The Seventh CSCMP China Conference, co-organized by the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP) and China (Shenzhen) Development Institute (CDI), held in Chengdu on September 8–9, 2016, addressed both the complicated challenges related to managing logistics and supply chain in China as well as the country's rapidly growing market potential and business opportunities.
Experts, supply chain thought leaders, and business executives from more than 10 countries and CSCMP roundtables gathered to share their views and insights with 300 participants in the two-day conference, which focused on the mega-trends for supply chain management in China. Under the theme "Supply Chain Management Plus: The Next Big Thing in China," the conference covered topics such as China's One Belt and One Road Initiative; innovative business models; and the application of technologies such as Big Data, cloud computing, the Internet of things, artificial intelligence, robotics and automation, and new energy solutions.
The following is a summary of some of the highlights from the conference's keynote speeches and breakout sessions. Throughout the conference a number of supply chain experts, CSCMP officers, researchers, and consultants shared their viewpoints on supply chain trends.
Kevin Smith, chairman of CSCMP and CEO of Sustainable Supply Chain Consulting, outlined what he believes will be the mega trends in supply chain development in the next ten years. On the technology front, he expects to see an increase in the use of automation, the Internet of things, and blockchain solutions. On a geopolitical level, supply chains will have to balance the conflicting forces of globalization and a resurgence in nationalism. Other trends include infrastructure construction, increasing service speed, and the power of the new "millennial" generation. Supply chain managers will also be facing operational constraints, such as labor shortages and increasing wages, he said.
Dr. Binyam Reja, transport officer of World Bank China, emphasized the importance of intermodal traffic. He also shared with participants his experiences with low-carbon transportation and energy-conserving logistics solutions through a case study of programs he has worked on in China.
Jon Creyts, managing director of Rocky Mountain Institute, a nonprofit research and educational foundation, presented the group's latest research results and demonstrated a roadmap for China's revolution in energy consumption and production to 2050.
Ding Junfa, chief advisor of the China Federation of Logistics and Purchasing, shared his insights on China's supply chain management in the 13th Five-Year Plan Period and the reforms on the supply side of supply chain. He believes that more attention should be paid to lowering the high cost of logistics and deregulating the industry. He advocates for efforts that will work simultaneously on both the supply and demand sides, as well as optimize the distribution of public resources. In the speech, he also proposed the Ten Year Supply Chain+ Plan.
Dr. Wang Wei, director of the Institute for Market Economy, Development Research Center of the State Council of China, explained why and how to construct industrial clusters and industrial parks. She provided an introduction to the principles of logistics clusters and the development of industrial parks as well as an analysis of case studies in both China and Europe.
Jeroen Bolt, president of CSCMP Benelux Roundtable and Owner of Fluas, a sustainable supply chain company, introduced the concept of horizontal collaboration. Horizontal collaboration involves companies sharing supply chain assets, such as transportation. After discussing some methodologies and tools, he also showed how governments should act to support horizontal collaboration.
Dr. Zhang Jin, director of Center of the Logistics Research Laboratory at Southwest Jiaotong University, shared his expertise and experience in supply chain management in China with participants during the roundtable discussion.
The Branch Manager of Ping An Bank Group, Liang Chaojie, shared Ping An's experiences in exploring supply chain finance, while Wen Jianjun, CEO of Chuangjie SCM, demonstrated a methodology for top-level design in supply chain finance.
Lloyd Morgan, vice president of St. Onge, presented the latest tools and methodologies for designing supply chain networks.
Li Linzi, CEO of Warehouse Technology, presented a case study on an automated e-commerce warehouse.
Dr. Feng An, founder and executive director of the Innovation Center for Energy and Technology (iCET), demonstrated how to supervise and measure the performance of green logistics techniques, as well as their applications in transportation.
The conference also featured thought leadership and best practices from well-known companies such as semiconductor giant Texas Instruments, logistics service provider DHL, IBM, health and nutrition company DSM, Xianyi SCM, and retailers JD.com and VIP.com.
Jan De Meulder, TI's director of supply chain & logistics, demonstrated the characteristics, benefits, and challenges of managing a global supply chain based on an analysis of TI's more than 900 global logistics suppliers.
Andrew Hong, director of fast-growing enterprises for DHL, who is based in the company's Singapore Regional Office, analyzed the potential global supply chain management opportunities and challenges brought by the Chinese government's One Belt, One Road Initiative, which seeks to foster cooperation and connectivity between China and the rest of Eurasia. He discussed the financing of Belt and Road programs and intermodal traffic solutions and shared DHL's experience of how a multinational enterprise could participate in Belt and Road.
Qin Deng, director of IBM Global Electronics Industry, introduced the concept and practice of IoT-enabled supply chain control towers and shared examples of IoT applications for the supply chain field.
Wang Jianzhi, deputy manager of Xianyi SCM, discussed the company's exploration and practice in temperature-controlled supply chains.
Yu Tian, senior logistics director of JD.com, and Zhao Liqiang, logistics director of VIP.com Holdings Limited, talked about the value of excellent supply chains.
During the roundtable discussion, Martin Lockstrom, APAC head of purchasing excellence at DSM, shared with the participants his experiences with low-carbon logistics and green supply chains.
Chengdu's role as a logistics hub
The conference also highlighted Chengdu's role as a national logistics hub in China and its goal to become an international leader in the Belt and Road Initiative. The city has the capability of handling materials and resources from all over the world. It offers rail lines connecting to European and coastal areas, a network of international air routes, and industrial clusters of leading-edge technologies. Chengdu is a good place to explore new business opportunities and set up local connections for logistics and supply chain activities in China.
Additionally 27 companies were presented with the 2016 Award for Excellent Supply Chain Management Companies & Best Practices in China.
We believe the 7th CSCMP China Conference proved the value and attractiveness of of CSCMP's global presence in China. Together with its partner China Development Institute (CDI), CSCMP will make sure the policy suggestions and business development strategies discussed will be collected and reported to relevant government agencies like China Customs as well as governmental inspection and quarantine agencies.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.