Demand for freight and logistics services in 2014 reached record levels in some sectors. If growth continues as expected, then tighter capacity—and higher rates—are likely to follow.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Last year, when Rosalyn Wilson, the Parsons Corp. transportation consultant who researches and writes the annual "State of Logistics Report," predicted that 2014 would turn out to be a "banner year" for the U.S. logistics industry, some listeners were skeptical. That bullish outlook simply didn't mesh with her persistently pessimistic take on the economy and the logistics business since the Great Recession ended in 2009.
But as it turns out, that optimism was more than justified. In the 26th annual report, released in June, Wilson wrote that in terms of freight volumes and demand for services, 2014 was the best year for U.S. logistics since the start of the recession in 2007. And there's more to come: Barring unforeseen events in this year's second half, 2015 should also show strong growth despite a weak first quarter caused by inclement weather, a stronger dollar that curbed export activity, and problems caused by labor strife at West Coast ports, the report said.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Calculation of 2014 logistics costs (in U.S. $ billions)Enlarge this image
The annual "State of Logistics Report," produced by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and presented by Penske Logistics, provides an overview of the economy, the logistics industry's key trends, and the total U.S. logistics costs for the previous year. The research also reviews 2014 freight market developments on a month-by-month basis and concludes with a look at industry indicators for the current year.
It comes down to the consumer
Why such an upbeat outlook? It's all about consumer demand. "The U.S. economy is on fairly solid ground" with unemployment falling, real net income and household net worth inching up, low to moderate inflation, and declining oil prices putting more money in Americans' pocketbooks, Wilson wrote in the report. "We're actually seeing some very sustained growth, in my opinion," she added in remarks during the press conference where the report was released.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For 26 years, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Currently the report is authored by transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This year's report was sponsored by Penske Logistics.
CSCMP members can download the 26th Annual "State of Logistics Report" as well as quarterly updates at no charge from CSCMP's website. Nonmembers can purchase the report and quarterly updates.
When consumers have more cash available, companies sell more products and construction firms build more houses. That translates into greater demand for transportation and logistics services—one of the main reasons total logistics costs in 2014 were up 3.1 percent over the previous year, to slightly less than US $1.45 trillion. (See Figure 1.)
One of the report's most frequently cited data points is logistics costs as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP). That number has remained within a range of 8.2 percent to 8.4 percent since 2010. That pattern continued in 2014, when the number hit 8.3 percent. (See Figure 2.) However, in an e-mail interview prior to the report's release, Wilson said that the current levels are likely unsustainable, and that the ratio eventually will rise to levels of 9 to 9.5 percent as a crisis in motor carrier capacity causes freight rates to climb. Trucking costs—measured as carrier revenues—accounted for slightly less than half of the total expense of the nation's logistics system, so any trends in that sector will have a significant impact on overall logistics costs.
That truck rates did not surge in 2014 was one of the biggest surprises in the report's findings, Wilson said in the interview. Truck revenues did rise, by 3 percent over 2013, but tonnage gained 3.5 percent, meaning that rates remained relatively flat, she wrote.
Shippers succeeded last year in whittling down motor carriers' proposed rate increases, from 6 to 8 percent to levels approaching 2 percent, Wilson said. However, that practice cannot continue indefinitely, especially as carrier capacity tightens to extraordinary levels, she added. "At some point, rates have to rise, and I think we'll see that by the end of this year," she said at the press conference.
When the pricing picture turns, it will likely be a quick and sharp change, with one of the big motor carriers taking the lead and others following suit, Wilson said in the e-mail interview. In her report, she advised shippers to pay more attention to carriers' capacity guarantees than to the rates they charge, and to work with carriers to optimize their equipment utilization. Shippers that take both routes will stand the best chance of mitigating 2015 rate increases, because carriers would be more willing to keep rates steady if they know their equipment and drivers are being turned faster and more efficiently, she said.
