Minimizing shipping penalties with ocean visibility technology
When they have greater visibility into the location and status of ocean cargo, shippers can take preemptive actions to avoid demurrage and detention fees.
Mike Hane is the director, product marketing, transportation management, at Descartes where he helps to drive the go-to-market strategy for the company’s transportation management solutions. Hane brings over 25 years of experience in supply chain and transportation to the company, including software implementation, consulting,and sales and marketing. Before joining Descartes, Hane had a long tenure at Chainalytics (now NTT DATA Supply Chain Consulting) and held positions at CAPS Logistics, DAT Freight & Analytics, and Optilogic.
Houthi rebel attacks in the Red Sea, inflation, ongoing geopolitical conflict, consumer demand trends, Panama Canal disruptions, container ship overcapacity, and slow steaming—all factor into the rates charged for ocean transport. On top of these issues, shippers have less negotiating power on the base shipping rates for ocean freight compared with over-the-road modes of transport. Consequently, when ocean rates increase, shippers have even fewer options to reduce the impact of higher rates.
In the face of the volatility surrounding ocean shipping rates, there are actions that companies can take now within their own supply chain operations that can significantly reduce their total ocean shipping costs. One way that shippers can save money on ocean freight is to minimize ancillary charges, primarily demurrage and detention fees. Although both charges are commonplace in the maritime shipping business, employing technology for advanced, real-time ocean visibility can help to minimize these added expenses.
What are demurrage and detention fees?
Demurrage refers to the time a container sits inside the port or terminal, waiting to be loaded on the vessel or picked up outside of the free time allowed in the contract with the carrier. Each container is allowed a specified amount of free time for loading or unloading at the port or terminal (usually three to seven days). After free time elapses, demurrage fees are charged for each day the container is delayed. Delays can be precipitated by a variety of problems including improper scheduling or planning; miscommunication of arrival time; incomplete or erroneous customs paperwork or other required documentation; shortage of labor; late transport; port congestion; payment issues; and even bad weather.
Demurrage amounts vary widely depending on multiple factors, including the type of cargo, the port, the shipping line, and the contract terms. Typically, fees range from $50 to $300 for each day beyond the free time allowance per container. Just a few days of demurrage can easily add 50% to the cost of shipping a container, and the charges increase over time if the cargo remains in the terminal.
Detention fees are charged when a container is delayed outside the port or terminal past the free time allotted by the carrier (typically at the destination facility). Detention fees are anywhere from $25 to $100 for every extra day until the empty container is returned to the port or terminal. Detention is typically caused by misalignment of the container’s arrival time with downstream supply chain processes. Shippers may not have space in the warehouse to unload the cargo, or their manufacturing lines may not be ready to accept the materials on arrival. In these cases, it’s common for containers to sit beyond free time allowances. It’s also not uncommon for companies to lose track of which containers are short on free time in their yard—and simply miss opportunities to return containers before penalties ensue.
From the carrier’s perspective, these fees are necessary in order to keep containers and vessels moving—and reduce port congestion. For the unprepared shipper, however, demurrage and detention fees can add up fast, compounding the cost of a shipment. In fact, a study by the Federal Maritime Commission found that nine carriers collected roughly $13.4 billion in demurrage and detention charges between April 2020 and June 2023.
Reducing demurrage and detention charges
Shippers can take several different actions to reduce demurrage and detention fees, including:
Negotiation: Shippers can negotiate with a carrier for extended free time, as well as for reduced demurrage and detention fees. It should be noted, however, that this tactic is typically more successful for large volume shippers.
Dispute incorrect fees: If a shipper believes fees have been charged in error, the charges can be disputed per the carrier’s dispute resolution policy.
Dispatch in advance: Schedule container pickup and delivery as far in advance as possible to ensure available capacity.
Prepare for customs clearance: Obtaining customs clearance prior to container arrival at the port and paying duties in advance can help shippers avoid customs delays and related fees.
