Macrotrends such as the growth of e-commerce and same-day delivery are placing costly new demands on warehouse operators. Here are four major problem areas affecting site-selection decisions this year.
John H. Boyd (jhb@theboydcompany.com) is founder and principal of The Boyd Co. Inc. Founded in 1975 in Princeton, New Jersey, and now based in Boca Raton, Florida, the firm provides independent site selection counsel to leading U.S. and overseas corporations.
Organizations served by Boyd over the years include The World Bank, The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), The Aerospace Industries Association (AIA), MIT’s Work of the Future Project, UPS, Canada's Privy Council, and most recently, the President’s National Economic Council providing insights on policies to reduce supply chain bottlenecks.
In corporate site selection, there always seems to be an industry or sector "du jour" that is setting trends and dominating relocation and investment activity. No doubt about it, this year's "industry of the day" is logistics. This hot sector is commanding record-high industrial rents, experiencing vacancy rates hitting lows not seen since "the go-go 1990s," and establishing new rules of the road when it comes to site selection.
With this kind of growth and dynamism come a number of challenges that impact location and investment decisions. Here are some of our company's observations on the major issues affecting both the logistics sector and site-selection activities in 2017.
Spiking operating costs
Brisk consumer spending, white-hot e-commerce sales, and global trade developments are all fueling the growth of new warehousing and distribution center (DC) space. In particular, the push for next-day or even same-day delivery, driven by our "instant gratification economy," is leading companies to place large DCs in expensive, big-city locations. These "last mile" dynamics, in fact, are putting virtually all the areas around large U.S. cities in play for new distribution facilities—something that in the pre-Amazon days had been rejected due to high costs (principally real estate and property taxes) in favor of lower-cost alternatives in the hinterland.
This is evident in Figure 1, where we have identified a series of distribution center "hot spots" that are increasingly on the radar screens of our site-seeking clients. The DC "hot spots" listed in Figure 1 also show that companies are favoring sites that have well-developed transportation infrastructure, access to major seaport and intermodal facilities, and real estate cost and availability advantages, in addition to strength in other site-selection factors.
Regardless of where they are located, comparative operating costs (such as labor, real estate, taxes, and utilities) continue to be important in most DC site-selection decisions given the uncertain U.S. economy and continued price pressures from offshore competitors. Improving the bottom line on the cost side of the ledger is the only choice for many DC operators.
While shipping rates have remained flat, helping to moderate overall logistics costs, there have been hefty increases in DC operating costs related to real estate, construction, and labor, which are up 5.5, 6.7, and 2.1 percent, respectively, from 2016. National average asking rents for DC space of around $5.75 per square foot (including taxes, utilities, and maintenance) are nearing decade highs. Rents are spiking even higher in many U.S. cities, especially those on the West and East coasts, where rents are approaching $10.00 per square foot in markets such as California and New York.
Labor costs are a particularly big concern for our DC clients. Many are increasingly outsourcing staffing and human resources (HR) functions to third-party agencies that specialize in the logistics sector in order to keep inflationary labor-cost pressures in check, especially the spiraling costs for health-care and legal fees. Onerous and costly labor laws in litigious states like California, New Jersey, and New York also continue to plague the industry and fuel the flight to third-party HR providers. Additionally, labor unrest at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach is escalating as dray drivers feel that the brunt of new clean-air standards are falling too heavily on their shoulders and pocketbooks. This unrest is creating workflow uncertainties at DCs and is putting pressure on shippers to pay higher drayage rates.
Port and rail congestion
Our firm has monitored traffic congestion for years, mostly within the context of labor-force commuting patterns and practices. Now, however, congestion is becoming a broader issue and is greatly challenging the efficiency of our DC clients and their supply chains. In particular, congestion at our nation's seaports and inland infrastructure links is an increasingly severe risk factor handicapping our clients' ability to keep pace with their global competitors.
Congestion and delays are becoming increasingly common at major U.S. ports—a problem having a profound impact on the $900 billion worth of goods transported to and from the United States each year by container ships. Of the 10 busiest container seaports, at least seven are grappling regularly with congestion, according to the American Association of Port Authorities. Ports like Charleston are doubling down on capital investments to keep ahead of congestion, as seen in Charleston's new $700 million Hugh K. Leatherman Sr. Terminal, which will increase container capacity by 50 percent at the South Carolina port.
