E-commerce and omnichannel retail are pushing aside the traditional drivers of business logistics costs, putting the U.S. consumer in the driver's seat when it comes to cost, service, and strategy. The shift may be permanent.
Contributing Editor Toby Gooley is a freelance writer and editor specializing in supply chain, logistics, material handling, and international trade. She previously was Editor at CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly. and Senior Editor of SCQ's sister publication, DC VELOCITY. Prior to joining AGiLE Business Media in 2007, she spent 20 years at Logistics Management magazine as Managing Editor and Senior Editor covering international trade and transportation. Prior to that she was an export traffic manager for 10 years. She holds a B.A. in Asian Studies from Cornell University.
Do you remember the old song "What a Difference a Day Makes"? Change "day" to "year," and you've pretty much summed up the impression one gets from reading the latest annual "State of Logistics Report." According to the report, logistics costs as a percentage of U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), inventory levels, freight rates, revenue growth, and shipment volumes for truck, rail, ocean, and air are flat or down, while capacity, inventory carrying costs, and volumes for parcel and express are up. Some shippers are becoming or buying carriers and 3PLs, the lines between logistics service providers and technology vendors are blurrier than ever, and consumers increasingly are determining what gets shipped when, where, and how. Small wonder, then, that the title of this year's report is "Logistics in Transition: New Drivers at the Wheel."
Some of that change was expected, and some was unforeseen. Some observers, perhaps, were lulled by last year's rosy report, which documented strong growth in freight volumes and predicted more of the same in 2015. But macroeconomic factors and an increasingly consumer-centric business environment have put the brakes on some of the trends that had been building since the end of the Great Recession.
[Figure 2] U.S. business logistics costs as a share of nominal GDPEnlarge this image
The annual "State of Logistics Report," produced by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and presented by Penske Logistics, provides an overview of the logistics industry's key trends and the total U.S. logistics costs for the previous year. The research also reviews macroeconomic trends affecting logistics costs and offers a wealth of historical and forecast data.
This is the first year the "State of Logistics Report" was written by the global management consulting firm A.T. Kearney, with input from economists, analysts, carriers, and other industry experts. The new report also incorporated a number of new data sources and changed the way certain information was classified and calculated. For example, motor carriers are now separated by business segment (truckload, less-than-truckload, and private/dedicated carriers), rather than being classified as "intercity" and "intracity," as was done in the past. The research also looks at parcel separately for the first time and includes both air cargo and air express, among other changes.
The big picture
A review of the report's major findings tells a tale of transition and an economy moving at a slower pace. All told, it cost $1.4 trillion to maintain the U.S. business logistics system in 2015. (All figures are in U.S. dollars.) That equated to 7.85 percent of last year's gross domestic product of nearly $18 trillion. Logistics costs rose 2.6 percent year-over-year, a decline from the 4.6 percent compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) seen from 2010 to 2014. The gains during that period were mostly fueled by 5.5 percent annualized growth in transport costs, the largest single component of U.S. business logistics costs. However, transport costs in 2015 rose just 1.3 percent year-over-year, as declining fuel surcharges triggered by the rapid drop in oil prices depressed carrier revenue in most modes and overcapacity pushed down rates in some transport modes. (See Figure 1 for details.)
In addition to transportation costs, total U.S. business logistics costs include inventory carrying costs, comprising financial, storage, and "other"; "carriers' support activities," which includes a much broader range of services than the "shipper-related costs" in past years' reports; and "shippers' administrative costs," which reflect wages and benefits for logistics-related occupations in manufacturing, retail, and wholesale industries as well as the cost of logistics-related information technology (essentially, the annual spend on supply chain management software in the United States).
Logistics costs as a percentage of GDP, historically one of the report's most often-quoted data points, was just six basis points below last year's number, indicating that the system was operating in only a marginally more efficient manner than the year before, according to the report. (See Figure 2.) In the early 1980s, long before the impact of transport deregulation was fully felt, logistics costs accounted for about 15 percent of GDP. The dramatic increase in transportation and logistics efficiency during the last 35 years has been an overlooked factor in the success of the U.S. economy during much of that period.
Transportation: Some up, some down
Transport revenue by mode diverged considerably in 2015, according to the report. Truckload revenue rose just 3 percent as overcapacity drove down rates. Rates started the year off weak and headed downward as the year wore on; for example, the report cites a 15 percent year-on-year decline in spot rates between the first week of January 2015 and the same period in 2016. In response, carriers increased operational efficiency and cut back on equipment orders. The report cautions, however, that energy markets could correct, overcapacity could level off, and other constraints, such as the ongoing driver shortage, could cause rates to head upward in the "not too distant future."