Communicate across the supply chain: Inadequate communication between ocean carriers, forwarders, shippers, and trucking/dray operators can cause delays that lead to demurrage and detention fees. With this in mind, timely and effective communication with inland carriers and other supply chain stakeholders can help to keep containers moving and minimize unnecessary penalties.
Establish a backup plan: Make sure a backup is in place in case issues arise with the primary dray or inland transport provider.
Track carrier performance: Monitoring service levels of carriers and service providers helps shippers choose reliable partners who are less likely to cause delays that lead to penalties.
Optimizing the supply chain with ocean visibility
In the end, this issue is not just about fees. While the penalties for demurrage and detention are costly, it is also important to realize that the associated delays can disrupt the supply chain and impact the ability to conduct business. Consequently, it is vital for shippers to have accurate and timely information on the location and status of their ocean freight to support several of the strategies outlined above—and real-time ocean visibility technology enables this access to information.
Real-time visibility into the exact location and status of ocean cargo—including customs clearance—can help shippers accurately predict estimated time of arrival (ETA) and avert the freight delays and supply chain disruptions that result in demurrage and detention charges. Greater visibility supports effective decision-making, allowing companies to make effective choices about carriers and transport, route optimization, storage, and resource allocation. Having a visibility platform provides a greater amount of data about carrier performance, such as on-time percentage, and insights into which carriers are better at capturing requested shipment data, such as temperature. Technology-enabled visibility also provides more reliable data on transportation lead times, so companies can make more informed decisions on whether to continue moving cargo on a certain path or change routes. With disruptions like the rerouting of freight around the Cape of Good Hope and the mixed impact on U.S. container import volumes due to the Panama Canal drought, improving operational efficiency with real-time visibility can help abate demurrage and detention costs. For example, companies could more intelligently assess whether they should continue to move freight through the Panama Canal to East Coast ports or land at West Coast ports and ship freight via road or rail to the East Coast.
The ideal ocean visibility platform provides continuous updates and sends automatic alerts when a shipment is at risk of exceeding free time. This valuable early warning allows shippers to take proactive measures, such as rescheduling appointments and re-prioritizing transport, to reduce the risk of demurrage and detention fees. For example, imagine you receive an alert that a time-sensitive load going to a high priority customer will be late by a day. You may have another load for the same product that is not as time-sensitive, or is allotted to a lower priority customer, which you could reroute to the high-priority customer.
Advanced ocean visibility platforms incorporate predictive analytics, as well. By analyzing historical data and current conditions, these tools can not only provide more accurate estimated arrival times for shipments but also more accurate estimated times when containers are available for pickup. This improves planning and coordination, increases supply chain efficiency, and reduces the likelihood of cargo sitting idle and incurring penalties.
Perhaps the most important benefit of ocean visibility is enhancing communication. A visibility platform enables data sharing with shipping and receiving locations, manufacturing plants, inland transportation providers, and the end customer. With the right information, decision-makers across the extended supply chain can take appropriate actions to keep shipments moving and reduce unforeseen and unnecessary costs.
Forklift batteries power the fleets at the center of facility operations. If your batteries are well-maintained, your team is empowered to drive efficient, sustainable, and productive operations. Given your forklift battery can also be as much as 30% of your forklift’s total cost, taking care of it is crucial not just for its longevity and efficiency, but in creating a safe, productive, and cost-effective facility. Improper battery care can create a financial strain on your company along with plenty of safety hazards.
Pulling from decades of experience helping some of the largest and busiest facilities across the country with their power management challenges, I’m sharing the most common mistakes that can shorten your forklift battery’s life by up to 60% or one to three years.
Most common forklift power system design mistakes
Four of the most common mistakes are associated with how a company designs its forklift power system, which includes not just the battery but also chargers and changers.
Not considering your batteries as part of a power system. Your system design should be based on more than just the forklift’s battery specification. The best power systems are built after an assessment of your facility’s applications and workflows, such as when and how batteries are watered. To drive higher uptimes and longer battery life, companies need to optimizing not just for everything they do today but also consider their future plans.
