Mauricio Ferreira of Kraft Foods Brazil says companies need to have a strong supply chain strategy if they want to take advantage of Latin America's fast-growing markets.
As someone who has spent much of his career managing supply chains in Latin America, Mauricio Ferreira, Latin America Supply Chain Director for Kraft Foods Brazil, is well-acquainted with the challenges and opportunities involved with manufacturing, sourcing, and distribution in that part of the world. In his current role, he heads up the food manufacturer's customer service, logistics, and planning functions.
Like many supply chain professionals in Latin America, Ferreira came to the profession with a background in engineering. He later earned a master's degree in business administration. Prior to joining Kraft, he worked at the consumer goods giant Unilever, beginning his career in plant maintenance and later overseeing manufacturing at a factory in São Paulo, Brazil. He continued to work in various positions for Unilever, including an assignment in Europe, and eventually became the supply chain planning director for Unilever Brazil. In 2009 he joined Kraft Foods Brazil as customer service and logistics director. At Kraft, he has led efforts to boost productivity and reduce inventory levels throughout the country.
Recently Ferreira has seen Latin America's fastgrowing consumer markets attracting companies from around the world. Indeed his own company, Kraft, is taking a careful look at how it can take advantage of economic and market growth there. But, as the CSCMP member explains in this interview with Editor James Cooke, growth creates both opportunities and challenges. Companies that want to succeed in Latin American markets must be fully aware of the unique conditions that affect supply chains in the region, he says.
What are the biggest challenges in running a supply chain operation serving Latin America?
In Latin America, the biggest challenge has to do with the fact that the economies are experiencing healthy growth. As a result of that growth and a lack of investment by Latin American countries, there are three roadblocks: an ill-prepared workforce, poor infrastructure, and a complicated business system with a lot of bureaucracy and dead-end processes that reduce supply chain efficiency. Although governments here have speeded up their efforts to make improvements, unfortunately, these are complex problems that will require time to fix.
The normal, day-to-day supply chain professional's agenda in Latin America is all about finding the right balance between urgent, pressing issues and long-term strategies. On the one hand, there are urgent matters that prevent the company from growing faster in the market. Examples include the import restrictions in Venezuela and the long lead times for adding production capacity in Brazil due to excessive demands for licenses and documentation. On the other hand, you need to build and put in place a strategy to support the sustainable development of your supply chain processes.
Name: Mauricio Giordano Ferreira Title: Latin America Supply Chain Director Organization: Kraft Foods Brazil
Education: Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering, Faculdade de Engenharia Industrial (FEI); Master in Business Administration from Fundaçao Dom Cabral
Work history: Kraft Foods Brazil (customer service and logistics director); Unilever (supply chain planning director, Latin American supply chain director, Northeast operations director—Brazil, supply chain manager—England, manufacturing manager—Brazil)
CSCMP member since 2010
Brazilian Engineering Council since 1990
Is it possible to run a central distribution operation to serve all regions in Latin America? Or does a company have to maintain a distribution presence in each country?
It depends. Normally, in capital-intensive businesses, longer order lifecycles and lower transportation costs relative to the product cost permit you to set up a network that is centralized in one country. So, if you run a global sourcing unit for power generators, a luxury car plant, or an electronics supply chain, you can centralize distribution.
But if you run a consumer-goods supply chain, you need to have a well-balanced network of warehouses to reach your customers and consumers. You also must keep products close to the point of consumption for a number of reasons. For one thing, you need to keep products fresh to maintain quality, and that requires a short-reach, highly responsive supply chain. You also need an extensive supply chain to deal with the poor logistics infrastructure that can cause long lead times for fulfilling orders. The last reason to have a well-balanced network is to be able to serve both the modern and the traditional trade channels in this market. The latter channel reaches the street-vending activity (via direct selling or distributors) that has a strong presence here.
Would you advise using a third-party logistics company (3PL) to handle warehousing and shipping in Latin America, or would you contract directly with warehouse and transportation operators?
Kraft uses a 3PL in almost all of its operations in the region. However, there is a disproportionate number of companies that still run warehousing and transportation operations with no economies of scale. So this is a "greenfield" market for those [third-party logistics] operators that are willing to take the risk and come to do business in the region.
Are there trucking companies that can deliver products throughout Latin America? Or does one have to contract with a trucker to service a specific country or region?
Although it's possible [to use a single carrier], it is not the rule. The market for trucking companies is very fragmented, with only a couple dozen companies that have revenues exceeding US $1 billion dollars. The market fragmentation also drives a fiercely competitive battle that drives down rates. As a consequence, the trucking companies can make only modest investments in process improvements and advanced technologies that would enable them to develop and compete in international operations.
Moreover, the customs bureaucracy's time-consuming clearance process adds more complexity to this kind of operation. For example, there are regulations in place that prevent one truck from operating in multiple countries. So at certain times of the year, it's faster to drive a Brazilian truck to the Argentine border, switch the load to an Argentine truck, cross the border on that truck, and move the load to the final destination. The customs regulations are very volatile and change frequently based on the relationships between countries.
