How to put the "strategic" back in supply management
Under pressure to produce "quick wins" in procurement? This seven-step process will help you gain top management's support for strategic sourcing—even in a bad economy.
As the economy continues to undergo a painful transition and adjustment, many supply management professionals have come under extreme pressure to generate "quick wins" that cut costs in a very short time. These demands come from upper management, which itself is under pressure to take immediate action and produce quick results.
In this environment, it can be tempting to set aside projects with longer-term, strategic goals and instead focus your team's attention on projects that could cut costs in the short term. In fact, it may be hard to avoid doing so: even though most supply management professionals recognize that quick wins typically produce only a portion of the results that could be achieved with long-term programs, they still feel compelled to respond to pressure from above, often at the expense of valuable strategic initiatives.
Article Figures
[Figure 1] Supply management's effect on four drivers of financial performanceEnlarge this image
This kind of pressure presents a challenge for supply chain leaders. How can you do what is right for your company in the long term without putting your career at risk? The answer is to strike a balance between quick wins and strategic initiatives. The seven-step program outlined in this article will help you achieve that balance—and, ultimately, gain high-level support for maintaining a focus on strategic sourcing. It is even possible to obtain additional resources for your department, despite the economy.
Seven steps to transformation
To help you achieve a balanced portfolio of short-term and long-term initiatives—and thus, maintain corporate support for a world-class, strategic sourcing organization—I recommend a program of seven interlinked actions.
First, you need to effectively communicate with senior management. The way to do that is to speak the language of the executive suite—that is, the "financial language" of the chief executive officer (CEO) and the chief financial officer (CFO). In my experience, learning to "speak like a CFO" is particularly important. Procurement and supply managers who understand the CFO's perspective and can present their ideas in that context are heading to the top of the profession. Those who don't—or won't—master this skill seem to end up perpetually carrying out tactical directives and are unable to gain control of their careers. (For a list of some key financial terms you should know, see the sidebar, above.)
The second, closely related step is to develop a plan with bold objectives that reflect senior management's interests and objectives, such as earnings per share (EPS), return on invested capital (ROIC), cash flow, risk management, and so forth. Figure 1 illustrates how supply management initiatives can directly influence four major drivers of financial performance: revenue, cost, and working capital initiatives as well as capital expenditures.
Third, lay out your transformation plan and detailed "roadmap" for advancing your company's current practices and processes based on best practices. This requires starting with a "current state" assessment; comparing the current state to best practices; and using the gap analysis to identify areas that require attention and improvement. Next, use technology as an enabler of your transformation plan and associated "stretch" objectives (such as a large cost-reduction target), not as an end in itself.
Fifth, based on the transformation plan, build a detailed business case that explains what you expect to deliver in exchange for the resources and budget you are requesting. The sixth step is to gain top management's commitment and support by using your transformation roadmap and business case to demonstrate that you are willing to make a commitment to deliver new, financially beneficial results. The final step, of course, is to lead the transformation effort and make the promised change happen.
Let's take a look at two of these steps and some suggestions for successfully carrying them out.
Build a credible business case
One of the most important skills needed to carry out this seven-step plan is knowing how to build a credible business case for change and for allocating the resources needed to make that change happen. This is true not just in relation to your overall transformation agenda but also for specific objectives, such as technology investments. It's best, however, to start by building a business case for the long-term, overall initiative rather than for specific objectives. In other words, start by thinking about what kind of financial improvements you could achieve if you embarked on a comprehensive transformation of your procurement department's role, processes, skills, organization, and technology.
This broad approach is preferable to focusing on a specific area like software implementation because it is part of a logical sequence. Once you have assessed your current state and compared it to best practices, identified the improvements that could result from transforming your own practices, and designed the detailed roadmap to get you to the desired goal, why not request the full amount of resources needed to do the job well?
It might sound overly optimistic to ask for more resources when the current business outlook for your company is weak, but that is not necessarily the case. Several supply management professionals who followed the seven-step process outlined above are now receiving the bottom-line benefits of taking that bold leap—and they actually added more resources to their strategic procurement staffs during the recession.
The alternative to taking broad-based action is to be subject to the same headcount-reduction guidelines that often are applied to all departments in times of business stress. That's not where you want to find yourself, and, quite frankly, there is no reason to end up there.
