Electronic commerce has now been on the scene for around two decades. In that brief period, it has transformed the processes of buying and selling goods and has made a profound impact on the way that companies manage their supply chains.
We previously wrote about the rise of e-commerce and its effects on supply chains in the Q2/2011 issue of Supply Chain Quarterly. In this column we offer an update to that article, "The economic impact of e-commerce," with new evidence of an accelerating transition to electronic transactions across the spectrum of U.S. goods-producing businesses. E-commerce continues to alter the nature of business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-consumer (B2C) commerce, influencing pricing, product availability, inventory management, transportation patterns, and consumer behavior in developed economies worldwide.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] E-commerce share of retail sales less auto dealers, gas, food stores, and restaurantsEnlarge this image
Business-to-business electronic commerce accounts for the vast majority of total e-commerce sales and plays an important role in global supply chain networks. Although online shopping gets more popular attention, e-commerce retail sales are dwarfed by electronic sales in both the manufacturing and wholesale sectors. Manufacturing e-commerce makes up 56 percent of total e-commerce in the United States, while wholesale make up 38 percent. The vast majority of both constitute B2B trade. Meanwhile, retail accounts for a mere 6 percent.
Moreover, e-commerce composes a greater share of the total sales for manufacturing and wholesale than it does for retail. In 2016, e-commerce sales made up 64.8 percent of overall manufacturing sales and 32.4 percent of wholesale sales, while e-commerce made up only 8 percent of total retail sales. This disparity is partially a consequence of the earlier development of B2B infrastructure from the electronic data interchange (EDI) networks of the 1970s and 1980s.
The growth of the e-commerce share of manufacturing and wholesale sales has been rapid; consider that in 2003, only 21 percent of manufacturing sales and 14.6 percent of wholesale sales in the United States were conducted via e-commerce. This rapid growth has changed the cost and profit picture for companies worldwide. At the microeconomic level, B2B e-commerce has caused a substantial reduction in transaction costs, improved supply chain management, and reduced costs for domestic and global sourcing. At the macroeconomic level, B2B e-commerce has placed downward pressure on inflation and increased productivity, profit margins, and competitiveness. In particular, price inflation for consumer goods has come under extraordinary downward pressure in recent years due to both B2B and B2C e-commerce. Indeed, the annual growth of the U.S. Consumer Price Index for commodities excluding food and energy was positive in only two of the 61 months since April 2013.
B2C rising rapidly
Although the B2C market started relatively behind the B2B market in terms of e-commerce adoption, e-commerce retail sales growth is catching up. Retail's e-commerce sales growth has outpaced that of the wholesale and manufacturing sectors for 12 of the 14 years leading up to 2016. Between 2003 and 2016, retail e-commerce has grown by an average of 17.0 percent annually, compared with 7.3 percent and 12.2 percent respectively for wholesale and manufacturing. The share of retail sales conducted by e-commerce in 2016 was 14.5 percent even when excluding sales at auto and auto parts dealers, gas stations, food and beverage stores, and restaurants—a far cry from manufacturing's 64.8 percent. But this share is rising rapidly; most recently, in the first quarter of 2018, it jumped to 17.1 percent. In IHS Markit's latest retail sales forecast, we expect e-commerce sales to reach 19 percent by mid-2019. (See Figure 2.)
One particularly important segment of e-commerce retail sales is mail-order houses, many of which have both an online and a traditional brick-and-mortar presence. While mail-order houses accounted for 10 percent of total retail sales, they dominated e-commerce retail sales at 85.5 percent. The adoption rate for e-commerce has been different for different types of products in the mail-order house segment. However, even products that have historically been slower to join online markets are now making headway. While in the early days, high-tech products were the stars of the show, other types of merchandise are now responsible for the rapidity of growth. Between 2003 and 2016, e-commerce sales growth of furniture in the mail-order channel tipped the scales at 1,100 percent, while computers and peripheral equipment managed only 184-percent growth.
Economic impacts
The relative ease, rapidity, and convenience of online shopping has produced shifts in consumer shopping patterns. Between 2003 and 2016, the average amount of time Americans spent shopping on weekends and holidays fell from 0.56 of an hour to 0.48—a 14-percent decline, due to the ease of online shopping. The growth of e-commerce retail sales has also reduced consumers' search cost, placed downward pressure on the price of many consumer goods, and reduced price dispersion for many consumer goods.
These economic impacts have led to a substantial decrease in the number of small businesses operating in certain areas of the retail space, as retailers are increasingly competing with the global market. As a result, only the biggest businesses and those most able to cut costs have been able to survive.
In addition, there appear to be considerable synergies between B2C parcel volumes and heavier freight. Parcel industry insiders have observed that businesses involved with B2B e-commerce often have stronger B2B shipment volumes if they also maintain robust B2C shipment volumes than those businesses that do not engage in consumer e-commerce.
The shift to electronic commerce is also visible in labor markets. Through 2010, e-commerce had a somewhat ambiguous effect on the jobs picture, with employment at "nonstore" retailers seeming to trend downward despite strong sales growth. The share of nonstore retail employees remained roughly stable between 2003 and 2009 at around 2.8 percent—even as nonstore retailers' share of total retail sales increased by more than a third. But after 2010, nonstore retail employment took off, rising from an average of 420,000 people employed in 2010 to 570,000 people employed in 2017, while its jobs share rose from 2.9 to 3.6 percent. Although punishing to many retailers, the rapid growth of e-commerce retail sales has also provided a major boost to residential parcel delivery services, which are needed to get the goods into consumers' hands. Between 2012 and 2017, employment of couriers and messengers rocketed from an average of 535,000 jobs to 685,000. (See Figure 3.)
As technology, e-commerce, and globalization become more intertwined, buyers and sellers are increasing their connectivity and the speed with which they conduct sales transactions. This has the side effect of transmitting market disturbances much more quickly—and even exacerbating them. Quicker responses to sales transactions can have cascading impacts on supply chains, resulting in large contractions or expansions in orders, production, shipments, and inventory. The rapid growth of e-commerce therefore requires supply chain managers to take precautions and develop strategies for dealing with the rapid demand swings that are a new feature of our connected world.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.