To successfully shift production and distribution to Mexico, companies must overcome some challenges and find the right employees, says strategist Rolando García.
Mexico has once again become attractive as a manufacturing and distribution location. In the last year or two, a number of companies have relocated some manufacturing and distribution capacity from Asia to Mexico. Those that make the move can expect to gain important benefits, but to be successful, they will have to overcome challenges in the areas of security, infrastructure, and human resources, says Rolando García.
García, a consultant and CSCMP member, knows both the rewards and challenges of managing supply chains in Mexico. For the past 14 years, he's worked in the fields of strategic planning, logistics, and finance for both Mexican and global corporations. During that time, he's participated in such projects as manufacturing plant startups, enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations, and lean operations initiatives.
In a recent interview with Editor James Cooke, García offered some practical advice for companies that want to set up operations in Mexico.
Why are more companies considering moving some manufacturing and distribution operations from Asia to Mexico right now?
I can identify three main motives. The first is the quality of the workforce. Mexico has a workforce with many years of experience manufacturing to the highest standards. With the current economic downturn, it's easy to find experienced engineers, managers, and operators at very competitive salaries.
Second, Mexico has accommodating legal and labor laws. A new company can easily arrange to have a "white" union—one that is basically controlled by the company. In addition, the legally mandated minimum wage and benefits are very low compared to the United States, Canada, and Europe. And there are incentives for establishing manufacturing plants in many states. A common example is an exemption from payroll taxes granted for a specified number of years by state governments. I was personally involved in a food manufacturing plant startup for a U.S. company, where one of our main raw materials was water. The company was granted a permit by local government to extract ground water for a number of years at a fraction of the commercial value.
Finally, Mexico offers savings in transportation costs not only to the United States but also to other Latin American countries, such as Brazil. And because Mexico itself is a major consumer market, goods produced here can be made for local consumption.
Name: Rolando García Title: Financial Information and Strategy Manager for Latin America Organization: Teleperformance, a contact-center management company with headquarters in Paris
Associate of Arts in Business Administration from Southwest Texas Junior College
Bachelor of Science in Accounting from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Master of Science in Strategic Planning from Tecnológico de Monterrey
Started BACS, a consulting firm specializing in reengineering finance and operations processes for manufacturing and retail industries, in 2005
Joined Teleperformance's Strategic Planning team in 2010
CSCMP member since 2009
What are some of the challenges companies face when operating in Mexico?
The first is security. For the past two years, Mexico has been going through an unprecedented crime wave. This translates into an increased risk of shipments being robbed en route—and that increases insurance rates, or it must be factored as shrinkage into logistics costs. There's also an increased risk of robbery in warehouses, which must also be factored into insurance rates and costs. The incidence of crimes like car theft and kidnapping has risen in recent years and can affect individuals, but they can be avoided by maintaining a low profile as well as identifying problem zones and staying out of them.
Besides security issues, there are logistics infrastructure challenges. While Mexico is in a privileged geographic position next to the United States and has vast coastlines, its infrastructure is seriously lacking. Public roads, with a few exceptions, are in bad shape. Suspensions and tires on trucks will need to be changed more often than in the United States. There is a vast railroad network, but few stations are configured for loading or unloading cargo.
There also are great differences in the quality of the workforce from region to region. My previous comments about the high quality of the workforce hold for the traditional industrial cities like Mexico City, Guadalajara, San Luis Potosí, Puebla, Monterrey, Saltillo, and others. Once you get out of these cities you will find very low-cost, very willing workers, but you will struggle to find qualified whitecollar workers.
Finally, there's corruption. While the higher levels of government will put in place programs like the tax exemptions I mentioned earlier, companies will encounter corruption in some local offices while trying to perform such basic tasks as obtaining building permits.
How do you find supply chain talent in Mexico, and what kind of education and experience do they typically have?
Regarding white-collar positions: In the three biggest cities—Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey— and in medium-sized industrial cities like San Luis Potosí, Aguascalientes, Puebla, Toluca, and Chihuahua, you are going to find an abundant pool of very qualified, motivated, and experienced candidates for any supply chain specialty you need.
The reasons are many. First, these cities have been home for many decades to global industries such as car manufacturers and their suppliers, American retailers and their distribution centers, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, and steel and cement. So the people in these cities have experience in these industries and are used to working with high quality standards.
Another plus is that many candidates who have worked with global companies will have experience in projects outside of Mexico. Although that experience will be reflected in higher salaries, they may still be lower or comparable to salaries in other countries. For example, an analyst or a manager in these cities will earn maybe 30 to 50 percent of what he or she would earn in the United States. Higher-level directors or chief operating officers will earn just as much in these cities as in the United States.
Second, these cities are where the best schools in the country are located, including Tecnológico de Monterrey, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, and so forth.
Third, for years there has been a shortage of whitecollar jobs in these cities, which in turn has made candidates very competitive. You will find many candidates, not just with bachelor of arts degrees but also with master's degrees, specialization diplomas, and/or professional certifications. You will also find that most candidates in these cities—in my experience more than 50 percent—will have English-language skills, at least enough to understand an e-mail and have a business conversation.
In the rest of the country you have a different scenario. As you go into smaller cities, most of the job opportunities are in local companies. Work conditions and standards are lower than in the larger cities, and there are not many opportunities to get a quality education. You will find that many good candidates who have the opportunity to study in one of the big schools outside of the small cities will eventually stay in the big cities.
Regarding blue-collar workers, you will find that their skills and experience tend to be approximately equal in both kinds of cities; the main difference will be that salaries could be up to 50 percent lower in the small cities. For example, a forklift operator trained to use bar-code scanning hardware can earn maybe US $15 a day in a small city like Zamora, in the state of Michoacán. That same operator can earn up to US $25 a day in Monterrey, in the state of Nuevo León, and he would probably earn around US $80 a day in the United States.
What advice would you give to a company that is planning to move some of its distribution operations to Mexico?
I would start by approaching a high level of government. The Secretaria de Economía (Office of the Secretary of the Economy, which is in charge of promoting industry) is a good starting point. Try to reach them through an official agency of your own country, or contact your chamber of commerce and ask if they have contacts in the Mexican Secretaria de Economía.
I would work on a detailed project plan and create a core project team before anything else. The team should be a mixture of experts from the home country, who will bring the know-how of your industry, and local talent, who will have the know-how related to local conditions. Contract the services of an accredited headhunter to hire local talent. You want to have on the core project team strong local players that line workers can relate to. In my personal experience, the best practice is to hire the local key players months ahead of the go-live date and send them to the home country for training.
If this is the company's first offshore experience, select a site in one of the traditional manufacturing cities. There will be cheaper sites, but you will struggle with logistics infrastructure, connectivity, and quality of the workforce if you make that choice.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.