There's a common stereotype about the new generation of supply chain professionals. One that paints them, for better or worse, as tech-savvy millennials who are wedded more to their smartphones, process optimization software, and data analytics than to old-school business practices like face-to-face meetings and relationship building.
But if this year's winners of the Emerging Leader Award are any indication, these stereotypes miss the mark. Both Nathan Chaney, branch manager for the logistics company Mainfreight, and David Perez, director with the commercial real estate firm Cushman & Wakefield, are acutely aware that supply chain management requires not just technical expertise but also keen interpersonal and relationship skills.
The CSCMP Emerging Leader Award was created to recognize outstanding supply chain management professionals, age 30 and under, for their contributions to and future influence on the profession. Supply Chain Quarterly Senior Editor Susan Lacefield asked this year's winners about their careers so far as well as their future aspirations. Her interviews appear below.
NATHAN CHANEY
As a branch manager for Auckland, New Zealand-based Mainfreight, Chaney manages sales, recruiting, human resources, finance, and operations for the company's Dallas/Fort Worth (Texas)-area distribution center, which he helped design and construct. Chaney is also heavily involved in CSCMP's Dallas/Fort Worth Roundtable, where he has served as the Hospitality Committee chair and Young Professional chair, and is currently vice president of programs. As the Young Professional chair in 2016-17, he organized events for more than 200 students and young professionals at a local high school, community college, and three universities as well as at the roundtable. Chaney earned a degree in logistics and supply chain management from the University of North Texas in 2009.
What attracted you to supply chain management as a profession?
I was going to a junior college and getting a degree in business administration. But toward the end of the two years, I went to the business school dean and said, "I don't think what I am doing is specific enough to help me find a job. I think I am being too general. Can you help me narrow down my focus?" And he said, "You should check out the logistics degree at the University of North Texas." So I Googled "logistics" and drove out to Denton, Texas, and it just seemed to fit. I won't lie; my love for toy trucks, trains, and cars when I was growing up was also a deciding factor!
What surprised you about the field of supply chain management when you entered the workforce?
Coming out of school, I didn't expect that I would use every bit of my business degree. But in my current role as a branch manager, I am doing a little bit of everything: accounting, organizational behavior, human resources, sales and marketing, and even psychology. Because when you work in logistics, you don't just do logistics, you also hire people and you help take care of their families, you look at the books, and you sell your services.
I do a lot of mentoring with students, and I find that a lot of students who study logistics think that in logistics you are just going to do route optimization or data analysis all day. But I tell them that if they are really good at moving product from A to B, if they are really good at the technical side of the business, then they are going to be promoted so that they will be responsible for other people doing the route optimization and data analysis. And if they are good at that, they are going to move up again.
You need to be able to use all of your general business tools. The higher you rise, the less what you do will have to do with your actual discipline. You are going to get to a point where 20 percent of your job will have to do with the actual discipline, and 80 percent will have to do with accounting and finance, dealing with shareholders and sales, and running an operation.
Is there a particular project you learned a lot from or especially enjoyed? What was it, and what did you learn?
When I was 25, I was given an opportunity to design, build, and get off the ground a 150,000-square-foot distribution center. As part of that, I had hundreds of truckloads of product moving into the new facility from the existing site, and [the putaway process] turned into a huge disaster. ... At the end of the third day, all of the product was in stock in the warehouse and the dock was clear, but when you looked in the warehouse management system, it said that half of the stock was still on the dock. We had to work double shifts for weeks to get it corrected. It was the hardest and biggest challenge of my professional life. At the time, I thought we were never going to get it right. But we persevered, and it's now grown into a million-square-foot facility and one of [our company's] most profitable operations in the U.S. Now when I am going through a difficult experience, I can think back on that challenge and remember how back then I felt like I wanted to crawl under a rock. And I know now that I will get through whatever new challenge I face.
I also use this experience as a manager. Now as a manager I intentionally give the people I manage challenges, and if I see them failing or struggling, I give them space to work through it. Because if you throw them a life raft and you save them, then you don't allow them to achieve the experience and the wisdom that can come from failure.
