Brian Gibson is the Wilson Family professor at Auburn University’s Raymond J. Harbert College of Business. He is also executive director of the Center for Supply Chain Innovation.
The past four months have been unprecedented in the supply chain world—an understatement you might say! It’s not just that the ongoing global pandemic has laid bare the complexities and vulnerabilities of modern supply chains. There has also been unprecedented media attention paid to supply chain management. For better or worse, now the whole world knows about supply chains. In particular, warehousing and distribution have been brought out of the shadows and into the bright media lights for the critical role they play.
The upcoming edition of the “Logistics 2030” (L-2030) report, sponsored by JLL and CenterPoint, will focus on the growing importance of warehousing and distribution and the strategic direction they will take over the next decade. The annual study is conducted by the Center for Supply Chain Innovation at Auburn University in partnership with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP), the National Shippers Strategic Transportation Council (NASSTRAC), and AGiLE Business Media (publisher of DC Velocity and CSCMP’s Supply Chain Quarterly). This year’s report is based on multiple in-depth focus group discussions with leading supply chain executives and survey responses from a wide range of supply chain professionals. The release of the Logistics 2030 warehousing report and a related panel discussion are scheduled for August 20 at the fourth annual Fusion 20/20 Supply Chain Symposium (www.auburnscm.org/events).
The focus group meetings and survey results highlighted a key point: Even before the onset of COVID-19, the role of warehousing and distribution had been in transition from supporting downstream supply chain functions to operating as a frontline service provider to end customers.
This is quite a turn of events. Historically, warehousing and distribution were considered a cost center by business executives—a function that needed to be economized. But this view is now changing. A large majority (80%) of survey respondents in our L-2030 study point to a shift in the way top management in their firms think about warehousing and distribution. They are now recognizing the business value warehousing and distribution can provide. We notice a near consensus among survey respondents (88% agree) that warehousing and distribution will be an organizational priority by 2030. (See Figure 1.)
[Figure1] A changing perspective of warehousing and distribution Enlarge this image
The shift is on
A key trend underlying the new value proposition for warehousing is the ongoing shift in the supply chain structure. Supply chain executives in our focus groups point to the decentralization of supply chains arising from the need to push inventory closer to the customers. As one respondent said, “We’re going to be relocating facilities closer to customers in response to the need for faster deliveries. We’re going to put facilities in multiple places as opposed to just being at the most geographically central place.” Survey results indicate that firms’ push for forward inventory placement will continue into the next decade. The use of retail stores to fulfill e-commerce orders is expected to double. Additionally, 68% of respondents expect to see an increase in the use of local fulfillment centers and a 51% increase in regional distribution facilities by 2030.
Developing a decentralized warehousing and distribution structure requires major investments in infrastructure and technology. A big part of these future investments will be targeted towards expanding firms’ distribution networks. Eight-five percent of survey respondents expects a significant increase in corporate funding to improve warehouse and distribution. These investments will go towards developing key capabilities deemed essential in the coming decade: expanding distribution networks (71% of survey respondents agree), incorporating flexibility in capacity and warehousing operations (68%), leveraging automation for speed (62%), and cutting distribution costs (61%).
Our discussions with focus group executives highlighted a key capability deemed critical in the coming decade – flexibility in adjusting warehousing and distribution capacity. The importance of this capability is rooted in the need to respond to the ever-shifting whims of customers, now and in the future. Firms are investigating ways to be nimble by adjusting their supply chain capacity to match the continually changing demand patterns. “We’re looking at logistics facilities that are flexible in size, construction, and attributes geared towards a cross-dock-like capacity,” explained one respondent Thereby, a necessary capability in warehousing and distribution would be the agility to expand (and shrink) capacity quickly.
Embrace the tech
We asked focus group executives and survey participants how they planned to implement their decentralized distribution strategy. A clear consensus (supported by 93% of survey respondents) is that firms are looking to leverage technology as a catalyst to upgrade their warehousing and distribution processes.
In our study, we noticed a clear change in the conversation around technology that went beyond the typical issues of acquisition costs and implementation pains. We found supply chain executives to be focused more on a broader return on investment (ROI) perspective. One executive highlighted this point as follows: “We know that warehouse labor isn’t going to get any easier to recruit or retain. So as soon as we can justify ROI to replace labor with technology, we’re ready ‘to swing the bat’.”
Another element of this new conversation is the need for execution speed. One executive articulated this point as follows: “So in our [distribution centers] (DCs) we’re investing in ways to unload faster [and] load faster to make fulfillment of things faster so that we can do more with less people.” The cost-benefit analysis for technology solutions is starting to tilt towards a favorable business case for early adoption. “The economics of technology and what you consider in terms of labor availability and how far you’re willing to think about cost escalation or things like healthcare and fringe benefits. I think it’s changed the game in terms of the business ROI,” said one executive.
Our survey results indicate a high use of order management system by 2030 (71% of respondents agree). This software would align inventory and customer orders for fulfillment and shipping across multiple channels. Another big increase is expected in the use of warehouse execution systems (from 16% currently to 61% in 2030) that can provide a real-time coordination of labor and equipment for automated picking, packing, and shipping. Based on the survey results, we project that more firms will start using traditional warehouse management systems (an increase of 67%) by 2030.
In response to our survey question about technologies that have the most potential to disrupt warehousing and distribution, supply chain professionals identified the following: predictive and prescriptive analytics, automated guided vehicles, automated storage and retrieval systems, and automated conveyor systems. It is interesting to note how these technology choices align with automation, capacity expansion, and speed of distribution; all of which support operationalizing the emerging decentralized supply chain structure mentioned above.
In conclusion, warehousing and distribution are marching forward towards fulfilling their new role of a frontline function that drives business growth for firms. As the pendulum swings back to a decentralized supply chain structure, we expect companies to increasingly implement technology in warehousing and distribution in the coming years. To develop the necessary capabilities of speed and flexibility, supply chain executives are strategizing to make the requisite investments in distribution networks, incorporate technology, and engage capable third-party logistics partners to harness the opportunities that lie ahead.
[Authors’ Note: The Auburn University Fusion 20/20 Supply Chain Symposium will be held on August 20th. Register at www.auburnscm.org/events]
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.