Those seeking to locate near seaports might want to consider what steps the ports are taking to alleviate congestion. Bayonne was the first terminal at the Port of New York and New Jersey to require appointments. A handful of other North American ports have adopted similar reservation systems to help mitigate congestion, including the West Coast ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Oakland in California, and Vancouver in British Columbia.
This problem is not limited to our nation's busy seaports. Railroads and intermodal yards across the country continue to battle congestion. For example, Chicago handles about 25 percent of the country's rail freight traffic and is becoming overwhelmed by the volume; it can now take a train as much as 32 hours to pass through the city. Legendary railroad executive Hunter Harrison, now head of CSX, says that Chicago is "bursting at the seams," and that CSX is exploring alternatives to bypass the city. Train delays in the pivotal Chicago freight market can have a cascading effect, disrupting delivery schedules in DCs throughout the national supply chain.
Challenges in the cold chain
The DC sector showing the strongest growth in new starts in 2017 is the cold-storage and blast-freezing warehouse sector. Yet suitable cold chain space is in short supply nationally. Growing exports of U.S. agricultural and branded food products are a key driver behind the growth of demand for temperature-controlled facilities. As a result, many companies in the cold-storage field are implementing a "port-centric" investment strategy. Near the Port of Charleston, South Carolina, for example, California-based Lineage Logistics recently broke ground on a new 340,000-square-foot cold-storage warehouse utilizing blast-freezing technology, which is required when exporting meats, fruits, and other perishable food products. Trident Seafoods, the nation's largest seafood company, just opened a convertible refrigerated/freezer warehouse near the Port of Tacoma, Washington, to meet growing export demands.
The Food Safety and Modernization Act (FSMA), the most extensive update of federal food-safety laws since 1938, adds expensive new compliance costs for the always hyper-cost-sensitive DC sector. FSMA requires warehouses and shippers to develop well-defined food-safety strategies that will ensure the integrity of their storage and transport operations. Compliance with the new regulations requires making upgrades to many existing cold-storage facilities, but this often is economically unfeasible due to those facilities' age and the expensive design and connectivity requirements of modern warehouses.
Cybersecurity threats
The banking industry has been under siege by cybercriminals for years now, losing billions of dollars to hackers and frauds—much of which transpires under the radar screen. Why rob banks? "It's where the money is," according to the infamous bank robber Willie Sutton. Why rob the supply chain? Well, "It's where the goods are," and therefore ripe for thievery, extortion, and ransom.
From the now almost daily reports of data breaches, identity theft, ransomware, and even hacking for political purposes, it's clear that cyberthreats are pervasive, affecting all sectors of the economy. It's also clear that they pose a most severe threat to the global supply chain. In June 2017, the NotPetya ransomware attack hit companies in at least 64 nations, including Russia, Germany, and the United States. A number of supply chain-related companies were directly affected. The world's largest shipping company, A.P. Møller-Maersk, was among the victims of the NotPetya attack, which caused outages in its computer systems around the world. Maersk-owned APM Terminals' facility at the Port of New York and New Jersey had to close temporarily due to the extent of the system attack. Another victim was FedEx's TNT subsidiary. Trade in FedEx stock was temporarily halted during the attack.
DCs and other logistics service providers will have to meet this new online threat, and their investments in cybersecurity will be soaring in the months and years ahead. For that reason, our firm's labor-market investigations for site-selection clients increasingly include special research into an area's ability to supply coveted information technology talent in cybersecurity. One of our benchmarks is the presence of a college or university that has full accreditation by the National Security Agency (NSA) for its programs in information assurance.
The NSA and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly sponsor the National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber Defense (CAE-CD) program. The goal of the program is to reduce vulnerability in our national information infrastructure by producing professionals with the latest in cyberdefense expertise. Such expertise is increasingly being sought by the human resources departments of our corporate site-seeking clients, both in and out of the logistics industry. NSA-designated colleges run the gamut from Dakota State University in Madison, South Dakota (population: 7,425), to schools in major metro areas like Northeastern University in Boston (population: 4.6 million).
Finding the way
Based on our firm's five decades of site-selection experience within the dynamic and ever-evolving supply chain industry, I am fully confident these and other challenges will be met with great success by the industry's best and brightest. Those logistics companies that find their way through these challenges—and do so while keeping costs in check—will lead this sector to even greater heights in the years ahead.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.