Why you may not be getting your planned value out of your tech investment
A PwC survey found that 83% of companies have not seen the results that they expected from their supply chain technology implementations. What changes do they need to make to make better use of their digital solutions and improve business outcomes?
After the pandemic hit in 2020, many companies realized how vulnerable their supply chain operations were and put a tremendous amount of investment into supply chain technologies. However, to for these investments to be effective, companies need to set clear objectives and success criteria up front and be ready and willing to make the changes needed so they can achieve these desired outcomes. Indeed, companies should be selective about what investments to make, as not every technology is right for every company. And more importantly, companies should strive to not just execute a technology implementation but also monitor its effectiveness.
To see what progress has been made in terms of supply chain tech advancements and what more is still needed, the consulting company PwC surveyed over 300 executives responsible for supply chain and procurement operations. PwC’s “2023 Digital Trends in Supply Chain Survey” revealed that many of the companies surveyed are using technology to improve their supply chains. Here are some quick insights to consider as you evaluate your own progress.
Where are we with investments?
The vast majority of companies surveyed by PwC reported that they are seeking to increase their digital supply chain capabilities (see Figure 1). For example, 84% of executives said that they had either partially or fully adopted a cloud-based common data platform, which is unsurprising given the steady evolution of cloud solution providers and the expanded reliability of cloud solutions. Other popular technologies—including the internet of things, scanning and intelligent data capture (such as optical character recognition), and third-party spend analytics tools—also ranked among the top investments and adaptations for supply chain leaders. In terms of future spending, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning are seeing the highest planned investments, with 22% of executives saying their companies plan to invest at least $5 million in those technologies.
FIGURE 1: Technology adoption levels and future investment areas
When you dig further into the data, you can see that different industries have different investment priorities. For instance, there are much higher rates of adoption and planned investment in AI and machine learning in technology, media, and telecommunications industries than in other sectors. Meanwhile, energy, utilities, and resources companies have adopted and/or are investing in drones more than other sectors.
While adoption levels are high, many companies are not yet thoroughly satisfied with their implementations. (See Figure 2.) In our survey, only 17% of respondents said that their technology investment had delivered the expected results. For the majority of respondents, the issue did not lie with the technologies themselves; only 9% indicated that the technology didn’t provide the expected capabilities/functionality. Instead, many of the answers indicated that the problem lay with how the company was implementing those technologies, be it not having adequate time, the necessary capabilities, or change management skills.
Another key challenge to getting more value out your tech investment is whether employees have the right skills and motivation to effectively use the new digital tools. According to the survey, 31% of executives said that a top challenge to digitizing their supply chains was getting employees and teams to work differently, perhaps through using a mix of new tools and processes while also maintaining existing ways of working. Additionally, 25% said they had difficulty attracting, developing, and retaining the “digital native” talent needed to transform their supply chain.
In fact, more than two-thirds of respondents expect digitizing their supply chain to require some upskilling of employees. Responses to the 2023 survey indicate that companies may be planning to work more with current employees rather than recruit new talent. Compared to 2022, fewer executives say they will need to add more employees overall, and more say they will retrain employees for different jobs because their current roles will no longer be necessary.
For their part, employees say they are eager to learn more about innovative technologies in the workplace. In PwC’s recent “Global Hopes and Fears Survey,” 52% of workers selected at least one positive statement about the impact of generative AI on their career—that it will increase productivity, bring opportunities to learn new skills, or create job opportunities.
However, only 7% of supply chain executives said digital upskilling was their top priority. This highlights the need for organizations to invest in training, to clarify and measure what “new ways of working” really entails, and to make the necessary process changes so that they can make better use of their technology investments.
Technological innovations will likely persist, so upskilling your employees should also be an ongoing process that is refreshed and re-evaluated regularly. Digital transformation should be approached with a people-first mindset. Training should focus not just on helping employees better perform their day-to-day jobs but also on adapting to new ways of working and executing strategic goals.
Companies should go beyond simply teaching employees how to use the new technology tools. They should also help them understand why these tools will make their jobs better and what the tools’ full capabilities are. This sort of instruction can be provided through use cases, situation scenarios, and practice exercises. In this way, companies can emphasize outcomes and value-added results and not just implementing a new tool or way of working.
Investing for the long term
One challenge that many companies face is transformative actions continue to compete with more traditional priorities. Many supply chain leaders are still tackling day-to-day fires while trying to activate a new way of working. Finding the bandwidth to make transformative changes is challenging. Leaders may find themselves leaning into cost-related or more near-term initiatives rather than long-term ones. For instance, more than half of respondents (51%) said optimizing costs was a top objective when investing in technology.
It is less evident how companies are factoring their digital investments into long-term business strategies, if at all. Although 53% said that driving growth was a top objective of their supply chain technology investments, other objectives that have the potential to advance returns on digitization long term were far less popular. Less than one-third (30%) cited exploring new innovations and only 16% said implementing a different business model was the top objective for their technology investments.
Another long-term focus for technology investment should be risk and resilience, especially given the disruptions of the last few years. Indeed, 86% of survey respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that their company should invest more in technology to help identify, track, and measure supply chain risk. However, just 34% of operations leaders cited increased resilience as one of their top objectives when investing in supply chain technology. These statistics suggest that companies are either considering investments in the context of current and traditional definitions of risk or have not yet thought about how to merge the intent of wanting to do broader risk management with the technology that will allow them to do it. Either way, this gap should be closed.
That’s not to say that companies should only focus on unlocking long-term growth and not on cutting costs. Rather both should be happening simultaneously, so that they can help feed each other. Technology often is at the heart of that. Solutions today can not only address some of your current issues but also evolve to enable the kind of business you will need to have in the future. Investments made today are a “cost,” but they will often help save money in the future. More importantly, these are investments in capabilities that will likely be required for the future. It can be beneficial to have something that can fit your purpose now and in the future, so that value capture can be sustained and growth can be properly supported and achieved.
More thoughtful implementation needed
If you have not already done so, now is the time to reset your technology enablement strategy. Make investments based on your company’s needs, so you can set up your people for success and help them take advantage of digitalization implementations. Examine not only what has worked but dig into why investments haven’t worked. Be honest about the potential gaps in planning, the quality of execution, and the effectiveness of leaders and staff as well as how well the solution delivered versus what was promised.
Companies that begin to think smarter about their tech investments and consider these strategies in tandem will often be more prepared to deal with disruptions, get a higher return out of their investments, and help to capture the growth opportunities that digitalization has to offer.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.