Rail intermodal volumes rose 5.2 percent last year, continuing a pattern of solid multiyear growth for the sector due to conversions from truckload services as well as the onboarding of new business. Rail carloads rose 3.9 percent, while overall revenue increased 6.5 percent. Together, the two segments posted the highest annual rail traffic on record: just under 28.7 million carloads, containers, and trailers. Rail traffic is now close to its prerecession levels, but the mix of products and the growth in various service segments has shifted, the report said.
All segments of waterborne transportation grew in 2014, despite the months-long congestion on the U.S. West Coast, as importers hurried to bring in merchandise in anticipation of labor troubles, and imports from China surged in the third quarter. Inland waterway freight traffic rebounded due to solid growth in the number of shipments of grain, minerals, and petroleum products by barge. Overall, costs for water transportation rose 8.9 percent.
Air cargo revenue declined 1.2 percent, paced to the downside by a 3.6 percent drop in international revenue. Domestic revenue, meanwhile, rose just 0.4 percent. Cargo yields fell as load factors remained weak, the report said, but there was one bright spot: In 2014, a record $968 billion of high-value merchandise moved by air, with exports accounting for just 44 percent of that total.
The current downward trend in exports will likely persist in the coming months, as the strong dollar continues to make U.S. products more expensive overseas, Wilson said. "I don't see exports recovering, at least before the end of the year," she said at the press conference.
The third-party logistics (3PL) segment, meanwhile, turned in a strong performance in 2014 with net revenue—revenue after factoring in transportation costs—rising 7.4 percent. Revenues for domestic transportation management and dedicated contract carriage services rose by 20.5 and 10.4 percent, respectively, as tightening truck capacity drove demand for those services. International transportation management and value-added warehousing and distribution services, meanwhile, each posted low-single-digit increases. The overall 3PL market is expected to grow at a slower pace in 2015 than it did in 2014; Armstrong & Associates Inc., the consulting firm that provided the 3PL data in the report, is forecasting growth of 5.7 percent.
Rising inventory costs a concern
Despite a 4.8 percent decline in the interest component that kept interest rates at historically low levels, inventory carrying costs increased by 2.1 percent over 2013.
The "State of Logistics Report" tracks three components of carrying costs. One is interest, which remained about the same as in 2013, at $2 billion. The second is taxes, obsolescence, depreciation, and insurance, a category that rose by 1.2 percent, in large part due to the growth in inventories last year. The other is warehousing costs, which rose 4.4 percent, capping off a second consecutive solid year as national vacancy rates declined to 7 percent, down 2.7 percent from the previous year. Strong demand from e-commerce providers is a major factor behind the shrinking availability of industrial space; U.S. retail e-commerce sales hit $237 billion in 2014, up from $211 billion in 2013, according to the report.
In the e-mail interview, Wilson forecast further increases in carrying costs as interest rates finally begin to rise and warehousing demand continues to escalate. In the report, she also pointed to rising warehouse labor costs as a contributor to higher warehouse costs in the future.
Inventory levels in 2014 remained above the recession high point, reaching nearly $2.5 trillion, with the second and third quarters the "high-water marks," the report said. (See Figure 3.) Retail and wholesale inventories saw the biggest gains, while manufacturing inventories experienced a slight decline in 2014.
The overall inventory-to-sales ratio, which measures a business's inventory investment in relation to its monthly sales, rose rapidly in 2014. The ratio ended 2014 at 1.35, its highest level since late 2009. (See Figure 4.) A rising ratio indicates either falling sales or excess inventory levels.
That rise was due in large part to wholesalers and retailers ordering more goods in anticipation of labor- and congestion-related delays at U.S. West Coast ports, combined with slower-than-expected holiday sales, the report said. The wholesale and retail ratios leveled off and the ratio for manufacturing began to trend downward in the first quarter of 2015.
In a brief interview following the press conference, Wilson said that she expects the overall inventory-to-sales ratio will decline. Rising carrying and obsolescence costs and warehousing expenses will provide an incentive for companies to get their inventory levels under control, she said. "I'm concerned that inventories are as high as they are, but ... manufacturers are using up the supplies that they have. Nobody is ready to make big investments in more inventory."
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.