Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Trade groups criticize White House tariffs on Chinese goods

Policy is intended to curb the use of “unfair trade practices,” but businesses say it will raise prices for consumers.

tariffs Screenshot 2024-05-16 at 10.29.45 AM.png

The Biden Administration’s move this week to increase tariffs on $18 billion of Chinese goods may help boost the American manufacturing sector by protecting it from competition by lower-priced imports, but it will harm the consumers who ultimately pay the price of all tariffs, several trade groups have said.

Tariffs are taxes charged on imports, and are collected by U.S. Customs and Border Protection from American importers or brokers, who typically pass the extra cost along to their consumers and manufacturers in the form of higher prices on the affected goods. 


The new directive stipulates that tariffs be paid on items such as batteries, electric vehicles, semiconductors, ship to shore cranes, solar cells, and steel and aluminum products. The intent of that policy is to discourage China from employing “unfair trade practices,” U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai said in a briefing.

“For too long, the PRC has been playing by a different set of rules with unfair and anticompetitive economic practices.  Those unfair practices include forced technology transfer, including cyber hacking and cyber theft; non-market policies, such as targeting industrial sectors for dominance, labor rights suppression, and weak environmental protection; and flooding markets worldwide with artificially cheap products that wipe out the competition,” Tai said. “The President’s action today is a part of his vision to rebuild our supply chains and our ability to make things in America to lower costs, outcompete the PRC, and encourage the elimination of practices that undercut American workers and businesses.  We are doing that by investing in manufacturing and clean energy here at home and raising tariffs to protect these investments.” 

However, the American Apparel & Footwear Association said the move would backfire by imposing cost increases on manufacturers and consumers, thus fanning the flames of inflation. "The decision to extend Section 301 tariffs on a wide range of apparel, footwear, accessories, and textiles — while not unexpected — is a real blow to American consumers and manufacturers alike. Tariffs are regressive taxes that are paid by U.S. importers and U.S. manufacturers and ultimately passed along to U.S. consumers. At a time when hardworking American families are struggling with inflation, continued tariffs on consumer necessities are entirely unwelcome," AAFA president and CEO Steve Lamar said in a release.

Another potential side effect of the policy could be harming the nation’s effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, since it imposes a 100% tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles, which could otherwise have helped to get more gas-burning cars off the road, according to Simon Geale, executive vice president of procurement at supply chain consulting firm Proxima. “The White House tariff hikes on a number of China-made imports into the US is the latest sign that the U.S. is ‘walking the walk’ when it comes to onshoring their supply chains and encouraging domestic industry. The 100% EV tariff is broadly symbolic, with recent calculations showing that only 1,700 Chinese EVs entered the United States in the first quarter of 2024, but it will potentially promote investment into the nascent EV industry in the States,” Geale said in an email. “Something that needs to be considered is the potential impact on net zero. China-made EV’s, clean energy technologies, computer chips, and minerals were bringing the cost of decarbonizing the US economy down, and a balance will need to be struck between bolstering domestic industries and continuing to progress net zero goals.”

A third criticism of the new policy is that the costs of the extended tariffs will ripple far beyond basic U.S. consumer price hikes. “The new tariffs are another hit to supply chains as they try to manage ongoing risks and build resiliency. Whenever tariffs are increased, regardless of the rational for doing so, the impact goes beyond cost increases to companies and consumers,” John Donigian, senior director of Supply Chain Strategy at Moody's, said in an email. For example, Donigian said that higher tariffs on Chinese goods could impact common strategies to offset their greater costs to American companies, such as reshoring supply chains, renegotiating contracts with suppliers, and increasing buffer stocks of inventory to cope with disruptions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recent

More Stories

cover of report on electrical efficiency

ABI: Push to drop fossil fuels also needs better electric efficiency

Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.

In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”

Keep ReadingShow less

Featured

Logistics economy continues on solid footing
Logistics Managers' Index

Logistics economy continues on solid footing

Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.

The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.

Keep ReadingShow less
iceberg drawing to represent threats

GEP: six factors could change calm to storm in 2025

The current year is ending on a calm note for the logistics sector, but 2025 is on pace to be an era of rapid transformation, due to six driving forces that will shape procurement and supply chains in coming months, according to a forecast from New Jersey-based supply chain software provider GEP.

"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."

Keep ReadingShow less
chart of top business concerns from descartes

Descartes: businesses say top concern is tariff hikes

Business leaders at companies of every size say that rising tariffs and trade barriers are the most significant global trade challenge facing logistics and supply chain leaders today, according to a survey from supply chain software provider Descartes.

Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.

Keep ReadingShow less
photo of worker at port tracking containers

Trump tariff threat strains logistics businesses

Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.

Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.

Keep ReadingShow less