Using the wrong charger. Many companies, trying to save a little money, switch to new batteries but use old, mismatched chargers. For example, they change their batteries every five years, but only buy new chargers every 10-20 years. While the battery technology has improved, the charger (the intelligence) hasn’t, and that means they may not be getting the most out of their new battery equipment as far as charge profiles and efficiency. This shortens battery life, drives up power bills, and in the long term, ends up being more expensive than simply buying new chargers.
Having malfunctioning chargers. Chargers are designed to provide power to batteries up until 100% capacity. When a new model of charger is unable to provide full power, it is often due to malfunctioning power modules or communications issues between battery modules and the charger itself. Additionally, older style high frequency (HF), silicon controlled rectifier (SCR), and Ferro chargers may experience output capacity drop off due to malfunctioning fuses, diodes, SCRs, insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), and capacitors. If left unchecked, the reduced output of these chargers will cause batteries to sulfate and ultimately fail.
Not planning a charging standard operating procedure (SOP) in advance. Most companies charge when it’s best for the operator, but it’s important to set up a charging schedule that also takes into account the needs of your facility and your batteries. A schedule that accommodates both the operator’s and the battery’s needs will lengthen lifespan tremendously. This requires regular monitoring to ensure compliance with the charging SOP. If this is not maintained, batteries will often fail due to the lack of consistent charging.
Most common forklift power maintenance mistakes
The remaining common mistakes focus on how a company maintains its batteries and chargers.
Not implementing an equalization schedule. Lead acid batteries require an equalization charge on a regular basis to maintain their long-term health and capacity. Build a plan for equalization into your battery charger plug-up times, then set those schedules into your chargers.
Not watering correctly. Batteries need to be watered on a schedule. Ideally, batteries are watered right after charging to avoid electrolyte overflow issues, chemical spills, and degradation. Proper water levels ensure electrolytes stay in balance and batteries don’t overheat. These expensive mistakes add up over time.
Having a malfunctioning single-point watering system. Single-point watering systems are employed for labor savings in the weekly watering of batteries. While useful, these systems are subject to failure due to abuse and just normal wear and tear. Oftentimes, these systems will fail at individual watering points and are not noticeably malfunctioning. This will lead to unequal watering and ultimately a series of battery failure points over time. This too must be regularly monitored for proper function.
Not responding swiftly to maintenance issues. It’s important to set up a maintenance schedule so you can ensure every battery and charger gets attention when it should. Early identification of issues, paired with course correction, can nip issues in the bud, greatly extending the life of your equipment.
Your forklift batteries are the preservers of power at your facility. If properly cared for, they power smooth and reliable operations that keep downtime at bay. The unexpected can and will happen every single year—that’s just a part of business. But the expected, that is something we can prepare for. Companies that take a proactive approach to their power and their facility’s unique power are poised to take on any challenge with an uninterrupted power supply.
More than ever before, supply chain businesses are faced with dynamic conditions due to consumer buying trends, supply chain disruptions, and upheaval caused by other outside forces including war, political instability, and weather conditions. Supply chain companies, including warehouses, must be able to pivot quickly and make changes to operational processes without waiting for weeks or months.
As a result, warehouse management systems (WMS) need to be agile enough to make changes to operational processes and turn on a dime in today’s fast-paced world. Traditional warehouse management systems, however, are rigid and complex, not easy to customize or change. In addition, integrations—especially to modern technologies such as the internet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and machine learning—can be problematic.
Furthermore, traditional warehouse management systems depend on the expertise, experience, and knowledge of software developers to hand code applications. This type of technical labor is costly and can be hard to find, leading to dependence on the WMS software developer. Whenever changes or customizations to traditional WMS are needed, experienced software developers are needed, and this effort is usually time-consuming and expensive.
One solution is to consider a warehouse management system built on a low-code application platform (LCAP). Unlike traditional warehouse management systems, software applications built on LCAPs are more flexible, adaptable to meet changing business requirements, easier to integrate, and scalable.
[subhead] What are low-code application platforms?