During the panel discussion that followed the report's release at a press conference in June, Marc Althen, president of Penske Logistics, predicted that overcapacity in the trucking segment would not diminish significantly until "at least the first quarter, and more likely the second half of 2017." In his estimation, there are about 80,000 excess tractors on the road in the United States and Canada today, he said.
Truck brokerage services and dedicated fleets are thriving in the current environment, the report said. The report notes that C.H. Robinson executives reported that they received twice as many requests for proposal (RFP) in the first quarter of 2016 as they typically would see. Other winners included less-than-truckload (LTL) and parcel and express. LTL and parcel revenues rose 8 and 7 percent, respectively, as both modes benefited from increased demand for e-commerce-related transactions. LTL rates were generally stable, the report said, and although some big carriers reported declining shipments and revenue, others—particularly those with a heavy presence in e-commerce and retail—saw stable or slight growth.
Business-to-consumer (B2C) e-commerce shipments boosted demand in the ground parcel market in 2015. Two of the biggest players, FedEx and UPS, reported revenue jumps of 9 percent and 3 percent, respectively, for ground parcel service last year. The trend has also been a boon for the U.S. Postal Service, which saw a 14 percent increase in package volume in 2015. However, e-commerce shipments typically generate less revenue and come with higher handling costs, leading carriers to invest in more technology and acquire specialized service providers in a bid to reduce costs and broaden their e-commerce-related service offerings.
At the same time, carriers and third-party logistics providers (3PLs) could potentially be confronted with new and unexpected competitors: their own customers. Amazon's foray into air and ground transportation fits the "logistics in transition" narrative. While many find it disconcerting, the increased competition could have a silver lining, said Ronald M. Marotta, vice president—international division, Yusen Logistics, during the panel discussion. "Quite frankly, Amazon [getting into transportation] is going to push all of us on the service side to move faster, deliver more reliably and more quickly, and serve customers the way they want us to serve them," he said.
Revenues declined in energy-sensitive modes like rail and pipeline. Rail carload revenues, hurt by a sharp drop in demand for coal, fell 12 percent, while pipeline revenues, hampered by lower crude oil prices, fell 11.8 percent, according to the report. Intermodal revenue, the star performer for many years, rose just 2 percent, although volume was flat, as falling truck rates made over-the-road transportation more attractive to some shippers.
Brian Hancock, executive vice president and chief marketing officer of the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, thinks the railroads' intermodal volumes will bounce back. "Fuel prices are cyclical, and it's inevitable that when fuel prices go down, the number of motor carriers increases. Then they cut prices, and when the price of fuel rises, they go out of business," he said at the press conference. "We feel we compete very well against truck, but we won't chase the lowest prices."
Both airfreight and water revenues (the latter includes import, export, and domestic waterborne traffic) increased 2.1 percent. Overcapacity plagues both modes. A shift to widebody aircraft by both cargo and passenger carriers has sent rates plunging. Meanwhile, international containerized shipping is battling record-low eastbound trans-Pacific rates, even as volumes increase modestly. Carriers continue to add capacity at a faster clip than volumes. Several mergers among large carriers and the realignment of vessel-sharing agreements may help to keep things under control.
The divergence in modal revenue is a harbinger of long-term change, according to the report's authors. A profound change in buying habits has now put American consumers "at the wheel" when it comes to influencing U.S. transport costs, rather than traditional industrial standbys like energy. This shift may be permanent, the authors said.
The report also looked at market conditions for international freight forwarding and third-party logistics services. Both play critical roles in freight flows: A.T. Kearney estimates that international forwarders contract for about 90 percent of air cargo capacity and 50 percent of ocean cargo capacity worldwide. On the domestic side, the report cited an Armstrong & Associates estimate that 3PLs handled about 11 percent of U.S. logistics spend in 2015. The outlook for both sectors is healthy—international forwarding is expected to grow about 6 percent annually through 2018, and the domestic 3PL market is forecast to continue its roughly 7 percent annual growth during the same period. But a growing need for increasingly sophisticated supply chain technology in an ever more-competitive market could determine who will thrive and who will fade away.
Inventory: Costs on the rise
The tailwind of low inventory carrying costs that U.S. businesses have enjoyed in recent years came to an end in 2015, and carrying costs are likely to prove a tougher challenge should the cost of money increase. According to the report, inventory carrying costs in 2015 rose 5.1 percent over the year-earlier period, paced by a 7.4 percent increase in the inventory's "financial cost." The financial cost was derived by multiplying the value of a company's business inventory by the average cost of capital it has borrowed to finance the inventory.
