C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. (jlangley@psu.edu) is Professor of Supply Chain Management at Penn State University’s Smeal College of Business and the Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, and Founder of the “Annual Third-Party Logistics Study.”
Sylvie Thompson is a supply chain executive focused on driving revenue, margin, and profitable results by combining emerging technologies with traditional supply chain best practices. She has co-led the Annual Third Party Logistics Study for the past three years.
Considering the attention being directed globally toward the pursuit of sustainability, it is not surprising that supply chains of all types have made highly visible commitments to achieving sustainability goals and objectives.1 For many companies, a key aspect of achieving those goals will be how well they collaborate with their third-party logistics providers (3PLs), fourth-party logistics providers (4PLs), and other logistics service providers. Recognizing the important role of 3PLs, the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” to be released at the CSCMP EDGE conference, will focus on investigating this topic.2
A closer look at ESG
Sustainability can be defined in a number of different ways from focusing solely on the environment to encompassing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI); corporate social responsibility (CSR); and the notion of the “circular” economy.
For the purposes of this article (and the “Annual 3PL Study”), the concept of ESG (environmental, social, and governance) will be used to anchor our reporting on how 3PL-customer relationships can impact sustainability in the context of supply chains. The ESG framework provides a well-structured approach for better understanding the progress being made towards environmentally friendly, socially acceptable, and ethically responsible business practices. The three elements of ESG and their connection to supply chain management are outlined in Figure 1 and below.
Environmental. Generally, environmental goals relate to reducing the overuse and destruction of natural resources and threats to all forms of life. Initiatives that are designed to address tactical environment concerns include the development of “carbon-neutral” activities and processes; biodegradability; alternative and renewable energy sources; reverse logistics; and circular supply chain strategies, to name just a few. One opportunity area that is relevant to many 3PL-customer relationships and provides numerous opportunities to enhance environmental sustainability is transportation management. Specific examples in this category would include fuel efficiency, capacity utilization, advances in electric vehicle technology, and improved vehicle scheduling and management.
Social. The social element of ESG focuses on identifying and managing the impacts of organizations and their supply chains, both positive and negative, on people.3 Recent experiences have highlighted the importance of issues such as: diversity, equity, and inclusion; work-life balance; fair labor practices; and human rights in our supply chains. The inclusion of supply chain visibility reflects the importance of preserving these principles throughout supply chains.
Governance. This component of ESG reflects the commitment of an organization to responsible decision-making and execution. Most frequently, this involves actions taken by senior and executive management and boards of directors. Just as “good processes lead to good results,” good governance should promote and foster sustainability both internally within the organization and externally with other supply chain participants and stakeholders. Some examples that relate to how 3PLs and their customers can collaborate on sustainability include improving relationships; increasing data and cybersecurity; and using visibility to help address anticorruption/bribery.
Among respondents in this year’s “Annual 3PL Study,” 85% of 3PL users and 83% of 3PL providers said that ESG is included in their organization’s supply chain and growth strategies. Currently, many supply chains are further along the maturity cycle in the area of environmental progress than social or governance. This is understandable when you consider the attention most organizations have focused on improving the efficiency and sustainability of their internal manufacturing operations and logistics activities. Social and governance areas, however, are receiving significant additional attention as ESG initiatives move forward.
This year’s survey, for example, asked respondents to indicate areas of importance related to ESG criteria. Top focus areas include workforce health and safety, government anticorruption/bribery, diversity and inclusion, sourcing, and visibility throughout the supply chain. Survey responses from 3PL users indicate that the areas of greatest potential include sourcing/procurement, supplier management, manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing.
Collaboration is key
Achieving ESG objectives across participating organizations in the supply chain ecosystem requires meaningful and effective collaboration. As 3PLs and their customers begin to take a serious look at what needs to be done in the areas of sustainability and ESG, the development of an objective and accurate base case is essential. Like all transformational efforts, ESG initiatives need to be enhanced from an “as-is” or current state to a “to-be” or future state. In the case of sustainability, the priority should be to develop a comprehensive and measurable understanding of the current state of sustainability and to assess key areas to be targeted for improvement.