LCAPs give users a visual, drag-and-drop interface that allows them to create applications by assembling prebuilt components, integrations, and templates. This simplification of the software development process facilitates faster prototyping, iteration, and deployment.
It also enables application development to be open to nontechnical users who may have significant experience, knowledge, and expertise in warehouse operations. Nontechnical users can work alongside IT resources to automate workflows, create business rules, process flows, and data models. To do this, visual tools are used to replace the need for writing complex code. Event-driven triggers and actions are leveraged to automate repetitive tasks and integrate with other systems. This can lead to better alignment of operational processes within the warehouse.
Low-code application platforms may also include features to promote team collaboration. Multiple users can work on the same project simultaneously, and version control mechanisms help to ensure that changes can be tracked and managed efficiently. In case it becomes necessary, rollback can be used to return to previous versions.
Low-code application platforms include tools for deployment, hosting, and maintenance. Applications can be deployed by users to a variety of environments with only minimal configuration. Maintenance and updates can be handled within the platform, and automated testing and deployment pipelines are frequently used.
Seven benefits of LCAPs
There are many benefits to using an LCAP as opposed to a traditionally coded warehouse management system, including:
1. Adaptability and ability to customize. LCAPs provide significant value for a WMS due to the speed at which applications, features, and customizations can be developed and deployed. This can help to ensure higher customer satisfaction and the ability to adapt more rapidly to supply chain disruptions, changes in demand, and advances in technology.
LCAPs help solve the challenges faced by a rigid traditional WMS by making the WMS faster and easier to tailor to meet customer or business requirements without high-priced IT resources. This can translate into time and labor savings for the warehouse operator.
2. Integration. Atraditional WMS often does not have the capability of integrating with cloud-based services, limiting the ability for it to take advantage of the cost benefits, flexibility, and scalability of cloud computing. In addition, it is often challenging for traditional warehouse management systems to integrate with automation technologies including robotics, autonomous guided vehicles (AGVs), conveyor systems, and other technologies.
Because LCAPs leverage built-in connectors as well as application programming interfaces (APIs) that facilitate integration with other systems, integration is seamless, ensuring a more efficient, cohesive ecosystem. This ease of integration can aid in unifying data across different systems to improve decision-making and information visibility.
3. Scalability. As a business grows, warehouse operations typically become more complex. This complexity typically leads to the need to handle increased volumes of data and more complicated workflows as well as expanded warehouse operations. This can present challenges for traditional warehouse management systems.
Low-code application platforms are able to scale more easily to handle increased volumes of data, more operational complexity, and additional functionality without a complete overhaul of the WMS. It is faster and easier to make quick adjustments on a WMS built on an LCAP. The system can easily scale up or down to handle new business requirements, changes in demand, and much more.
4. Security. Older warehouse management systems may lack the advanced security features required to protect sensitive data from cyber-attacks. Modern low-code application platforms typically include robust security measures to ensure that data is protected.
5. Up-to-date user interface and user experience. The outdated user interfaces commonly found with many older warehouse management systems can hamper productivity and lead to errors. WMS users need to have a streamlined user interface, designed to focus their attention on operations, without distractions.
Using a WMS built on an LCAP can improve the user experience and boost productivity. This is because LCAPs often feature intuitive, user-friendly interfaces that enhance the overall user experience. This makes it easier for warehouse workers to navigate the software, reducing errors and frustration.
6. Real time visibility. Older warehouse management systems may not be able to provide visibility into warehouse operations, inventory levels, and order status in real time. This can reduce the responsiveness to customer and market demands and delay decision-making.
One advantage of using a WMS built on an LCAP is that it can be integrated to IoT devices and sensors. This will enable the capture of real-time data on inventory levels, environmental conditions within the warehouse, equipment status, and more.
7. Data management. Today, with the popularity of online shopping, a WMS needs to be able to handle a high volume of orders with many individual items per order. A traditional WMS, which is designed to handle goods by the case or pallet, rather than by the individual saleable unit, may have performance issues, such as with data lock up or data retrieval, when handling large volumes of data.
