While many question whether drone deliveries will ever happen in the developed world, Keller Rinaudo is already using autonomous aircraft to deliver medical supplies to remote locations in Africa.
Few people are fortunate enough to combine their job with their passion. Keller Rinaudo is one of them. Rinaudo is CEO and cofounder of Zipline, a company that builds autonomous drones designed for delivering medical supplies to remote parts of the world.
The Harvard University-educated Rinaudo started his career as a software engineer and a professional rock climber. For a time, he built computers out of RNA and DNA to operate in human cells as molecular doctors. Then, he discovered the wonderful world of logistics and the possibilities of using new technologies to deliver medical supplies to all of the world's inhabitants, wherever they may live.
San Francisco, California-based Zipline employs 40 aerospace and software engineers and is funded by an impressive slate of investors, including Sequoia Capital, Google Ventures, Paul Allen, Jerry Yang, and Stanford University. The tech firm builds and operates 40-pound battery-powered drones that look like small airplanes. The drones are catapult-launched and fly to remote destinations to make deliveries by paper parachutes. They then return to the distribution center, where they fly into a large net or are caught by a tailhook and are quicklymade ready for further deliveries. (You can watch a video of a drone delivery on the company's website, www.flyzipline.com.)
NAME: Keller Rinaudo TITLE: Chief Executive Officer and cofounder of Zipline EDUCATION: Artium Baccalaureus (Bachelor of Arts) in economic and biotechnology from Harvard University EXPERIENCE: Chief executive officer of Zipline, where he oversees a team of 100 flight engineers and operators formerly of companies including SpaceX, Boeing, and Google based in the San Francisco Bay area and Rwanda; software engineer; professional rock climber; as a student at Harvard, he built computers out of RNA and DNA that can operate in human cells as molecular doctors RECOGNITION: Published research on RNA and DNA computers in Nature Biotechnology, becoming one of the youngest first authors in the publication's history
Zipline's first major project was partnering with the government of Rwanda to use its drones to make last-mile deliveries of blood to remote transfusing facilities. From its DCs, Zipline currently delivers about 30 percent of the national blood supply of Rwanda. The long-term vision for this project is to be able to swiftly reach each of Rwanda's 11 million citizens with any essential medical product they need, regardless of how remote they are.
Rinaudo recently sat down with CSCMP's Supply Chain Quarterly Editorial Director David Maloney to discuss this ground-breakingventure. The following is an edited version of their conversation. To watch the full interview, go to https://www.supplychainquarterly.com/video.
Q: What made you decide to zero in on health care logistics for Zipline's first drone deliveries?
Health care logistics was a really good place for us to start for a number of reasons. First of all, every delivery is potentially saving a human life. Second, health care products are obviously urgently needed, and logistics is a really important part of making sure that doctors have what they need to treat patients. Plus, the health carelogistics market itself is a huge US$7 billion market, and it's one that, while it functions well in developed countries, really doesn't function well in a lot of other parts of the world. There is a huge opportunity to both push the industry forward and also save lives.
Q: Why was Rwanda chosen?
We wanted to find a country that was small enough that we could get to national scale quickly and had a government that was making active investments in technology and health carefor its citizens. Rwanda really fit that bill. So, in partnership with Rwanda's administrative health [ministry], we've been able to turn Rwanda into the first country to achieve universal health careaccess for all. They have been able to put every single one of their citizens within a 15- to 25-minute delivery of any essential medical product.
Q: Your drones sometimes have to fly over populated areas to reach patients in remote locations. Some people have questioned the safety of drones flying over people. Is that a concern for you as well?
When we're flying, what's important to us is not just saving the life of the person that we're delivering for, but also ensuring that we're safe for the people we're flying over—the people who live in the towns and cities that we fly over on a daily basis. It's really important that these vehicles be able to operate at a similar level of reliability as general aviation aircraft.
Q: Could you describe just how the vehicles fly and make their deliveries?
The user experience of receiving a delivery from Zipline is very simple. Any doctor or health worker can use a cellphone to send a text message to place an order. When the distribution center receives that text, Zipline's team will basically pull the product from stock and load it into one of our aircraft. That aircraft is then launched from the distribution center, and it flies autonomously to the destination's GPS coordinates.
Q: So, no one is controlling it? It is all programmed electronically and by computer?
Exactly. The plane is flying itself using a flight control algorithm. It will descend to about 30 feet off the ground, and then we drop the package using a really simple paper parachute. That enables us to deliver every shipment right into the receiver's "mailbox," which is an area about the size of two parking spaces on the ground. The plane will turn around, come home, and land at the distribution center. It is ready to fly again a few minutes later.
Q: Have you had any complications with your deliveries in Rwanda?
We've made tens of thousands of deliveries, and we've never lost a vehicle. We design redundant systems into every level, whether it's the flight controls, the avionics, or the way the vehicle is mechanically engineered.
Q: And these are delivery vehicles that your company has created?
Yes. We build everything from scratch. We also have a system on board so if the vehicle can't make it back to the distribution center, it can actually use a parachute to bring itself to ground gently. So, this is how we ensure that these vehicles are 100-percent safe for the people they're flying over.
Q: How many types of those deliveries are you making a day in Rwanda?
We just agreed to an expansion of our services in Rwanda and have added a second distribution center. That will allow us to do about 200 deliveries per day countrywide.
Q: Are you looking to expand to other nations with this technology?
Yes, rural health care is a global problem. A lot of other countries are now looking at Rwanda as a role model and figuring out how they can leverage similar technology to improve their own health care systems. So, we will be launching in several other African countries in the next six months.
And here in the United States, we will soon begin making lifesaving medical deliveries in rural North Carolina. We're working through final details with the Federal Aviation Administration, the state of North Carolina, and our partners on the ground. We expect to begin deliveries there beginning in the second quarter of this year.
Q:There's been a lot of talk in the logistics industry about drones being used for deliveries. Can you see a day when that technology will be used on a regular basis for small parcel deliveries, such as e-commerce orders?
Yes. The funny thing is, it is already happening at scale today, just not in the United States. When it comes to e-commerce, we think it's inevitable that this type of technology will have a big impact on how e-commerce orders are delivered, but that's not the first place the technology is going to start. It makes more sense to start focused on lifesaving applications. Then I think after that, you'll see a lot of high-need, urgent applications that might be more industrial applications. And then in the long run, you'll start to see this technology permeate the really big parcel-delivery market that's currently served mainly by UPS and FedEx.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.