Victoria Kickham, an editor at large for Supply Chain Quarterly, started her career as a newspaper reporter in the Boston area before moving into B2B journalism. She has covered manufacturing, distribution and supply chain issues for a variety of publications in the industrial and electronics sectors, and now writes about everything from forklift batteries to omnichannel business trends for Supply Chain Quarterly's sister publication, DC Velocity.
Business leaders are looking at all aspects of their operations to find ways to become more environmentally friendly these days, from energy and water usage in their facilities, to fuel consumption in their transportation networks, to the types of paper and packaging they consume across their operations. Experts say packaging is an especially hot topic, and they point to the growing ranks of businesses seeking sustainable solutions for product transport—the boxes, trays, pallets, and containers used to move products through their supply chains.
Demand for reusable transport packaging (RTP), as it’s known, increased 66% in 2020 and was expected to rise 88% in 2021 on its way to even higher levels this year, according to the Reusable Packaging Association (RPA), which published its first annual “State of the Industry” report on RTP in late 2020 and plans to release new data later this year. Consumers’ concern for the environment and the growing use of automated equipment throughout the supply chain were driving forces cited at the time, and they continue to be key motivators, according to Norm Kukuk, president of reusable packaging manufacturer Orbis and a member of RPA, which represents both suppliers and users of reusable packaging.
“We are seeing more interest, absolutely,” says Kukuk, emphasizing the increased demand for reusables in the food, medical, and pharmaceutical industries, which have also been major adopters of automated material handling equipment. “Our plastic packaging is high tolerance [so it can be used more easily] on conveyors and in automation. Because of that, [plastic] pallets and handheld totes are seeing more demand.”
But plastic isn’t the only reusable getting attention. Metal and wood factor into it as well, according to RPA, which defines reusable transport packaging solutions as those made from durable materials designed for multiple uses in rigorous operations and logistics systems. They stand in contrast to “one-way” packaging solutions, such as corrugated boxes and containers, which are designed for a single use before being recycled or tossed in a landfill. Reusable transport packaging represented a little more than 20% of the total global packaging market in 2020, also according to RPA, a figure that is rising as business customers and consumers alike seek to become part of the circular economy.
“These packaging products are designed for lasting use in a system that ensures their effective recovery and return for continuous purpose,” according to RPA. “Reusable transport packaging products are largely designed for business-to-business applications, although the growth of e-commerce and home delivery applications is opening opportunities for the effective use of reusable packaging for transporting merchandise to households” as well.
MAKING A ROUND TRIP
The goal of reusable transport packaging is to replace one-way solutions with those that can be used multiple times. Pallets are a case in point. Both wood and plastic pallets can be reused, and increasingly, the plastic variety are being used over and over again in food and beverage operations, often because they are easy to clean and are less prone to contamination, according to Kukuk. Third-party logistics service providers (3PLs) are investing more in this type of reusable packaging as well, he says.
“Our goal is to replace limited-use with high-volume-reuse packaging,” says Kukuk, adding that Orbis’ plastic pallets, in particular, are designed for the circular economy—where they’re used as many times as possible. It’s all part of a broader effort to develop a “circular supply chain,” in which the reusables are returned to the point of origin to be refilled and sent out again. In other models, reusables are managed by a third party that pools pallets, containers, and other reusables and then readies them for reuse by other partners in the pooling system.
The frequency of reuse varies. Pallet lifespan, for instance, largely depends on how the unit is used, and manufacturers of both the plastic and wood varieties tout the virtues of whichever type they make. Kukuk says one of Orbis’ plastic pallets recently underwent testing at the Virginia Tech Center for Packaging and Unit Load Design and was found to have a lifespan of more than 400 cycles, for instance. Meanwhile, experts at the National Wooden Pallet & Container Association note that wood is the only 100% renewable and recyclable reusable product available, and that wooden pallets still dominate the market. But no matter where a company stands on the issue, both products fit the bill as reusable transport packaging and can become part of a company’s environmental sustainability story—especially as environmental, social, and governance (ESG) initiatives gain prominence in supply chains.
“Our customers have ESG [objectives] that they are committed to, [and] we are helping them understand how reusable packaging can help them meet those goals,” Kukuk explains, noting that Orbis recently hired a sustainability director to advance those efforts.
A separate industry study on the demand for returnable transport packaging underscores those sentiments. A March 2023 report from the market research firm Future Market Insights estimated that the returnable transport packaging market would hit nearly $28 billion this year and rise to nearly $46 billion over the next 10 years, primarily due to an increased focus on reuse and recycling worldwide, ongoing demands to reduce waste, and a push to reduce the utilization of single-use packages in favor of the round-trip variety. The report cites the retail, food and beverage, logistics, chemicals, and building and construction sectors as key market drivers.
A CASE IN POINT
A recent sustainable packaging project by the materials science company W.L. Gore & Associates illustrates the ways in which companies are trying to reduce their environmental impact by rethinking the way they transport goods. Gore—which is best known for its waterproof, breathable Gore-Tex fabrics—switched from using single-use cardboard containers to transport large, bulky rolls of one of its products to using reusable metal racks. Ken Staz, the company’s U.S. regional logistics operations leader, presented details of the project at the recent annual meeting of the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), a warehouse industry trade group.
Staz explained that the previous shipping method required customers to either discard or recycle the cardboard boxes once the product was received—taking the disposal decision out of Gore’s hands. To gain more control over the process, Gore built a prototype of a reusable metal shipping rack that could accommodate the 240-pound rolls of product. Once the product has been removed, the racks can be broken down at the customer location and shipped back for re-use. Today, Gore is using the racks for international shipments, which are handled by the company’s third-party logistics service provider. The 3PL manages the labeling and tracking of the racks for shipping as well as sorting, inspecting, and restocking the racks at Gore’s facilities after they’ve been returned.
Staz told attendees the project will achieve a return on investment (ROI) in just over three years and has yielded annual cost savings as well.
Above all, he says, it reinforces the company’s desire to be kinder to the environment and demonstrates its willingness to take on projects aimed at meeting that goal.
“Today, sustainability is more front of mind than it has been historically,” he told attendees.
Editor’s note: This article originally appeared in the July 2023 issue of DC Velocity.
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.