Using a WMS built on an LCAP can facilitate the integration of multiple data sources into one unified platform, improving data accuracy and consistency. All data is available in one place. In addition, there are built-in tools for data validation, cleansing, and governance. This helps to ensure high data quality, essential for reliable real-time data visibility.
Transformative potential
Technology continues to advance. Software development continues to evolve. By taking advantage of low-code application platforms to simplify the software development process, supply chain professionals can ensure that they are able to keep up with these changes.
LCAPs enable rapid development, customization, and deployment of software applications, enabling businesses to respond to changing market conditions and technological advances. The result is notable cost and time savings, increased efficiency, and more effective operations. Using LCAPs, companies can take advantage of increased flexibility, scalability, and adaptability to be more competitive, drive operational excellence, and support growth.
Gartner recently published a report discussing the big changes being wrought by artificial intelligence (AI) for procurement. The analysis begins with some intriguing data points:
By 2026, virtual assistants and chatbots will be used by 20% of organizations to handle internal and supplier interactions, and by 2027, 50% of organizations will support supplier contract negotiations with AI-enabled tools.
Data literacy and technology skills will be equally as important as social and creative skills (that is “soft skills”) for procurement staff.
By 2027, 40% of sourcing events will be executed by nonprocurement staff.
By 2029, 80% of human decisions will be augmented—not replaced—by generative AI (GenAI), as humans will maintain their comparative advantages in ingenuity, creativity, and knowledge.
One of the reasons for the forecasted rapid adoption of AI is that the technology seems to respond to a key pressure point on procurement as a function: the lack of staff or staff with the right skills and experience. Staffing concerns are driving procurement organizations to increasingly lean on digital technologies, especially AI and automation, to help. Let’s explore Gartner's argument.
Substantial increase in interest
Thanks to the advancements in the technology skills of procurement professionals and decision support software, there has been a remarkable 17-fold increase in interest in AI applications for procurement in 2023 compared to 2022. Gartner's team anticipates a substantial surge in AI pilot initiatives in 2024. It also sees this as a trend expected to establish widespread acceptance and utilization of AI in procurement in the years ahead.
In particular, the application of GenAI is expected to expand throughout the entire procurement process—presenting opportunities to enhance both the speed and efficiency of operations within the department. For example, autonomous sourcing solutions driven by AI are progressively becoming more adept at handling responsibilities and decision-making that traditionally demanded the expertise of seasoned sourcing professionals.
This expansion enables organizations to streamline sourcing events effectively, transforming them into a more accessible process. Consequently, individuals outside the professional sourcing realm, such as those in the line of business, can now define requirements, pinpoint supplier sources, and initiate and manage sourcing events. In essence, sourcing is evolving into a skill rather than merely a function.
As outlined by Gartner, failing to adopt AI technologies in procurement may place organizations at a significant competitive disadvantage in terms of cost efficiency and agility compared to their peers. To avoid falling behind, the analyst firm is advising procurement leaders to wholeheartedly embrace transformative technologies that will promote and cultivate collaborative relationships with suppliers.
Making AI your servant, not your master
To be clear, procurement professionals will remain pivotal decision-makers. While human decisions will be enhanced by GenAI, humans will continue to make a vital contribution via their knowledge, creativity, and insight.
The unique contribution of GenAI is its ability to generate fresh content, complete missing information, and formulate sample outcomes or scenarios. This capability will play a supporting role in strategic decision-making, augmenting the human decision-making process. Procurement organizations, for example, will want to use virtual agents to automate repetitive tasks, such as purchase request (PR) approvals, internal and external communication, and supplier approvals, enabling human teams to focus on other areas.
To make this work, procurement staff will need to adapt as technology changes the nature of their work, and companies will need to make attracting top talent a priority. Certain skills will be at a premium as AI becomes more prevalent in everyday operations.
This “future-proofing” of skills needs to occur along two axes. One axis is technical. The cornerstone of all AI models is high-quality data and that means organizations need to foster proficiency in data literacy. The ability to identify pivotal data elements influencing decision-making becomes paramount in unleashing the complete potential of technology investments. This ensures that AI incorporates the most relevant data for its intended purposes.