What advice would you give to companies that are looking to recruit and retain good young talent?
What I have found about my cohort is that we have been told that if you want to advance and go places, you need to change companies every three years. So what I would tell employers is, if you want to retain young professionals, make sure you have the next role or steps ready for them, so they don't go looking for something outside of your walls. Make sure you have a system in place so that when young professionals get antsy, you can move them to a new challenge and retain the knowledge and culture that has been invested in them.
DAVID PEREZ
Perez is a director within Cushman & Wakefield's Industrial Brokerage Platform, and is based in Orlando, Florida. Since joining the firm in 2012, he has been involved in industrial property transactions totaling over US$400 million, and his team is routinely recognized as one of the top three teams in the Orlando market. Perez earned a bachelor's degree in finance from the University of Central Florida (UCF) in 2010. In addition to being a CSCMP member, he is a member of the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties (NAIOP) as well as the Warehousing Education and Research Council (WERC), and works closely with Cushman & Wakefield's Build-to-Suit Specialty Practice Group.
What attracted you to supply chain management as a profession?
It was really somewhat serendipitous. I was studying finance, and I initially anticipated that I would be in financial management of some kind, maybe investment banking or financial planning. But I ended up falling into the real estate business, and I saw that there were tailwinds that were aiding the industrial market that were also serving as headwinds for retail product. So I thought rather than fight the current, I might as well join it. Once I jumped in, I did so with both feet and have never looked back.
What is your favorite part of the job?
Frankly, it all revolves around people. I do really enjoy the function and creating value. But what I enjoy the most is communicating with the client, and the part of the discussion that leads to creating new solutions to problems and new decisions.
I like helping the people we work with on a day-to-day basis and supporting the ongoing pursuit of optimal operations, which generally benefits society as a whole. The ongoing supply chain challenges faced by companies have always been complex, but now it is particularly complicated as the lines between asset types continue to blur, particularly between retail and industrial. At the end of the day, I feel that individuals within the supply chain industry make the world run, and in that regard, by being involved in these critical operations you are creating value not only for companies, but for consumers as well.
What surprised you about the field of supply chain management when you entered the workforce?
In a concise answer, the complexity of tasks that we take for granted. Consider something such as where to place a distribution center. Many people would think that it is a fairly simple proposition: you find a piece of land or a building that seems reasonably priced in the size range that seems to be needed, sign a lease, and magically you're operational. Though some companies do operate in this manner, this approach does not take into account elements that may have a meaningful impact on their ongoing operating costs, which can include the labor climate, tax climate, incentives, building design for optimal flow, various layers of complexity within a build-to-suit scenario, environmental considerations, general best practices, detailed transportation analysis, and so forth. Though many users are aware of all of these individual elements, a holistic view is what is needed to be competitive in today's environment.
Is there a particular project that you learned a lot from or especially enjoyed?
There have been a lot of projects that I have learned from, but one in particular that jumps out at me happened when I had just started at Cushman & Wakefield. My team and I were working with a Fortune 20 retailer on a complicated deal. Though the deal was large and very complex, it did bring to light the principle that ... as long as we listen to our clients and work to find solutions to their needs, we will continue to be successful in being a strong partner and creating value.
What advice would you give to other young people just entering the field?
I would advise them to get involved as soon as they can, whether that be through industry organizations such as CSCMP or at the university level, because relationships are extremely valuable in every business but particularly in this one. And relationships, in a lot of ways, are a game of "time in," so that the earlier you are able to start building them, the better off you will be.
My approach for building relationships has been to find ways to provide value to others rather than to scan for what others can do for me. [But] there are many relationships that have been helpful to me over the course of my career, and many people that I have learned from. I think it is critical to recognize all of the people who helped to create your good luck, and let them know that they are appreciated along the way. This can include clients, fellow advisers, managers, friends, and acquaintances.
In my view, it is essential to realize that our lives are shaped more by external forces than by internal forces. Understanding this keeps us humble and allows us to constantly be scanning for the relationships and opportunities that lie ahead.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.