Are some locations or countries better than others for setting up a manufacturing plant because of lower labor, regulatory, or logistics costs?
There are some free trade areas that have been strategically developed to provide companies with competitive costs. For manufacturing, there are free trade areas in northern Mexico and some areas in the northeastern region of Brazil.
Competitive "shared service" capabilities can be found in Central America and parts of Brazil. These areas combine labor capacity and lower labor costs with tax incentives from governments, and they are situated in "easy to flow" locations for logistics. These places have been developed through agreements between the government and the investing company. As a result, it's possible for a company to receive better or worse [tax] incentives than its competitors. In Brazil, such incentives often depend on the period when you are negotiating. For example, this is a pre-election period, so you can get better incentives now. In a post-election period, you will be assessed the full rate because the new government needs more money.
There are specific zones, such as those for the automobile industry and the maquilas in Mexico, for electronics and motorcycles in the rain forest in northern Brazil, and for the consumer industry in northeastern Brazil. There are also shared-service centers in Costa Rica and for the global call-center industry in the Brazilian state of São Paulo.
One of your accomplishments at Kraft was generating impressive savings through improved delivery productivity. How did you achieve those results?
We have been very aggressive in pursuing an optimized supply chain operation. One of the most important activities we've focused on is choosing the right partners that will be able to join us in a "co-creative" journey to best-in-class operations. We need partners that are able to invest in the best talent, technology, and efficiency in the market—partners that can challenge our status quo and are not afraid to take risks together with us. The key factor in achieving success with our partners is to be very open in sharing business perspectives and our ultimate supply chain objectives.
Another important aspect [of our effort to achieve best-inclass operations] is to look outside our own walls. We are a huge consumer company, and there's a lot of knowledge spread around the world within the company and within our partners—academics, suppliers, customers, and even benchmarking peers in the industry. Our company's leaders have been able to create an "open mind" culture that generates continuous improvements and helps us to be a performancedriven organization. This has inspired us to do more sharing and learn faster.
What advice would you give a supply chain manager who has been asked to establish a supply chain in South America?
First of all, have a very strong strategy beforehand—that will be your compass. Second, the diversity of agendas and the challenges here have led to the development of many highcaliber supply chain professionals, and you should recruit the best talent you can afford.
There are a lot of roadblocks, such as infrastructure, government regulations, market practices, and "guerrilla" competitors that do not operate with a high standard of business ethics, so you need to know and learn the field fast. Also, you should be capable of raising the bar and running an operation with the highest standards, as that will result in a quick payback.
People here want to be successful. They are very creative and smart, and they are prepared to work hard. This is what makes us special: the emotional involvement and passion we add to everything we do. So, enjoy the ride!
Benefits for Amazon's customers--who include marketplace retailers and logistics services customers, as well as companies who use its Amazon Web Services (AWS) platform and the e-commerce shoppers who buy goods on the website--will include generative AI (Gen AI) solutions that offer real-world value, the company said.
The launch is based on “Amazon Nova,” the company’s new generation of foundation models, the company said in a blog post. Data scientists use foundation models (FMs) to develop machine learning (ML) platforms more quickly than starting from scratch, allowing them to create artificial intelligence applications capable of performing a wide variety of general tasks, since they were trained on a broad spectrum of generalized data, Amazon says.
The new models are integrated with Amazon Bedrock, a managed service that makes FMs from AI companies and Amazon available for use through a single API. Using Amazon Bedrock, customers can experiment with and evaluate Amazon Nova models, as well as other FMs, to determine the best model for an application.
Calling the launch “the next step in our AI journey,” the company says Amazon Nova has the ability to process text, image, and video as prompts, so customers can use Amazon Nova-powered generative AI applications to understand videos, charts, and documents, or to generate videos and other multimedia content.
“Inside Amazon, we have about 1,000 Gen AI applications in motion, and we’ve had a bird’s-eye view of what application builders are still grappling with,” Rohit Prasad, SVP of Amazon Artificial General Intelligence, said in a release. “Our new Amazon Nova models are intended to help with these challenges for internal and external builders, and provide compelling intelligence and content generation while also delivering meaningful progress on latency, cost-effectiveness, customization, information grounding, and agentic capabilities.”
The new Amazon Nova models available in Amazon Bedrock include:
Amazon Nova Micro, a text-only model that delivers the lowest latency responses at very low cost.
Amazon Nova Lite, a very low-cost multimodal model that is lightning fast for processing image, video, and text inputs.
Amazon Nova Pro, a highly capable multimodal model with the best combination of accuracy, speed, and cost for a wide range of tasks.
Amazon Nova Premier, the most capable of Amazon’s multimodal models for complex reasoning tasks and for use as the best teacher for distilling custom models
Amazon Nova Canvas, a state-of-the-art image generation model.
Amazon Nova Reel, a state-of-the-art video generation model that can transform a single image input into a brief video with the prompt: dolly forward.
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.