This process can be initiated by either party and may be facilitated by other stakeholders, such as consumers, investors, and corporate partners. We have seen cases where big box retailers and consumer packaged goods companies, for example, will work only with transportation providers that meet specific goals relating to efficiency and sustainability. At the same time, some large providers, such as FedEx and UPS, have announced internal sustainability goals. Among the available resources that encourage businesses to manage logistics in an environmentally responsible way is the Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program that reduces transportation-related emissions by creating incentives to improve supply chain fuel efficiency.4
Successful sustainability efforts along the end-to-end supply chain require that participating members are aligned along ESG practices while not unnecessarily compromising the progress already made at any individual firm. Customer organizations that have developed effective supplier relationship management strategies with their 3PLs should benefit accordingly.
Collaboration will also be essential for responding to the some of the challenges that supply chains face in implementing effective ESG measures. According to survey findings from the “2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study,” top challenges include the cost of implementation, changing regulatory requirements, and a lack of tools and technologies to support ESG programs. To address some of these concerns, 3PLs and customers will need to share costs and investments. Addressing these issues ahead of time and assessing each party’s willingness to make investments is crucial to the success of the relationship between a 3PL and its customer.
It is also important to recognize that as supply chain organizations promote and pursue objectives relating to ESG, they need to do so in a way that is economically and financially sustainable. A reasonable expectation is that organizations and their supply chains have the financial well-being to accommodate investments that will yield positive results. While altruism may be a virtue, businesses must be financially viable in order to contribute to the pursuit of sustainability.
A serious business
The focus on ESG in supply chains is serious business. Supply chains are broad, encompassing everything from sourcing and packaging to warehousing and final-mile delivery, and ESG is applicable at every point. Network optimization, reduced-emission equipment, and efficient buildings can reduce carbon and greenhouse gas emissions, while increased supply chain visibility and traceability can provide insight into sustainable sourcing and the importance of respecting and preserving human rights.
As organizations look to make progress in the areas of environment, social, and governance issues, today’s supply chains leaders will need to step up to the task. Making progress in these areas will shape supply chains of the future. A focus by 3PLs and customers on collaboration to achieve these priorities has the potential to create meaningful advances in meeting the goals of sustainability and ESG. At the same time, attention to the ESG process can be a very useful element for building and strengthening the relationship between 3PLs and customers.
Authors’ Note:The authors would like to thank Mindy Long of Mindy Long Freelance LLC for her contributions to this article.
2. C. John Langley Jr., Ph.D. and NTT DATA Inc., 2022 26th Annual Third-Party Logistics Study, forthcoming September 2021. This study is sponsored by NTT DATA, Penske, and Penn State University. Copies will be available for download at https://www.3PLStudy.com.
3. United Nations Global Compact: https://www.unglobalcompact.org. The United Nations Global Compact is a nonbinding U.N. pact to encourage businesses and firms worldwide to adopt sustainable and socially sustainable policies and to report on their implementation.
Companies in every sector are converting assets from fossil fuel to electric power in their push to reach net-zero energy targets and to reduce costs along the way, but to truly accelerate those efforts, they also need to improve electric energy efficiency, according to a study from technology consulting firm ABI Research.
In fact, boosting that efficiency could contribute fully 25% of the emissions reductions needed to reach net zero. And the pursuit of that goal will drive aggregated global investments in energy efficiency technologies to grow from $106 Billion in 2024 to $153 Billion in 2030, ABI said today in a report titled “The Role of Energy Efficiency in Reaching Net Zero Targets for Enterprises and Industries.”