However, the human element will also remain crucial, and this is the second axis. The creativity of procurement staff will be even more highly valued than it is today, given that AI's limitations lie in comprehending problems lacking sufficient data or precedent. Here, skills such as critical thinking will be essential. It will also be important to make connections with internal and external stakeholders. As a result, the ability to make effective presentations and secure stakeholder engagement are also expected to be in high demand. Companies need to think long-term when it comes to professional development and prepare for a future when these capabilities will be essential.
As another analyst firm, McKinsey, has said, it’s the procurement leaders capable of demonstrating quantifiable and long-term value to the enterprise who will become strategic partners to the C-suite.
Moving the needle in procurement
While these predictions are close at hand, they can sound future tense. Yet leading global companies, like adidas, BT, Tesco, and Santander Bank, are already using AI to maximize returns on billions of dollars of spend via autonomous sourcing.
For example, telecommunications company BT is using an autonomous sourcing platform to manage two-thirds of the organization’s £13 billion annual indirect spend—a percentage that BT wants to increase over time to 100%. Buyers have so far put more than 1,000 projects through the platform, automating admin-heavy tasks and cutting go-to-market time for project delivery that made a difference in overall performance. The platform supports various sourcing scenarios, including requests for proposal (RFP), requests for information (RFI), requests for quote (RFQ), sole source, delivery of staffing, supplier panels, and more. It also enables the creation and customization of requirements and the collection of supplier responses in different formats. Consequently, BT reports that autonomous sourcing allows nonprocurement team members to effortlessly initiate a request “with one sentence.”
Clearly, procurement leaders should make plans now to leverage the full power of procurement AI and GenAI. As Gartner recommends, organizations need to start by:
Building a roadmap that shows the technologies organizations need in key areas such as collaboration, negotiation, and sourcing;
Exploring which types of work can be commoditized; and
Looking very carefully at AI procurement vendor offerings—including their research and development (R&D) spend and focus.
But whatever you do, don't delay. CPOs need to start working with CFOs to introduce AI-powered sourcing quickly and secure the results the organization needs to meet the challenges of an uncertain global economy.
Why? Because this AI future is here today. As committed autonomous sourcing user BT has said, “We’re not thinking about if GenAI could help us. Instead, we’re doing it—and across billions of pounds of spend.”
In a male-dominated industry like supply chain technology, there is a growing opportunity for women to lean in and contribute their unique skills and perspectives. Research consistently demonstrates that diverse teams outperform less diverse ones, emphasizing the importance of inclusivity and gender diversity within the industry.
According to research by McKinsey & Company, companies with more than 30% female executives are more likely to outperform companies with only 10% to 30% of women leaders. The study also found more gender-diverse companies outperform the rest by 48%.
In light of this research, every supply chain company should take a moment to examine how to better diversify its leadership team and enable women to advance in the industry.
Strengthen the university-to-supply-chain pipeline
With no end in sight to the supply chain talent crunch, this protracted crisis presents an opportunity for more women to jump into the supply chain field. At Optilogic, we have found working with universities with supply chain management programs a great way to encourage budding female practitioners as well as create a future talent pipeline.
We connect with local University of Michigan students to teach them about supply chain design and get them involved in hands-on testing, training, and networking events. I am also working on a joint initiative with the female leader at the University of Michigan Ross Master of Supply Chain Management program on a STEM panel for women in supply chain.
Promote clarity and dispel bias about supply chain careers
Even in 2024 misconceptions and biases exist about supply chain roles for women. Women may perceive supply chain roles as being not well suited for females, especially some front-line roles in logistics and warehousing where women are underrepresented in traditionally male-dominated roles. Conscious or unconscious bias may exist with hiring managers as well.
Employers can also consider improvements to supply chain roles to make them more flexible and family-friendly. For women in the workforce, especially those with children, benefits like flexible hours and roles that allow them to balance work and other responsibilities can help address real barriers to entry.
