Why should you become involved in the humanitarian supply chain?
In addition to the satisfaction and pride of being a good citizen, companies that participate in relief efforts can improve their own supply chain resiliency and discover new commercial opportunities.
It's easy to think of humanitarian relief organizations and private industry as different realms with different goals. To put it simply: One is focused on providing aid to those in need—no matter what the cost—and the other is focused on making money. But, as evidenced by a recent report presented at the World Humanitarian Summit in May, there's a growing awareness among relief organizations that the success of their supply chains depends on long-term partnerships with companies in private industry.
Private companies need to recognize that the reverse is also true. There is great value for them in participating in relief efforts both locally and on a global scale—and not just in terms of meeting their corporate social-responsibility goals or in being perceived as a good global citizen.
Greater resiliency
Time and again, research has shown that resilient supply chains and a robust risk management program can have a significant impact on a company's bottom line. (See, for example, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Yossi Sheffi's work on the power of resilience in the supply chain.)
Many of the efforts that improve the success rate of humanitarian relief efforts, such as a strengthening transportation infrastructure and creating effective local emergency-response plans, also improve the resiliency of both local businesses and international ones that reach into that market.
"When disasters occur, it is the company's employees and markets that are disrupted. Supporting relief and recovery for their employees and communities (which are made up of their employees and customers) supports their own sustainability," said Kathy Fulton, executive director of the American Logistics Aid Network (ALAN), in an e-mail interview. ALAN helps private companies coordinate with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and government agencies to provide logistics services for relief efforts.
Stephen Cahill, Global Logistics Cluster coordinator for the World Food Programme, points to the examples of Hurricane Katrina and Superstorm Sandy, which disrupted the supply chains of hundreds of major companies in the United States. "Also think how a major pandemic could completely disrupt your supply chain if airports and ports started to restrict movement," he wrote in an email interview. "That is what happened in certain countries during the Ebola emergency, and it could be much worse if the pandemic had occurred in a country that is a major source of manufacturers' goods."
Some experts argue that it will become increasing important for supply chain professionals to be able to anticipate and mitigate these kinds of risks. For example, a recent report from the commercial insurer FM Global forecasts that climate change will cause an increase in natural disasters like extreme rainfall and urged companies to prepare for related supply chain disruptions.
Who better to teach private supply chain organizations how to prepare for and respond to disruptions than those who work on these issues every day? "The humanitarian community can help the private sector prepare, deal with, and react to emergencies better than anyone else," Cahill said.
ALAN, for example, has a disaster-simulation game that it presents regularly to supply chain operations as well as to government and nonprofit organizations. "The preparedness concepts are universal," Fulton said, "and the information-sharing issues that cause supply chains to break down play a big role in the game."
Indeed, employees who are involved in emergency-preparedness efforts will learn skills that can also be applied in the workplace, according to Fulton. "The coordination and collaboration skills inherent in any humanitarian operation are skills that make better employees and business leaders," she said.
Humanitarian relief organizations have a vested interest in working with local companies to strengthen their supply chain operations. "Risk management and operational continuity are important for the private sector but it's equally as important for humanitarian actors to ensure that we are ready to respond," said Cahill. "We also know that the longer the private sector stays operational in-country, the quicker the recovery and the lower the impact."
Fulton also believes in the symbiotic relationship between the private sector and the relief agency world. "If your business—and especially your employees—are able to withstand a crisis then you are first, reducing the volume of services that need to be provided by government and humanitarian agencies, and second, ensuring you'll have a workforce to keep your business operating," she said.
If these "softer" benefits are not convincing enough, there are also commercial opportunities to be found in the humanitarian realm. According to Cahill, humanitarian aid represented US $28 billion in 2015. Typically supply chain costs equal 60 to 80 percent of that amount, he says.
Companies that are involved in humanitarian relief efforts also have a chance to discover new market opportunities, according to Kathy Fulton. "Participating in humanitarian supply chain activities often reveals new challenges that require innovative solutions, which may spark additional creativity for a company's commercial activities," she said.
Where to start
For companies that are looking to take the first steps, there are several places to start. Fulton recommends attending emergency-preparedness events that are put on by local, regional, and national emergency management agencies as well as organizations that foster public-private partnerships. According to Fulton, by participating in such exercises and discussions, companies can learn about resources that are available to them as well as how they can help these organizations.
A few organizations and programs to consider include:
American Logistics Aid Network. This organization, which is based in the United States and has deep roots in the trucking and warehousing communities, supports disaster recovery by engaging industry to address the unmet supply chain needs of relief organizations, communities, and people.
Airlink. This nonprofit disaster-relief organization links airlines with NGOs and focuses mostly on air cargo and personnel movement.
The Connecting Business Initiative. Launched at the World Humanitarian Summit in May 2016, this program helps to get the private sector involved in a coordinated manner with the United Nations system, national governments, and civil society on crisis risk reduction and emergency preparedness, response, and recovery.
Lift. This not-for-profit logistics provider for NGOs responding to disasters has a network of freight forwarders, general aviation aircraft, and ocean vessels. Supporters include companies such as Damco, Kuehne + Nagel, and UPS.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.