If it's been some time since you last interviewed for a management position, you
might be surprised at how much things have changed. These days, companies look for candidates
with broader experience in supply chain management, an understanding of general business
principles, and a stable history of success. Interviewers will ask questions pertaining to
how and why you made certain career and business choices. Through the interviewing
process, they will develop a profile of your leadership ability, drive to succeed, communication
skills, and potential to advance, and they will consider all of that in relation to your past successes
and failures. They are interested in not only what you have achieved but also why you
achieved it and what you learned along the way. Moreover, they will ask behavioral questions
that will help them to understand who you are and whether you will fit the company's
business culture.
How can you be at your best and succeed in this new interview environment? William C.
Belknap, president of the career coaching firm Performance Leadership, says it is all about
preparation, preparation, and more preparation.
Your preparation for an interview should focus on three areas: Researching the industry
and the company; being ready to discuss the requirements and responsibilities of the positions
you have held in relation to the one you are interviewing for; and understanding the
interests and priorities of the people who will interview you. Here are some tips on how to go
about it.
Research the company and the
industry
This is an absolute must. Just as the hiring company will use many methods to screen and
evaluate you as a candidate, you must do the same to evaluate the company and position for
which you are interviewing. The more you know about a company and its management,
the better you will be able to interview and make your decision regarding employment.
The Internet is a wonderful place to find information about a company and its key people.
Through online research, you can not only find financial information about the company
but also identify changes that may affect the position for which you are interviewing. Is
there new management? Is the company stable? How does it match up against the competition?
Is there a pattern of outsourcing? Is there a likelihood of a merger or takeover? These are just a
few of the questions to consider.
You can use online social and business networks, such as LinkedIn, MySpace, Twitter,
and Facebook, to mention a few, to find present and past employees of the hiring company.
There you may find information about the people who are involved in the interviewing
process, including professional profiles and information that could help you to develop a
personal bond during the interview. For example, you may discover that you share similar
backgrounds and education, which you can discuss with the interviewer—at the appropriate
time, of course. Additionally, contacting past employees can give you greater insight
into the "personality" of the company, the department, and even the person you would be
reporting to. These contacts may alert you to information that could be of concern, such as a
high turnover rate.
Don't limit your research to the company itself. It is just as important to know about the
prospective employer's industry. Some questions you'll want to investigate include: Who
are the major players? What challenges do they face? How profitable is the industry as a whole?
Are there any products or technology that may affect its future success? Are there any safety or
environmental issues that could create trouble for the industry?
Be prepared to discuss your career in
detail
When interviewers for top supply chain positions ask about your career, they are looking for
much more than a list of past positions and responsibilities. They will expect you to analyze not
only what you have accomplished but also why and how you made your decisions. You will need to be introspective with regard to your successes and failures and be able to articulate what you have learned and how you have grown. You should also be able to talk
about each company you worked for, the industries they were in, their sizes, locations, and how they conducted business. In addition, be ready to discuss in detail what your responsibilities were, the decisions you made, and what effect those decisions had on your
department, on your customers, and on manufacturing and marketing. What improvements did you make that led to greater profitability for your company? What analytic process did you use to make those decisions? If you made mistakes, how did you correct them?—and what did
you learn from the experience?
You will also be expected to discuss your overall career, including
the changes you have made and how they relate to your personal and professional goals. Be able to
show a relationship between your past career moves and successes and the responsibilities of the
position you are interviewing for. It's important to do so without implying that you
already fully understand the company and have all the solutions to their problems.
Understand interviewers' interests and priorities
The interviewers you meet will have different concerns and agendas based on their working relationships with the position you are interviewing for. Understanding their priorities will help you present yourself in the best light to each individual and group. There are several types of interviewers you are likely to encounter: co-workers, internal customers, human resource professionals, the hiring manager, and senior management. Here is a rundown of how these different groups typically think about potential new hires:
Co-workers want to hire a person who understands the position and has the skills to work at their level, yet does not pose a threat to their jobs or careers. Naturally, they want someone they can get along with—someone who is interesting and has similar interests. In other words, they want to hire someone they like.
Internal customers want someone who is competent,
easy to work with, likable, and trustworthy. They want
someone who can solve their problems and make their
jobs easier, a person who will see the work world
through their eyes.
Human resource professionals are interested in verifying
that you are who you say you are, and that your
work history is accurately described, with no unexplained
breaks. They want to know whether you fit
the technical parameters of the position, including
salary requirement. Their agenda focuses on the future
as much as it does on the present. Do you fit the
department's and the company's profile for success?
What is your career potential on both a departmental
and companywide level? Less tangibly, are you someone
they feel comfortable with?
Hiring managers are interested in bringing in talented
people who will be successful in their new positions
and also have the potential to learn and grow within
the department. They want someone who has the right experience and the maturity
to manage the position effectively. It is important to them to hire someone who is career-focused
and will be loyal to the company, not just looking for more money. They will be concerned that the
candidate fit the "personality" of the department and that there is good "chemistry" with other
employees.
Executive management normally lets the hiring manager delve into the specifics, such
as technical expertise. They will be looking for a positive
personality with a history of success. Candidates'
potential to contribute to the company's success,
career goals, presentation skills, social and communication
skills, ability to think on their feet, worldliness, and overall business awareness and
understanding are all important to them.
Quickly but carefully
The only opportunity you will have to negotiate is
when an offer has been presented to you. Once negotiations
have been completed, you will need to decide
whether or not to accept the offer. If you have done
your homework beforehand, then the choice should
be easy to make. Be certain the position is right for
you, and that you are right for the position?—if you
accept a job that turns out to be a mistake, you will
carry that decision with you on your résumé. Carefully
consider the offer, but don't take too long; companies
normally want to know your decision as soon as possible.
If you show indecisiveness you may "lose your
shine" or the offer may be rescinded.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.