A champion for supply chains: interview with Kevin Smith
When it comes to the supply chain's value to an enterprise, there's more to it than most companies realize, says Kevin Smith, CSCMP's new chairman. He aims to get the word out.
For Kevin Smith, it all started with a job unloading freight cars at a General Mills warehouse in Massachusetts. That was the entry point for a distinguished 30-plus-year career in logistics and supply chain management that has included executive-level positions at some of the world's best-known companies. For instance, prior to his retirement in 2008, Smith served as senior vice president supply chain & logistics and corporate sustainability officer for CVS Caremark. Before that, he worked for H.J. Heinz, where he was vice president of logistics and customer support, and for Kraft Foods, where he was the director of network design and implementation. Today, he is president and CEO of his own firm, Sustainable Supply Chain Consulting, which he started after retiring.
In September, Smith began a one-year term as chairman of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). In addition to his CSCMP post, he is a special adviser to World 50, a private community for senior-most executives from globally respected organizations, and its Supply Chain 50 subgroup. Smith also serves on the advisory board of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Center for Transportation & Logistics.
Smith spoke recently with Editorial Director Peter Bradley about his goals for CSCMP, the relevance of trade groups in the age of the Internet, and why the supply chain should get more respect.
Q: Congratulations on becoming the CSCMP chairman. My first question is what are your principal goals for the next year?
A: When I think about furthering the progress and development of what we do in supply chain management, I think there are three challenges: We have to provide foundational information for people to use in their own personal development. We need to build an appreciation of the importance of what we do as an industry. And we have to help supply chain managers develop the confidence to change, innovate, and involve—to make supply chains more effective, efficient, and important to their individual enterprises.
Name: Kevin Smith Title: Chairman Organization: Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals
Title: President and CEO Organization: Sustainable Supply Chain Consulting
Special advisor to World 50, a community of senior executives from organizations across the globe, and its Supply Chain 50 subgroup
Advisory board member, Center for Transportation & Logistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technoogy
CSCMP Member: since 1986
Q: How do you accomplish those goals?
A: Well, of course, you've got CSCMP as a network that can connect all kinds of people. Whether it's based on a particular business issue or it's mentoring or just networking within the industry, we have the wherewithal to do that because we have a lot of members who want to share either information or experiences.
We also have a lot of educational information, a lot of educational programs, a lot of pre-existing research that can be helpful to people trying to solve problems for their businesses. We've got all this content. The question is, how do you make it readily available to people in such a way that they recognize the importance or the value it brings to their enterprise? That is the tricky part.
Once they have that, it could help them develop confidence to take chances, introduce innovations, and actually try to look at the supply chain as something very positive for the enterprise.
I have seen this repeatedly, especially in 2008. In 2008, we hit the skids. Supply chains became very important to businesses. Why? Because the supply chain had the ability to influence both the top line through the way we dealt with customers and the bottom line in terms of saving money and decreasing costs within the enterprise. When that happened, it was almost like a switch went on, and CEOs and CFOs suddenly realized that supply chains could play an important role in making sure that the companies, in some cases, literally survived that first couple of years.
Now, as the environment improves, as the economy improves, I think there's a tendency to try to put supply chain operations and supply chain management back into the backroom and let the sexy marketing take over again. That has been the premier activity within the enterprise. I'm not sure that is wrong, but I think what is wrong is for companies or enterprises to totally disregard the importance of supply chain even in good times. The ability to control costs, to reduce costs for the enterprise, is very important. More important, though, is the ability of the supply chain to develop a relationship with the customers and clients, so that those customers and clients want to do more business with the enterprise. So to discount that and push it off to the side and focus your company on just marketing or just finance, I think you are losing something. We have a challenge within CSCMP to bring all that out into the open so CEOs and companies recognize the value of supply chain not just in cutting costs, but also in growing business.
Q: One of the challenges, not just for CSCMP but for every trade organization, is holding onto and building membership. Why do you think that is so, and what approach will CSCMP take to build membership?
A: When did membership in professional organizations start to wane? Some would say it was 9/11. A lot of people were afraid of traveling, and companies used it as an excuse to say, "Let's curtail travel." It actually started before that. The advent of the Internet and the "wiki" world that we live in, I think, has given people this false impression of where they can get knowledge and useful information.
I think it's a very small percentage of people that actually take that information and transform it into something that's really useful. I think as human beings, (it is) much more important to have interaction and to network with people, especially the people who have actually done what you're trying to do.
So, we've got what we call "the lifecycle" at CSCMP. We try to get people involved in CSCMP and supply chain from the time they are college students up to the time when they are senior fellows like me. So we categorize people as students, young professionals, mid-career, senior leaders, and senior fellows. You can participate in CSCMP whether you're 18 years old or 88. You just participate at a different level. What we're trying to do is develop an information network where people are able to participate no matter where they are in their career.
Q: You've been a supply chain professional for a long time, and now, in your current role, you see a lot of businesses. What do you see as the biggest challenges folks in our profession are facing?
A: As I said before, I think a lot of it is economically driven through the C-suite. The challenge for CSCMP and the challenge for enterprises over the next couple of years will be to try to capitalize on supply chains and leverage what the supply chains have to offer. In many businesses, the people who have the face-to-face interaction with companies, besides the individual salesperson, are the supply chain people. It is the supply chain that has to deliver in the end and look the customer in the eye and either say, "We've done what we promised to do" or "We failed in what we promised to do." So that relationship, I think, in many ways is as important as the sales-to-customer relationship—and in some cases, it is more important because the last and final impression that a customer gets is whether or not the product was delivered on time, complete, and free of damage. If the supply chain is doing all of those things, you're probably going to build a really good relationship with your clients. If it's not doing those things, then you're going to be in big trouble.
Q: Right, which goes back to the old silo argument we've been having for decades. If the merchants and sales and marketing people aren't talking to supply chain, you may have some issues.
A: Right, and, you know, I think a lot of companies have done a better job with that over the last few years, especially since 2008. Back in 2004 or so, 30 percent of companies had a position called supply chain or logistics that was either in the C-suite or reporting directly to the C-suite. By 2011, 80 percent of Fortune 500 companies had that position, supply chain or logistics reporting to or in the C-suite. There has been a recognition that supply chain management is important to the enterprise. The trick is keeping it top of mind because when things get good, when the economy is booming, when you can't help but sell things, enterprises lose track of the fact that the supply chain is important, and they only come back to that realization when things get tough.
Q: Wall Street pays attention to supply chain these days, too.
A: It does. But again, I think that has been more since 2008. I can recall being the first supply chain person at CVS to ask to present at an analysts' meeting in New York because of all the things we just talked about—the fact that we had a story to tell and it was not just about how we were cutting and controlling costs, but how we were adding to the value proposition on the top line.
We have certainly come a long way. The trick now is to make sure that we keep our value proposition front of mind so people understand that we're not just the backroom people who ship stuff and store stuff, but that we are also a part of the enterprise that helps add value to whatever product or service is being provided.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.