Storage costs, which were included in the total inventory calculation, rose 2.5 percent year-over-year, according to the report. The cost of what the report classifies as "other" factors, including inventory obsolescence, insurance, shrinkage, and handling, rose 5.1 percent year-over-year.
Following the U.S. Federal Reserve's moves to cut its benchmark federal funds rate (an overnight interbank lending rate) amid the 2007-08 financial crisis and subsequent recession, inventory carrying costs have remained at historic lows. From 2010 to 2014, capital costs grew by just 0.9 percent, compounded annually, the report concluded. By contrast, storage costs rose 4.7 percent a year, compounded annually.
In December, the Fed raised the benchmark rate from between near zero and 0.25 percent to between 0.25 and 0.50 percent, its first increase in nearly 10 years. The central bank said at the time it was considering several rate increases during 2016, but subpar economic growth in the United States and abroad since then has led policymakers to rethink that position.
From 2010 to 2014, a period generally associated with U.S. economic growth, inventories rose 5 percent a year as businesses restocked in the hope of increased demand, and mega-fulfillment centers were erected to accommodate what would become a multiyear surge in e-commerce traffic. Though inventory levels flattened in 2015—rising just 0.25 percent—the cost of capital did not, the report concluded.
Businesses today have costlier inventory loads to finance than at any time in years. In 2009, inventory value stood at $1.93 trillion. At the end of 2015, it stood at $2.51 trillion, according to the report's data.
The nation's inventory-to-sales ratio, which in the retail trade measures the value of inventories relative to final sales, has been climbing steadily for years, resulting in a protracted inventory bloat. Despite concerns over rising inventory levels and higher borrowing costs, the report's authors do not forecast a general recession. Rather, they say the current trends—notably, the dramatic slowdown in inventory growth last year—represent an "inventory correction."
Rick Gabrielson, vice president of transportation for Lowe's, said during the panel discussion that he expects the growth of e-commerce and omnichannel commerce to impact inventory deployment. He predicted more aggregation of inventory in fewer locations, and that companies will rely more on mechanization and technology to allow faster response and delivery. "I don't think e-commerce requires or necessarily leads to more inventory," he said. "It's about where to play it." However, some markets, he added, will still need more warehouses to meet service requirements.
Prepare for disruption
The U.S. logistics system today is "sound," the report said. Services generally are available when and how they are needed, and pricing is favorable to shippers. But, the authors warned, inadequate infrastructure and the accelerating demand for last-minute home delivery will tax a system that was not designed for e-commerce. The report also forecasts that disruptive technologies, such as the Internet of Things, analytics, robotics, and 3D printing, together with operational constraints like regulations, driver shortages, and infrastructure bottlenecks, will bring about a new era in logistics.
Four "disruptive forces" will shape future costs and performance of the U.S. logistics system, the report concludes. They include:
Technology adoption that will create efficiencies in connectivity, labor, and assets
Operational constraints that will influence the scope, scale, reach, and ability to perform transportation and logistics activities
Macroeconomic trends that will dictate new trade and freight flows
Consumer requirements that will stretch carriers' and 3PLs' capabilities
All of these forces have been talked about for some time. But as they mature and become widespread, they will converge with each other. Overlay them on the e-commerce trend that puts consumers "at the wheel," and it's clear that a very different and challenging era lies ahead for logistics.
About the "State of Logistics Report"
For 27 years, the annual "State of Logistics Report" has quantified the size of the U.S. transportation market and the impact of logistics on the U.S. economy. The late logistics consultant Robert V. Delaney began the study in 1989 as a way to measure logistics efficiency following the deregulation of transportation in the United States. Later, Delaney's colleague, the transportation consultant Rosalyn Wilson, wrote the report under the auspices of the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP). This year's report was written for the first time by the consulting firm A.T. Kearney. As in past years, Penske Logistics was the report's principal supporter.
CSCMP members can download a copy of the 27th Annual "State of Logistics Report" at no charge from CSCMP's website (https://cscmp.org). Nonmembers can purchase the report by going to CSCMP's website, clicking on the "Research" tab, and then selecting "State of Logistics Report."
Editor's note: Videos of the June 21 "State of Logistics Report" presentation at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., and the panel discussion that followed the report's release can be found on Penske Logistics' YouTube channel.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.