The power of a good roadmap
How long does it take to transform procurement at a large or medium-sized company to a world-class organization? That question came up at a recent meeting I attended, where a supply chain manager from a well-known company said, "We benchmarked Company X and learned that it took them seven years to transform their indirect procurement activities to become world-class." The manager wanted to know if that was a typical time frame.
The answer is straightforward: if you lack an organized assessment process and a properly formulated transformation roadmap, it can indeed take a long time to transform your procurement activities (including your direct and/or indirect spend). In fact, without a roadmap and the associated business case and resources, the goal is probably not achievable in any reasonable amount of time. On the other hand, with a well-constructed roadmap, it is possible to achieve a great deal within 18 to 36 months.
Creating an effective transformation roadmap starts with an independent, candid, and comprehensive comparison of the current state at your company versus best practices in supply management across all industries. This exercise will allow you to identify opportunities for improvement and prioritize initiatives. It will also provide input for constructing a roadmap that is tailored to your company's specific situation and to your desired speed of progression. Pay special attention to the sequencing of your roadmap's elements; this extremely important task is part art and part science.
Done well, the assessment and roadmap process will create understanding, excitement, and support among your company's top executives. And if you approach and communicate this subject in a way that makes sense to the CEO and CFO, then you can indeed achieve what might seem like an impossible goal: getting senior management to commit to world-class supply management regardless of the state of the economy.
A balanced plan
Now, back to the original challenge: what to do if you are under extreme pressure from above to deliver some quick results.
As discussed earlier, a credible and effective approach is to build a balanced plan comprising both quick wins and strategic, long-term projects. The quick wins generate the immediate results that your management might be looking for while buying time for you to properly carry out the strategic projects. The quick wins also help to fund the strategic projects that clearly offer the best, long-term, sustainable value to your company. Ideally, this "hybrid" plan will reflect the overall plan of transformation that you envision, helping you to obtain management's buy-in for your strategic direction as well as the resources you need.
Here is a real-life example of how this approach can help you. With one client, we developed a plan comprising about 10 quick win projects and 20 strategic sourcing projects. We produced a schedule that projected the financial benefits of those projects over the next 6 to 18 months. That schedule also showed the costs associated with adding three, full-time strategic procurement positions related to the proposed projects. The compelling ROI of both the short- and long-term initiatives quickly convinced the company's executives to proceed with the projects as well as the additional staffing—and the results lived up to expectations.
It has been said that no rational senior executive will consciously impede projects that have clear, strategic value. If that's the case, then make it easy for your executives to support you by following the seven-step plan outlined in this article. Within that framework, lay out a hybrid plan of specific projects in two categories—quick wins and strategic initiatives—and estimate when executives can expect to see results.
A final point: Putting "strategic" back in supply management doesn't have to involve a lot of time and money. A full assessment and transformation roadmap—including a detailed business case—can be developed in less than 10 weeks.
Note: More information about building a transformation roadmap for procurement organizations can be found in the white papers located in the "Resources" page of Greybeard Advisors' website: www.greybeardadvisors.com/white_papers.
Balancing "quick wins" and strategic initiatives
Following these seven steps will help you achieve a balance between short-term cost-cutting and long-term, strategic programs—and, ultimately, gain high-level support for maintaining a focus on strategic sourcing.
Communicate effectively with senior management by speaking the "financial language" of the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO).
Develop a plan with bold objectives that reflect senior management's interests and objectives.
Lay out a transformation plan and detailed "roadmap" for advancing your company's current sourcing practices and processes based on best practices.
Use technology as an enabler of your transformation plan and associated objectives, not as an end in itself.
Build a detailed business case that explains what you expect to deliver in exchange for the resources and budget you are requesting.
Gain top management's commitment and support by demonstrating that you are willing to make a commitment to deliver new, financially beneficial results.
Lead the transformation effort and make the promised change happen.
Key financial terms you should know
The first recommendation in the seven-step program outlined in this article is to "speak like a CFO." That requires understanding the chief financial officer's perspective and being able to present your ideas in that context. Here are just a few of the financial terms that are bound to come up in those discussions.
DIO (days of inventory outstanding): Year-end inventory divided by average daily revenues
DPO (days of payables outstanding): Year-end accounts payable divided by average daily revenues
DWC (days of working capital outstanding): Year-end working capital divided by average daily revenues
EPS (earnings per share): Earnings divided by the number of outstanding shares
ROIC (return on invested capital): Earnings divided by the capital invested in the business (long-term debt plus stockholders' equity)
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.