Practical ways you can support women in supply chain today
Below are three ways the industry can help support female leaders.
Create a personal “board of directors.” Support female executives in the supply chain industry to move ahead in their careers by enabling them to cultivate a personal board of directors. This may consist of a few individuals who can offer advice, mentorship, support, and diverse viewpoints. These mentors can be both men and women who are inside or outside of the industry and can create a well-rounded network for personal and professional growth.
Join a women leaders platform. Organizations, platforms and groups designed to provide networking opportunities, mentorship, and skill-building resources are another great opportunity for female executives in the supply chain industry. For example, the Optilogic Women Leaders platform empowers the next generation of female leaders to thrive, leading to a more diverse and fair work environment.
Pass it forward. Female executives in the supply chain industry can also advance the cause by sharing their experiences with other professionals and supporting educational programs that promote women leaders. They can also attract young women to the supply chain industry by promoting their successes and encouraging them to pursue careers in the industry. Another simple yet effective way to support other women is to stand up for one another in meetings, give each other the floor, and promote others to encourage high potential female leaders.
It’s important for everyone in the supply chain industry to support women who are ready to rise in the ranks through the recruitment and development of female executives. Doing so will help ensure companies remain competitive by harnessing the power of gender-diverse teams.
In a rapidly evolving business landscape, the spotlight on supplier compliance has intensified, according to the “QIMA 2024 Q1 Barometer Report,” which is based on a survey of more than 800 businesses within the international supply chain as well as QIMA’s own internal data. This scrutiny can include making sure suppliers meet various requirements and policies around social issues, forced labor, structural integrity, traceability, environmental goals, scope-3 emissions, and more.
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to QIMA’s survey acknowledged the growing importance of compliance, with 70% of businesses saying they factor at least one ESG (environmental, social, and governance) element into their sourcing decisions. However, as we peel back the data, a stark reality emerges: Despite the commitment to ESG compliance, actual progress has been slow, with 25% of respondents saying that inspected supplier factories require urgent improvement.
As businesses embrace the multifaceted dimensions of ESG considerations, an unsettling gap emerges between intention and execution. How do these intentions materialize on the ground, and why does the alleged emphasis on ethical sourcing fall short?
Unveiling discrepancies
The field audit data paints a detailed picture of the challenges in ethical compliance. A quarter of factories audited received a concerning “red” ranking, indicating a need for immediate remediation. A substantial 67% of the issues identified center around health and safety and working hours and wages.
While many of these challenges are not new and cannot be tackled through a single audit, there is an even bigger hurdle to fully addressing ethical risk in supply chains: a lack of supply chain visibility. Only 16% of businesses claim to know all of their suppliers across all tiers, indicating that a majority of companies are in the dark when it comes to how the goods within their supply chain are manufactured and procured. This visibility gap can be a red flag for disparity between ESG intentions and actual implementation.
An unfortunate consequence of focusing audits at strategic tier-1 suppliers is that this practice creates a knowledge gap. Not including all tier-1 suppliers in your audit program can leave a company with unknown—and therefore unmanageable—risk. Companies also leave themselves open to potential material risks and impacts that could affect their ESG strategy when they do not engage with lower-tier suppliers. While tier-1 suppliers might be more inclined to meet compliance standards, smaller suppliers may maintain a wide range of ESG risks yet to be uncovered due to lack of an audit. The greater problem with working with less audited factories underscores a tremendous issue: not knowing what you don't know may be the biggest risk.
Navigating the crossroads
Reviewing these findings, the implications for businesses become clear: Aligning ESG strategies with ground-level realities, enhancing supply chain visibility, and tailoring ethical compliance considerations are imperative. The data within this survey is not simply a revelation of challenges but a call-to-action for businesses to bridge the gap between intention and execution in their ethical sourcing programming.
The intricacies of ethical compliance underscore tremendous challenges and opportunities. By understanding the correlation between sourcing region maturity and compliance, businesses can develop a more sustainable future. It’s time to acknowledge the challenges and actively engage in forging a path toward ethical and responsible sourcing practices.