ABI’s report divided the range of energy-efficiency-enhancing technologies and equipment into three industrial categories:
Commercial Buildings – Network Lighting Control (NLC) and occupancy sensing for automated lighting and heating; Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based energy management; heat-pumps and energy-efficient HVAC equipment; insulation technologies
Manufacturing Plants – Energy digital twins, factory automation, manufacturing process design and optimization software (PLM, MES, simulation); Electric Arc Furnaces (EAFs); energy efficient electric motors (compressors, fans, pumps)
“Both the International Energy Agency (IEA) and the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP) continue to insist on the importance of energy efficiency,” Dominique Bonte, VP of End Markets and Verticals at ABI Research, said in a release. “At COP 29 in Dubai, it was agreed to commit to collectively double the global average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from around 2% to over 4% every year until 2030, following recommendations from the IEA. This complements the EU’s Energy Efficiency First (EE1) Framework and the U.S. 2022 Inflation Reduction Act in which US$86 billion was earmarked for energy efficiency actions.”
Economic activity in the logistics industry expanded in November, continuing a steady growth pattern that began earlier this year and signaling a return to seasonality after several years of fluctuating conditions, according to the latest Logistics Managers’ Index report (LMI), released today.
The November LMI registered 58.4, down slightly from October’s reading of 58.9, which was the highest level in two years. The LMI is a monthly gauge of business conditions across warehousing and logistics markets; a reading above 50 indicates growth and a reading below 50 indicates contraction.
“The overall index has been very consistent in the past three months, with readings of 58.6, 58.9, and 58.4,” LMI analyst Zac Rogers, associate professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University, wrote in the November LMI report. “This plateau is slightly higher than a similar plateau of consistency earlier in the year when May to August saw four readings between 55.3 and 56.4. Seasonally speaking, it is consistent that this later year run of readings would be the highest all year.”
Separately, Rogers said the end-of-year growth reflects the return to a healthy holiday peak, which started when inventory levels expanded in late summer and early fall as retailers began stocking up to meet consumer demand. Pandemic-driven shifts in consumer buying behavior, inflation, and economic uncertainty contributed to volatile peak season conditions over the past four years, with the LMI swinging from record-high growth in late 2020 and 2021 to slower growth in 2022 and contraction in 2023.
“The LMI contracted at this time a year ago, so basically [there was] no peak season,” Rogers said, citing inflation as a drag on demand. “To have a normal November … [really] for the first time in five years, justifies what we’ve seen all these companies doing—building up inventory in a sustainable, seasonal way.
“Based on what we’re seeing, a lot of supply chains called it right and were ready for healthy holiday season, so far.”
The LMI has remained in the mid to high 50s range since January—with the exception of April, when the index dipped to 52.9—signaling strong and consistent demand for warehousing and transportation services.
The LMI is a monthly survey of logistics managers from across the country. It tracks industry growth overall and across eight areas: inventory levels and costs; warehousing capacity, utilization, and prices; and transportation capacity, utilization, and prices. The report is released monthly by researchers from Arizona State University, Colorado State University, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rutgers University, and the University of Nevada, Reno, in conjunction with the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals (CSCMP).
"After several years of mitigating inflation, disruption, supply shocks, conflicts, and uncertainty, we are currently in a relative period of calm," John Paitek, vice president, GEP, said in a release. "But it is very much the calm before the coming storm. This report provides procurement and supply chain leaders with a prescriptive guide to weathering the gale force headwinds of protectionism, tariffs, trade wars, regulatory pressures, uncertainty, and the AI revolution that we will face in 2025."
A report from the company released today offers predictions and strategies for the upcoming year, organized into six major predictions in GEP’s “Outlook 2025: Procurement & Supply Chain.”
Advanced AI agents will play a key role in demand forecasting, risk monitoring, and supply chain optimization, shifting procurement's mandate from tactical to strategic. Companies should invest in the technology now to to streamline processes and enhance decision-making.
Expanded value metrics will drive decisions, as success will be measured by resilience, sustainability, and compliance… not just cost efficiency. Companies should communicate value beyond cost savings to stakeholders, and develop new KPIs.
