as of Tuesday afternoon. “Since learning of the incident, the Blue Yonder team has been working diligently together with external cybersecurity firms to make progress in their recovery process. We have implemented several defensive and forensic protocols,” a Blue Yonder spokesperson said in an email.
The timing of the attack suggests that hackers may have targeted Blue Yonder in a calculated attack based on the upcoming Thanksgiving break, since many U.S. organizations downsize their security staffing on holidays and weekends, according to a statement from Dan Lattimer, VP of Semperis, a New Jersey-based computer and network security firm.
“While details on the specifics of the Blue Yonder attack are scant, it is yet another reminder how damaging supply chain disruptions become when suppliers are taken offline. Kudos to Blue Yonder for dealing with this cyberattack head on but we still don’t know how far reaching the business disruptions will be in the UK, U.S. and other countries,” Lattimer said. “Now is time for organizations to fight back against threat actors. Deciding whether or not to pay a ransom is a personal decision that each company has to make, but paying emboldens threat actors and throws more fuel onto an already burning inferno. Simply, it doesn’t pay-to-pay,” he said.
The incident closely followed an unrelated cybersecurity issue at the grocery giant Ahold Delhaize, which has been recovering from impacts to the Stop & Shop chain that it across the U.S. Northeast region. In a statement apologizing to customers for the inconvenience of the cybersecurity issue, Netherlands-based Ahold Delhaize said its top priority is the security of its customers, associates and partners, and that the company’s internal IT security staff was working with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement to speed recovery. “Our teams are taking steps to assess and mitigate the issue. This includes taking some systems offline to help protect them. This issue and subsequent mitigating actions have affected certain Ahold Delhaize USA brands and services including a number of pharmacies and certain e-commerce operations,” the company said.
Editor's note:This article was revised on November 27 to indicate that the cybersecurity issue at Ahold Delhaize was unrelated to the Blue Yonder hack.