The 22nd Annual Third-Party Logistics Study shows that shippers and 3PLs have, in general, built solid, mutually beneficial relationships, but opportunities for improvement still remain.
For many organizations, successful supply chain operations depend on there being strong and positive relationships between shippers and their third-party logistics providers (3PLs). Those partnerships are crucial for enabling the supply chain to improve service and innovation. Shippers and 3PLs alike should be heartened then by the overall results of the 2018 22nd Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, which show that these relationships are indeed strong.
The Annual Third-Party Logistics Study is produced by Infosys Consulting, Penn State University, Korn/Ferry International, and Penske Logistics. It examines the global marketplace for logistics outsourcing, surveying both shippers and third-party logistics providers.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Information technology (IT) outsourcing servicesEnlarge this image
The survey found that shippers are relying on their 3PL partners for a broad range of logistics and supply chain services. The most frequently outsourced activities are domestic transportation (83 percent), warehousing (66 percent), international transportation (63 percent), customs brokerage (46 percent), and freight forwarding (46 percent).
Less frequently outsourced activities continue to be those that are more strategic and customer-facing. Examples include: service-parts logistics (18 percent), inventory management (17 percent), supply chain consulting services (15 percent), customer service (11 percent), lead logistics provider/4PL services (11 percent), and fleet management (10 percent).
In general, both shippers and 3PLs said they are satisfied with the quality of the services being provided. Among respondents of the 2018 study, 81 percent of shippers and 98 percent of 3PL providers agreed that the use of 3PLs has contributed to improving services to the ultimate (or end) customers. In addition, 73 percent of 3PL users and 92 percent of 3PL providers agreed that 3PLs provide new and innovative ways to improve logistics effectiveness.
Opportunities for improvement
There still remain, however, many opportunities for both 3PLs and shippers to improve on these relationships. For example, achieving effective and efficient relationships requires open and transparent communication between 3PLs and shippers. In the study, 98 percent of shippers and 99 percent of 3PLs agreed that there is an increased need for 3PLs to respond to customers more quickly and with complete, accurate, and consistent information. Both parties also agreed there is a need for improvement, with just over half of shippers—51 percent—and half of 3PLs reporting that 3PLs communicate well in responding to risks and executing operating objectives.
This need for complete, accurate, and consistent information means that the importance of data continues to increase. Both shippers and 3PLs can experience a range of consequences when information at the shipper-3PL interface is not complete, accurate, or consistent. These consequences include creating frustration at the organization (74 percent of shippers and 68 percent of 3PLs) and project delays or cancelation (54 percent of shippers and 51 percent of 3PLs).
Given the importance of collecting, centralizing, and analyzing information, an increasing number of shippers, 27 percent, said they were utilizing information technology (IT) outsourcing services from 3PLs, up from 17 percent in the 2017 study. However, the percentage of shippers satisfied by 3PL IT outsourcing dropped to 56 percent in 2018, down from 65 percent in 2017. (See Figure 1.) C. John Langley, a professor at Penn State University and the founder of the report, said this could be due to higher expectations among shippers as technology continues to make gains. Shippers could also be looking for enhanced analytical capabilities to help drive more effective supply chain decisions, he said.
Indeed, there is increasing interest among 3PLs and shippers in big data analytics. According to the survey, 41 percent of 3PLs are currently use big data analytics, compared to 25 percent of shippers. However, 67 percent of 3PLs and 69 percent of shippers said they will invest in big data analytics in the future.
The future in tech
Big data analytics is not the only technology that 3PLs and users are interested in. The majority of respondents—70 percent of shippers and 77 percent of 3PLs—reported that they are currently using core supply chain technology, such as transportation and warehouse management systems, and 68 percent of shippers and 64 percent of 3PLs reported that they plan to invest in the technology in the future.
Those within the supply chain are also adapting to emerging technologies, such as blockchain, which breaks each movement down into a block and documents transactions every time a shipment changes hands. Among respondents, 30 percent of 3PLs and 16 percent of shippers said they view blockchain as potential application. Automation solutions and equipment are also generating a great deal of interest. The survey shows that 62 percent of 3PLs and 57 percent of shippers investing in automation/digitization.
Third-party logistics providers that take the opportunity to be early adopters of emerging technologies could gain a significant competitive advantage from this expertise. For example, more than half of shippers (67 percent) and 3PLs (62 percent) said they don't know enough about blockchain to be able to fairly rate its potential future benefits to their business. Those that seize the opportunity now could benefit from a head start.
Technology is also reframing the demands on the workforce. Companies are increasingly looking for supply chain employees who have experience with automation, digitization, and data collection. The 2018 study found that workforce innovation and agility, which would allow those within the supply chain to create and redefine positions as the industry changes, will be particularly important for the 3PL industry as the industry changes. These needs will not be limited to entry-level employees or mid-level managers. Supply chain and logistics executives will need to increasingly shift from being focused on the supply chain's physical efficiency to being focused on its data efficiency.
Looking ahead
The 2019 study, which will be released in October 2018, will take a deeper dive into several of these subject areas. Researchers talked with shippers and 3PLs about the need to keep the supply chain relevant, effective, and nimble, which is taking on greater significance given the increasing level of complexity within the supply chain. This is particularly relevant as retailers and manufacturing locations work to keep inventories low, respond to faster shipping demands, and react to changes in demand patterns within the global economy.
For example, the last mile, which generally refers to the final segment of a delivery process, has taken on enhanced significance with the growth in e-commerce and omnichannel distribution. As part of this year's upcoming study, researchers have taken the last-mile concept one step further to look at the "last yard," which is what happens to a shipment once it is delivered to a customer or consumer and how it is routed to the specific location where it may be needed or used. Last-yard logistics can be chaotic, but seamless execution is needed to drive customer service.
The 2019 survey will also look at how retailers are continuing to emphasize an "always-on, always-open" shopping experience that provides seamless interaction across all retail sales channels. Omnichannel retailing is forcing shippers and their logistics partners to be fluid and move quickly. The 3PL study last asked those within the supply chain about omnichannel retailing in 2015. This year's responses demonstrate that many shippers and 3PLs are still struggling to create a true, omnichannel retailing experience.
The 2019 study is also revisiting the topic of supply chain disruption, which it last visited in 2013. Supply chain disruptions are a major area of concern because they can result in increased costs, missed deliveries, and downed production lines. The 2019Annual Third-Party Logistics Study is expected to show that shippers and 3PLs are placing greater importance on mitigating supply chain disruption.
The final version of the study will be presented during the CSCMP EDGE Conference in Nashville, Tennessee, on October 1, at 10:30 a.m.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.