Increasing regulatory demands will necessitate heightened supply chain transparency and accountability. So companies should strengthen supplier audits, adopt ESG tracking tools, and integrate compliance into strategic procurement decisions.
Widening tariffs and trade restrictions will force companies to reassess total cost of ownership (TCO) metrics to include geopolitical and environmental risks, as nearshoring and friendshoring attempt to balance resilience with cost.
Rising energy costs and regulatory demands will accelerate the shift to sustainable operations, pushing companies to invest in renewable energy and redesign supply chains to align with ESG commitments.
New tariffs could drive prices higher, just as inflation has come under control and interest rates are returning to near-zero levels. That means companies must continue to secure cost savings as their primary responsibility.
Specifically, 48% of respondents identified rising tariffs and trade barriers as their top concern, followed by supply chain disruptions at 45% and geopolitical instability at 41%. Moreover, tariffs and trade barriers ranked as the priority issue regardless of company size, as respondents at companies with less than 250 employees, 251-500, 501-1,000, 1,001-50,000 and 50,000+ employees all cited it as the most significant issue they are currently facing.
“Evolving tariffs and trade policies are one of a number of complex issues requiring organizations to build more resilience into their supply chains through compliance, technology and strategic planning,” Jackson Wood, Director, Industry Strategy at Descartes, said in a release. “With the potential for the incoming U.S. administration to impose new and additional tariffs on a wide variety of goods and countries of origin, U.S. importers may need to significantly re-engineer their sourcing strategies to mitigate potentially higher costs.”
Freight transportation providers and maritime port operators are bracing for rough business impacts if the incoming Trump Administration follows through on its pledge to impose a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and an additional 10% tariff on China, analysts say.
Industry contacts say they fear that such heavy fees could prompt importers to “pull forward” a massive surge of goods before the new administration is seated on January 20, and then quickly cut back again once the hefty new fees are instituted, according to a report from TD Cowen.
As a measure of the potential economic impact of that uncertain scenario, transport company stocks were mostly trading down yesterday following Donald Trump’s social media post on Monday night announcing the proposed new policy, TD Cowen said in a note to investors.
But an alternative impact of the tariff jump could be that it doesn’t happen at all, but is merely a threat intended to force other nations to the table to strike new deals on trade, immigration, or drug smuggling. “Trump is perfectly comfortable being a policy paradox and pushing competing policies (and people); this ‘chaos premium’ only increases his leverage in negotiations,” the firm said.
However, if that truly is the new administration’s strategy, it could backfire by sparking a tit-for-tat trade war that includes retaliatory tariffs by other countries on U.S. exports, other analysts said. “The additional tariffs on China that the incoming US administration plans to impose will add to restrictions on China-made products, driving up their prices and fueling an already-under-way surge in efforts to beat the tariffs by importing products before the inauguration,” Andrei Quinn-Barabanov, Senior Director – Supplier Risk Management solutions at Moody’s, said in a statement. “The Mexico and Canada tariffs may be an invitation to negotiations with the U.S. on immigration and other issues. If implemented, they would also be challenging to maintain, because the two nations can threaten the U.S. with significant retaliation and because of a likely pressure from the American business community that would be greatly affected by the costs and supply chain obstacles resulting from the tariffs.”
New tariffs could also damage sensitive supply chains by triggering unintended consequences, according to a report by Matt Lekstutis, Director at Efficio, a global procurement and supply chain procurement consultancy. “While ultimate tariff policy will likely be implemented to achieve specific US re-industrialization and other political objectives, the responses of various nations, companies and trading partners is not easily predicted and companies that even have little or no exposure to Mexico, China or Canada could be impacted. New tariffs may disrupt supply chains dependent on just in time deliveries as they adjust to new trade flows. This could affect all industries dependent on distribution and logistics providers and result in supply shortages,” Lekstutis said.