Lights! Camera! Logistics!: interview with Elaine Singleton
Technicolor has been part of the filmgoing fabric for decades. But as Elaine Singleton, the company's vice president of supply chain, explains, there is also a thriving 3PL brand behind the credits.
[Editor's Note: This interview originally appeared in the October 2017 issue of DC Velocity, a sister publication of Supply Chain Quarterly.]
It's a brand so associated with filmmaking that it's hard to think of it being in any other line of work. Yet over the years, Technicolor SA has built a successful third-party logistics (3PL) business, first in the video and entertainment field, and then in other industries. The company, based in the Paris suburb of Issy-les-Moulineaux but with a strong U.S. presence, has long supported its traditional core customers with logistics and distribution services. However, several years ago, it decided to leverage those capabilities in a bid to branch out beyond video and entertainment.
In an interview with Executive Editor Mark B. Solomon, Elaine Singleton, Technicolor's vice president of supply chain, describes how the 3PL services came to be, what drove the company to explore opportunities outside its core business, and how the changes in the way content is distributed influenced its strategy.
Q: Can you describe the history of your 3PL strategy?
A: The impetus came about a decade ago as Technicolor began to review opportunities to expand our service offerings in the logistics space. We started offering full-blown logistics services to our core studio customers by, among other things, providing final-mile deliveries. This included parcel, truckload, and less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments to retail distribution centers (DCs) as well as direct-to-store shipments.
Technicolor was able to leverage its expertise in time-sensitive upstream capabilities in manufacturing and distribution so that studios could rapidly fulfill orders to retail. We've demonstrated our ability to help studios reduce infrastructure cost and cost of goods.
Q: Did Technicolor's background as a distributor provide a tailwind?
A: Definitely. We have a track record as a supply chain conduit that ensures new releases or titles can be delivered to the right place at the right time to more than 9,000 retail locations simultaneously for a product launch. Precision in our business is critical. Getting product to a destination too soon creates logistical problems for store-level execution, and getting it there late is obviously a non-starter.
Our experience has allowed us to build solid relationships. This is important because there are many intricacies in understanding which stores require which capabilities, which distribution centers have windows for receiving, and how the product will arrive. Should it get there on a pallet or should it arrive in cartons in a floor-load environment to then be conveyed through the DC?
These intricacies and complexities need to be taken into consideration when providing logistics services to retail. Both studio shippers and retailers are customers. For Technicolor, it is important to have a clear understanding of vendor routing guides for inbound freight delivery. This insight laid the foundation for our 3PL strategy.
Q: Most companies that are not already logistics specialists don't establish 3PL operations. Were there factors, such as the shift to streaming and satellite transmissions from hard discs that might have impacted your core business, that influenced your decision to go all in on 3PL services?
A: With the home entertainment industry's shift to digital distribution via on-demand and streaming, our migration to new customers became an equally important initiative. Over the last five years, we've explored different ways to build our 3PL services for other verticals and markets. We've grown the non-studio business 20 to 30 percent year over year over the past five years. Most of the growth is coming from verticals such as electronics, consumer products, and manufacturing of industrial supplies such as raw materials and dry goods, as well as from direct-to-consumer services. We now provide full-service supply chain coordination for high-profile time-sensitive new product launches in retail that require very precise distribution and store deliveries. We are no longer just about transporting media content.
Additionally, we are entering into market verticals such as heating/air conditioning, postal distribution, and automotive with diverse customer segmentation. As our customer base expands, so has our people, process, and technology infrastructure.
Q: Your deep knowledge of the film and entertainment industry helped you design effective logistics solutions for companies in your field. Yet you decided to go beyond your core vertical. What prompted you to expand, and what challenges did you face in doing so?
A: One of the biggest hurdles we faced revolved around preconceived notions attached to the Technicolor brand. When you say "Technicolor," people have not traditionally thought of logistics.
We are well known for creating and delivering content by offering post production, visual effects, sound effects, etc., for movies, episodic TV, and games. The Technicolor brand resonated with our studio/games customers, resulting in an end-to-end supply chain solution, including final-mile delivery.
This effort early on has enabled progress as we migrated into servicing new customers within new verticals. We began by investing time and effort devising a strategy to begin calling on potential customers in adjacent markets (print, corrugate, cases, etc.).
At the end of the day, a widget is a widget, and a truck is a truck. It's ultimately about having the economies of scale, experience, technology, and customer mindset to perform well while serving up competitive rates.
Q: How do you see your 3PL business evolving as your core field becomes less reliant on "hard" commodities that must be distributed and shipped, and more on streaming and satellite, which have a totally different model?
A: The demand for packaged media is still stable and not diminishing as rapidly as many predicted 10 years ago. There's definitely been a downturn in demand, but Technicolor Home Entertainment is still producing over a billion optical discs a year. We continue to perform due diligence month after month to make sure we understand the key trends, so we are prepared for any cliff that we may come upon.
Q: Can other shippers and distributors pull this off? What needs to happen, culturally, strategically, and operationally, for other companies to do what Technicolor has done?
A: There are some universal success factors. The long-term customer/supplier contractual environment is about seamless relationships that are highlighted with candor, smart ideas, and, above all, mutual commitment.
We must be totally focused on the customer's need to make sure that the logistics solution is completely in tune with the receiving end, whether it's Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, Best Buy, or the local variety store.
The situation is a bit different in shorter-term wins that come about on the open market. First impressions are lasting and will build into long-term relationships when we are fully transparent about obstacles, solutions, and failures, and when we enact practices to mute negative events. We see these as opportunities to build long-term relationships.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.